This assignment delves into contract law principles, focusing on the case of *Pinnel's Case* and its impact on part payments. It analyzes a scenario where Timbo agrees to pay Samuel $15,000 for moving expenses but later offers only $5,000 due to financial hardship. Samuel accepts the $5,000 as full settlement, but Timbo's business improves. The assignment examines whether Samuel can legally claim the remaining $10,000, considering exceptions like promissory estoppel and the case of *Foakes v Beer*. It concludes by determining Samuel's legal rights based on contract law principles.