Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions by British and French Nation
Verified
Added on 2023/01/16
|10
|718
|21
PowerPoint Presentation
AI Summary
This presentation explores the cultural dimensions of British and French nations according to Hofstede's framework and discusses the challenges they face and ways to overcome them.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Individuals in Society
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
INTRODUCTION This presentation is going to show some different dimensions of culture in which different nations such as British and French operate. It will also show some challenges whichboth nations have to face due to their culture and ways of performing.
Hofstede's cultural dimensions by British and French nation Hofstede's cultural dimension is an effective framework that shows effects of a society's culture on all members' value as all these values related to human behaviour. As per this theory there are mainly 4 cultural values which are being adopted by 2 nations such as: British and French. Different dimensions are described as below: Power distance:In the context of power distance it can be said that it shows a degree to which the less powerful members of an organization or different countries accept as well as expect that the power is distributed unequally. It is stated that French managers have high competition units and also provided less feedback's for mutual adjustments than British managers. It shows that French managers have less ineffective and high power distance than British.
Cont... Uncertainty avoidance/ Acceptance:Uncertainty avoidance shows tolerance power of different societies for ambiguity. Those societies or organizations who have high degree then they opt for stiff codes of behaviors and a lower degree shows more acceptance of differing thoughts. British have high degree whereas, French managers have lower degree as they have more control over their work but have less mutual understanding. Masculine/feminine:Masculinity shows a preference of male workers in the society for achievement and material rewards for success. On the other hand, in femininity, respective societies tend to display different values as they share caring views. British is masculinity type in which they are recognized by encouragement and French is femininity type in which all members are being valued.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Challenges faced by British and French and ways to overcome them. Low morale:Due to different power distance, it is stated that British managers have high power distance due to which power of controlling is distributed unequally among members. This can create the problem of low morale as people feel discriminated.
Cont... Lower productivity:As per the other element of cultural dimensions, French and British focus on individualism rather collectivism in which all members of an organization have their personal way of performing activities and goals which can sometimes lower the productivity and can have negative impacts on relationship.
Cont... Conflicts: In the uncertainty avoidance and acceptance it is stated that British managers have mutual understanding and ability to accept risks and diversity. Whereas, French do not consider this they have more control but still have lack mutual understanding which can create situation of conflicts.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Cont... Private and personal benefits:Channel tunnel is consider as the beneficial infrastructure project. It gives high speed passenger services between London and Paris which is beneficial for customers and business as it cut cost and time.
REFERENCES Bauer, F., Matzler, K. and Wolf, S., 2016. M&A and innovation: The role of integration and cultural differences—A central European targets perspective.International Business Review.25(1). pp.76-86. Beugelsdijk, S., Kostova, T. and Roth, K., 2017. An overview of Hofstede-inspired country-level culture research in international business since 2006.Journal of International Business Studies.48(1). pp.30-47. Kaasa, A., Vadi, M. and Varblane, U., 2016. A new dataset of cultural distances for European countries and regions.Research in International Business and Finance.37.pp.231-241. Kim, S., 2017. National culture and public service motivation: investigating the relationship using Hofstede’s five cultural dimensions. International Review of Administrative Sciences.83(1_suppl), pp.23-40. Zhang, C., 2019. Mobile Borders and Turbulent Mobilities: Mapping the Geopolitics of the Channel Tunnel.Geopolitics.24(3). pp.728- 755.