Impact of IFRS Framework on Intangible Assets of Wesfarmers Ltd
VerifiedAdded on 2023/06/08
|13
|2422
|215
AI Summary
This assessment analyzes the impact of IFRS framework on intangible assets of Wesfarmers Ltd. It considers accounting standards related to AASB 138 and AASB 136. The assessment also reviews two articles to establish the overall impact on financial reporting work. The negative impacts of IFRS framework are discussed along with the impact on intangible assets of Wesfarmers Ltd.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTING
Foundations in accounting
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note
Foundations in accounting
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTING
Table of Contents
Introduction:...............................................................................................................................2
Discussion..................................................................................................................................2
Implementation of IFRS Framework.........................................................................................2
Negative Impacts........................................................................................................................4
Impact of IFRS in relation to intangible assets of Wesfarmers Ltd:..........................................4
Conclusion:................................................................................................................................7
References list:...........................................................................................................................9
Table of Contents
Introduction:...............................................................................................................................2
Discussion..................................................................................................................................2
Implementation of IFRS Framework.........................................................................................2
Negative Impacts........................................................................................................................4
Impact of IFRS in relation to intangible assets of Wesfarmers Ltd:..........................................4
Conclusion:................................................................................................................................7
References list:...........................................................................................................................9
FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTING
Introduction:
The main purpose of this assessment is to analyze the impact of IFRS framework for
the purpose of meeting the reporting requirements of the business. The assessment will be
considering reporting for intangibles assets for a company which is Wesfarmer ltd which
operates in Australia. The assessment will also be considering review of two articles for the
purpose of ensuring the overall impact on the financial reporting work is clearly established.
In addition to this, the assessment will be considering accounting standards which are related
to AASB 138 and AASB 136.
Discussion
Implementation of IFRS Framework
International Framework Reporting Standards are international standards which are
introduced in order to bring about a universality in the accounting practices which are
followed by companies in Australia. IFRS framework was introduced in 2005 and
implemented in the same year in Australia. The overall impact of the implementation has far
reaching results as it brings about both positive and negative impact on the reporting
framework (Saidu& Dauda, 2014).In the case of implementation of AASB 138 which is
related to intangible assets of the business.
The impact of intangible assets can be judged by the analysis of article which is
provided in the question. One of the article states the impact of implementation of the new
accounting standards which are related to intangible assets of the business deals with the
reaction of different businesses on the implementation of the new accounting framework
(Jermakowicz, Reinstein&Churyk, 2014). The article states that the with the introduction of
IFRS framework has resulted in valuing the intangible assets at cost which in turn has
Introduction:
The main purpose of this assessment is to analyze the impact of IFRS framework for
the purpose of meeting the reporting requirements of the business. The assessment will be
considering reporting for intangibles assets for a company which is Wesfarmer ltd which
operates in Australia. The assessment will also be considering review of two articles for the
purpose of ensuring the overall impact on the financial reporting work is clearly established.
In addition to this, the assessment will be considering accounting standards which are related
to AASB 138 and AASB 136.
Discussion
Implementation of IFRS Framework
International Framework Reporting Standards are international standards which are
introduced in order to bring about a universality in the accounting practices which are
followed by companies in Australia. IFRS framework was introduced in 2005 and
implemented in the same year in Australia. The overall impact of the implementation has far
reaching results as it brings about both positive and negative impact on the reporting
framework (Saidu& Dauda, 2014).In the case of implementation of AASB 138 which is
related to intangible assets of the business.
The impact of intangible assets can be judged by the analysis of article which is
provided in the question. One of the article states the impact of implementation of the new
accounting standards which are related to intangible assets of the business deals with the
reaction of different businesses on the implementation of the new accounting framework
(Jermakowicz, Reinstein&Churyk, 2014). The article states that the with the introduction of
IFRS framework has resulted in valuing the intangible assets at cost which in turn has
FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTING
resulted in the reduction of the assets of the business significantly(Yao, Percy & Hu,2015).
The implementation will force the businesses to write down the values of the intangible assets
of the business which will be including assets such as patents, trademarks licenses etc. In
certain big companies, the overall value of intangibles assets was above $ 40 to $ 50 billion
before the implementations of the new accounting framework in the business.
As per Para 21 of AASB 138, an intangible asset of a business is recognized on if the
following provisions are satisfied:
It is probable that the future expected benefits which are associated with the assets
will be flowing to the business as expected.
The cost of the assets can be reliably measured.
As per para 24 of AASB 138, an intangible asset of a business is to be valued at cost
initially (Steenkamp & Steenkamp, 2016). The reduction in the intangible assets of the
business will be writing the value of the assets of the business as there is no solid or liquid
market for judging the value of intangible assets of the business (Kung et al., 2013). The
above provision needs to be followed by companies in Australia in measuring and
recognizing intangible assets of the business. In addition to this, the companies also need to
follow provisions for impairment of assets of the business as stated in ASSB 136 (Bepari,
Rahman &Mollik, 2014). As per para 10 of AASB 138, companies need to test assets which
have indefinite life or intangibles assets so that any deduction in the value of asset or
impairment loss can be recognized (Bond, Govendir& Wells, 2016). The impairment test will
be done by making comparison of assets recoverable amount with that of carrying amount. In
addition to this, there is a provision that in case an intangible asset is recognized in current
year than the same is to be tested before the end of the current annual period.
resulted in the reduction of the assets of the business significantly(Yao, Percy & Hu,2015).
The implementation will force the businesses to write down the values of the intangible assets
of the business which will be including assets such as patents, trademarks licenses etc. In
certain big companies, the overall value of intangibles assets was above $ 40 to $ 50 billion
before the implementations of the new accounting framework in the business.
As per Para 21 of AASB 138, an intangible asset of a business is recognized on if the
following provisions are satisfied:
It is probable that the future expected benefits which are associated with the assets
will be flowing to the business as expected.
The cost of the assets can be reliably measured.
As per para 24 of AASB 138, an intangible asset of a business is to be valued at cost
initially (Steenkamp & Steenkamp, 2016). The reduction in the intangible assets of the
business will be writing the value of the assets of the business as there is no solid or liquid
market for judging the value of intangible assets of the business (Kung et al., 2013). The
above provision needs to be followed by companies in Australia in measuring and
recognizing intangible assets of the business. In addition to this, the companies also need to
follow provisions for impairment of assets of the business as stated in ASSB 136 (Bepari,
Rahman &Mollik, 2014). As per para 10 of AASB 138, companies need to test assets which
have indefinite life or intangibles assets so that any deduction in the value of asset or
impairment loss can be recognized (Bond, Govendir& Wells, 2016). The impairment test will
be done by making comparison of assets recoverable amount with that of carrying amount. In
addition to this, there is a provision that in case an intangible asset is recognized in current
year than the same is to be tested before the end of the current annual period.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTING
Negative Impacts
The negative impacts which are can be identified due to the implementation of IFRS
framework in on a business is mainly related to the cutting down of profits of the business
and also the total assets of the business. As the provisions of AASB 138, requires businesses
to record intangible assets at cost initially, the total assets of a company especially a company
which have a high percentage of intellectual property have effectively reduced. As per the
articles which are provided in the assessment, major companies such as Coca-Cola Amatil,
Foster ltd. In addition to this, fall in the total assets of the business will affect presentability
of the financial statements of the business (Ji, 2013). In addition to this, the fall in the value
of the assets will affect the ability of the business to procure funds from the capital market.
Moreover, it is also not certain whether the implementation of the accounting standard will be
bringing better quality of information and disclosure for the same.
Impact of IFRS in relation to intangible assets of Wesfarmers Ltd:
The Australian accounting standard board AASB 138 requires specifying the
disclosures about intangible assets and the amount at which they are being carried.
Organizations complying with this standard are not required to write down their intangible
assets if they are carried or acquired at costs (Garg, 2017). In event of internal revaluation,
the amounts by which the assets have been revalued have to be written down.
The intangible assets that have been acquired by Wesfarmers Limited are measured
by recognizing it initially at cost. Intangible assets cost at the acquisition date that has been
gained in a business combination is measured at their fair value. After the assets are
recognized initially, intangible assets are determined at cost by deducting impairment loss
and amortization. Amortization of intangible assets having finite lives is done over their
useful lives on a straight line basis (Steenkamp & Steenkamp, 2016). Such assets are
Negative Impacts
The negative impacts which are can be identified due to the implementation of IFRS
framework in on a business is mainly related to the cutting down of profits of the business
and also the total assets of the business. As the provisions of AASB 138, requires businesses
to record intangible assets at cost initially, the total assets of a company especially a company
which have a high percentage of intellectual property have effectively reduced. As per the
articles which are provided in the assessment, major companies such as Coca-Cola Amatil,
Foster ltd. In addition to this, fall in the total assets of the business will affect presentability
of the financial statements of the business (Ji, 2013). In addition to this, the fall in the value
of the assets will affect the ability of the business to procure funds from the capital market.
Moreover, it is also not certain whether the implementation of the accounting standard will be
bringing better quality of information and disclosure for the same.
Impact of IFRS in relation to intangible assets of Wesfarmers Ltd:
The Australian accounting standard board AASB 138 requires specifying the
disclosures about intangible assets and the amount at which they are being carried.
Organizations complying with this standard are not required to write down their intangible
assets if they are carried or acquired at costs (Garg, 2017). In event of internal revaluation,
the amounts by which the assets have been revalued have to be written down.
The intangible assets that have been acquired by Wesfarmers Limited are measured
by recognizing it initially at cost. Intangible assets cost at the acquisition date that has been
gained in a business combination is measured at their fair value. After the assets are
recognized initially, intangible assets are determined at cost by deducting impairment loss
and amortization. Amortization of intangible assets having finite lives is done over their
useful lives on a straight line basis (Steenkamp & Steenkamp, 2016). Such assets are
FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTING
impaired when there is any indication of impairment. Intangible assets having indistinct lives
on other hand are hardened for impairment as goodwill.
Organization is required to review the assets for impairment according to AASB 136
and the standard requires assessing the intangible assets for impairment when there is any
indication for the same. Wesfarmers makes the assessment of intangible assets whether there
is any indication of impairment as required by Australian accounting standard (Yao et al.,
2015).
The intangible assets of Wesfarmers comprised of brand, contractual and non
contractual relationships, gaming and liquor license and software. Brand, gaming and liquor
licenses have indefinite useful lives and reviewing of assets with an assumed indefinite lives
are done at each reporting period for determining whether such assumptions are appropriate.
If the assumptions are found to be inappropriate, the assumptions regarding the useful
lives are changed to finite life and any change in accounting estimate helps in accounting any
prospectively of assets. Intangible assets such as software, contractual and non contractual
relationships have finite lives of seven years and fifteen years respectively. Intangible assets
of Wesfarmers that have arisen through business combination that comprise of contractual
and non contractual relationships (Cheung & Lau, 2016).
impaired when there is any indication of impairment. Intangible assets having indistinct lives
on other hand are hardened for impairment as goodwill.
Organization is required to review the assets for impairment according to AASB 136
and the standard requires assessing the intangible assets for impairment when there is any
indication for the same. Wesfarmers makes the assessment of intangible assets whether there
is any indication of impairment as required by Australian accounting standard (Yao et al.,
2015).
The intangible assets of Wesfarmers comprised of brand, contractual and non
contractual relationships, gaming and liquor license and software. Brand, gaming and liquor
licenses have indefinite useful lives and reviewing of assets with an assumed indefinite lives
are done at each reporting period for determining whether such assumptions are appropriate.
If the assumptions are found to be inappropriate, the assumptions regarding the useful
lives are changed to finite life and any change in accounting estimate helps in accounting any
prospectively of assets. Intangible assets such as software, contractual and non contractual
relationships have finite lives of seven years and fifteen years respectively. Intangible assets
of Wesfarmers that have arisen through business combination that comprise of contractual
and non contractual relationships (Cheung & Lau, 2016).
FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTING
Intangible assets:
(Source: Wesfarmers.com.au, 2018)
AASB 136 paragraph 88 requires reporting entity to make the assessment of useful
lives of intangible assets whether it is infinite or finite in length. An intangible asset is
considered by reporting entity having indefinite useful lives by making the analysis of all
relevant factors attributable to the same (Hu et al., 2015). If the period over which net cash
flows for entity are generated does not have any foreseeable limit, then the lives of intangible
assets are considered to be imprecise. Amortization of intangible assets is done when it has
finite useful lives as per paragraph 97-107. As per paragraph 107-110, the intangible assets
having indefinite useful lives are not amortized. The total amount of intangible assets
recorded during the financial year 2016 and 2017 stood at $ 4553 million and $ 4539 million
respectively (Wesfarmers.com.au, 2018).
Intangible assets:
(Source: Wesfarmers.com.au, 2018)
AASB 136 paragraph 88 requires reporting entity to make the assessment of useful
lives of intangible assets whether it is infinite or finite in length. An intangible asset is
considered by reporting entity having indefinite useful lives by making the analysis of all
relevant factors attributable to the same (Hu et al., 2015). If the period over which net cash
flows for entity are generated does not have any foreseeable limit, then the lives of intangible
assets are considered to be imprecise. Amortization of intangible assets is done when it has
finite useful lives as per paragraph 97-107. As per paragraph 107-110, the intangible assets
having indefinite useful lives are not amortized. The total amount of intangible assets
recorded during the financial year 2016 and 2017 stood at $ 4553 million and $ 4539 million
respectively (Wesfarmers.com.au, 2018).
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTING
Wesfarmers has certain brands which have been assessed to have indefinite lives
based on different factors such as ongoing expected probability, strong brand strength and
continuing support. Some of the complimentary assets that are incorporated in the brand
include network, store formats and product offerings. In addition to this, the group has
assessed liquor license and gaming having indefinite lives and such assessment is based on
the fact that it is required to renew licenses in line with the requirements of business
continuity (Su et al., 2018).
Moreover, the intangible assets of Wesfarmers having indefinite lives are allocated to
cash generating units. Allocation of intangible assets having indistinct lives are done to cash
generating units is recorded at $ 3944 million and $ 3945 million respectively. Assessment of
recoverable amount of intangible assets having indefinite lives is done by group by making
some assumptions which comprise of discount rate, computation of terminal value as
percentage of recoverable value of cash generating unit, growth rate that is beyond corporate
plan and headroom as a percentage of net carrying value of cash generating unit (Bond et al.,
2016).
Conclusion:
Adoption of International financial reporting standard by Wesfarmers has required
changing their accounting policy. Implementation of such reporting standard incurred
considerable expenses that had resulted in reduced retained earnings in earlier year. It can be
concluded from the analysis of impact of such international reporting standard in relation to
intangible assets that Wesfarmers comply with the recognition criteria. In addition to this,
organization provides the specification of how the carrying amount of intangible assets is
measured. In relation to impairment of intangible assets, group has also conducted the
Wesfarmers has certain brands which have been assessed to have indefinite lives
based on different factors such as ongoing expected probability, strong brand strength and
continuing support. Some of the complimentary assets that are incorporated in the brand
include network, store formats and product offerings. In addition to this, the group has
assessed liquor license and gaming having indefinite lives and such assessment is based on
the fact that it is required to renew licenses in line with the requirements of business
continuity (Su et al., 2018).
Moreover, the intangible assets of Wesfarmers having indefinite lives are allocated to
cash generating units. Allocation of intangible assets having indistinct lives are done to cash
generating units is recorded at $ 3944 million and $ 3945 million respectively. Assessment of
recoverable amount of intangible assets having indefinite lives is done by group by making
some assumptions which comprise of discount rate, computation of terminal value as
percentage of recoverable value of cash generating unit, growth rate that is beyond corporate
plan and headroom as a percentage of net carrying value of cash generating unit (Bond et al.,
2016).
Conclusion:
Adoption of International financial reporting standard by Wesfarmers has required
changing their accounting policy. Implementation of such reporting standard incurred
considerable expenses that had resulted in reduced retained earnings in earlier year. It can be
concluded from the analysis of impact of such international reporting standard in relation to
intangible assets that Wesfarmers comply with the recognition criteria. In addition to this,
organization provides the specification of how the carrying amount of intangible assets is
measured. In relation to impairment of intangible assets, group has also conducted the
FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTING
assessment as per the requirements of Australian accounting standards. Therefore, it can be
concluded Wesfarmers has complied with the reporting requirement of intangible assets.
assessment as per the requirements of Australian accounting standards. Therefore, it can be
concluded Wesfarmers has complied with the reporting requirement of intangible assets.
FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTING
References list:
Bepari, M. K., Rahman, S. F., &Mollik, A. T. (2014). Firms' compliance with the disclosure
requirements of IFRS for goodwill impairment testing: Effect of the global financial
crisis and other firm characteristics. Journal of Accounting and Organizational
Change, 10(1), 116-149.
Bond, D., Govendir, B., & Wells, P. (2016). An evaluation of asset impairment decisions by
Australian firms and whether this was impacted by AASB 136.
Bond, D., Govendir, B., & Wells, P. (2016). An evaluation of asset impairments by
Australian firms and whether they were impacted by AASB 136. Accounting &
Finance, 56(1), 259-288.
Cheung, E., & Lau, J. (2016). Readability of Notes to the Financial Statements and the
Adoption of IFRS. Australian Accounting Review, 26(2), 162-176.
Garg, M. (2017). Analysis of Hidden Value and Value Relevance of Financial Statements
Pre-and Post-IFRS Adoption. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 13(2), 51-
74.
Hu, F., Percy, M., & Yao, D. (2015). Asset revaluations and earnings management: Evidence
from Australian companies. Corporate Ownership and Control, 13(1), 930-939.
Jermakowicz, E. K., Reinstein, A., &Churyk, N. T. (2014). IFRS framework-based case
study: DaimlerChrysler–Adopting IFRS accounting policies. Journal of Accounting
Education, 32(3), 288-304.
References list:
Bepari, M. K., Rahman, S. F., &Mollik, A. T. (2014). Firms' compliance with the disclosure
requirements of IFRS for goodwill impairment testing: Effect of the global financial
crisis and other firm characteristics. Journal of Accounting and Organizational
Change, 10(1), 116-149.
Bond, D., Govendir, B., & Wells, P. (2016). An evaluation of asset impairment decisions by
Australian firms and whether this was impacted by AASB 136.
Bond, D., Govendir, B., & Wells, P. (2016). An evaluation of asset impairments by
Australian firms and whether they were impacted by AASB 136. Accounting &
Finance, 56(1), 259-288.
Cheung, E., & Lau, J. (2016). Readability of Notes to the Financial Statements and the
Adoption of IFRS. Australian Accounting Review, 26(2), 162-176.
Garg, M. (2017). Analysis of Hidden Value and Value Relevance of Financial Statements
Pre-and Post-IFRS Adoption. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 13(2), 51-
74.
Hu, F., Percy, M., & Yao, D. (2015). Asset revaluations and earnings management: Evidence
from Australian companies. Corporate Ownership and Control, 13(1), 930-939.
Jermakowicz, E. K., Reinstein, A., &Churyk, N. T. (2014). IFRS framework-based case
study: DaimlerChrysler–Adopting IFRS accounting policies. Journal of Accounting
Education, 32(3), 288-304.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTING
Ji, K. (2013). Better late than never, the timing of goodwill impairment testing in
Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 23(4), 369-379.
Kung, F. H., James, K., Cheng, C. L., & Jaafar, S. B. (2013). The Association between
Goodwill Amortisation and the Dividend Payout Ratio. Asian Journal of Business and
Accounting, 6(2).
Saidu, S., & Dauda, U. (2014). An assessment of compliance with IFRS framework at first-
time adoption by the quoted banks in Nigeria. Journal of Finance and
Accounting, 2(3), 64-73.
Steenkamp, N., & Steenkamp, S. (2016). AASB 138: catalyst for managerial decisions
reducing R&D spending?. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 14(1),
116-130.
Steenkamp, N., & Steenkamp, S. (2016). AASB 138: catalyst for managerial decisions
reducing R&D spending?. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 14(1),
116-130.
Su, W. H., & Wells, P. (2018). Acquisition premiums and the recognition of identifiable
intangible assets in business combinations pre and post IFRS adoption. Accounting
Research Journal, (just-accepted), 00-00.
Wesfarmers.com.au. (2018). Retrieved 9 August 2018, from
https://www.wesfarmers.com.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/2017-
annual-report.pdf?sfvrsn=0
Yao, D. F. T., Percy, M., & Hu, F. (2015). Fair value accounting for non-current assets and
audit fees: Evidence from Australian companies. Journal of Contemporary
Accounting & Economics, 11(1), 31-45.
Ji, K. (2013). Better late than never, the timing of goodwill impairment testing in
Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 23(4), 369-379.
Kung, F. H., James, K., Cheng, C. L., & Jaafar, S. B. (2013). The Association between
Goodwill Amortisation and the Dividend Payout Ratio. Asian Journal of Business and
Accounting, 6(2).
Saidu, S., & Dauda, U. (2014). An assessment of compliance with IFRS framework at first-
time adoption by the quoted banks in Nigeria. Journal of Finance and
Accounting, 2(3), 64-73.
Steenkamp, N., & Steenkamp, S. (2016). AASB 138: catalyst for managerial decisions
reducing R&D spending?. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 14(1),
116-130.
Steenkamp, N., & Steenkamp, S. (2016). AASB 138: catalyst for managerial decisions
reducing R&D spending?. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 14(1),
116-130.
Su, W. H., & Wells, P. (2018). Acquisition premiums and the recognition of identifiable
intangible assets in business combinations pre and post IFRS adoption. Accounting
Research Journal, (just-accepted), 00-00.
Wesfarmers.com.au. (2018). Retrieved 9 August 2018, from
https://www.wesfarmers.com.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/2017-
annual-report.pdf?sfvrsn=0
Yao, D. F. T., Percy, M., & Hu, F. (2015). Fair value accounting for non-current assets and
audit fees: Evidence from Australian companies. Journal of Contemporary
Accounting & Economics, 11(1), 31-45.
FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTING
FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTING
1 out of 13
Related Documents
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.