HI6005 Managing Organisations in a Global Environment Appendix for Group Report

HI6005 Managing Organisations in a
Global Environment Appendix
for Group Report
After forming the group you must confirm your group members’ details in
writing with your lecturer. Note that once you do so, your group members
are fixed and cannot be changed. The group size should be 3, but your
lecturer may allow a maximum of 4. It is essential that every member
makes a significant valid academic contribution to the team result.
As you start to work on your group report, you are required to assimilate
this Appendix, to be submitted via a link on the UNIT blackboard site in
week 8, by Friday 5 pm.
What should be included in the appendix?
1. All the group member details-full name, student id numbers,
contact phone numbers.
2. The topic chosen for your group assignment
3. Allocation of the tasks for each member in
the group. You may utilise this format for the
above:
Topic Chosen:
Student ID First Name Family
Name
Contact
Phone
Number
Allocat
ed
Task(s)
4. A Gantt chart showing the working plan towards completion of
the group assignment. This chart must have every allocated task,
deadlines and dates clearly stated.
[See Gantt chart example, feel free to choose
your own style] GANTT CHART example:
work plan timeline Resources
establishimg various
criterias 1-2days(15th june to 17th june) Analysis tools
brainstorming 2 weeks (15thjune- 30th june) innovative tools
continous evaluation every six months( 30th june- 31st Evaluation tools

december)
pg. 1 HI6005 APPENDIX AND GROUP TOOLS

5. Each student to list at least five references and sources for their
chosen part. [Final assignment must contain these references plus
any others that are cited or used].
Stude
nt ID
Referenc
es
Key theme /
Reason for
choosing this?
1. Because it shows the
experience
This reference shows the
Solomon’s experiment
It shows the relation
between decision
making and social
environment
It shows the impact of
the experiment carried
out by Milgram
1. Backward, L., & Festinger, L. (2017).
Experiments as Theater.
The Rise and Fall of
Social Psychology: An Iconoclast's Guide to
the Use and Misuse of the Experimental
Method, 37.
2. BATTAL, F., YILDIZ, Ş., KILIÇASLAN, Ş., &
ÇINAR, E. (2018). THE RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN SOLOMON ASH COMFORMITY TEST
AND DECISION MAKING STYLES:(THE CASE OF
TURKEY).
Electronic Turkish Studies,
13(26).
3. Bruch, E., Hammond, R. A., & Todd, P. M.
(2015). Coevolution of Decision‐Making and
Social Environments.
Emerging Trends in the
Social and Behavioral Sciences: An
Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable
Resource, 1-16.
4. Gibson, S. (2019).
Arguing, Obeying and
Defying: A Rhetorical Perspective on Stanley
Milgram's Obedience Experiments.
Cambridge University Press.
5. Gibson, S., Blenkinsopp, G., Johnstone, E.,
& Marshall, A. (2018). Just following orders?
The rhetorical invocation of ‘obedience’in