Barriers to Communication and Resistance to Change in a Law Firm
Verified
Added on 2023/06/07
|5
|801
|290
AI Summary
This case study discusses the reasons for employee resistance to change to an open-plan office plan and barriers to communication in a law firm. It also suggests strategies to overcome these barriers.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Case Study 71 CASE STUDY 7 By Name) Name of the Class (Course) Professor Name of the School State (Location of the School) Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Case Study 72 Discussion Questions 1a. Reasons for Employees Resisting the Change to an Open-Plan Office Plan The change to have a new open-plan office was proposed by the new blood in the organization. One of the reasons that employees resisted started from the two senior partners, Jack and Owen. They did not want to move in with other employees in the open office layout. They suggested that they were entitled to privacy and maintain the corner office. The employees had the negative response to the show of power by the senior partners. They wrote a memo explaining that equality was not being observed as some people were allowed to have private offices. The older workforce was also opposed to balances to racial, gender and religious balance. Some other employees were not happy with being in a system where they shared the office space with others. It became difficult to have private conversations and interactions in the open-plan office plan. 1b. What Partners might have Done Better to Minimize the Resistance One of the most important aspects in minimizing resistance to change was for the senior partners to participate in the initiative. They left the management aspects to junior partners and new employees. They could have taken time to analyze the effects the new members could have on the organization and consult with the younger partners on how to bring them to the firm. The partners could also have given both the new and older workers the chance to express their views on how to come up and enforce the changes Skesley (2009). The overall direction came from the partners without taking into consideration the views of other staff members. The partners could also have put in place measures to respond to responses to the changes in the organization. They could have ensured that all employees could give their complaints and possible improvements to the management using properly-established channels.
Case Study 73 2a. Barriers to Communication in the Law Firm One of the main barriers in communication in the law firm is the gap between the senior partners and other employees. The management personnel chose to maintain corner offices while others had an open-office layout. They could not air their grievances or possible changes to other members easily. The changes in leadership were drastic. Both the new workers were confused of who to approach when faced with various problems in the firm. Another barrier was that the organization had a dysfunctional human resource department. One person was responsible for managing both the lawyers and other staff members. The person was not equipped with the necessary skills to handle the two differing types of people in the firm. The firm also lacked a formal channel to address issues affecting the workers. People were forced to approach the two senior partners in an informal setting, which was difficult especially when addressing formal affairs. 2b. Overcoming the Barriers to Communication One of the strategies that the law firm could have used to overcome the barriers to communication was to eliminate the differences in perception. The senior partners could have ensured that they communicated their desire to bring in new managers and change the previous organizational structure to accommodate the changes in the firm. According to Olynk and Widmar, (2016), Proper introduction programs ensure that each person understands the organizational policies and every employee is aware of his or her roles as well as expectations. The firm should also have set up proper structures to address employee grievances. They could have ensured that at each level of the organization, people could freely air their complaints anonymously and receive proper interventions. The law firm should also have employed a human resource department to address people’s grievances. It could have created professionalism
Case Study 74 among the individuals and ensured that they could maintain professional relationships with fair and enforceable contracts between the employers and employees.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Case Study 75 Bibliography Olynk, N. and Widmar, D. (2016). Identifying and Addressing Barriers to Communication. Information Gateway. Retrieved from http://porkgateway.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/identifying-and-addressing-barriers-to- communication1.pdfon September 9, 2018 Skelsey, D. (29 July 2013). "Why Do People In Business Resist Change?". Project Laneway. Retrived fromhttp://www.project-laneways.com.au/blog/articles/_thread_/why-do-people-in- business-resist-changeon September 9, 2018