This history essay explores the war of 1812, a forgotten conflict in American history. It delves into the causes, battles, and impact of the war, which is often referred to as the Second Revolutionary War.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: HISTORY ESSAY History essay Student’s name University Name Author’s Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
2 HISTORY ESSAY The war of 1812 had been one of the most obscure conflicts in the history of America. In spite of the long drawn researches that have been conducted in favor of this war, the average Americans like us are merely aware of the whereabouts of the war, including the actual issue which initiated the war. Most of the general Americans are not even informed about who were the adversaries during this war. In fact, the people who possess minimal information about the ware are only aware of the specific dramatic occurrences like the writing on the Star Spangled Banner, the burning of the capital of the nation or the battle that took place in the New Orleans. On investigating the reasons for obscurity regarding the war, one obvious reason seems to be the presence of the great president who was thoroughly associated with the war. The USA declared their independence from Britain in the year 1776 and gained their position as an independent country in the year 17831. Following that, the constitution of USA was developed and George Washington ascended the post as the first ever President of Free USA. In the 1793, when the war broke out between Great Britain and the French, Thomas Jefferson objectified the purchase of Louisiana Territory from the French2. However, it is evident that at this time, not only the English or the French, rather the whole of Europe was at war with each other. Both English and the French perceived that the supply ships of America were helping the opponent. That is why both the sides started to routinely stop the American ships.Both French and British demanded to invigilate the cargo holds and such claims ended in to violent outcomes on most occasions. This situation of animosity grew further when the imposition of restriction over American shipping came from the ends of the British in the year 1807. As a reply the 1Shi, David E., and George Brown Tindall. America: A narrative history. WW Norton & Company, 2016. 2Cox, Ashley. Wilsonian Approaches to American Conflicts: From the War of 1812 to the First Gulf War. Routledge, 2017. Hickey, Donald. "An American Perspective on the War of 1812." PBS. Retrieved May 26 (2018).
3 HISTORY ESSAY American National Congress passed the Embargo Act who prohibited trading with the British. It was expected that cutting off American trade would impact the two European nations at war. Rather, it turned out that in the backfire it was America who was hurt. As indicated above, the war of 1812 is often referred to as the Forgotten War as also the Second Revolutionary War. This was mostly a battle over ego and this is evident in the words that President Harry Truman uses to describe this war: “The silliest damn war we ever had” The war was partly caused by disagreements over shipping as well as trade amidst the high seas and partly because of the kidnapping of the American sailors who were forcefully made to serve in the navy of Britain. In US, there was a differentiation of attitude between the West and the south, which was looking for a significant battle. However, David reports that the New England was strictly against holding a war on these two mere grounds. The opposition started to gain in strength as the war progressed. The members were in favor of the war, within the Congress, pushed for keeping the fight on3. President, James Madison was on the verge of asking Congress for giving consent to declare the war. Finally, it was the USA who first declared war on Great Britain, at the time of their war with the French in the year 18124. In the year 1794, the constitution of USA emphasized on the introduction of the navy. Permission was also granted from the Congress who granted the construction of six navy ships. One famous ship out of them was the U.S.S Constitution5. The time taken for the construction of 3Cress, Lawrence Delbert. Citizens in Arms: The Army and Militia in American Society to the War of 1812. UNC Press Books, 2017. 4Peace, Roger. "The War of 1812." United States Foreign Policy History and Resource Guide Website (2016). 5Lucas, Michael T., and Julie M. Schablitsky. "Alarum in North America: An Overview of the War of 1812 and a Context to the Archaeological Studies in this Book." In Archaeology of the War of 1812, pp. 19-36. Routledge, 2016.
4 HISTORY ESSAY the ship had been three years and the total cost incurred for the constriction had been $318,719. It had been the second largest warship of the modern times. The active presence of the ship during the war of 1812 helped the US by sinking significant number of ship pertaining to the British navy. As informed by Ashley the ship accounted for capturing 24 vessels of the enemy in all. The end of the first significant battle in 1812 accounted as a disaster for the USA. The major incident that is remembered by Americans as a cause of surrendering before the British is the moment when General William Hull who had an army of 2200 men in possession, surrenderedstraightforwardtotheBritisharmyatDetroit.Mostimportantly,asDonald discusses, he did not even fire a single shot. Although the reason that led him to surrendered in such a pitiable way, is unclear. However, in this context, an excerpt from a letter written by an American soldier Private Nathaniel Adams can be highlighted: “We could have whipped the hell out of the rascals but General Hull has proved himself a traitor and a coward” (Nardo, 2000). Incidentally, after two years of this incident, Hull had to accept death penalty for his acute display of cowardice. However, he was later pardoned by President James Madison. The next battle was obviously much more crucial and the troops needed to cross Niagara and step in to Canada. The army of Americans numbering to 6000 under the commandment of Stephen Van Rensselaer went on to invade Canada6. The Canadian army under the leadership of British Commander General Issac Brock invaded the Americans while they were busy crossing 6Lockau, Laura, Rebecca Gilmour, Jean-Paul Menard, Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan, Ana-Maria Dragomir, Madeleine Mant, Lelia Watamaniuk, and Megan Brickley. "“Buck and Ball”: Identification and interpretation of buckshot injuries to the pelvis from the War of 1812." Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 6 (2016): 424- 433.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
5 HISTORY ESSAY the Niagara River7. The lack of expertise of Rensselaer was evident in his decision to scatter the army. The segregated army was weak and they perished before the might British attack. However, general Brick was also killed in the war. In the October of 1812, Captain Stephen Decatur who was commanding the USS, held back the British battle ship Macedonian adjacent to the Madeira Islands off the North African coast. During this time, Madison who was in active support of the second war with America, won the electoral campaign and was elected as President again. However, this emphasized the forces in opposition to the second war with Britain to indulge in to a revival of the Federalist organization. It was followed by the meeting of all Federalists in New York where they took the major decision of supporting De Witt Clinton, not because of the differential view on war, but as a sign of active protest against the policy of Madison. However, there was still popular support against the war and that is why Madison was able to surface a win with a margin of 39 votes8. This course of events actually gave fuel to the war and in a third battle Captain Hazard Perry led the fleet of 6 vessels on Lake Erie. The British fleet could only sustain the attack of the Americans for 8 minutes after which they ran up their white flags one by one9. As discussed by Lawrence Delbert, Perry had been able to gain victory from the mouth of certain defeat with the dint of aggression. This was a strategic point of time in the war when the Americas were able to capture the Lake Erie, which implied that British troops in Canada would not be able to get supplies any more. Now the way was open before Harrison to conquer Upper Canada and 7Williams, Daniel. "William Henry Harrison and the Conquest of the Ohio Country: Frontier Fighting in the War of 1812 by David Curtis Skaggs." Ohio Valley History 16, no. 2 (2016): 86-88. 8Smith, Nathan. "Worth Fighting For: Canada's Tradition of War Resistance from 1812 to the War on Terror." (2017): 316-318. 9Turner, Frederick Jackson. The significance of the frontier in American history. Charles River Editors via PublishDrive, 2018.
6 HISTORY ESSAY thereby recapture Detroit10. This followed the famous Battle of Thames where Harrison was able to defeat British as well as their allies from India. The Shawnee leader, Tecumseh, the head of the Pan Indian confederation was killed at the battle leading to the abandonment of the British alliance by the Indian forces. Quite strategically, in the same time, French army of Napoleon was also defeated at the Leipzig and this caused Napoleon to retreat from lands of Russia in the year 1812. Immediately after the defeat of Napoleon in the Leipzig battle, the allies offered peace to Napoleon marking the Rhine as well as the Alps as the boundary of France. The offer was disregarded by Napoleon which led to the emergence of a coordinated campaign against the forces of Napoleon who experienced a crushing defeat in multiple battles. The victorious army of the British entered the territory of Paris and it was declared that Napoleon had fled the throne of France. Direct talk between the United States and England was the proposition of British Foreign minister, which finally began in Ghent. In the team of American delegates there was Albert Gallatin, John Quincy Adams, Jonathan Russell, Henry Clay as well as James Bayard. The British led an army of 4000 and the citizens of Washington simply fled the city11. Te defenders of America with the attendance of Madison were swiftly routed by the invaders in the battle of Bladensburg. Followed by that, The First Lady of America, Dolly Madison also fled. The British indulged in to mass destruction of the capital buildings like White House, Capitol as well as other executive buildings. The British had got their greatest success and after bringing down the city of Washington so easily, they were now ensured that there was no other big 10Owsley, Frank Lawrence. Struggle for the Gulf Borderlands: The Creek War and the Battle of New Orleans, 1812- 1815. Library Press at UF, 2017. 11Rouleau, Brian. "Privateers of the Americas: Spanish American Privateering from the United States in the Early Republic by David Head, and: Privateering: Patriots and Profits in the War of 1812 by Faye M. Kert." Journal of the Early Republic 37, no. 2 (2017): 363-366.
7 HISTORY ESSAY impending disaster coming their way. They were also convinced that now they would be easily able to capture Baltimore also. The plan was to sail their ships in to the harbor and then destroy the Fort McHenry with cannon fire. However, Roger states that since the British had initially decidedtoattackWashingtonleavingBaltimore,theAmericansgottheopportunityto accumulate a force of 16000 soldiers as well as civilians. General Ross was killed when he tried to attack en route through the land way. At the time of the Battle of Plattsburg, held over the Lake Champlain, in the year 1814, the Americans threatened a British army of 11000 to retreat under commandment of George Prevost. The Americans were at a point outnumbered three to one. However, they were still able to hold on the supremacy and forced Prevost to move away from the field. Prevost was left with no other option that leaving for Canada. The victory of the Americans over the British army helped them to save New York from being attacked by the British and then laid the foundation for the phase of negotiation between Britain as well as United States in Ghent, Belgium. TheHartfortConventionconvenesasfederalistdelegatesfromVermont,New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and Connecticut. The main motive of the discussion was to discuss their perception about the war. As Michael and Schablitsky states, it was expected that the convention would be highlighting the issues like the secession of England from the States and also argue over negotiating for a separate peace treaty with British12. On the contrary, the federalists proposed some constitutional amendments which needed two third of the votes for being sanctioned as an universal policy for America in context to declaration of war, laws which restricts commerce, resenting the selection of presidents, consequently from the same state and 12Bynum, Victoria E. The Free State of Jones, Movie Edition: Mississippi's Longest Civil War. UNC Press Books, 2016.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
8 HISTORY ESSAY lastly restrict the tenure of presidents by on one term in office after each election. Immediately before the end of the war, these proposals reached the Washington. Signing of the peace treaty fostered all negotiations with Europe to commence the war. However, Laura et al. states that only one month before the launch of the treaty signing campaign, America have had their greatest share of military domination over the British forces. The last as well as most severe battle in the battle of 1812 had been the Battle at New Orleans which had been the most prolonged as well as the final of the major battles between the two sides in the Battle of 1812. Under the commandment of General A. Jackson, the American forces defeated an intruding army of British attempting to seize New Orleans. This battle is referred to as the greatest land victory of the American forces in war. Speedy communication would have easily eliminated this war. Hence, Daniel prefers to call the war of 1812, as the war with lack of communication13. If the reasons behind this war are ambiguous, so are the consequences of it. The consequences of the individual wars had no impact on the final settlement. Most of the battles were being won by the US, often deriving significant concessions from the British army14. However, the war could not bring the enemy to their terms. On the contrary, Nathan states that USA had been lucky enough, to be able to escape without having to make excessive concessions. There was no specific mention of the maritime issues which caused the war in the Treaty of Ghent and there was no alibi saying that the strategic aims of America have been achieved15. On 13DiLorenzo, Thomas. "Yankee Confederates: New England Secession Movements Prior to the War Between the States." In Secession, State, and Liberty, pp. 135-154. Routledge, 2017. 14DiLorenzo, Thomas. "Yankee Confederates: New England Secession Movements Prior to the War Between the States." In Secession, State, and Liberty, pp. 135-154. Routledge, 2017. 15Hattendorf, John B. "Coffins of the Brave: Lake Shipwrecks of the War of 1812 ed. by Kevin J. Crisman." Middle West Review 4, no. 1 (2017): 150-152.
9 HISTORY ESSAY the contrary, Frederick Jackson provided that the war and the treaty merely provided for a return to the status quo ante bellum- the state that had existed before the war. The prosecution had been marred in the war through considerable bungling as well as mismanagement. The nature of the public had been partly responsible for this. As a nation, America was still very much young as well as immature and at that moment the government of the country had also been immature as well as lacking experience. Hence, these factors could be counted as major hindrances in the way of proper execution of a war to lead it to its desirable consequences. Again, as opined by Frank Lawrence, politics had a crucial and deciding role to play in the war. The conflict and the war itself had been vehemently despised by the federalists. Protests against the war came sparingly from the end of the Republicans also. In fact the political as well as the military forces that were playing a crucial role to play in the war were also segregated as well as feuded in their approach among themselves. As Brian analyses, there was mo exhibition of patriotic enthusiasm that have easily evident in the latter wars fought by America. The conflict with the British were supported by the advocates of the war more with the head than their heart. In fact, investment behind the war was also not appropriate. That is why, efforts to raise soldiers as well as funds for the war lagged far behind compared to the requisite volume. In spite of the bungling as well as half hearted support that have been a typical characteristic of this war, the battle of 1812 had its own share of instilling and stirring moments as well as the taste of remarkable victories that were enjoyed by both parties16. The success of the American parties at the Thames at Northwest, the achievement of Chippewa as well as Fort Erie 16Emery, Matthew V., Tracy L. Prowse, Spencer Elford, Henry P. Schwarcz, and Megan Brickley. "Geographic origins of a War of 1812 skeletal sample integrating oxygen and strontium isotopes with GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation analysis." Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 14 (2017): 323-331.
10 HISTORY ESSAY in the vicinity of The Niagara, the rousing of the American defense at Baltimore, as well as the crushing defeat experienced by the British at the hands of the Americans at New Orleans , made it evident that proper leadership as well as training could have helped the American fighters to hold their own in course of their combat against the hardened as well as the regular soldiers of Great Britain. Similarly the victories of the navy at the Lakes of the North as well as the high seas including the success of the privateers all over the world showed that, provided the right odds, the armed ships of America matched well up against the vaunted as well as the seemingly invincible mistress of the seas17. In fact, Victoria analyses that the war also highlighted the extravaganza of some of the heroes who gained in reputation through military and/or government service. The battle helped to catapult four personalities in to the presidency: Quincy Adams, William Henry Harrison, Andrew Jackson, James Monroe as well as Richard Johnson and Calhoun18. The war also gave a big boost to the military as well as political careers of the other personalities associated with the war. In some ways, Thomas analyses that the battle of 1812 overlooked the future to ponder more over the past. This was the second and the last war of the America against Great Britain and this war echoed the ideology as well as issues of the American Revolution. This was the last time in a war when America had been underdog in a war and in fact the last time when the nation attempted to invade America19. However, John B identified that in the course of the war, the more strategic event is that this was the last time that the Indians were playing a crucial role in 17Hooks, Jonathon. "The Man Who Captured Washington: Major General Robert Ross and the War of 1812 by John McCavitt and Christopher T. George." Journal of Southern History 83, no. 3 (2017): 670-671. 18Tucker, Glenn. Poltroons and Patriots: A Popular Account of the War of 1812. Vol. 1. Pickle Partners Publishing, 2018. 19Lucas, Michael T., and Julie M. Schablitsky. "A deserted garrison village: Nottingham, Maryland, and the War of 1812." In Archaeology of the War of 1812, pp. 99-120. Routledge, 2016.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
11 HISTORY ESSAY determination of the future consequences of the whole continent. In this sense, the battle of 1812 had a significant role to play as the last of the colonial wars of North America20. There was an unusual generation of the vehement political opposition and it had been nearly unique in ending in a stalemate on the battle ground. In spite of the fact, that the Americans pretended that they had been victorious in the battle, even going up to the extent of declaring the battle as the second battle for independence, actually America could figure out some sparing gains only, certain none of them had their specification in the peace treaty that could helped to sustain this claim. The lack of success in the war can be the best justification against the fact that the war is so less remembered. As stated by, Matthew et al., the Americans have the innate tendency of characteristically judging the battles on individual and unique criteria of victory and points of success. In this context, Glenn describes that although most of the Americans remember this war as a point of success, in reality it is a subtle failure21. However, it can be discussed with evidence that the obscurity of the battle should not make the people oblivious of the significances associated with it. The war can be identified as a big turning point in the history of the young republic22. Along with the end to this war, the quarter of the century which involved troubled diplomacy gradually ended. The war marked the end of the Federalist party and it also promoted the national self confidence. Finally, the war gave the fledgling republic a host of sayings, symbols, and songs that helped Americans define who they were and where their young republic was headed. Although looking to the past, the war was fraught with consequences for the future, and for this reason it is worth studying today. 20Draper, Theodore. American business and public policy: The politics of foreign trade. Routledge, 2017. 21Billington, Ray Allen. The Historian's Contribution to Anglo-American Misunderstanding: Report of a Committee on National Bias in Anglo-American History Text Books. Routledge, 2016. 22Armstrong, Benjamin. "‘Zeal Intelligence and Intrepidity’: Naval irregular warfare and the War of 1812 on the Lakes." The Mariner's Mirror 103, no. 1 (2017): 30-42.
12 HISTORY ESSAY
13 HISTORY ESSAY Bibliography Armstrong, Benjamin. "‘Zeal Intelligence and Intrepidity’: Naval irregular warfare and the War of 1812 on the Lakes." The Mariner's Mirror 103, no. 1 (2017): 30-42. Billington, Ray Allen. The Historian's Contribution to Anglo-American Misunderstanding: Report of a Committee on National Bias in Anglo-American History Text Books. Routledge, 2016. Bynum, Victoria E. The Free State of Jones, Movie Edition: Mississippi's Longest Civil War. UNC Press Books, 2016. Cox, Ashley. Wilsonian Approaches to American Conflicts: From the War of 1812 to the First Gulf War. Routledge, 2017. Cress, Lawrence Delbert. Citizens in Arms: The Army and Militia in American Society to the War of 1812. UNC Press Books, 2017. DiLorenzo, Thomas. "Yankee Confederates: New England Secession Movements Prior to the War Between the States." In Secession, State, and Liberty, pp. 135-154. Routledge, 2017. Draper, Theodore. American business and public policy: The politics of foreign trade. Routledge, 2017. Emery, Matthew V., Tracy L. Prowse, Spencer Elford, Henry P. Schwarcz, and Megan Brickley. "Geographic origins of a War of 1812 skeletal sample integrating oxygen and strontium isotopes with GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation analysis." Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 14 (2017): 323-331.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
14 HISTORY ESSAY Hattendorf, John B. "Coffins of the Brave: Lake Shipwrecks of the War of 1812 ed. by Kevin J. Crisman." Middle West Review 4, no. 1 (2017): 150-152. Hickey, Donald. "An American Perspective on the War of 1812." PBS. Retrieved May 26 (2018). Hooks, Jonathon. "The Man Who Captured Washington: Major General Robert Ross and the War of 1812 by John McCavitt and Christopher T. George." Journal of Southern History 83, no. 3 (2017): 670-671. Lockau, Laura, Rebecca Gilmour, Jean-Paul Menard, Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan, Ana-Maria Dragomir,MadeleineMant,LeliaWatamaniuk,andMeganBrickley."“BuckandBall”: Identification and interpretation of buckshot injuries to the pelvis from the War of 1812." Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 6 (2016): 424-433. Lucas,MichaelT.,andJulieM.Schablitsky."Adesertedgarrisonvillage:Nottingham, Maryland, and the War of 1812." In Archaeology of the War of 1812, pp. 99-120. Routledge, 2016. Lucas, Michael T., and Julie M. Schablitsky. "Alarum in North America: An Overview of the War of 1812 and a Context to the Archaeological Studies in this Book." In Archaeology of the War of 1812, pp. 19-36. Routledge, 2016. Owsley, Frank Lawrence. Struggle for the Gulf Borderlands: The Creek War and the Battle of New Orleans, 1812-1815. Library Press at UF, 2017. Peace, Roger. "The War of 1812." United States Foreign Policy History and Resource Guide Website (2016).
15 HISTORY ESSAY Rouleau, Brian. "Privateers of the Americas: Spanish American Privateering from the United States in the Early Republic by David Head, and: Privateering: Patriots and Profits in the War of 1812 by Faye M. Kert." Journal of the Early Republic 37, no. 2 (2017): 363-366. Shi, David E., and George Brown Tindall. America: A narrative history. WW Norton & Company, 2016. Smith, Nathan. "Worth Fighting For: Canada's Tradition of War Resistance from 1812 to the War on Terror." (2017): 316-318. Tucker, Glenn. Poltroons and Patriots: A Popular Account of the War of 1812. Vol. 1. Pickle Partners Publishing, 2018. Turner, Frederick Jackson. The significance of the frontier in American history. Charles River Editors via PublishDrive, 2018. Williams, Daniel. "William Henry Harrison and the Conquest of the Ohio Country: Frontier Fighting in the War of 1812 by David Curtis Skaggs." Ohio Valley History 16, no. 2 (2016): 86- 88.