Leadership and Management: Understanding the Differences and Importance

LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
University
City
Date
Page 1 of 15

Proposal Package 2
Leadership and Management
Leadership and management should be applied concurrently at all times. Leadership and
management should not be confused to mean or be the same terms. The terms are however are
complementary and linked. As a result a slight effort to separate the two will certainly cause
havoc. The outlined manager’s function includes planning, preparation and coordination. On the
other hand, a leader’s work could encompass motivation and inspiration.
Leadership
The leadership has various definitions given by diverse scholars and practitioners.
Ordinarily, leadership encompasses an interconnection in which the movement of characters
remains guided by a single perspective. Besides, it also refers to the method of controlling an
assemblage inside an organization towards reaching an aim or goal’’ (Johns)
Yukl leadership explanation is:-
Leadership is process of influencing colleagues or other persons to comprehend and agree with
what needs to be done and the mode of doing it.
Leadership also is the means of facilitating both personal and combined efforts to achieve
shared objectives. Individual and companies’ achievement is shaped by the executives because it
is a dual procedure. In facilitating their juniors to duty, leaders drive members along with
drafting organizational settings efficiently. In cases where groups are motivated by the manager
and they fully present their application for attainment of the coveted goal, then there is gradual
company performance improvement.
Mullins (2010) stated that management entails utilizing other individuals’ efforts to accomplish
tasks.
Leadership versus Management

Proposal Package 3
• Management is about executing things right while leading concerns itself with performance
of right things.
• Firmness is developed by the administration while transformation is as a result of driving.
Differences Managing Internal Stakeholders and manager direct
o A management is a reflection; the leadership is unique.
o The management reserves; the leadership details.
o The management concentrates on arrangement; leadership centers on human
resource.
o The management depends on command; the leadership encourages trust.
o The superintendent is short lived; the leadership possesses a long-range prospect.
o The management questions how and when; whereas leadership challenges what
and why.
o The management is focused always on the bottom line; the leadership’s sight is on
the range.
o Management emulates; the leadership dawns.
o The management believes the status quo; while leadership disputes it.
In modern economy, management and leadership are inseparable. Acquaintance of individuals is
the root source of appraise. In our present economy, workers are no longer undifferentiated cogs
in a company. Most staff depend on their executives for tasks allocation together with purpose
definition. The administration ought to set up the subordinates efficiency escalation, knack
enhancement, inspire results, lastly nature skill etc.

Proposal Package 4
Peter Drucker was one of his kinds to realize this management fact, as was to comprehend so
many other management truths. “Knowledge worker,” emanation and the fathomless disparities
can be the reason for the arrangement of business.
Drucker stated that “one does not ‘manage’ people with the emergence of informed workforce.
“The responsibility encompasses leading subordinates’ with the intention of making those
specific employee strengths profitable.
Differences between public and private leadership
I am sure it is of no surprise that the researchers conducting these empirical leadership
studies discovered significant differences among leaders in the diverse sectors. Inquisition on
why? As such follows. The reason for variances in civil and their counterparts get subjected to
the indifferent “challenges of achieving organizational goals through human people” (Bolding,
2016). Subordinates across the two fields in the same manner perform almost identical job
description. Civil administration scholarship has suggested that civic companies are naturally
distinct from the unshared firms due to the functions given to the community (Anderson 2010,
138).
Below is a list of conclusions drawn by those conducting the research: unshared aims
can be evaluated in economic outcomes since they are straighter forward? Civic managers ought
to pursue multiple goals concurrently. Civic staff has greater job security as well as there is more
leadership turnover.
The following take away or conclusions have been drawn by those conducting the
studies: those private goals are straighter because they can be evaluated in economic outcomes.
Civic managers must pursue many goals simultaneously. There is more leadership turnover in
the public sector Public with employees enjoying greater job security in their reward system;