This essay analyzes the impacts of UK leaving the European Union on trade and economic performance. It examines the effects on trade, foreign direct investments, supply chain, living standards, and transfer pricing. The overall conclusion is that Brexit is likely to have negative consequences for the UK's economy.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
ESSAY1 The European Union (EU) is known to be one of the world’s most powerful alliances of different countries. The event known as the Brexit is one of the most revolutionary and significant events in terms of the global trade and economic changes. The event has already led to a number of implications and would continue to do so, around the globe. As a result, there has been an ongoing debate as to what will the likely impacts of the said event. The following work is aimed at analysing the impacts of UKleaving the European Union. The impacts would be analysed on the lines of the trade and economic performance of the UK, whether the same would be enhanced or reduced with such exit. The essay will begin with the meaning of the term Brexit, its background and would analyse the possible impacts that have been occurring in economic scenario of the UK. The essay will conclude on the whether the overall effects are negative or positive. The term Brexit is used to define the (Britain plus exit), that is the referendum in June 2016, in which the UK voted to exit the European Union. The critics of the event and the major number of economists are of the view that being the part of the European Union, the trade and the economy of the UK was under a range of positive impacts; the same would be withdrawn by the said referendum. It is significant to note that the European Union is the largest trade partner of the UK in terms of the trade. This is backed by the fact that approximately half of the overall trade of the UK are with the EU. Being the part of the EU, there was a significant reduction in the costs of trade between UK and EU. The reduced costs were reflected in the reduced and cheaper prices for the goods and services for the consumer of the UK. In addition, the same aided the businesspersons to indulge into more export trades. The leaving of UK from the EU will lead to the reduction in the trade and specifically exports from the UK to the EU. The reason for the same would be higher tariff rates and the presence of the non-trade barriers to the trade. It is essential to note that the overall trade would be impacted on two major lines. Firstly the new tariffs and secondly the non-tariff barriers to trade are the said two factors. It must be noted that if the trades go on the same lines as that of the EU and the existing WTO rules with the different countries, this would lead to the average tariff being charged on the exports from the to the EU and vice versa, would be somewhere between 2% and 3%. This would lead to the lower trade and a direct reduction in the GDP of around 1 percent. In addition to the above the non-tariff barriers such as manufacturing requirements, plant, and animal health regulations and others, that are necessary to be met before the imports. The said barriers and other incidental barriers may now increase.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
ESSAY2 The next major impact would be on the foreign direct investments of the nation. This can be explained as follows. Foreign Direct Investments or the FDI is referred to as the investments that occur from outside the country and are used to acquire either the local entities or the starting up new subsidiaries of the existing companies, or the expansion of the existing establishments within a country. It is significant to note that the UK was one of the major recipients of the foreign direct investments from the varied range of the members of the EU (Sampson, 2017). As the country UK is a part of the Single Market, the country was an attractive platform for the exports. It is further to note that the country comprises of a strong set of the legal rules and statutes, together with the highly educated workforces and the flexible labour rates. This has made the country an attractive sport for the foreign direct investments. In numerical terms, the country was in receipt of FDI in terms of stock value of £ 1 trillion. The UK FDI flow has been pointed out to be approximate around 25 to 30 percent from the EU membership, which marks a significant impact evolution of UK FDI (Campos and Coricelli, 2015). Approximate value of the FDI from the member EU countries was half of the total, as per the data of the UK Trade and Investment (UKTI, 2015). The said foreign investment would result in a number of monetary aids, economies of scale and technology and the benefits on line of the business operations for the UK. The Brexit would result in the significant reduction in the FDI in the UK as per the trends as stated above. This is also because a number of international agreements as on the lines of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) agreements would be split between the UK and the EU. Because of which there would be a dampening effect on the FDI (Dhingra et. al, 2016). In addition to theabove,thereexistanumberofcoordinationcostsandcomplicatedsupplychain procedures. With the leaving of the UK, and the above mentioned reasons, the FDI receipts would be deeply affected, which would be further reflected in the UK global business and trades statistics. Such losses of the investments would adversely affect the productivity of the UK and the static income losses. Another major sector that would be deeply impacted by the Brexit is the supply chain. The supply chain is one of the essential elements for the competitiveness. These not only ensure the lower prices, but also thereby aid in customer satisfaction and the timely deliveries. It must be noted that the UK trade is majorly connected to the global supply chains. Some of the industries of UK that are highly dependent on the supply chain are the telecom, financial services, wholesale and retail sectors, mining and chemical products and obviously the transport sector. The Brexit would lead disturbances in the global supply chains, and majorly
ESSAY3 that of the UK. As a result of which the strategic investment decisions with respect to the logistic capabilities, warehouses and the factories would be deeply impacted. If the ultimate transaction costs become relatively high, the companies in UK would be forced to reconsider their current locations at the UK. The companies based at the UK would reconsider not only the supply chain decisions, but also other value chain decisions with respect to marketing, sales, and research and development. As a result, a range of reconsiderations and strategic directions shall follow, which might lead to the loss of valuable entities from the UK. In addition to the above impacts, there would be significant impacts on the living standards on the population of the UK. The living standards would be reduced following the fall in the migration level in the nation (Dhingra, Ottaviano and Sampson, 2015). It is essential to note that the labour market of the UK is greased with the aid of the flow of the migrant into the country. The Brexit has already showed up the effect on the flow of such migrants. The number of people at work has significantly fallen in the period between the months of July to October, which in numerical terms is regarded as the steepest fall since the year 2015 (Wadsworth et. al, 2016). The decline in the inflow of such migrants in the country would result in the further fall in the gross domestic product and the overall productivity of the nation. The incidental impact of the same is the reduction in mobility in the UK economy and the shortage in the skilled labour forces in the country. As the migrants are in search of the housing facilities, the Brexit would result in the slowing down of the housing industry as well. The most accurate measure of the living standards is the real wage growth. Eventually, it must be noted that real wages have fallen consistently for the seventh month and in for the month of December 2017 were at the rate that were in the May 2010 (Blanchflower, 2017). Another major impact of the Brexit can be stated in the Transfer pricing. In simple words, it can be stated that the Brexit would yield impact on the trade-based fiscal regulations. Post the Brexit, the UK would no longer be the party to the EU fiscal statute (PWC, 2018). As the UK was earlier the part of EU fiscal legislation, and member of the single market, the companies engaged into the transportation of goods and services in different EU regions were required to pay the taxes. However, with the fiscal legislation in practice, the companies were able to avoid the double taxation in between the UK and the other EU member countries. Now the transfer pricing regulations will be affected for the companies. This is because the EU Arbitration Convention is a treaty among the member states only. The revision of the said convention can only be engaged into by the contracting member states. Therefore, the issue
ESSAY4 of the double taxation for the movements within UK organisations and the EU entities would depend on the willingness and the viewpoints of such member states. In addition to the above impacts, one major economic aftermath that took place immediately was the falling the share prices of the chief banks and financial institutions of the UK. Stock markets are one of the significant means to gauge the future economic impact of economic and political changes like that of Brexit. As the value of the pound sterling dropped significantly against the US Dollars, this eventually led to the down rating the credit score of the UK businesses by credit rating agencies like Standards & Poor’s, Fitch Group, Moody’s (Chen, 2017). It cannot be said that the stock markets are the sole indicator of the future economic trends, but it does represents the consensus view of varied numbers of the economic players. Thus, the stock market’s information aggregation function, as represented by the continuous rise in the inflation and the falling share prices indicate that the regulatory and political changes because of Brexit have overall negative sentiments in the market. The same would continue until specific political and economic regulations are not enacted. Thus, as per the discussions conducted in the previous parts, it can be stated that as per the analysis and the views of the various range of economists and the experts, the Brexit referendum is likely to adversely affect the trade and the various economic facets of the nation. In line of the discussions as carried in the previous parts, the work focussed on factors like falling strength of trade, falling inflow of the foreign direct investments and the negative impact in the migration of the workforce are some of the major outcomes of the UK leaving the European Union. This is because, as stated above, UK was one of the major participants as well as the beneficiary of the one of the major blocs in the world. As discussed in the previous parts, it would be right to state that the UK’s overall economic growth will be impeded post the Brexit. Though the eventual impact would be dependent on the fact that how the trade relations turn out to be in future for the UK and the EU, the initial impacts as seen in the falling housing markets, falling share prices of the chief banks, falling credit ratings of the UK business are some instances. These taken together are evident of the fact that a negative course of growth would follow for the country in the long times as well.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
ESSAY5 References Blanchflower, D. (2017)Brexit helped push down living standards in 2017 – experts debate the data. [online] Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/dec/21/brexit- helped-push-down-living-standards-in-2018-experts-debate-the-data[Accessedon: 08/01/2019]. Campos, N. and Coricelli, F. (2015)Some unpleasant Brexit econometrics.[online] Available from:https://voxeu.org/article/some-unpleasant-brexit-econometrics[Accessedon: 08/01/2019]. Chen, R. (2017)The Economic Impact of Brexit on UK and EU Trade.[online] Available from:https://medium.com/@rchen8/the-economic-impact-of-brexit-on-uk-and-eu-trade- 464dd090f92e [Accessed on: 08/01/2019]. Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G. and Sampson, T. (2015) Should we stay or should we go? The economic consequences of leaving the EU.British Politics and Policy at LSE. Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., Sampson, T. and Van Reenen, J. (2016) The impact of Brexit on foreign investment in the UK.BREXIT 2016,24. PWC. (2018) Brexit Monitor The impact of Brexit on (global) trade. [online] Available from: https://www.pwc.nl/nl/brexit/documents/pwc-brexit-monitor-trade.pdf[Accessedon: 08/01/2019]. Sampson,T.(2017)Brexit:theeconomicsofinternationaldisintegration.Journalof Economic Perspectives,31(4), pp. 163-84. UK Trade & Investment (2015)UKTI Inward Investment Report 2014 to 2015. [online] Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ukti-inward-investment-report- 2014-to-2015/ukti-inward-investment-report-2014-to-2015-online-viewing[Accessedon: 08/01/2019]. Wadsworth, J., Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G. and Van Reenen, J. (2016) Brexit and the Impact of Immigration on the UK.CEP Brexit Analysis, (5), pp. 34-53.