ProductsLogo
LogoStudy Documents
LogoAI Grader
LogoAI Answer
LogoAI Code Checker
LogoPlagiarism Checker
LogoAI Paraphraser
LogoAI Quiz
LogoAI Detector
PricingBlogAbout Us
logo

Investment Appraisal Techniques: Payback Period and NPV

Verified

Added on  2023/01/13

|7
|1262
|85
AI Summary
This essay discusses the calculation of payback period and net present value (NPV) for two investment opportunities. It analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques and provides practical implications for decision making. The essay also explores the financial and non-financial factors that influence investment decisions.

Contribute Materials

Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your documents today.
Document Page
Essay

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................3
1. Calculation of Payback Period.................................................................................................3
2. Calculation of Net Present Value (NPV).................................................................................4
3. Analysis....................................................................................................................................4
4. Practical implications...............................................................................................................5
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................6
REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................................7
Document Page
INTRODUCTION
In an organization, decision making process is very essential which helps the managers to
take effective actions which helps in contributing to maximise operational productivity as well as
profitability (Cheng, Hackett and Lee-Chin, 2018). Before making any strategic decision,
management should identify the need of business and perform accordingly. ABC Plc is computer
software organization where strategic managers looking to invest into new business and they
found two new opportunities to invest which are Motor software project or Hardware project.
This essay covers payback period and NPV method which helps in identifying which project is
most suitable as well as beneficial for the company.
MAIN BODY
1. Calculation of Payback Period
Year
Motor Software
Project A ( £ ) CCF ( £ )
Hardware
Project B ( £ ) CCF ( £ )
0 40,000 0 60,000 0
1 8,000 8,000 10,000 10,000
2 12,000 20,000 20,000 30,000
3 16,000 36,000 25,000 55,000
4 20,000 56,000 30,000 85,000
5 30,000 86,000 40,000 125,000
Formula:
Payback Period = Year before full recovery + Unrecoverable cost at the beginning of year / cash
flow during the year
Motor Software (A) = 3 + £4000 / £20000
= 3 + 0.2
= 3.2 years
Hardware (B) = 3 + £5000 / £30000
= 3 + 0.16
Document Page
= 3.16 years
From the above calculations it has been observed that ABC Plc has two different options
to invest but according to Payback period there is no such difference among the recovery time.
Project B that is hardware business is more favourable in respect of Project A, so company
should invest in this business which has 3.16 year recovery period.
2. Calculation of Net Present Value (NPV)
Formula:
NPV = Present value of cash inflow – Present value of cash outflow
Year
Motor Software
Project A
PV @
12%
Discounted
Cash Flow
Hardware
Project B
PV @
12%
Discounted
Cash Flow
0 - 40,000 1 - 40000 -£ 60000 1 - 60000
1 8000 0.893 7143 £ 10,000 0.893 8929
2 12000 0.797 9566 £ 20,000 0.797 15944
3 16000 0.712 11388 £ 25,000 0.712 17795
4 20000 0.636 12710 £ 30,000 0.636 19066
5 30000 0.567 17023 £ 40,000 0.567 22697
Net Present Value £ 17831 Net Present Value £ 24430
Net present value of Project A is £ 17,831 and Project B is £ 24,430, it is clearly visible
that Hardware business has higher NPV which is beneficial as well as profitable for the ABC Plc
to invest.
3. Analysis
Payback Period: It is the time period when company recover their initial investment of
any project. Low payback period is beneficial and attract investors to invest and higher period
mostly ignored by organizations (Claudia and Murniati, 2018). In the above calculations, Project
B that is investment in hardware business is more suitable in comparison to Motor software
project because initial cost of project B could be recovered in 3.16 year and for project A this

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
period is 3.20 years. It is one of the effective method of capital budgeting and its advantages or
disadvantage are as follow:
Advantage: It is very simple to calculate method which help the managers to evaluate
results of projects. With the help of its analysis, businesses will be able to reduce risk and
make decisions accordingly.
Disadvantage: This method does not consider the time value of money which may vary
the results and further impact managers decisions. In addition, this method does not
consider the cash inflows after calculating payback period.
Net Present Value (NPV): It is most useable method of capital budgeting that is used to
evaluate the present value of cash flow (Fan and Xia, 2018). NPV is calculated through
identifying difference between present value of cash inflow and present value of cash outflow.
From the above calculations it has been determined that NPV of Project A is £ 17,831 and
Project B is £ 24,430. Managers of ABC Plc decided to invest in Project B because its NPV is
high in comparison to other project. In addition, there are some advantages or disadvantage of
this method which are mentioned below:
Advantage: This method helps the organization to identify that whether project is
beneficial as well as profitable for the company or not, to invest.
Disadvantage: NPV method can't be compared with other project or portfolio if they are
if different size. In addition, entire calculation based on discounting rate of rerun which
can vary the final results.
Financial factors are various financial factors which influence the decision making
process of business. These are interest rate on borrowings, economic growth rate etc. because
high interest rate will demotivate people to invest more but if interest rate is low than it will
encourage them to invest to generate more revenue for them.
Non financial factors evaluated by the managers of ABC Plc, at the time of making
business decisions managers should evaluate non financial factors and it can be identified with
the help of SWOT or PESTEL analysis. By using SWOT, managers able to identify future
opportunities, threats or weakness. In addition, also helps in evaluating external factors such as
political, economic, social etc.
Document Page
4. Practical implications
From the above analysis it has been observed that Project B is more favourable for ABC
Plc to invest into new business (Galli, 2018). For strategic managers, it is quite difficult to make
their decision on the basis of Payback Period because it is almost similar but they can make
business decisions as per NPV of the projects. Company should make decisions to invest in
hardware business which will help to generate more return and recover their initial cost in
comparison to Project A.
CONCLUSION
Above discussion helps the managers of organizations to understand the various
advantages or disadvantages of Investment appraisal techniques such as NPV or payback period.
Along with this, identify financial or non financial factors which influence decision making
process of managers.
Document Page
REFERENCES
Books & Journals
Cheng, M. M. and et.al., 2018. Simulation and big data: in search of causality in big data-related
managial decision making.
Claudia, G. and Murniati, M. P., 2018. SELF EFFICACY AS THE MODERATING
VARIABLE IN FRAMING EFFECT ON INVESTMENT DECISION MAKING. South
East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law. 16(1). pp.22-27.
Fan, Y. and Xia, X., 2018. Energy-efficiency building retrofit planning for green building
compliance. Building and Environment. 136. pp.312-321.
Galli, B. J., 2018. Effective Decision-Making in Project Based Environments: A Reflection of
Best Practices. International Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering (IJAIE). 5(1).
pp.50-62.
1 out of 7
[object Object]

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]