1LEADERSHIP IN HOSPITALITY “It always seems impossible until it’s done.”- Nelson Mandela While observing certain perspectives such as political, religious, economic, social, and ideological these viewpoints played a significant role in the process of perceptions, beliefs and opinions. It has often been wondered whether individuals have developed in emerging as an effective leader in the society or have transformed by leading other people to achieve an improved future (Senge, Hamilton & Kania, 2015). Significant revolutionary leaders have successfully inspired as well as encouraged people with particular action that involved utmost uniqueness and exclusivity. The essay intends to explore the powerful and significant leadership of Nelson Mandela and his influence on his people. The term leadership has been defined as the competence to influence a group of individuals towards the accomplishment of certain aims and objectives. Significant leaders such as Nelson Mandela, who is known as a symbol of courage, determination, strength, compassion and reconciliation has further been recognized as a role model not only for South Africa but for the world (Allison & Goethals, 2014). Mandela despite of serving a life imprisonment possessed thecompetenceandabilitytoleadandconducthissupportersthroughnoteorwritten correspondence. His immense passion and dedication was strongly felt by his followers as well as other political leaders further reinforcing his belief that no one could imprison his sprits and compassion towards his people and nation (Olesen, 2015). Mandela during his imprisonment demonstrated to the people the significance of three essential factors, firstly, the power and ability of taking action whereby he underpinned the consequence of taking risks for purposes and ideas one believes in. It is important to recognize his ability of individualism and rapport which had the power to hold the nation together when the country was losing its significance (Denenberg, 2014). Such a distinctive quality has not been possessed by many, which has led to
2LEADERSHIP IN HOSPITALITY conclusion as to why several individuals have still been gaining insights from his experiences and leadership styles. Secondly, the connotation of perceptions, rationale, disagreements had been taught by Mandela whereby he showed that an individual must not specifically gain knowledge through conformity but must engage into the construct of competition that would facilitate one to comprehend the confronting perceptions in order to permit one to make improved decisions for oneself (Pietersen, 2015). A leader like Mandela never expressed any forms of apprehension to make conciliations for the sake of his purpose and further preferred to show practicality and review his ideologies for the majority authority, rights, and fundamental freedom of every citizen of South Africa (Beresford, 2014).Finally, Mandela comprehended and identified that individuals are bound together in such a way that will reflect transparency to the naked eye. Though, there were few who perceived Mandela as a hideous individual and has further been given accusations of implementing aggressive acts in order to determine or resolve conflicting situations that had been occurring in his nation. Mandela through his famous quote, “Lead from the back-and let others believe they are in front” had intended to demonstrate his followers to effectively perform and to learn to gain trust and loyalty in order to gather people to follow the similar paths (Olesen, 2015). He further believed that leading from behind or shifting the focus to others facilitates the subordinates or followers to understand their significance and ability and further identify themselves as an integral part of the process (Weisse, 2013). Mandela further depicted his constructive ability related to visionary leadership in order to create as well as articulate a pragmatic, credible as well as striking vision of the future that would enhance the current circumstances. His vision and aim to implement transformations in the then situational contexts of South America for his people further demonstrated them with potential betterments and what could be better about the state of
3LEADERSHIP IN HOSPITALITY apartheid at hand. Furthermore, his techniques of democratic leadership involved several people into the nation’sdecision making proceduresand develop consensus from his team and subordinates (Gini & Green, 2014). Mandela had also been recognized for being immensely responsive to several various aspects of disagreements and disputes thereby providing effective supervision and guidance and offering his analysis. Thus, leading his people to yearn for such a genuine and distinctive leadership that encouraged, inspired, and elevated the people in the shared journey. Most of Mandela’s effective leadership styles dependent on his style of team building and sustaining team collaboration (Beresford, 2014). His techniques of cultural and ethical implementation in order to develop effective collaboration are being executed by many in recent times that has further led to establish effective teams in order to succeed and establish goals and objectives that one set in the initial phase of leading people. Nelson Mandela has represented the epitome of soft power whereby as a President, his ethical standpoints as well as political stature and importance in the world surpassed and further suggested by the size of the military services or the GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of South Africa (Olesen, 2015). Being identified as a prototype of a successful leader his power and influence emerged from military or economic from the competencies to capture the interests and perceptions of people across his nation as well as across the world (Senge, Hamilton & Kania, 2015). Within the construct of several observations, it has been comprehended from the life as well as legacy of Mandela is considered as a fact that peacekeeping and diplomacy increasingly is reliable on ethical ecology which further cannot be found in the forces or economic authority. Mandela’s leadership style was honed in the biased or political culture of the African National Congress along with its prominence on mutual and consultative leadership (Olesen, 2015). Mandela was thus considered as a champion of a suitable distribution of wealth as well as
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4LEADERSHIP IN HOSPITALITY technology between the affluent and deprived classes but effectively believed to sought business and expansion aid rather than engaging into charitable activities. His dedication towards reconciliation as a shared procedure has been considered as one of his significant contribution to global concerns (Allison & Goethals, 2014). However, the ones who have been seeking to emulate Mandela’s ideologies and beliefs related to leading people and nation towards healing must take into consideration that the idea of reconciliation was regarded as a continuum that involved factors related to confession, explanations along with other forms of reinstitution.
5LEADERSHIP IN HOSPITALITY References Allison, S. T., & Goethals, G. R. (2014). “Now he belongs to the ages”: The heroic leadership dynamic and deep narratives of greatness. InConceptions of Leadership(pp. 167-183). Palgrave Macmillan, New York. Beresford,A.(2014).NelsonMandelaandthepoliticsofSouthAfrica'sunfinished liberation.Review of African Political Economy,41(140), 297-305. Denenberg, B. (2014).Nelson Mandela:" no Easy Walk to Freedom". Scholastic Inc.. Gini, A., & Green, R. M. (2014). Three criticalcharacteristicsof leadership: Character, stewardship, experience.Business and Society Review,119(4), 435-446. Olesen, T. (2015). Global political iconography: The making of Nelson Mandela.American Journal of Cultural Sociology,3(1), 34-64. Pietersen, W. (2015). What Nelson Mandela taught the world about leadership.Leader to Leader,2015(76), 60-66. Senge, P., Hamilton, H., & Kania, J. (2015). The dawn of system leadership.Stanford Social Innovation Review,13(1), 27-33. Weisse, W. (2013). Introduction.Scriptura,83, 189-191.