Euthanasia and its Importance in Severely Ill Patients Life
Verified
Added on 2023/06/11
|5
|1228
|208
AI Summary
This nursing assignment discusses the importance of euthanasia in severely ill patients' lives. It covers arguments for and against euthanasia, ethical considerations, and legal positions.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: NURSING ASSIGNMENT EUTHANASIA AND ITS IMPORTANCE IN SEVERELY ILL PATIENTS LIFE Name of the Student Name of the University Author note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1NURSING ASSIGNMENT Introduction As per the Greek meaning, euthanasia is associated with ‘Good Death’. There are several aspects of Euthanasia and there are various dimension such as active and passive euthanasia, voluntary and involuntary euthanasia, and physician assisted and non-assisted euthanasia (Hahn, 2012). There are several nations where abetment or attempt of suicide is determined as criminal offense and hence, this document determines the need of such freedom for severely ill patient so that they can end their life with dignity (Leppert et al., 2013). Further in this document, the argument and counterargument of euthanasia protesters and supporters will be provided with the support of World Health Organization constitution. Thesis statement The thesis statement of this assignment will be “Euthanasia should be legalized for severely ill cancer patients so that they can chose their end of suffering and die with dignity”, as the healthcare law also provide them the right to autonomy, in the process of their healthcare. Argument in support of euthanasia There are numerous healthcare professionals, researchers and social workers support the concept of euthanasia and label it as the human right of the patient. Healthcare professional’s argument states that if the patient is incurable and shows no sign of improvement in future, then the healthcare professionals should invest their time on other patients who can improve their condition within that time period (Boudreau & Somerville, 2014). Further there are several rights provided to different patients of different countries namely right to refuse care, right to die, which provides the complete right to the patient to choose their level of care. Further as per Hahn
2NURSING ASSIGNMENT (2012), if the patient is suffering from cancer or any severe disease from a long time and the financial condition of the patient do not allow them to continue the care, then he or she should have the right to end his life as his or her family might also suffer from the disease and its outcomes. Hence, this group of people feel that euthanasia should be legalized for the group of people who are suffering from severe diseases and willing to end their life for the betterment and dignity of their family (Leppert et al., 2013). Argument against euthanasia ThereareseveralopinionsagainsttheEuthanasiapresentedbytheresearchand sociologists that determine this phenomenon as a threat to civilized society. As per their opinion, the concept of euthanasia leads to eliminate all the severely ill incurable patients from the society, which is threat to society. In this place they prefer the palliative care as in that situation, patients are provided with relief so that the distressing symptoms of the patient can be removed and the patient can gradually progress towards death. Further a section of researchers also belief that due to euthanasia and associated rights, the healthcare professionals will not focus on the care process and hence, people will lose hope from the care system and accept euthanasia to get rid of their disease. Thirdly, depression has found to be the primary reason, due to which patients are applying for euthanasia worldwide, hence, instead of focusing on ways to reduce depression, several researchers find permission of euthanasia baseless. Hence, they do not support the right related to death with dignity and prefers palliative care to reduce the pain and depression of the patient.
3NURSING ASSIGNMENT Ethics of euthanasia In the meantime, there are several aspects that should also be included in this section such as ethical consideration of euthanasia as per the religion aspect, legal position and ethical consideration. In many countries including Britain, euthanasia has been included in the suicidal act as the law consider this phenomenon equal to murder, or man slaughtering. Goldstein et al. (2012) mentions that due to this ethical and legal aspect, there are several countries, who has also included this concept of death with dignity as criminal offense (Bhowmik et al., 2012). Further, as per several religious beliefs, only God has the right to kill individual and due to this, only he should have the ability to kill the person (Bülow et al., 2012). Hence, as per these religious and ethical consideration many civilized nations do not include this aspect in healthcare process. Further due to increasing rates of euthanasia related abuse many countries do not include this process in their healthcare process and prevent the patient severely ill from their right to death with dignity (Goldstein et al., 2012). Conclusion In this assignment, the discussion about euthanasia was carried out as per the thesis statement of the assignment, severely ill patients should have the right to end their suffering and diewithdignity.However,severalargumentspresentedagainsttheconceptandethical considerations were also included that argues against the application of this in the healthcare system.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4NURSING ASSIGNMENT References Bhowmik, D., Kumar, K. S., Yadav, A., Srivastava, S., Paswan, S., & Dutta, A. S. (2012). RecenttrendsinIndiantraditionalherbsSyzygiumaromaticumanditshealth benefits.Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry,1(1), 13-23. Boudreau, J. D., & Somerville, M. (2014). euthanasia and assisted suicide: a physician’s and ethicist’s perspectives.International Journal of Nanomedicine,9, 1883-1889. Bülow, H. H., Sprung, C. L., Baras, M., Carmel, S., Svantesson, M., Benbenishty, J., ... & Nalos, D. (2012). Are religion and religiosity important to end-of-life decisions and patient autonomy in the ICU? The Ethicatt study.Intensive care medicine,38(7), 1126-1133. Goldstein, N. E., Cohen, L. M., Arnold, R. M., Goy, E., Arons, S., & Ganzini, L. (2012). Prevalence of formal accusations of murder and euthanasia against physicians.Journal of palliative medicine,15(3), 334-339. Hahn, M. P. (2012). Review of palliative sedation and its distinction from euthanasia and lethal injection.Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy,26(1), 30-39. Leppert,W.,Gottwald,L.,Majkowicz,M.,Kazmierczak-Lukaszewicz,S.,Forycka,M., Cialkowska-Rysz, A., & Kotlinska-Lemieszek, A. (2013). A comparison of attitudes toward euthanasia among medical students at two Polish universities.Journal of Cancer Education,28(2), 384-391.