Statement of Work for ERP Implementation in ACA Health Organization
Verified
Added on 2023/06/03
|7
|1912
|370
AI Summary
This statement of work document is prepared for the ERP implementation solution in ACA Health organization. It includes services, deliverables, period of performance, payment schedule, sub-contractors, stakeholders, risks and assumptions, and applicable standards.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
1 Assessment 1 – Statement of Work Statement of Work – ERP implementation This statement of work document is prepared for the ERP implementation solution in ACA Health organization. It is different from statement of work document for an exhaustive IT deploymentprojectbecauseitshalldealswithonlyinstallation,developmentand configuration aspects of project. It shall not include major elements of IT projects as defined in the PMBok principles guide. Hence, this document does not include cost management, risk management,humanresourcemanagement,integrationandqualitymanagement.The Statement of Work (SOW) does not work on any business problem. However, it will assume that mentioned organization needs to implement ERP solution. Services ERP implementation solution shall install and configure the ERP software on specific ACA Health organizations’ server and also provide configuration of systems in all its associated locations. ABC consultancy will be identifying the requirements of the organization for ERP implementation which is under the scope of work. It will include the timeline of the implementation and configurations in the locations where it would be deployed (Field & Keller, 2015). Deliverables Plan of installation –After having exhaustive planning session conducted at organization site by ABC and discussion happened during this session, ABC will prepare an installation plan on the basis of requirements of ACA Health,Project manager will be responsible for this planning document after having a discussion with the director of ACA Health. Implementation preparation– After reviewing the installation plan, next step would to check for the file sets and partitions which would be required as per this plan. All firewalls and security settings shall be reviewed to figure out the presence of any blocked ports. These ports may be required to be open before installation. In order to start installation, security and procurement heads need to arrange for necessary security and implementation provisions. All this preparation shall be conducted o the basis of installation plan designed for ACA Health (Kerzner, 2001). Solution customization– On the basis of requirements identified, the ERP software needs to be customized to prepare exact solution for the organization. And then, developers will be
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
2 Assessment 1 – Statement of Work recruited and involved in the customization of ERP software for ACA Health(Welsh & Black, 2010). Customized solution testing– Unit testingand application testing will be conducted to test the customized solution. These techniques shall be used to check whether the prepared solution meets the requirements of ACA Health.The testing shall be done by few users selected from end-user groups and management of ACA Health. All the identified bugs will be documented and sent to the developers for resolution (Spinner, 1997). Solution installation and configuration– The identified and required file sets will be configured and installed on the server. This activity would be conducted by the operational team. After this, all the installation details will be put in the document along with instruction set of configuration. It shall be performed by IT manager and project manager will prepare configuration document. Period of Performance The entire project shall be done in 6 months. Resources shall work from Monday to Friday from 9 am to 6pm. The schedule is mentioned below: Start DateItemTimein Hours RoleResponsibility 1stAugust 2018 Projectfirst meeting 4 hoursProject manager Discussion over: Deliverables Identifytherolesand responsibilitiesof project members. 2ndAugust 2018 Time schedule 3 hoursProject Manager Preparationofprojectplan alongwithtimelineforERP system. 3rdAugust 2018–13th August 2018 Availability of hardware 7 daysProcurement manager (IT) Get bids for hardware Select best bid; Get hardware as per the requirements Testing of hardware Installationinthe organization 14thAugust 2018to20th Business process 6 DaysERP Consultant Getunderstandingof business process of the
3 Assessment 1 – Statement of Work August 2018analysisof organization organization Convertbusiness process into requirement specification. 21stAugust 2018to2nd Sept 2018 Technical requirements 8 DaysERP Designer Conversionof functionalrequirements intotechnical requirements. Prepare documents of all requirementsand processes Prepare model for ERP software. 3rdSept 2018 to20thOct 2018 Development of customized solution 40 daysDevelopersCoding of ERP software 21stNovto 25thNov 2018 Testing5 daysTestersUnittestingandapplication testing 26thNovto 30thNov 2018 Initialization4 daysDBADatabase creation and execution of scripts. 1stDec to 5th Dec 2018 ERP Installation and Configuration 5 daysConfiguration ITManager (Villarroel, Rayo, Loughlin,& Nguyen, 2007) Install ERP solution Configure ERP solution 6thDecto 31stDec 2018 Migrationof data 14 daysIT ManagerObtain old data Place old data into new system Payment Schedule 55% payment shall be paid before starting the project and rest of the payment will be paid on monthly basis(O’Donnell, 2017). Sub-contractors Following are 2 sub-contractors required for development of ERP solution:
4 Assessment 1 – Statement of Work Hardware provider – It includes sellers who would provide infrastructure i.e. server and systems required for ERP implementation. Security solution provider - It includes security providing solutions for proposed ERP system. Representatives Following are key representatives of the project: Vendors – It will include providers who would be supplying security and hardware solutions. CEO – CEO of ACA Health will be responsible for providing and allocating funds for the ERP project implementation. Project manager – He/she shall be responsible for planning, preparation, executing and controlling the proposed project. Vendors would be representing contracts for hardware and security solution Risks and Assumptions FollowingtablerepresentsthelikelyrisksthatmayoccurintheproposedERP implementation.Thetableincludesidentifiedrisks,theirimpact,theirprobabilityof occurrence along with the contingency plan: RiskProbabilityImpactContingency/Risk response plan Budgetexceeding the allocated costHigh HighCEO shall be contacted when allocated budget fails to meet the assigned budget. CEO shall provide additional budget by keeping extra cost in contingency. Changes in scope Medium High ACAHealthcanchangethescopeby addingrequirementsduringthe developmentandimplementation.But only the approved change requests shall be considered or only those are considered whichareverycrucialfortheACA Health. Rest may be rejected. DeliverablesareLowMonitoringandcontrollingmechanisms
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
5 Assessment 1 – Statement of Work delayed Higharefollowedthroughouttheproject development.Delayeddeliverablesare identified instantly and can be avoided. Qualityof deliverablesis varying.Medium LowConductsoftwaretestingregularlyat regular intervals of time and identify bugs. Resolvethemwithintheassigned deadline. Conflictsamong stakeholdersLow HighConduct weekly status meetings with all teammemberstounderstandtheir expectationsandconcern(Wallmüller, 2011). Stakeholders Following stakeholder matrix presents a list of all the stakeholders involved in ERP project, their respective responsibilities and their level of interest and influence over the ERP project. On the basis of given factors, decisions can be taken on the communication among the team members: Stakeholder Group StakeholderResponsibilitiesInterestInfluence InternalSponsorProjectreview–Checkfor project feasibility. HighHigh Team members Execution of all project tasks andachievemilestonesand provide deliverables. HighMedium Highlevel Management Projectprogressreviewon regularbasis;Resolve conflicts;Overcomeissues faced by the project team (Liu, 2013). MediumHigh Organization Users Helpsingathering requirements. HighLow
6 Assessment 1 – Statement of Work External Stakeholders Patients/end- users Helpsingathering requirements. MediumHigh ConsultantsAllowsACAHealth organizationtomakean efficient plan for ERP project. HighLow VendorsProvide required hardware and softwareasperERPproject plan LowLow (Light, 2001) Applicable Standards: Quality process should start along with defining the scope of the project. The quality must be measured according to the Software Engineering Process Group metrics. Acceptance Criteria: Patients records error has decreased by 20% in the first year of implementation. Waiting time for the patients have been reduced by 25% by the end of 2ndyear. Special Requirements or out of scope items: Marketing of the system Significance of business case A business case justifies the alignment of project with the business strategies. Many project fail because of missing business case with incorrect scope statement. An efficient business case should be prepared so that it can facilitate in project selection. Project selection involves comparison among different projects keeping cost, risks, benefits, etc. as the base. Project selection techniques Following are various techniques used for project selection: Scoring model - It involves giving weightage to the selection criteria. Benefit/cost ratio – It involves comparing the basis of ratio of cash inflow and outflow. Payback period – It is the total average per period cash received with shortest cash back time. Economic model – For measuring performance, economic value addition technique is used. Benefit measurement – In this method, benefits are compared against the cash flows.
7 Assessment 1 – Statement of Work References Field, M., & Keller, L. (2015).Project management(1st ed., pp. 12-14). Andover, Hants.: Cengage Learning. Kerzner, H. (2001).Strategic planning for project management using a project management maturity model(2nd ed., pp. 22-23). New York: John Wiley. Light, B. (2001). The maintenance implications of the customization of ERP software. Journal of software maintenance and evolution: research and practice, :415–429. Liu, F. (2013).Rutherford Library Renovation Project Plan.University of Alberta Library. O’Donnell, S. W. (2017).5 Steps To Successful ERP Implementation .Datacor, Inc. Spinner, M. (1997).Project management(1st ed., pp. 22-23). London: Prentice-Hall International. Villarroel, S., Rayo, G., Loughlin, R., & Nguyen, K. (2007).ERP Systems .CSUSM. Wallmüller, E. (2011').Risk Management for IT and Software Projects.Qualität und Informatik. Welsh, W. D., & Black, D. (2010). Engaging stakeholders for a software development project: River Manager model.International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), (pp. 1-10).