1INTERNATIONAL MARKETING Question:Discuss whether you come from a high or a low context communication culture. Personally, do you think your own communication is mostly high or low context? Thinking of your own communication patterns, do you agree with Hall’s theory of high and low context communication? The culture I belong to is a low context communication culture. According to personal insight, the pattern of the communication of my culture is low context. The concept of the low and high context was established by Edward T. Hall. In his book Beyond Culture of 1976, he states different ways the cultures in the world initiate communication (Burgoon, Guerrero and Floyd 2016). According to his concepts, the high context communication culture includes implicit communication practices. In this culture, the value of context and relationships are far higher than effective communication practice, hence the exchange of words in this culture is comparatively low. On the other hand, in case of low context cultures, the practice of effective communication is far more valued and practiced and messages are conveyed only by the means of words and communication. Hence it needs to be explicit in nature. Hall’s theory states that the internaldatathatisused tointerpretistermedasB, whereastheoriginalmessageof communication is termed as A (Barkema et al. 2015). In his theory, he states that the high contextculturesdependonintimatepersonalrelationships,traditions,andestablished hierarchies. The low context cultures do not necessarily have the same traditional depth and include more short-term relationships and shallower connection. To summarize, the high context cultures includes physical context and internalization by an individual in the culture, whereas it is just the opposite in case of low context cultures (Kittler, Rygl and Mackinnon 2011). Considering my own communication patterns, the Halls theory totally justifies the concept and factors of low communication culture. In our cultural communication practice, the mass of data
2INTERNATIONAL MARKETING is conferred by explicit codes. Some of the notable characteristics of the low context culture that the theory of Hall stated justify our culture. These include the tendency to make shorter and shallow relationships, the requirement of explicit communication practices because they lack additional context (Knapp, Hall and Horgan 2013). Besides this, in our culture, the practice of communicationismoredirectandconfrontational.Someothernotablefeaturesinclude individualistic approaches, the capability to identify faults and lies and tendency of frequent alteration. Another of the related aspect in the context of culture is the perception of time. The low context cultures use monochromic perceptions (Barros 2017). The time is observed as sequential and tangible. There are far-reaching implications of the high and low context cultural practices. The culture I belong from is a low context culture, the people in our culture generally tends to behave in a way that is generally considered as rude, incompetent and ignorant in front of the high context culture. Thus it can be said that there lies a wide range of difference between the high context and low context communication cultures around the globe. The Halls theory justifies the factors and pointed out the notable nature of the two cultures in one platform.
3INTERNATIONAL MARKETING References Barkema, H.G., Chen, X.P., George, G., Luo, Y. and Tsui, A.S., 2015. West meets East: New concepts and theories.Academy of Management Journal,58(2), p.460. Barros, M.S., 2017. How Does High-/Low-Context Communication Influence Advertisement Perception?. Burgoon, J.K., Guerrero, L.K. and Floyd, K., 2016.Nonverbal communication. Routledge. Kittler, M.G., Rygl, D. and Mackinnon, A., 2011. Special Review Article: Beyond culture or beyond control? Reviewing the use of Hall’s high-/low-context concept.International Journal of Cross Cultural Management,11(1), pp.63-82. Knapp,M.L.,Hall,J.A.andHorgan,T.G.,2013.Nonverbalcommunicationinhuman interaction. Cengage Learning.