HR Practices and Organizational Structure Presentation 2022
VerifiedAdded on 2022/07/28
|11
|714
|17
Presentation
AI Summary
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
HR Practices and
Organizational
Structure
Semco Case Study
Organizational
Structure
Semco Case Study
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Introduction
The presentation will discuss:
– The Background of Semco
– Situational Analysis
– Description of the Areas of Problem
– HR Practices
– Leadership
– Strategic Focus
– Supporting theories
– Recommendations
The presentation will discuss:
– The Background of Semco
– Situational Analysis
– Description of the Areas of Problem
– HR Practices
– Leadership
– Strategic Focus
– Supporting theories
– Recommendations
The Background of Semco
– Semco was established in Brazil in 1953
– Austrian Immigrant Antonio Curt Semler founded the company
– Since then the company offers marine pumps as manufacturers
– 90% of the companies products were supplied to Brazilian ship makers
– The company was hierarchy based and was governed by various policies.
– Semco was established in Brazil in 1953
– Austrian Immigrant Antonio Curt Semler founded the company
– Since then the company offers marine pumps as manufacturers
– 90% of the companies products were supplied to Brazilian ship makers
– The company was hierarchy based and was governed by various policies.
Situational Analysis
– The company was experiencing financial distress in 1982.
– The company was taken over by Ricardo Semler, that year
– Semler was appointed as the CEO of the company
– He focused on improving the financial capabilities of the company.
– Authoritarian approach was adopted by the CEO, creating pressure and
mounting stress.
– Appointed managers pushed employees
– Thus, building unfavorable culture
– The company was experiencing financial distress in 1982.
– The company was taken over by Ricardo Semler, that year
– Semler was appointed as the CEO of the company
– He focused on improving the financial capabilities of the company.
– Authoritarian approach was adopted by the CEO, creating pressure and
mounting stress.
– Appointed managers pushed employees
– Thus, building unfavorable culture
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Situational Analysis
– New employee appointment were being made in the company
– Loyal employees were being laid off.
– Semler himself, various managers and employees had to put in long hours at
work
– There was a point that the stress got to Semler and he fainted while touring the
pump factory
– Hence, new approaches were decided to be taken in terms of HRE practices,
Leadership and Strategic Focus
– New employee appointment were being made in the company
– Loyal employees were being laid off.
– Semler himself, various managers and employees had to put in long hours at
work
– There was a point that the stress got to Semler and he fainted while touring the
pump factory
– Hence, new approaches were decided to be taken in terms of HRE practices,
Leadership and Strategic Focus
Description of the Areas of
Problem: HR Practices
– HR Practices (Before)
– Employee loyalty not valued
– Uninformed change management
– Stressful shifts
– HR Practices (After)
– Flexible work hours
– Employees evaluated on the basis of target achievement not on the basis of hours
worked.
– Focus on employee wellbeing
Problem: HR Practices
– HR Practices (Before)
– Employee loyalty not valued
– Uninformed change management
– Stressful shifts
– HR Practices (After)
– Flexible work hours
– Employees evaluated on the basis of target achievement not on the basis of hours
worked.
– Focus on employee wellbeing
Description of the Areas of
Problem: Leadership
– Leadership (Before)
– Lack of empathy
– Rigid leadership and hierarchy
– Authoritarian style leaders appointed
– Leadership (After)
– Leaders of appraised regularly
– Feedback taken from leadership experts
– Leadership positions had to be earned now
Problem: Leadership
– Leadership (Before)
– Lack of empathy
– Rigid leadership and hierarchy
– Authoritarian style leaders appointed
– Leadership (After)
– Leaders of appraised regularly
– Feedback taken from leadership experts
– Leadership positions had to be earned now
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Description of the Areas of
Problem: Strategic Focus
– Strategic Focus (Before)
– High Productivity though extra efforts
– Lack of focus on factors such as motivation and organisational culture
– Lack transparency and management focus
– Strategic Focus (After)
– Maintaining transparent operations
– Operations are driven by individuals
– Mutual relationship between management and employees
Problem: Strategic Focus
– Strategic Focus (Before)
– High Productivity though extra efforts
– Lack of focus on factors such as motivation and organisational culture
– Lack transparency and management focus
– Strategic Focus (After)
– Maintaining transparent operations
– Operations are driven by individuals
– Mutual relationship between management and employees
Supporting theories
Following are the theories that relate to the case
Authoritarian Leadership:
– Authoritarian Leadership is also known as autocratic leadership (Zheng et al. 2019)
– Leadership style in which leaders control all operations and make all decisions (Fiaz, Su and Saqib 2017)
– Judgements made on individual assessment of situations
Organizational Structure:
– Functional: Structure based on functional divisions (Bai et al. 2017)
– Divisional: Structure based on geographical location
– Matrix: Structure developed on the basis of Projects and Functional competencies (Lukinaitė and Sondaitė
2017).
– Flatarchy: Structure that is a characterized by horizonal integration of functional divisions (Aleem et al. 2019)
Following are the theories that relate to the case
Authoritarian Leadership:
– Authoritarian Leadership is also known as autocratic leadership (Zheng et al. 2019)
– Leadership style in which leaders control all operations and make all decisions (Fiaz, Su and Saqib 2017)
– Judgements made on individual assessment of situations
Organizational Structure:
– Functional: Structure based on functional divisions (Bai et al. 2017)
– Divisional: Structure based on geographical location
– Matrix: Structure developed on the basis of Projects and Functional competencies (Lukinaitė and Sondaitė
2017).
– Flatarchy: Structure that is a characterized by horizonal integration of functional divisions (Aleem et al. 2019)
Recommendations
Following can be recommended:
– Listening the needs of the employees
– Paying importance to organizational culture
– Staying up to date with best HR practices
– Establishing smooth communication framework
Following can be recommended:
– Listening the needs of the employees
– Paying importance to organizational culture
– Staying up to date with best HR practices
– Establishing smooth communication framework
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
REFERENCES
Aleem, S., Batool, R., Ahmed, F. and Khattak, A., 2019, November. Guidelines for Key Organizational Factors
for SaaS Organizations. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Big Data Research (pp.
83-87).
Bai, W., Feng, Y., Yue, Y. and Feng, L., 2017. Organizational structure, cross-functional integration and
performance of new product development team. Procedia engineering, 174, pp.621-629.
Fiaz, M., Su, Q. and Saqib, A., 2017. Leadership styles and employees' motivation: Perspective from an
emerging economy. The Journal of Developing Areas, 51(4), pp.143-156.
Lukinaitė, E. and Sondaitė, J., 2017. Mindset of employees working in a matrix organizational
structure. Business: Theory and Practice, 18, pp.144-151.
Zheng, Y., Huang, X., Redman, T., Graham, L. and Hu, S., 2019. Deterrence effects: the role of authoritarian
leadership in controlling employee workplace deviance. Management and Organization Review.
Aleem, S., Batool, R., Ahmed, F. and Khattak, A., 2019, November. Guidelines for Key Organizational Factors
for SaaS Organizations. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Big Data Research (pp.
83-87).
Bai, W., Feng, Y., Yue, Y. and Feng, L., 2017. Organizational structure, cross-functional integration and
performance of new product development team. Procedia engineering, 174, pp.621-629.
Fiaz, M., Su, Q. and Saqib, A., 2017. Leadership styles and employees' motivation: Perspective from an
emerging economy. The Journal of Developing Areas, 51(4), pp.143-156.
Lukinaitė, E. and Sondaitė, J., 2017. Mindset of employees working in a matrix organizational
structure. Business: Theory and Practice, 18, pp.144-151.
Zheng, Y., Huang, X., Redman, T., Graham, L. and Hu, S., 2019. Deterrence effects: the role of authoritarian
leadership in controlling employee workplace deviance. Management and Organization Review.
1 out of 11
Related Documents
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.