Finance for Business: Analysis of Coca Cola's Performance and NPV
Verified
Added on  2022/11/09
|9
|1001
|226
AI Summary
This assignment analyzes the performance of Coca Cola based on capital structure, liquidity, and efficiency ratios. It also evaluates the NPV of the organization in different scenarios.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: FINANCE FOR BUSINESS FINANCE FOR BUSINESS Name of the student: Name of the university: Author Note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1FINANCE FOR BUSINESS Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................2 Discussion..................................................................................................................................2 In Response to Question 2.2...................................................................................................2 In Response to Question 2.4...................................................................................................5 Conclusion..................................................................................................................................6 References..................................................................................................................................7
2FINANCE FOR BUSINESS Introduction The aim of the assignment actually deals with the chosen organization which is the Coca cola and on the basis of that three years performance analysis of the organization has beendepictedintheconductedstudyaccordingly.Thedetailedinformationofthe organization is obtained from the annual report based on the last three years which are the 2016, 2017 and 2018. On the other hand, a situational analysis of the organization is performed which is actually based on the provided information along with the sensitivity analysis in case of the best and worst scenario of the organization is performed accordingly. Discussion In Response to Question 2.2 Capital Structure Ratio 201620172018 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 C apital Structure R atio Debt Equity Ratio (A/B)Total Asset To Debt Ratio (C/A)
3FINANCE FOR BUSINESS From the above evaluation of the capital structure of the organization, it can be interpreted that in case of the debt to equity ratio, the debt of the organization is higher than equity which means that the organization is running based on the debt leverage. In case of the debt to total asset ratio, the standard of the ratio is 1 where the organization is completely relying on its debt which is actually a huge risk for the organization (Fisher 2018). Liquidity Ratio 201620172018 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 Liquidity R atio Current Ratio (A/B)Quick Ratio (A/B) From the evaluation of the overall liquidity position of the organization it can be said that the ratio is actually bellow the standard where the senior level management of the organization in that case needs to take the potential action to enhance the overall liquidity ratio by minimizing the risk related to debt leverage (Gitman, Juchau and Flanagan 2015).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4FINANCE FOR BUSINESS Working Capital Ratio 201620172018 1.2811.343 1.048 Working Capital Ratio From the above evaluation of the working capital ratio of the organization for the past three years it can be said that overall the working capital ratio of the organization is quite low as it is needed to pay off the debt leverage and it is too tough the business to run the day to day activities in the business of the organization. In order to ensure strong working capital of the organization it is further needed toalleviate the risk associated with the debt leverage of the business (Pilbeam 2018).
5FINANCE FOR BUSINESS Efficiency Ratio 201620172018 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Efficicency Ratio Average Trade Receivables turnover Ratio (365/C) in daysAverage Trade Payables turnover Ratio (365/C) in days Inventory Turnover ratio (A/D)= F From the above evaluation of the efficiency ratio it can be interpreted that the payable turnover ratio of the organization is much larger in comparison to the average receivables turnover ratio of the organization. The inventory turnover ratio of the organization in the year 2016 was highest in comparison to the other year.
6FINANCE FOR BUSINESS In Response to Question 2.4 Analysis of NPV The above evaluation is based on the information which is provided in case of the initial scenario of the organization. In such a situation the NPV of the organization along with the internal rate of return of the organization is satisfactory and the main reason behind it is that the NPV of the organization is actually positive at the initial stage (Arcand, Berkes and Panizza 2015). The above evaluation of the organization is simply based on the worst situation of the organization where there are certain changes in the parameters which are the unit sales decrease by 20%; price per unit decreases by 20%; variable cost per unit increases by 20 %; cash fixed cost per year increases by $100 000. Based on the changes, NPV in the worst scenarioispositivebutitislessincomparisontothatoftheinitialscenario.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7FINANCE FOR BUSINESS The above evaluation of the organization is simply based on the best scenario of the organization where there are changes in the Unit sales increase by 20%; price per unit increases by 20%; variable cost per unit decreases by 20%; cash fixed cost per year decreases by $100 000. Based on the changes the NPV of the organization is positive which actually a good sign for the business. But the overall NPV of the organization is much higher than the Initial scenario (Härdle, Chen and Overbeck 2017). The changes will further help the management or rather the senior level of the organization to go for the best scenario at time of selecting the project. Conclusion From the above discussion it can be said that from the evaluation and interpretation of the ratio of the organization it can be said that the overall financial performance of the organization based on the two significant parameters which are the capital structure ratio and liquidity ratio of the organization is quite satisfactory. But still there are areas where the management of the organization needs to adopt the significant changes in the business. In case of the NPV evaluation, the organization must accept the project as the NPV of the project is positive in each of the three business scenarios.
8FINANCE FOR BUSINESS References Arcand, J.L., Berkes, E. and Panizza, U., 2015. Too much finance?. Journal of Economic Growth, 20(2), pp.105-148. Fisher, R.C., 2018. State and local public finance. Routledge. Gitman, L.J., Juchau, R. and Flanagan, J., 2015. Principles of managerial finance. Pearson Higher Education AU. Härdle, W.K., Chen, C.Y.H. and Overbeck, L. eds., 2017. Applied quantitative finance (Vol. 2). Springer. Pilbeam, K., 2018. Finance & financial markets. Macmillan International Higher Education. Shoup, C., 2017. Public finance. Routledge.