Ingogo Company: Background, Industry, Customer, Competitor, SWOT Analysis

This presentation provides an overview of Ingogo, an Australian organization that specializes in online taxi booking and payments. It includes an analysis of the taxi industry, macro forces affecting the company, customer and competitor analysis, and a SWOT analysis. The presentation concludes with a summary of the company's strengths and weaknesses, as well as opportunities and potential problems.

P R E S E N T E D B Y …
INGOGO COMPANY

Background information of the company service
Organizational analysis
It is an Australian organization which specializes in online taxi booking and
payments (Royle & Laing, 2014).
Ingogo is taxi bookings and payments service for the passengers and
drivers.
The organization provides a mobile app and website which is easiest way to
book any kind of taxi for now, later- anywhere and on any given device.
Cab drivers process fares utilizing customized mobile application on
Android smartphones (Hall & Krueger, 2015).
The company at present serves Adelaide, Melbourne, Perth, Brisbane and
Sydney.
They have GPs-enable booking system and allow nearby taxi service to pick
up fares regardless of taxi services.

Industry definition
Taxi industry refers to kind of vehicles for rent
with a driver , employed by just one
passenger or small number of the
passengers, more regularly for the non-
shared drive ( Chan, Chang, Lau, Law & Lei,
2016 )
A taxicab generally conveys travelers
between the destinations of their choice(Chan,
Chang, Lau, Law & Lei, 2016).

Macro force analysis
PEST framework
Political factor
At first they faced controversy; in their development they did not have clear regulations
Difficult to pinpoint insurance lie (Cramer & Krueger, 2016).
Economics factors
The industry operate in sharing economy
Uber hires drivers to respond to the customer as well as drive to location
It is deemed cheaper than taxis and easier booking (Bhalla, 2013)
Social factor
Booking and pick up is easier utilizing the Smartphone
It requires no communication rather presses of the button.
The clients enjoys the rides (Tan, Tan & Land, 2015).
Technological factor
Consumers make their booking through the app (Cramer & Krueger, 2016).
An estimate of the ride appears in the app
The customer can pay for the ride in advance with the app

Customer analysis
The organization was the first transportation service in
Australia to offer riders with fixed rates.
Their main customers are located in Metropolitan Sydney,
Melbourne, Brisbane and Adelaide (Järvinen,Tollinen,
Karjaluoto & Jayawardhena, 2012).
These are areas which they currently operate.

Competitor analysis
The man competitor of the organization is Uber- Ticktoc.
This is a Smartphone application for booking taxi and
hires cars (Royle & Laing, 2014).

Other stakeholders’ analysis
Client/passengers- convenience, safety while riding
(Karjaluoto, Mustonen & Ulkuniemi, 2015).
Partners and drivers- Good payment, safety
Company executives/ directors- defend the organization
through counter-lawsuits (Karjaluoto& Ulkuniemi, 2015).

SWOT analysis
Strengths
Well trained employees
Strong, market-driven business model(Aarhaug &
Skollerud, 2014).
Weaknesses
Inability to raise large amount of capital (Hou, 2018).

Problem and opportunity statement
Opportunities
Participation in high demand industry
Steady future demand (Aarhaug & Skollerud, 2014).
Problem
Potential competition from franchise.

Conclusion
Ingogo has been a booking and payment services to
passengers and drivers.
They offer a mobile app and their websites are the easiest
way to book any kind of taxi
They have dominated the Australian market for a long
time.
The company can let track the location of taxi on map and
one can call driver or send a text
There has been situational analysis done on the company.

References
Aarhaug, J., & Skollerud, K. (2014). Taxi: different solutions in different segments. Transportation Research Procedia, 1(1), 276-283.
Bhalla, M. (2013). Waterfall versus sprinkler product launch strategy: Influencing the herd. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 61(1),
138-165.
Chan, J. W., Chang, V. L., Lau, W. K., Law, L. K., & Lei, C. J. (2016). Taxi App Market Analysis in Hong Kong. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 4(3).
Cramer, J., & Krueger, A. B. (2016). Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber. American Economic Review, 106(5), 177-82.
Hall, J. V., & Krueger, A. B. (2015). An analysis of the labor market for Uber’s driver-partners in the United States. ILR Review, 0019793917717222.
Hou, Z. (2018). The Impact on Traditional Taxi Industry of Taxi-Calling Mobile Apps: a Case Study in Chengdu, China (No. 18-04226).
Järvinen, J., Tollinen, A., Karjaluoto, H., & Jayawardhena, C. (2012). DIGITAL AND SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING USAGE IN B2B INDUSTRIAL SECTION.
Marketing Management Journal, 22(2).
Karjaluoto, H., Mustonen, N., & Ulkuniemi, P. (2015). The role of digital channels in industrial marketing communications. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,
30(6), 703-710.
Karjaluoto, H., & Ulkuniemi, P. (2015). Digital communications in industrial marketing. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 30(6).
Royle, J., & Laing, A. (2014). The digital marketing skills gap: Developing a Digital Marketer Model for the communication industries. International Journal of Information
Management, 34(2), 65-73.
Tan, F. T. C., Tan, B., & Land, L. (2015, January). The affordance of gamification in enabling a digital disruptor: a case study of the goCatch taxi booking app. In System
Sciences (HICSS), 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1197-1206). IEEE.