This essay discusses the role of future political, social and cultural framework that can positively or negatively affecting Russia in globalisation. It also highlights the opportunities and disadvantages of Russian globalisation.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: FUTURE OF RUSSIAN GLOBALIZATION FUTURE OF RUSSIAN GLOBALIZATION Name of the Student: Name of University: Author Note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1FUTURE OF RUSSIAN GLOBALIZATION The term Globalisation has a strong resemblance with the idea of geographical expansion of trade and commerce and develop the world economy intensely. Moreover, the dynamism of the globalisation also ends the state orientated economic drives and makes a global exposure for the business organisation. However, the national establishments and factors such as politics, culture and culture are also played effectively in the process of influencing the globalisation extensively. In this context, this essay is trying to discuss the role of future political, social and cultural framework that can positively or negatively affecting Russia in globalisation. The political dimension has a direct impact on the globalisation in Russia. As far as the Russianinterventioninglobalisationisconcerned,itcanbestatedduetothepolitical immobilisation halted the growth of the economy and becoming an obstacle in the path of globalisation as well. After Vladimir Putin came to power in 2000, it ushered a new era in the history of Russia (Zajda, 2015). The country started to transcend its economic territory outside Russia and within 2007 Russia was able to bolster the foundation of global economy (Dufy, 2015). Despite of having a conservative mentality and protectionism the Putin government never stopped the coming of international business organisation and surprisingly increased the global trade volume for refurbishing the national economy. However, the Russian government defines the notion of globalisation in a different manner. As per the research ofRomano and Romero(2014) it can be stated that Russia condemned the neo-liberal approach of the West Europe. This neoliberal approach is considered to be one of the major causer for escalating tension and chaos all around the world. Moreover, Figge and Martens(2014) claimed that due to the immense dominance of the West in the political cohesion of the world, moist of the under developed countries are facing threats to safeguard their sovereignty as globalisation of the West created a threat for the independence of
2FUTURE OF RUSSIAN GLOBALIZATION the new world order. In this context, Russia sights a world full of mutual understanding, sovereignty and cooperation that can lead to a better form of globalisation. However, there are some disadvantages of the Russian political establishment outside its domain. For an instance, the aggressive political measures in case of Siberia and continuous hostility towards the West European countries made the dream of Russia into a nutshell. Moreover, the political aggression and the theoretical concept of globalisation faced serious gaps of perception. In case of the political discourses, often Russia itself violated its own perception of globalisation. In fact, arguing against the Western Europe did not fit with the perception to make a better paradigm of globalisation. In an apparent assessment it can be stated that the Russian society practices a liberal approach in case of sharing their views in an international platform. As per the research of Mouraviev and Kakabadse(2014) the state sponsored protectionism that Russia had been used to with is not prevalent in the present case scenario. The society is freer and the government encourages different languages and societies to live the nation. In fact, through the research of Minina(2014) it can be asserted that the liberal approach can also be seen in case of the social norms. Many European MNCs have their office in Russia and the Russian expatriates are also performed well enough in the global sphere. From that point of view, the social equality and the harmonious nature of the Russian society paves the way for the country to shape itself towards globalisation. However, there are some astonishing factors that the can create huge damage to the globalisation of Russia. According toKohl and Brouwer(2014) within the national territory the government is still very hostile toward its minority communities and continuous fight between the two can jeopardise the social cohesion entirely. Moreover, the seclusion of the Russian
3FUTURE OF RUSSIAN GLOBALIZATION society from the hub of globalisation in terms of the West European countries is also considered to be a disadvantage. The social efforts and the norms are also very rigid in order to establish an amicable relation with other society. Language is identified as one of the driving factor that alienate the Russian society dominantly. Therefore, it becomes an obstacle for the Russian society to get the light of globalisation. From the cultural point of view,Gerybadze and Merk(2014) showed that the Russian government lost their permanence in the international forum due to the existence of communism and the draconian measures. Imperialistic agenda before 1990s with supressing alternative voices were the most infamous characteristics of the Soviet regime. Those stereotypes are also relevant in the present times where most of the countries feel relaxed to get in touch with Western Europe rather than making amity with Russia. Cultural similarities and friendly relations are contributed a lot for the West European countries that Russia fails to develop even today. Despite of the disadvantages, it can be argued that there are still some opportunities left for Russia in order to refurbish its existing structure. In fact, in many cases the cultural stereotypes are hampering the global image of Russia. However, the cultural richness of Russia will never be restricted itself into its own domain (Gerybadze & Merk, 2014). Furthermore, the presence of globalisation itself is a contributing factor to help Russia in developing a global platform on the basis of its cultural platform. Based on this understanding, it can be stated that the social status of the Russia may not be suitable for fostering a better environment for globalisation in near future. Nevertheless, the political discourses are already launched a process to deliver global platform for the Russia. Inn association with this, the cultural underpinnings are played an important role in order to justify
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4FUTURE OF RUSSIAN GLOBALIZATION its step towards making a new face fashioned in globalisation. Government initiatives and the cultural assimilation with other countries will contribute a lot in the process. Similarly, the world needs new players to continue the efficacy of globalisation. From that point of view, the Russian politics, cultural ethos and social establishments will undoubtedly play significant role in order to take the benefits of globalisation.
5FUTURE OF RUSSIAN GLOBALIZATION Reference Dufy, C. (2015). Redefining business values in Russia: The boundaries of globalisation and patriotism in contemporary Russian industry.Europe-Asia Studies,67(1), 84- 10 Figge, L., & Martens, P. (2014). Globalisation continues: the Maastricht globalisation index revisited and updated.Globalizations,11(6), 875-89 Gerybadze, A., & Merk, S. (2014). Globalisation of R&D and host-country patenting of multinationalcorporationsinemergingcountries.InternationalJournalof Technology Management,64(2-4), 148-179. Kohl, T., & Brouwer, A. E. (2014). The development of trade blocs in an era of globalisation.Environment and Planning A,46(7), 1535-1553. Minina, E. (2014). Neoliberalism and education in Russia: Global and local dynamics in post-soviet education reform. Mouraviev, N., & Kakabadse, N. K. (2014). Public–private partnerships in Russia: dynamics contributing to an emerging policy paradigm.Policy Studies,35(1), 79- 96. Romano, A., & Romero, F. (2014). European Socialist regimes facing globalisation and European co-operation: dilemmas and responses–introduction.European Review of History: Revue europeenne d'histoire,21(2), 157-164.
6FUTURE OF RUSSIAN GLOBALIZATION Zajda, J. (2015). Globalisation and the politics of education reforms: History education. InNation-building and history education in a global culture(pp. 1-14). Springer, Dordrecht.