Epidemiology: Study of Disease Distribution and Prevention
Verified
Added on 2023/06/12
|6
|1219
|119
AI Summary
This article discusses the basics of epidemiology, including its role in studying disease distribution and prevention. It includes exercises on smoking and dental erosion, along with relevant research studies.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Epidemiology
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3 Exercise 1...............................................................................................................................3 Exercise 2...............................................................................................................................4 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................5 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................6
INTRODUCTION Epidemiologyrefersto the foundation of public healthwhichincludesthe study of distribution along with determination of any disease or disorder. It also includes the development of knowledge to control or prevent them. Exercise 1 A.There is high risk of being past smoker and current smoker and individual who never smoke. There is large number of men who are at current risk which can lead to increase within world(Donovan et. al., (2021)). Non smokerPast smokerCurrent smoker Riskofduodenal ulcer Higherriskwhich caneitherdueto gettingpassive smokerwhichcan leadtocreate negativehealth impact. Past smoker are not smokingincurrent time but due to have smokerpreviously, it causes higher risk of duodenal ulcer. Currentsmokeris partiallyatriskof developing duodenal ulcer. This is due to gettinginprogress duetosmoking currently which can causeriskof duodenalulcer overtime. B.There is higher risk of negative health impact on people who have the belief that damage has been done and they should keep smoking. This can lead to create cause of high risk of negative health impact and can lead to serious health related issues which includes the duodenal ulcer. There is also lowering of risk of increasing impact of duodenal ulcer which are associated with creating negative health impact which are associated through leaving smoking and assuming this can help to reduce the risk. Damage has been done due to leaving smoking can help to increase risk further. In this, there is need to ensure about the management which is better(Mahalakshmi Nandakumar, (2018)). C.There is high risk of getting negative health impact on individual where damage has been done and they keep smoking. here, it can say that nothing can be done about health and
there is further impact of leaving smoking. so, it does not matter if they leave smoking. They can smoke further and can get some medical assistant that can help in reducing the negative health impact of smoking and causing duodenal ulcer. It can also help through using the nursing management(Lussi et. al., (2019)). Exercise 2 A.There is higher incident rate of erosion over the five years’ children. In this, the children who were living in the area of non-fluoridated area have about 60% of getting erosion. Whereas, there is also 40% of chances of not getting any risk of erosion on their teeth. There is about large number of student can have higher risk of teeth erosion who are living in the Non fluoridated area where about 68% of children has been observed as having erosion to them. There are about 32% of student have been evidence about the getting teeth erosion who are living in the non-fluoridated area(Viana et. al., (2020)). B.There is about 60% rate of getting erosion of teeth from the fluoridate area whereas, about 62% rate of erosion of teeth that may include the non-fluoridated area. There is about 45% of rates of getting non erosion in the fluoridated area where about 52% are not getting infected in the non-fluoridated area. So, it can say that there is rate difference between the fluoridated areas and non-fluoridated areas is about 20%. C.There is lower risk of getting erosion of teeth for the children who are exposed to the non-fluoridatedarea.Therefluoridesareachildrenareaffectedtowardsthetooth declaration and can have negative health impact on their teeth which can referred as the erosion. There is about 80% of chances to get safe from overall risk of teeth erosion in comparison to children who are exposed to fluoridated area(Asadollah et. al., (2019)). D.Form provided data, it can help to interpret that there are large number of cases which has been gathered observed that fluoridated area exposed children are at higher risk of increased dental erosion which is not good for their overall health. Study also provides the data that there are higher chances of getting risk of dental erosion to children who are exposed towards the fluorides area in comparison to non-fluoridated area. Here is about 80% risk of getting chances of risk of dental erosion who are living in the fluorides area. Whereas, only 20% chances of getting higher chance of dental erosion who are living in the non-fluorides area(Farhadi et. al., (2021)).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
CONCLUSION From above discussion it can conclude that there are higher chances of getting dental related issues like erosion to who are living in the fluorides area in comparison to who are living in the non-fluorides area.
REFERENCES Books and Journals Asadollah, F. M., Mojahedi, S. M., Nojedehian, H., Asnaashari, M., & Asnaashari, N. (2019). The effect of Er: YAG laser irradiation combined with fluoride application on the resistance of primary and permanent dental enamel to erosion.Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences,10(4), 290. Donovan, T., Nguyen‐Ngoc, C., Abd Alraheam, I., & Irusa, K. (2021). Contemporary diagnosis and management of dental erosion.Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry,33(1), 78-87. Farhadi, E., Kermanshah, H., Rafizadeh, S., Saeedi, R., & Ranjbar Omrani, L. (2021). In Vitro Effect of Acidic Solutions and Sodium Fluoride on Surface Roughness of Two Types of CAD-CAM Dental Ceramics.International Journal of Dentistry,2021. Lussi, A., Buzalaf, M. A. R., Duangthip, D., Anttonen, V., Ganss, C., João-Souza, S. H., ... & Carvalho, T. S. (2019). The use of fluoride for the prevention of dental erosion and erosivetoothwearinchildrenandadolescents.Europeanarchivesofpaediatric dentistry,20(6), 517-527. Mahalakshmi Nandakumar, I. N. (2018). Comparative evaluation of grape seed and cranberry extractsinpreventingenamelerosion:Anopticalemissionspectrometric analysis.Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD,21(5), 516. Viana, Í. E. L., Lopes, R. M., Silva, F. R. O., Lima, N. B., Aranha, A. C. C., Feitosa, S., & Scaramucci,T.(2020).Novelfluorideandstannous-functionalizedβ-tricalcium phosphate nanoparticles for the management of dental erosion.Journal of Dentistry,92, 103263.