logo

Health Care Experience Research 2022

   

Added on  2022-08-19

3 Pages1160 Words15 Views
Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice
Appendix F: Non-Research Evidence Appraisal Tool
© The Johns Hopkins Hospital/Johns Hopkins University. May not be used or reprinted without permission. Page 1
Evidence Level & Quality:
Article Title: Health Care Experiences of Lesbian Women A Metasynthesis Number: Vol. 0, No.
0, pp. 1–21
Author(s): Marianne Snyder, PhD, MSN, RN Publication Date: doi:
10.1097/ANS.000000
0000000226.
Journal: Advances in Nursing Science
Does this evidence address the EBP
question? Yes No
Do not proceed with appraisal of this evidence
Clinical Practice Guidelines: Systematically developed recommendations from nationally
recognized experts based on research evidence or expert consensus panel. LEVEL IV
Consensus or Position Statement: Systematically developed recommendations based on research
and nationally recognized expert opinion that guides members of a professional organization in
decision-making for an issue of concern. LEVEL IV
Are the types of evidence included identified?
Were appropriate stakeholders involved in the development of recommendations?
Are groups to which recommendations apply and do not apply clearly stated?
Have potential biases been eliminated?
Were recommendations valid (reproducible search, expert consensus,
independent review, current, and level of supporting evidence identified for each
recommendation)?
Were the recommendations supported by evidence?
Are recommendations clear?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Literature Review: Summary of published literature without systematic appraisal of evidence quality
or strength. LEVEL V
Is subject matter to be reviewed clearly stated?
Is relevant, up-to-date literature included in the review (most sources within
last 5 years or classic)?
Is there a meaningful analysis of the conclusions in the literature?
Are gaps in the literature identified?
Are recommendations made for future practice or study?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Expert Opinion: Opinion of one or more individuals based on clinical expertise. LEVEL V
Has the individual published or presented on the topic?
Is author’s opinion based on scientific evidence?
Is the author’s opinion clearly stated?
Are potential biases acknowledged?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Health Care Experience Research 2022_1

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Critical Analysis of Determinants and Prevalence of Burnout in Emergency Nurses
|13
|3017
|425

Critical Appraisal in Nurse Education Systematic Review
|37
|6671
|186

Critical Appraisal of Intravenous and Intra-Articular Tranexamic Acid in Total Knee Arthroplasty
|5
|890
|98

CASP Checklist: 10 questions for Systematic Review Appraisal
|4
|943
|478

Effectiveness of Educational Programs for Chronic Kidney Disease Patients
|10
|2609
|389

Effectiveness of Evidence Based Practice in Skin Firming Treatments
|13
|4613
|148