Gender Equity in the Primary Schools in Australia
VerifiedAdded on 2023/06/11
|13
|3327
|150
AI Summary
Gender inequality in the primary school settings in Australia have been identified to be a pertinent issue that leads to the self perception of the girls and the boys about their capability. Gendered segregation and gendered division in the schools can be attributed to the gendered division of labour and gendered socialization prevalent in the society that structures and informs the behaviour of the boys and the girls. Teachers have been found to to contribute t to this gender inequity in the classroom. There needs to be an understanding about this essentialist understanding and realize its implications in realizing an limiting the life opportunities for the boys and the girls.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: GENDER EQUITY IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
GENDER EQUITY IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
Name of student:
Name of university:
Author note:
GENDER EQUITY IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
Name of student:
Name of university:
Author note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1GENDER EQUITY IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
Executive summary
Gender inequality in the primary school settings in Australia have been identified to be a
pertinent issue that leads to the self perception of the girls and the boys about their capability.
Gendered segregation and gendered division in the schools can be attributed to the gendered
division of labour and gendered socialization prevalent in the society that structures and
informs the behaviour of the boys and the girls. Teachers have been found to to contribute t to
this gender inequity in the classroom. There needs to be an understanding about this
essentialist understanding and realize its implications in realizing an limiting the life
opportunities for the boys and the girls.
Executive summary
Gender inequality in the primary school settings in Australia have been identified to be a
pertinent issue that leads to the self perception of the girls and the boys about their capability.
Gendered segregation and gendered division in the schools can be attributed to the gendered
division of labour and gendered socialization prevalent in the society that structures and
informs the behaviour of the boys and the girls. Teachers have been found to to contribute t to
this gender inequity in the classroom. There needs to be an understanding about this
essentialist understanding and realize its implications in realizing an limiting the life
opportunities for the boys and the girls.
2GENDER EQUITY IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
Table of Contents
Introduction:...............................................................................................................................3
Contemporary perspectives of learning and development.........................................................4
Rationale for relevance to have an understanding of the issue..................................................5
Findings......................................................................................................................................6
Factors contributing to the issue................................................................................................8
Reports on the potential effects of the issue in relation to children’s learning and development
in the primary school setting’.....................................................................................................9
Conclusion................................................................................................................................10
References................................................................................................................................11
Table of Contents
Introduction:...............................................................................................................................3
Contemporary perspectives of learning and development.........................................................4
Rationale for relevance to have an understanding of the issue..................................................5
Findings......................................................................................................................................6
Factors contributing to the issue................................................................................................8
Reports on the potential effects of the issue in relation to children’s learning and development
in the primary school setting’.....................................................................................................9
Conclusion................................................................................................................................10
References................................................................................................................................11
3GENDER EQUITY IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
Introduction:
Gender equity in schooling is premised on the notion that there are differences in the
experiences and the outcomes in the education for girls and boys. This may be attributed to
the gendered socialization and the gendered expectations from the members of the opposite
sexes. There is the recognition of the impact of gendered socialization that restricts and limits
instead of expanding the possibilities for the women and girls. Much like the different areas
of human experience, the construction of gender can be understood and has the potential to
change. The Australian Education Council established the National Policy for the education
of Girls in 1987. Australian Education Council released the National Action Plan for the
Education of Girls 1993-97 in the year 1993. The National Action Plan focussed on the areas
of reform that was considered to be important for improving the education of girls. Gender is
a central issue for both boys and girls. It is argued that boys have different needs that are not
fulfilled by the schools. The myopic view of masculinity and the archetypical views about the
roles and responsibilities of the girls and the boys, vis-à-vis the gendered division of labour.
It has been identified that there are significant differences between the rewards of schooling
experienced by the boys and girls. Although girls stay longer in school compared to boys, the
former is not deriving the same post-school benefits from schooling. This view is buttressed
by the closer examination of the experience of the boys and the girls from their outcome of
schooling. It is manifested in the differences in subject choices, differences in the skills
developed by the boys and the girls and the different life experiences related to the gendered
construction of the boys and the girls (Gray & Leith, 2004). It has been found that whilst girls
are entering the subjects traditionally seen to be the territories of men and securing
Introduction:
Gender equity in schooling is premised on the notion that there are differences in the
experiences and the outcomes in the education for girls and boys. This may be attributed to
the gendered socialization and the gendered expectations from the members of the opposite
sexes. There is the recognition of the impact of gendered socialization that restricts and limits
instead of expanding the possibilities for the women and girls. Much like the different areas
of human experience, the construction of gender can be understood and has the potential to
change. The Australian Education Council established the National Policy for the education
of Girls in 1987. Australian Education Council released the National Action Plan for the
Education of Girls 1993-97 in the year 1993. The National Action Plan focussed on the areas
of reform that was considered to be important for improving the education of girls. Gender is
a central issue for both boys and girls. It is argued that boys have different needs that are not
fulfilled by the schools. The myopic view of masculinity and the archetypical views about the
roles and responsibilities of the girls and the boys, vis-à-vis the gendered division of labour.
It has been identified that there are significant differences between the rewards of schooling
experienced by the boys and girls. Although girls stay longer in school compared to boys, the
former is not deriving the same post-school benefits from schooling. This view is buttressed
by the closer examination of the experience of the boys and the girls from their outcome of
schooling. It is manifested in the differences in subject choices, differences in the skills
developed by the boys and the girls and the different life experiences related to the gendered
construction of the boys and the girls (Gray & Leith, 2004). It has been found that whilst girls
are entering the subjects traditionally seen to be the territories of men and securing
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
4GENDER EQUITY IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
praiseworthy results, however their participation rate in this is significantly lower than the
boys. The participation of the boys remain concentrated in the subjects that are traditionally
seen appropriate to their character. Boys are found to be predominant in the literacy
programs, reading and other learning support programs for the students with emotional and
the behavioural disturbances. Schools and communities have recognized that violence in
schools is linked to the understanding of the inappropriate and distorted understandings of
femininity and masculinity. There is a greater propensity for men being involved in violence
compared to women, engaging in risk-taking behaviours and behaviours that are destructive
to the emotional and physical health of boys and girls. The reason that boys and girls
continue to narrowly define their gender is reflected in the limited post-school career options
for the boys and the girls. School achievements related to gender equity do not necessarily
translate into the much needed reforms in the workplace or the wider community and the
schools do not wish to always teach those skills necessary to deal with the post-school
barriers to equity. Although there has been an increase in the number of women entering the
occupations that are traditionally considered to be the male domains and women are under-
represented in the field of management studies and in the leadership positions. Girls and
women are found to be carrying the great share of unpaid work whilst boys and men are less
involved in the affective roles. All these can be attributed to the complex dynamic of gender,
schooling and society therefore creating a range of interpretations about masculinity and
femininity.
Contemporary perspectives of learning and development
In Australia, the principles for action that have developed encapsulate the best
practise for education considering the needs of all the students and connect it to the best
practise to the demands of the changing community. The principles documented in the
praiseworthy results, however their participation rate in this is significantly lower than the
boys. The participation of the boys remain concentrated in the subjects that are traditionally
seen appropriate to their character. Boys are found to be predominant in the literacy
programs, reading and other learning support programs for the students with emotional and
the behavioural disturbances. Schools and communities have recognized that violence in
schools is linked to the understanding of the inappropriate and distorted understandings of
femininity and masculinity. There is a greater propensity for men being involved in violence
compared to women, engaging in risk-taking behaviours and behaviours that are destructive
to the emotional and physical health of boys and girls. The reason that boys and girls
continue to narrowly define their gender is reflected in the limited post-school career options
for the boys and the girls. School achievements related to gender equity do not necessarily
translate into the much needed reforms in the workplace or the wider community and the
schools do not wish to always teach those skills necessary to deal with the post-school
barriers to equity. Although there has been an increase in the number of women entering the
occupations that are traditionally considered to be the male domains and women are under-
represented in the field of management studies and in the leadership positions. Girls and
women are found to be carrying the great share of unpaid work whilst boys and men are less
involved in the affective roles. All these can be attributed to the complex dynamic of gender,
schooling and society therefore creating a range of interpretations about masculinity and
femininity.
Contemporary perspectives of learning and development
In Australia, the principles for action that have developed encapsulate the best
practise for education considering the needs of all the students and connect it to the best
practise to the demands of the changing community. The principles documented in the
5GENDER EQUITY IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
Gender Equity: A Framework for Australian schools upholds that there should be equitable
access to education that would be centred around effective and rewarding education. The
objective of this is to enhance rather than limit about what it means to be female and male
(Dorius & Firebaugh, 2010). There is an emphasis on the equitable participation of the girls
and the boys in the society that is characterized by the changing patterns of working and the
civic and the domestic life. There is an emphasis on schools need to recognize their active
role in the construction of gender and their responsibility to ensure that the management and
the organizational practises manifest the commitment to gender equity. There is an
understanding regarding the effective partnership between schools, education and the training
systems, the community and the parent along with a wide range of agencies and organizations
for contributing to the improvement and the change in the educational outcomes for the girls
and the boys. There is an anti-discrimination and other relevant legislation on the state,
territory, federal and the international levels that inform the educational programs and the
services.
Rationale for relevance to have an understanding of the issue
Teachers believe that that they treat boys and girls equally that is hardly achieved.
Studies have shown that boys are reprimanded more than the girls are and there are more
questions directed at the boys than the girls (Gray & Leith, 2004). There is clear-cut gender
disparity in the classroom. It has been found that boys are socialized to expect more attention
in the classroom whereas girls receive less attention in the classroom despite putting extra
effort. However as the study by Davis and Brember have shown that girls are more motivated
and are less demanding compared to their male counterparts. Gendered socialization of the
girls make them more submissive and conforming whereas the boys are found to be less
Gender Equity: A Framework for Australian schools upholds that there should be equitable
access to education that would be centred around effective and rewarding education. The
objective of this is to enhance rather than limit about what it means to be female and male
(Dorius & Firebaugh, 2010). There is an emphasis on the equitable participation of the girls
and the boys in the society that is characterized by the changing patterns of working and the
civic and the domestic life. There is an emphasis on schools need to recognize their active
role in the construction of gender and their responsibility to ensure that the management and
the organizational practises manifest the commitment to gender equity. There is an
understanding regarding the effective partnership between schools, education and the training
systems, the community and the parent along with a wide range of agencies and organizations
for contributing to the improvement and the change in the educational outcomes for the girls
and the boys. There is an anti-discrimination and other relevant legislation on the state,
territory, federal and the international levels that inform the educational programs and the
services.
Rationale for relevance to have an understanding of the issue
Teachers believe that that they treat boys and girls equally that is hardly achieved.
Studies have shown that boys are reprimanded more than the girls are and there are more
questions directed at the boys than the girls (Gray & Leith, 2004). There is clear-cut gender
disparity in the classroom. It has been found that boys are socialized to expect more attention
in the classroom whereas girls receive less attention in the classroom despite putting extra
effort. However as the study by Davis and Brember have shown that girls are more motivated
and are less demanding compared to their male counterparts. Gendered socialization of the
girls make them more submissive and conforming whereas the boys are found to be less
6GENDER EQUITY IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
conforming by the teachers (Cooray & Potrafke, 2011). However, this non-conformity among
the boys is treated with affirmation and interest. On the contrary, non-conformity among the
girls is considered to anomalous with their personality. Girls and boys receive different
feedback from the teachers. In case of girls during marking, they are marked right or wrong.
On the contrary boys are explained more about the marking criteria so that they can improve
their performance. Although there is not much gender difference in the mathematics score of
the boys and the girls, teachers perceive the ability and aptitude of the boys and the girls to be
different. It has been found that there are teachers who are uncomfortable with challenging
the gender stereotypes.
Findings
Inequality remains a strong issue in Australia. A recent survey has shown that the
children in the primary school have reported that they are not treated as fairly as their male
counterparts. International Australia surveyed more than 1700 girls in the age group of 10
and 17 to understand their experiences of inequality (Gender gap, 2018). It was revealed that
98 per cent believed that they were unfairly treated particularly in the field of sports. Deputy
chief Executive Sussane Legena found the report to be quite shocking and exhorted for
immediate action. She underscored that it is a wakeup call for the governments to address this
pertinent issue by banning sexist advertisement that reinforce gender stereotypes and by
removing gendered school uniforms as it exacerbates the divide between girls and boys.
These have been recognized as the ways for closing the gender gap. Legena further asserted
that it is no use telling a girl that she is empowered until the structures of patriarchy and the
systematic exclusion of women are not outlawed immediately. Two thirds of the girls aged
between 10 and 14 reported that they were treated equally at home. Schools have fared
conforming by the teachers (Cooray & Potrafke, 2011). However, this non-conformity among
the boys is treated with affirmation and interest. On the contrary, non-conformity among the
girls is considered to anomalous with their personality. Girls and boys receive different
feedback from the teachers. In case of girls during marking, they are marked right or wrong.
On the contrary boys are explained more about the marking criteria so that they can improve
their performance. Although there is not much gender difference in the mathematics score of
the boys and the girls, teachers perceive the ability and aptitude of the boys and the girls to be
different. It has been found that there are teachers who are uncomfortable with challenging
the gender stereotypes.
Findings
Inequality remains a strong issue in Australia. A recent survey has shown that the
children in the primary school have reported that they are not treated as fairly as their male
counterparts. International Australia surveyed more than 1700 girls in the age group of 10
and 17 to understand their experiences of inequality (Gender gap, 2018). It was revealed that
98 per cent believed that they were unfairly treated particularly in the field of sports. Deputy
chief Executive Sussane Legena found the report to be quite shocking and exhorted for
immediate action. She underscored that it is a wakeup call for the governments to address this
pertinent issue by banning sexist advertisement that reinforce gender stereotypes and by
removing gendered school uniforms as it exacerbates the divide between girls and boys.
These have been recognized as the ways for closing the gender gap. Legena further asserted
that it is no use telling a girl that she is empowered until the structures of patriarchy and the
systematic exclusion of women are not outlawed immediately. Two thirds of the girls aged
between 10 and 14 reported that they were treated equally at home. Schools have fared
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
7GENDER EQUITY IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
slightly better with 45 per cent of the younger girls who reported that they were treated equal
to the boys in the class. More than half of the teenage girls reported that they were not treated
equally as compared to their male counterparts. Schools in Western Australia and Victoria
have been successful in removing gendered uniforms and teaching students to be more
respectful towards the relationships. All the girls who were surveyed reported that they were
equal to their male counterparts and that there was equality between the sexes. More than half
of the 10 to 12 year olds have described themselves to be confident.
Like most of the English speaking market-oriented democracies, Australia considers
itself to be a merit-based society in which every individual irrespective of their social location
has an equal chance in the society. However, the existing reality of the education system
characterizes that the Australian society is an epitome of social stratification and inequality.
Evidence has shown that schools promote inequality instead of promoting equity and
therefore, schools have turned into engines of inequality (Sikora & Saha, 2009). Schools have
organized themselves around choice and competition to perpetuate education. The social
stratification in the filed of education is sharper than most of the countries. Children who
belong to affluent families are enrolled in the high, independent schools. On the other hand,
children from the low-income and marginalized groups are enrolled in the public or the
government schools. Teachers are encouraged to develop feminist collectives at the schools
to counter everyday sexism and part of the Victorian government backed initiative to deal
with the social epidemic of domestic violence beyond the schoolyard. Fightback is a feminist-
based teaching guide that provides a grim picture about the white male privilege in the
schools of Australia is endorsed within the Victorian government’s $21 Respectful
Relationships project has been implemented in more than 120 schools and there will be more
than 100 schools that would follow the footsteps (Subrahmanian, 2005). The objective of
Fightback is to educate the school students about gender equality that leads to the high rates
slightly better with 45 per cent of the younger girls who reported that they were treated equal
to the boys in the class. More than half of the teenage girls reported that they were not treated
equally as compared to their male counterparts. Schools in Western Australia and Victoria
have been successful in removing gendered uniforms and teaching students to be more
respectful towards the relationships. All the girls who were surveyed reported that they were
equal to their male counterparts and that there was equality between the sexes. More than half
of the 10 to 12 year olds have described themselves to be confident.
Like most of the English speaking market-oriented democracies, Australia considers
itself to be a merit-based society in which every individual irrespective of their social location
has an equal chance in the society. However, the existing reality of the education system
characterizes that the Australian society is an epitome of social stratification and inequality.
Evidence has shown that schools promote inequality instead of promoting equity and
therefore, schools have turned into engines of inequality (Sikora & Saha, 2009). Schools have
organized themselves around choice and competition to perpetuate education. The social
stratification in the filed of education is sharper than most of the countries. Children who
belong to affluent families are enrolled in the high, independent schools. On the other hand,
children from the low-income and marginalized groups are enrolled in the public or the
government schools. Teachers are encouraged to develop feminist collectives at the schools
to counter everyday sexism and part of the Victorian government backed initiative to deal
with the social epidemic of domestic violence beyond the schoolyard. Fightback is a feminist-
based teaching guide that provides a grim picture about the white male privilege in the
schools of Australia is endorsed within the Victorian government’s $21 Respectful
Relationships project has been implemented in more than 120 schools and there will be more
than 100 schools that would follow the footsteps (Subrahmanian, 2005). The objective of
Fightback is to educate the school students about gender equality that leads to the high rates
8GENDER EQUITY IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
of sexism and the discrimination that ultimately promotes to high rates of sexism and
discrimination and perpetuates violence against women. Respectful Relationships curriculum
guide and introduces the students to the concept of privilege in which some groups have
advantage over other groups that are not achieved but are ascribed. Gender inequality in
enmeshed with racism and class inequality in Australia. However, the Respectful
Relationship curriculum has earned wide criticism. It has been stated that 25 per cent of the
domestic violence victims are men, men have been found having high mortality rate than
women and young men have greater rates of youth suicide (Belot, 2018). It has been further
argued that such kind of teachings are embedded in reverse sexism that essentializes all men
as perpetrators of crime and this kind of campaigns can make men feel targeted and lead to
self-fulfilling prophecy. It has been argued if people are not treated as individuals but
members of a victim group is quite socially destructive. However, the Fightback initiative is
important to discuss issues pertaining to gender and what it can mean to people. Another
criticism that was hurled against the Fightback initiative is from the Liberal education
spokesman Nick Wakeling who has attacked the Labor government for deploying insidious
political ideologies in school by sacrificing the real education. He is of the opinion that young
boys are in need of skills that would prepare them for meaningful employment instead they
are being brainwashed and socially stigmatized. However, State Education Minister, James
Merlino contended that schools can use whatever means they deem fit for teaching the
children to deal with the various challenges of life.
Factors contributing to the issue
The gendered segregation, gendered stereotypes and gendered experiences in the
primary school settings in Australia can be attributed gendered socialization and gendered
of sexism and the discrimination that ultimately promotes to high rates of sexism and
discrimination and perpetuates violence against women. Respectful Relationships curriculum
guide and introduces the students to the concept of privilege in which some groups have
advantage over other groups that are not achieved but are ascribed. Gender inequality in
enmeshed with racism and class inequality in Australia. However, the Respectful
Relationship curriculum has earned wide criticism. It has been stated that 25 per cent of the
domestic violence victims are men, men have been found having high mortality rate than
women and young men have greater rates of youth suicide (Belot, 2018). It has been further
argued that such kind of teachings are embedded in reverse sexism that essentializes all men
as perpetrators of crime and this kind of campaigns can make men feel targeted and lead to
self-fulfilling prophecy. It has been argued if people are not treated as individuals but
members of a victim group is quite socially destructive. However, the Fightback initiative is
important to discuss issues pertaining to gender and what it can mean to people. Another
criticism that was hurled against the Fightback initiative is from the Liberal education
spokesman Nick Wakeling who has attacked the Labor government for deploying insidious
political ideologies in school by sacrificing the real education. He is of the opinion that young
boys are in need of skills that would prepare them for meaningful employment instead they
are being brainwashed and socially stigmatized. However, State Education Minister, James
Merlino contended that schools can use whatever means they deem fit for teaching the
children to deal with the various challenges of life.
Factors contributing to the issue
The gendered segregation, gendered stereotypes and gendered experiences in the
primary school settings in Australia can be attributed gendered socialization and gendered
9GENDER EQUITY IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
division of labour that is prevalent in the patriarchal society (Marks, 2018). Schools exist
within the boundaries of the patriarchal society and reflect the broader stratified values of the
society. Therefore, it is the cultural socialization rather than inherent biological endowments
that inform the characteristics between the boys and the girls. The dominant conceptions of
masculinity and femininity structure and determine the males and the females by highlighting
their differences and assigning them unequal value, power and status. These dominant
concepts ignore the ways in which girls and the boys develop their own concept of what it
means to be feminine and what it means to exhibit masculine behaviour.
Reports on the potential effects of the issue in relation to children’s
learning and development in the primary school setting’
Studies conducted by Wigfield et al have found that when low expectations from the
teachers are transferred to the students either in a direct or an indirect manner they can bring
down the morale of the girl students and lower their self-competence and self-esteem
compared to their male counterparts (Sikora & Saha, 2009). Gender is also marked in the
everyday school practise where girls and boys are segregated differently. Playgrounds are
considered as the football pitches and it is the boys who are found to be occupying the larger
area compared to the girls who are found to be occupying the smaller area (Vosko,
MacDonald & Campbell, 2009). The gendered division and gendered inequality has resulted
in the boys monopolizing the natural sciences apparatus and being more visible in the areas
related to physical science. The lack of participation of the girls in the classroom activities
leads girls to develop negative and less confident attitude towards the computers compared to
the boys. The gendered construction of men and women in the school curriculum have been
division of labour that is prevalent in the patriarchal society (Marks, 2018). Schools exist
within the boundaries of the patriarchal society and reflect the broader stratified values of the
society. Therefore, it is the cultural socialization rather than inherent biological endowments
that inform the characteristics between the boys and the girls. The dominant conceptions of
masculinity and femininity structure and determine the males and the females by highlighting
their differences and assigning them unequal value, power and status. These dominant
concepts ignore the ways in which girls and the boys develop their own concept of what it
means to be feminine and what it means to exhibit masculine behaviour.
Reports on the potential effects of the issue in relation to children’s
learning and development in the primary school setting’
Studies conducted by Wigfield et al have found that when low expectations from the
teachers are transferred to the students either in a direct or an indirect manner they can bring
down the morale of the girl students and lower their self-competence and self-esteem
compared to their male counterparts (Sikora & Saha, 2009). Gender is also marked in the
everyday school practise where girls and boys are segregated differently. Playgrounds are
considered as the football pitches and it is the boys who are found to be occupying the larger
area compared to the girls who are found to be occupying the smaller area (Vosko,
MacDonald & Campbell, 2009). The gendered division and gendered inequality has resulted
in the boys monopolizing the natural sciences apparatus and being more visible in the areas
related to physical science. The lack of participation of the girls in the classroom activities
leads girls to develop negative and less confident attitude towards the computers compared to
the boys. The gendered construction of men and women in the school curriculum have been
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
10GENDER EQUITY IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
argued to impinge on the children’s play preference and inform their perception about the
appropriateness of the task to be performed by the members of different sex.
Conclusion
The first step in this direction is to challenge the stereotypes posed by a patriarchal
society and liberating the children from these gender restrictions. There needs to be an
exposure to non-traditional literature that would challenge that traditional stereotypes and the
opportunities that would act as the fulcrum for classroom debate. It has been found that
teachers although are comfortable about the equal participation of the girls and the boys in
the classroom. They are not comfortable with discussions related to the sexist language, the
construction of men and women through the textbooks and the identification of their own sex.
There needs to be a more nuanced understanding in terms of essentialising the girls and the
boys. There needs to be the incorporation of sexuality as identity formation in the classroom
to understand the power and position of sexuality informing the teacher and the student
dynamics. There should be incorporation of a wide range of experiences, skills and
knowledge, and aspirations of girls and women and also for the boys and the men. It should
be ensured that there is a clear understanding of gender equality that are integral to the
curriculum development, assessment of the design and the implementation of all the key
findings into the learning areas. There needs to be an alteration for assessing the
competencies between boys and girls. There needs to be major policies for attaining the
gender equity in which both the men and the women will be targeted. There needs to be
discussion on the ways, the teachers and parents can overcome resistance in learning about
the gendered construction and its implications for the development of the child.
argued to impinge on the children’s play preference and inform their perception about the
appropriateness of the task to be performed by the members of different sex.
Conclusion
The first step in this direction is to challenge the stereotypes posed by a patriarchal
society and liberating the children from these gender restrictions. There needs to be an
exposure to non-traditional literature that would challenge that traditional stereotypes and the
opportunities that would act as the fulcrum for classroom debate. It has been found that
teachers although are comfortable about the equal participation of the girls and the boys in
the classroom. They are not comfortable with discussions related to the sexist language, the
construction of men and women through the textbooks and the identification of their own sex.
There needs to be a more nuanced understanding in terms of essentialising the girls and the
boys. There needs to be the incorporation of sexuality as identity formation in the classroom
to understand the power and position of sexuality informing the teacher and the student
dynamics. There should be incorporation of a wide range of experiences, skills and
knowledge, and aspirations of girls and women and also for the boys and the men. It should
be ensured that there is a clear understanding of gender equality that are integral to the
curriculum development, assessment of the design and the implementation of all the key
findings into the learning areas. There needs to be an alteration for assessing the
competencies between boys and girls. There needs to be major policies for attaining the
gender equity in which both the men and the women will be targeted. There needs to be
discussion on the ways, the teachers and parents can overcome resistance in learning about
the gendered construction and its implications for the development of the child.
11GENDER EQUITY IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
References
Belot, H. (2018). Engineers concerned by gender inequality and school standards. Retrieved
from https://www.smh.com.au/education/engineers-concerned-by-gender-inequality-
and-school-standards-20160420-goatfo.html
Cooray, A., & Potrafke, N. (2011). Gender inequality in education: Political institutions or
culture and religion?.European Journal of Political Economy, 27(2), 268-280.
Dorius, S. F., & Firebaugh, G. (2010). Trends in global gender inequality. Social
Forces, 88(5), 1941-1968.
Gender gap. (2018). Retrieved from
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/opinion/gender-gap/news-story/
0cc568ad44f35773b07417322e66ff45?sv=75d6a706720d7ab54d02630ad27d86dd
Gray, C., & Leith, H. (2004). Perpetuating gender stereotypes in the classroom: A teacher
perspective. Educational Studies,30(1), 3-17.
How Far Have We Come? Gender Disparities in the Australian Higher Education System –
Parliament of Australia. (2018). Retrieved from
https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/
Parliamentary_Library/Publica
Marks, G. N. (2008). Accounting for the gender gaps in student performance in reading and
mathematics: evidence from 31 countries. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 89-
109.
Sikora, J., & Saha, L. J. (2009). Gender and professional career plans of high school students
in comparative perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(4), 385-403.
References
Belot, H. (2018). Engineers concerned by gender inequality and school standards. Retrieved
from https://www.smh.com.au/education/engineers-concerned-by-gender-inequality-
and-school-standards-20160420-goatfo.html
Cooray, A., & Potrafke, N. (2011). Gender inequality in education: Political institutions or
culture and religion?.European Journal of Political Economy, 27(2), 268-280.
Dorius, S. F., & Firebaugh, G. (2010). Trends in global gender inequality. Social
Forces, 88(5), 1941-1968.
Gender gap. (2018). Retrieved from
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/opinion/gender-gap/news-story/
0cc568ad44f35773b07417322e66ff45?sv=75d6a706720d7ab54d02630ad27d86dd
Gray, C., & Leith, H. (2004). Perpetuating gender stereotypes in the classroom: A teacher
perspective. Educational Studies,30(1), 3-17.
How Far Have We Come? Gender Disparities in the Australian Higher Education System –
Parliament of Australia. (2018). Retrieved from
https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/
Parliamentary_Library/Publica
Marks, G. N. (2008). Accounting for the gender gaps in student performance in reading and
mathematics: evidence from 31 countries. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 89-
109.
Sikora, J., & Saha, L. J. (2009). Gender and professional career plans of high school students
in comparative perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(4), 385-403.
12GENDER EQUITY IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
Subrahmanian, R. (2005). Gender equality in education: Definitions and
measurements. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(4), 395-407.
Vosko, L. F., MacDonald, M., & Campbell, I. (Eds.). (2009).Gender and the contours of
precarious employment. Routledge.
Subrahmanian, R. (2005). Gender equality in education: Definitions and
measurements. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(4), 395-407.
Vosko, L. F., MacDonald, M., & Campbell, I. (Eds.). (2009).Gender and the contours of
precarious employment. Routledge.
1 out of 13
Related Documents
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.