Safety and Health Regulations in Industry

This assignment delves into the crucial role of safety and health regulations within various industries. It emphasizes the significance of adhering to these regulations to ensure the well-being and safety of all individuals involved in the industry's operations. The text discusses relevant standards, methodologies, and best practices for maintaining a safe and healthy work environment.

Health and Safety and Risk 1
HEALTH AND SAFETY AND RISK
By (Student’s Name)
Professor’s Name
College
Course
Date

Health and Safety and Risk 2
HEALTH AND SAFETY AND RISK
Introduction
The paper is based on the understanding of the nature as well as use of present health
alongside safety legislation. The present regulation that are relevant as well a present United
States and European Union regulation including noise at work, COSHH, manual handling,
pressure systems, control of asbestos, personal protective equipment, management of health and
safety at work, IEE wiring regulations, health and safety at work Act, EMC directive; for the
typical engineering operations for example, engineering production alongside manufacture,
engineering services, materials handling, telecommunications as well as transportation (Brauer
2016).
Health Risks
Since several in aerospace-engineering works frequently work non-archetypal hours, the
risks of both psychological alongside physical impairment/illness remain s greater than any
ordinary risk that a typical work assumes. This probably emerge from the physical alongside
psychological stress which is a shared outcome or work-linked schedule disturbances of the
biological functions of work like sleep, a social life as well as a family. Since aircraft-
engineering remains a pivotal safety functions with a straight connection in a series of events
which might culminate in any type of aircraft incident, the association between health as well as
safety and shift work must be effectively spoken to by each one engaged.
Safety Issues
The risks and hazards which one can discover with respect to maintenance work on the
aircraft remain extremely identical to the ones one would observe in construction industry. A few
extra risks particular to airline industry have been found plus the non-linear outline of aircraft

Health and Safety and Risk 3
one is working on, as well as the significance of evading damage to outside surface alongside
plane structure. It remains extremely obligatory on each proprietor to ensure their admittance
equipment stays safer (as long as is sensibly applied) for the workers to utilize. Concrete,
appropriate as well as efficient measures must be assumed to keep everyone from dwindling any
distance which might trigger personal injury (Vogl, Weiss. and Donmez 2014).
Diverse equipment remain utilized to permit workforces access aircraft whereby they
have to execute maintenance. This encompass work podiums which remain hanged particularly
for refinishing work of aircraft, decking which is tailored to fit particular areas of plane or entire
item, docking which might be attuned in height and weight like nose/tail, dissimilar types of
scaffolding, moveable uplifting work podiums, steps alongside barbicans.
Such issues directly pose several safety issues and can be minimized for example by use
of special docking equipment. This remains a costly equipment, yet it offers safe access and
hence harmonized closely to contour of plane. These systems could further be a fraction of
hangar-structure as well as utilized in a range of horizontal as well as vertical combinations. It
remains common, albeit, to utilize custom scaffolding as well as docking that are often perceived
as lasting mobile structures (Nair, de-la-Vara, Sabetzadeh. and Falessi 2015).
Ways of staying safe has been highlighted. The salient issue in the provision of safer
accessibility to aircraft relates to need for following rounded rather than straight plane body
shape. One has be alert to ensure no hazardous holes between work podium and plane. Each
work podium edge from where the personnel might tumble a distance liable to trigger personal
injuries has to encompass edge fortification. Planes individually often offers safeguard on at
minimum a single edge. Gaps in fuselage of the plane including cargo and doors holds must

Health and Safety and Risk 4
encompass edge fortification/remain shut at all time. Straps must never be used at all as
fortification.
The edges through which materials and tools might tumble need to encompass toe-boards
for protecting the ones beneath. The gap between the planes must as well be as slim as feasible,
and must certainly not be outsized enough for individuals/objects to tumble. One has to often
keep scaffolding and all podiums stable, and one must be capable of providing evidence which
he has performed strength as well as stability computations (Sujan, Habli, Kelly, Pozzi and
Johnson 2016).
Accessing scaffold alongside decking must remain internal, robust sufficiently for
holding materials’ weight as well as fixed with the trap-doors. In certain instances, one must
further have a prepared scheme in place to assemble, utilize as well as disassemble scaffolding.
A mechanism for escaping in case of emergency must further be taken into account to make sure
that the personnel have a range of ways to get down in case of an incident occurrence (Sujan,
Habli, Kelly, Pozzi and Johnson 2016).
COSHH
The regulations states that some substances categorized as health hazards, and that
workers could be highly prone to, have to be recognized at work and assessment of workers’
health-risks performed. The dangerous materials could be chemicals, liquids, gases, dusts, fumes,
alongside mixtures with such constituents. A prospective for high inhalation, skin/eye contact
skin are common in aircraft and must be addressed. As seen in the above discussion, aircraft has
chemicals like asbestos that must be assessed and dealt with effectively. There is a need to
minimize the exposure.

Health and Safety and Risk 5
The prevention of exposure to such noted hazardous substances is never possible in
certain cases. Thus, one has to do her best in that controls contact. The aircraft must utilize work
systems which minimize hazardous materials’ production and restricts the pollution area during
leakages/spillages. They should reduce the period in which workers are exposed to hazardous
substances via the acceptable working hour’s limits and shifts. There is a need for regular
cleaning of contamination walls and surfaces and prohibit eating and drinking in contaminated
areas. There is a need to provide employees with appropriate facilities in the untainted area for
eating and drinking. The aircraft must install a Carbon (IV) Oxide monitor in the limited spaces.
Noise at work
The EU rules create a precise and transparent procedure for the introduction of
restrictions for evidence-based decisions and provide ideal resolutions for noise-derived glitches
in regards to cost, production alongside capacity. The regulation (EU) No. 598/2014 is applicable
to aircraft because albeit discrete aircraft having been 75%t less noisy in previous three decades,
expanding air traffic amount implies several EU populace remain increasingly susceptible to
extreme noise levels. The measures that target noise impact have remained essential to ensure
sustainability.
Via knock-on effects makes noise-associated measures limit not solely capacity of airport
at a given airport but further the entire system of aviation. These regulation focus on measures
for noise alongside the acceptable noise safeguard levels which have to weighed vis-à-vis entire
implications for capacity. For this reason, European community has assumed Regulation (EU)
No 598/2014 on procedures relating to ushering of noise-linked operation limitations. These
precincts further influence air-carriers from outside EU economies and hence Regulations
complies with global noise management principles called balanced approach.

Health and Safety and Risk 6
Pressure systems
The Aircraft must comply with Directive 97/23/EC) (PED). It is the European Single
Market Directive covering pressure-equipment as well as assemblies with the supreme
permissible pressure PS greater than 0.5 bar having been embraced in 1997/05/29; being
effective from 29/11/2009. The pressure systems safety regulation 2000 (PSSR) imposes such
duties relating to pressure-systems for the utilization at workplace alongside risk to safety/health.
They must be adhered with to prevent sever injuries from stored-energy hazards due pressure- or
constituent portions’ failure (Freivalds and Niebel 2013).
Manual handling
The manual handling operations regulations as amended in 1992 must be adhered with by
the aircraft industry. The MHOR highlights manual-handling as any supporting/transporting of a
loads through hands or bodily force. This regulation has set out of precise ranking of measures
for addressing the risk from manual handling which must be adhered with by aircraft. The first
ranking is the avoidance of dangerous operations of manual-handling so far is sensibly workable;
second ranking is assessing any dangerous operations of manual-handling which are inevitable;
whereas the 3rd ranking describes the reduction of risk of injuries for as far as sensibly
practicable.
Personal Protective Equipment
The regulations 1992 highlights regulations set established within the H&S at Work. It
must be followed strictly by the aircraft industry because it places a duty on each employer to
ensure that appropriate protective equipment is availed to the staffs vulnerable to a risk to H&S
at workplace. The regulations describe every equipment for protection against weather that are

Health and Safety and Risk 7
purposed be put on or held by the individual at the work that protects the person against one or
additional risks ro safety and health
Control of Asbestos
The Regulations 2012 remains critical to aircraft industry. The regulation took effect on
2011 April 6th, having updated the past asbestos regulations to consider the European
Commission’s perception that United Kingdom had never wholly applied the EU Directive on
asbestos’ exposure, Directive 2009/148/EC. Aircraft industry must take note of those unlicensed
work with asbestos with extra requirements including work notification, record keeping and
surveillance of medical.
Health and safety at work Act
The Act 1974 or HSWA/HASAWA is that Act of UK Parliament that defined the
fundamental structure as well as authority for encouraging, regulating as well as enforcing
workplace health, safety as well as welfare within the UK. This Act is applicable to aircraft
industry as it presents definition of overal duties on employees, employers, contractors, goods
suppliers and substances for use at work, individuals in control of premises of work as well as
the people managing and maintaining them, and individuals in general (Gregson, Hampson,
Junor, Fraser, Quinlan and Williamson 2015). The established H&S Commission alongside H&S
Executive are critical since without adherence, the industry players could face sanctions
criminally elongating to unrestricted fines alongside incarceration for over 24 months. It further
avails a pivotal interface with EU law on workstation H&S.
Management of health and safety at work
The MHSWR 1999 was introduced to buttress the 1974 H&S at Work etc. Act. It puts
duties workers and employers encompassing those who are designers, clients, principal

Health and Safety and Risk 8
contractors alongside other contractors. The duties overlap the CDM’s, however, where duties
override CDM’s extra measures shall be required to comply completely with MHSWR. It is
pivotal to aircraft industry since it requires employers to undertake effective risk assessment on
health as well as safety of their workers alongside others that might be impacted by their
respective work activity.
The regulation requires employers with five or more workers to record substantial
findings of such risk assessment. The employees have a duty to report any limitations in H&S
armaments and report dangerous conditions. The employees must as well use equipment in
compliance with training and instructions as well as take sensible care of their individual H&S
and those of others that might be affected by their omissions or acts.
IEE wiring regulations
The wiring regulations (BS 7671) plays a pivotal major role in electrical installation
standards and safety, and is renowned for its standalone and trusted voice. It has set the standards
for electrical installation in the United Kingdom and aims at ensuring that works in aircraft for
instance, meets the Electricity at Work Regulations 1989 requirements.
EMC directive
The directive 2002/49 EC relates to the environment-noise assessment as well as
management. It is applicable to aircraft industry. The directive aimed at defining a common
approach to evade, bar/decrease on a preference footing the harmful effects encompassing
annoyance as a result of exposure to environmental noise. It is applicable to environmental noise
to which people working in aircraft are exposed to and also applicable to noise which is triggered
by an individual himself, and noise at workplaces and noise inside the plane.
Conclusion

Health and Safety and Risk 9
The aircraft industry always record high rates of diseases and injuries which are slightly
higher than the national average. Workers are usually lifting weighty items, operating power
tools as well as handling toxic chemicals which are all hazardous (Freivalds and Niebel 2013).
Noise and vibrations remain common, and hence they must take serious precautions like putting
on ear-safeguards alongside luminously colored-vests to be easily seen. Workers further work on
scaffolding and ladders up in air to reach aircraft. Compliance with all the above discussed
regulations and Acts remain of paramount in this industry to ensure health and safety for all
stakeholders.

Health and Safety and Risk 10
References
Brauer, R.L., 2016. Safety and health for engineers. John Wiley & Sons.
Freivalds, A. and Niebel, B., 2013. Niebel's Methods, Standards, & Work Design. Mcgraw-Hill
higher education.
Gregson, S., Hampson, I., Junor, A., Fraser, D., Quinlan, M. and Williamson, A., 2015. Supply
chains, maintenance and safety in the Australian airline industry. Journal of Industrial Relations,
57(4), pp.604-623.
Middleton, B., Bloomrosen, M., Dente, M.A., Hashmat, B., Koppel, R., Overhage, J.M., Payne,
T.H., Rosenbloom, S.T., Weaver, C. and Zhang, J., 2013. Enhancing patient safety and quality of
care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from
AMIA. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(e1), pp.e2-e8.
Nair, S., de la Vara, J.L., Sabetzadeh, M. and Falessi, D., 2015. Evidence management for
compliance of critical systems with safety standards: A survey on the state of practice.
Information and Software Technology, 60, pp.1-15.
Sujan, M.A., Habli, I., Kelly, T.P., Pozzi, S. and Johnson, C.W., 2016. Should healthcare
providers do safety cases? Lessons from a cross-industry review of safety case practices. Safety
science, 84, pp.181-189.
Vogl, G.W., Weiss, B.A. and Donmez, M.A., 2014, September. Standards for prognostics and
health management (PHM) techniques within manufacturing operations. In Annual Conference
of the Prognostics and Health Management Society.

Health and Safety and Risk 11
Vuorio, A., Rantonen, J., Johnson, C., Ollila, T., Salminen, S. and Braithwaite, G., 2014. What
fatal occupational accident investigators can learn from fatal aircraft accident investigations?
Safety science, 62, pp.366-369.