Open Office Design and Employee Well-being

The assignment delves into the complexities of open office design, exploring its effects on employee well-being, productivity, and communication. It investigates factors such as noise pollution, lighting conditions, privacy issues, and proposes strategies to mitigate negative impacts. The analysis draws upon research findings and real-world examples to highlight the challenges and opportunities associated with contemporary workplace layouts.

Running head: CASE STUDY ON OPEN PLAN
Case Study on Open Plan
Student’s Name:
University Name:
Author Note

1CASE STUDY ON OPEN PLAN
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................2
Question 1........................................................................................................................................2
Answer to Part (a)........................................................................................................................2
Answer to Part b..........................................................................................................................4
Question 2........................................................................................................................................4
Answer to Part a...........................................................................................................................4
Answer to Part b..........................................................................................................................5
Question 3........................................................................................................................................6
Answer to Part a...........................................................................................................................6
Answer to Part b..........................................................................................................................6
Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................7

2CASE STUDY ON OPEN PLAN
Introduction
The situation described in this particular case study is that a fast growing law firm,
Cheetham and Wyne is located in Aucklandand specializes in commercial law. The law firm was
initially founded by Owen Cheetham and Jack Wyne. Then the partners’ list increased by two
more lawyers who were Mark Cheetham and Cathy Wyne. With the arrival of new faces and
hiring of new staff, the old premises of the office became quite small for accommodating the
total number of employees, thus the entire office was shifted to a new premises that overlooked
the harbor. Mark and Cathy also convinced their fathers to restructure the office design into an
open plan design. This study particularly focuses upon the changes in office after the installation
of the open office design and the reactions of the partners and employees in relation to this. The
discussion has been presented in the form of answers in relation to the questions mentioned in
the project.
Question 1
Answer to Part (a)
There are a number of reasons for employees resisting the change to an open-plan office
approach. One of the major reasons is that employees in general are resistant to change. This
means that employees after working in a certain environment for a long period of time tend to
get used to such environment, thus resist any kind of change. To be more specific, generally a
particular individual is the most comfortable in his own house, similarly an employee is the most
comfortable in the known environment that he is working in since the beginning, therefore
prefers his or her old desk rather than a new table (Creemers 2014).
The founders or the senior partners Jack and Owen though did not like the idea of
transforming the design of the office into open plan design they listened to their children and
changed the design of the office. Similarly like Jack and Owen many of the employees think that
enclosed spaces rather than open wide ones enable a person to work in a better way, thus they
resist the open plan approach (Kim and de 2013).

3CASE STUDY ON OPEN PLAN
Another reason for resisting change to an open-plan office approach is that some
employees especially those among the senior staff of the law firm feel that they have lost their
privacy and that they are treated a little too much equally with the other staff that is their
subordinates. This is a reason of concern because in general most of the senior staff are old men
who like their privacy and do not like the idea of working in open spaces. Some other employees
are of the opinion that the open-plan office approach has hampered their work because earlier
they could spend their little intervals of breaks in between work, just by sitting in their own
enclosed spaces and chatting over the phone but now as the entire concept of walls has been
demolished under the design of open-plan office approach, they are not being able to spend their
leisure time in accordance to their wish. In fact this is very true and advised by experts that the
smallest measure of time that an employee gets within his or her work should be quality time
spent by him or her. If this is blocked then the quality of work is ultimately hampered. Therefore
this is a major reason for resisting change. Another reason is that the online booking system that
Cathy had introduced for booking rooms for conducting meetings has not been a success among
the employees. Even the playpen created for the relaxation of the employees is of no use as the
employees use it for the purpose of chatting and wasting time. Thus the founders Jack and Owen
resist the change (Hongisto et al., 2016).
Another major reason for employees resisting the change to an open-plan office
approachis that, an office is the meeting point of different individuals from different backgrounds
and all of them have an unique style of thinking and belong to different cultures. This may be a
positive point for many but in case of working in an office where there is no option other than
communicating with everyone as the work place is designed in such a way, it may be a barrier or
an issue of concern for many. For an instance the topic of interest for a particular employee may
not be the same for another and as the design of the office is such that there are no walls or
enclosed spaces, an employee is left with no other option but to participate. This may not be a
major issue of concern for others but some employees may be hackneyed by this de (Bakker et
al., 2017). The most concerning issue with the concept of open-plan office is that it directly
affects business. This is because a law firm handles a variety of clients and as a result there will
be certain client-centric critical information that is private and should only be shared between the
client and his lawyer. A design of open-plan office is such that there will be no enclosed spaces
where such exchange of confidential information can take place, thus imposing a breach on the

4CASE STUDY ON OPEN PLAN
client’s data security. Therefore these are the primary reasons for the employees posing
resistance to change (Austin, Kimmons and Sigmar 2014).
Answer to Part b
The partners in order to minimize the resistance to change might have adopted a number
of ways. The first action that could be taken is that along with the wide open space shared by
employees there also could be the provision of meeting rooms or enclosed spaces available so
that the employees could avail the option of both communicating with everyone and maintaining
their privacy as and when required. The next action that could be taken on the part of the partners
is that before implementing the open-plan office design, a feedback from the staff could be taken
so as to plan the design in a better and competent way. This would also ensure that the needs and
choices of the employees of are kept in mind while implementing anything in the office or in the
process of decision making. The management of the law firm should be very keen on
maintaining the privacy of client information. Client information is crucial information in the
hands of the firm and should be handled with utmost care. For this purpose small, totally
enclosed rooms could also be installed inside theoffice premises where lawyers and clients could
meet and discuss the case accordingly. Lastly the senior staff who have been in the firm for a
long time should be treated with due respect meaning personal rooms should be arranged
according to their hierarchy of authority (Konis 2013).
Question 2
Answer to Part a
The barriers of communication that appear to exist in the law firm are numerous.
According to the case study there has been loads of complaints from many of the staff in the law
firm. The major barrier to communication is the deficiency of the use of written communication.
For an instance a particular employee as mentioned in the case study comments that he had been
employed as an accountant in the law firm along with loads of promise like he would be in
charge of the administrative and the paralegal staff. He was further promised that he would be
managing the entire staff other than the lawyers but after nine months of employment he was just
managing four of the staff and even the restructuring of the firm had not taken place. When
enquired, the accountant had been informed that due to shifting of the office to the new premises

5CASE STUDY ON OPEN PLAN
the restructuring was on hold and would progress once the shifting to the new premises had been
done. But post shifting the needful still had not been done in the past three months. The
particular employee also enrolled himself in a MBA related to law with thehope that the fees of
the course would be borne by the firm as discussed with him informally via verbal
communication. This as usual was not maintained on the part of his employer. The reason that
was presented to him was that normally course fees amounted to $6000 per annum therefore his
MBA fees that amounted to $30000 could not be borne by the company. Therefore no usage of
written communication is most definitely a barrier to communication (Shahzad 2016).
Another barrier is lack of interaction among the employees. For instance there are several
events that take place in office outings. The way of expressing humour by some individuals may
not be the same for others. As mentioned in the case study Cathy putting ants inside the top of
Pauline during the office picnic was not at all appreciated by Pauline but this was not
communicated by Pauline. Had this been sat and discussed between the two then the personal
grudges and complaints could be excluded. Another instance is that another employee post the
process of performance review, did get only a raise of two percent. When he enquired the reason
for such a low raise he was informed that he was too slow in processing contracts and his work
had some errors but when further enquired about the errors he was informed that the errors were
corrected and that his no further assistance was required. This is also a barrier to communication
because had the doubts regarding the raise been cleared by the higher authority official then the
confusion and complaint on the part of the employee could have been avoided (Chraibi et al.,
2016).
There are also issues regarding the communication of the policies of the firm. For an
instance a particular situation is described in the case study where a particular employee claims
that he has shared certain tampered and provocative information about Cathy in the social media
by addressing her with a different name. Now if the rules and regulations about sharing any kind
of data related to the office over the social media could be very well communicated to each and
every employee then the occurrence of such nuisance could have been averted (Vassie and
Richardson 2017).

6CASE STUDY ON OPEN PLAN
Answer to Part b
The ways in which the barriers to communication can be avoided are increasing both
inter level and intra level communication. The communication issues that are highlighted in the
above answer to part a clearly suggest that there has been a huge gap in communication. It is
evident that the employees are not at all comfortable in sharing their complaints and grievances
with the management of the firm. Either they are in fear of losing their job therefore do not take
up their issues to the higher authority officials or they think complaining or putting forth their
grievances will minimize their chances of getting promotion or excelling in their area of work.
Thus more and more initiatives must be taken on the part of the partners to encourage the
employees so that they can develop a free attitude and communicate clearly with the
management (Brown 2015).
Question 3
Answer to Part a
The law firm had been initially founded by Owen Cheetham and Jack Wyne. Later their
children Mark Cheetham and Cathy Wyne had taken over the law firm. Cathy especially had
convinced her father to restructure the firm. In fact both Cathy and Mark convinced Owen and
Jack as to hire new staff, an idea which both Owen and Jack strongly opposed because they
thought that not every lawyer could work had like they did. Cathy even could convince her father
to change the design of the office into an open office. Thus it is evident that Mark and Cathy
have much power in their hand. A further example of them exercising their power can be
understood from the instance when Cathy and Mark in order to support another lawyer travelled
to Hamilton. Thus it is clear that they have much power in their hands and are using it in the
interest of the firm as well as the employees (Danielsson et al., 2015).
Answer to Part b
An influence tactic used by the partners is the concept of performance review. As
mentioned in the case study there are no judgment rules or standards by which the performance
of a particular employee can be measured. To be more clear many employees are of the opinion
that they have no understanding of the ways in which their performance has been measured and
how they are getting a low raise in their basic salaries. Another tactic used by an employee is that

7CASE STUDY ON OPEN PLAN
she did bring business for the firm but in exchange did share certain information with the client
which she did hide from the office. These are some of the basic tactics used by the partners and
other staff of the firm (Hongisto 2017).
Conclusion
It is understood from the entire study that the law firm is in a good position to prosper but
the new imposed design of open-office plan has not been a much success. In fact it has become a
barrier in the road to excellence for the law firm. Thus initiatives should be taken to remove
employee grievances and should be encouraged in order to share the issues they are facing in the
office.

8CASE STUDY ON OPEN PLAN
References
Austin, T.L., Kimmons, J.V. and Sigmar, L.S., 2014. LOST IN SPACE: THE CASE FOR (OR
AGAINST) THE OPEN OFFICE. Business Studies Journal, p.19.
Brown, M.J., 2015, August. Prediction and control of occupant generated noise levels in open
plan collaborative office spaces. In INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference
Proceedings (Vol. 250, No. 2, pp. 4693-4704). Institute of Noise Control Engineering.
Chraibi, S., Lashina, T., Shrubsole, P., Aries, M., van Loenen, E. and Rosemann, A., 2016.
Satisfying light conditions: a field study on perception of consensus light in Dutch open office
environments. Building and Environment, 105, pp.116-127.
Creemers, P.P., 2014. Satisfying dimming speed for co-workers in an open office: optimal fading
time of a granular lighting system in an open-plan office.
Danielsson, C.B., Bodin, L., Wulff, C. and Theorell, T., 2015. The relation between office type
and workplace conflict: A gender and noise perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology,
42, pp.161-171.
de Bakker, C., Aries, M., Kort, H. and Rosemann, A., 2017. Occupancy-based lighting control in
open-plan office spaces: A state-of-the-art review. Building and Environment, 112, pp.308-321.
Hongisto, V., Haapakangas, A., Varjo, J., Helenius, R. and Koskela, H., 2016. Refurbishment of
an open-plan office–Environmental and job satisfaction. Journal of environmental psychology,
45, pp.176-191.
Hongisto, V., Varjo, J., Oliva, D., Haapakangas, A. and Benway, E., 2017. Perception of Water-
Based Masking Sounds—Long-Term Experiment in an Open-Plan Office. Frontiers in
psychology, 8.
Kim, J. and de Dear, R., 2013. Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off in
open-plan offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, pp.18-26.

9CASE STUDY ON OPEN PLAN
Konis, K., 2013. Evaluating daylighting effectiveness and occupant visual comfort in a side-lit
open-plan office building in San Francisco, California. Building and Environment, 59, pp.662-
677.
Shahzad, S., Calautit, J.K., Hughes, B., Brennan, J. and Theodossopoulos, D., 2016, January.
Thermal Comfort and Energy: CFD, BES and Field Study in a British Open Plan Office with
Displacement Ventilation. In Proceedings of 9th Windsor Conference: Making Comfort
Relevant..
Vassie, K. and Richardson, M., 2017. Effect of self-adjustable masking noise on open-plan office
worker’s concentration, task performance and attitudes. Applied Acoustics, 119, pp.119-127.