All About Leadership Management

RUNNING HEAD: LEADERSHIP MANAGEMENT
0
Leadership Management

Leadership Management
1
Introduction
Leadership is a critical aspect for organizations, as workers in an organization need
someone to learn from, to look to and to thrive with. Leadership is defined as the art of
leading a group of people in order to achieve common goals. Leadership includes three
aspects leaders, followers, and goals. Every leader has a different strategy and leadership
style to deal with the situation or these leadership styles vary because of personal challenges
or traits or outside influences (Mathews,2016). This paper includes different leadership styles
used by leaders in today’s situation. Further, the paper aims to describe the challenges,
benefits, and future of a bossless leadership style. In order to understand the concept of which
leadership style leaders choose according to the situation, different leadership theories are
also included in this paper. At last, the conclusion of leadership styles and the future of
leadership is presented.
Contemporary Leadership Style
According to Northouse (2018), leadership considered the ability of an individual to
guide and help others to achieve their goals. An effective leader is the one who is able to
manage the present situation and plan effectively for the future. Further, leadership is a”
process of influencing personnel toward achieving a common goal”. On the other side,
leadership style understood as the behavior adopted by a manager or leader to guide followers
to achieve the ultimate goal (Caramela, 2018). Moreover because of the complex situations in
the business leadership theories emerged. Contemporary leadership styles are charismatic
leadership, transformational leadership, servant leadership, transactional leadership and
bossless leadership that includes self-managed teams (Montgomery, 2020).
Leadership traits are unique to everyone as a different individual possesses different
leadership traits. Some of the leadership traits that a leader possesses are decisiveness, focus,
awareness, accountability, honesty, inspiration, and confidence (Zhou,2016). In this
changing era, in businesses, the uses of self-managed teams in workplaces gain momentum.
Self-managed teams are formed in organizations in many forms such as quality circles, focus
groups, new venture teams, communication teams, and business brand teams. This leadership
style is mainly used by GE, Pepsico, Honeywell and Hewlett-Packard (Lee &
Edmondson,2017). This leadership style proves to be beneficial in many ways such as cost
reduction, the introduction of new products and achieving conceptual breakthroughs. These
“bossless teams” taken as a key to solving complex problems further to boost productivity
and heightening creativity in the organization (Pandey & Karve,2017).
Moreover, in the current situation, this leadership style is in trend because some
drivers or forces are technological advancements, increased use of capital intensive
techniques and increasing level of global and domestic competition. Technology
advancement resultant in increasing numbers of self-motivated, highly educated, self-directed
specialists and for such trained and skilled workers to work effectively and efficiently, highly
flexible and participative work structures like self-managed teams (SMT) is required
(Barry,1991). The use of capital intensive techniques also forced organizations to focus on
boss less leadership as the use of automatic machines require a real-time decision as a group
of people don’t rely on a supervisor for small decisions. At last, in order to compete at the
global level in terms of price and product organizations depend on SMT as it boosts
innovation and reduces the cost of production (Nowogrodski, 2015).

Leadership Management
2
Perry, Pearce & Sims, (1999) said that the area of concern in this aspect is how well
leadership can be exercised in leaderless settings. The leadership theories that are developed
are inadequate in this sort of settings as all leadership theories focus on individual traits that
are a leader. Some of the leadership theories are trait theory that focuses on traits of an
individual that is leader, behavioral theories that focus on application across all situations and
last is situation theories that focus on the aspect that in different situations different
leadership styles are used. These theories neglect the leadership dynamics in relation to a
group where the development of the group requires a shift in leadership behavior. Leadership
theories that supported this concept include Blanchard situational leadership and Robert
Tannenbaum warren Schmidt's leadership model. These theories focus on the aspect of group
decisional process and mainly in managerial groups in which decisions taken by the group is
the final output (Perry, Pearce & Sims, 1999).
Daft & Marcic (2016) highlights that Blanchard situational theory is mainly
applicable in boss less situations that focus on stages of group development. This framework
highlights two functions that change with changing group nature that is the directive function
and social cantered support function. At the first group stage, task competence is low and
commitment is high in that situation leaders with high directiveness and low supportiveness
work best. Further, a different type of leadership style that works well for self-managed teams
falls into four categories that are organizing, envisioning, social and spanning.
Envisioning leadership style revolves around the concept of building a new and
compelling vision. This requires championing and defining overall goals, facilitating
innovation and idea generation, and fostering frame-breaking thinking. The main advantage
of this leadership is that people have more solutions to a problem. Experienced envisioning
leaders will help others to follow the envisioning process and help others to bring more ideas
(Irving, 2015).
Organizing leadership roles brings focus on many elements that are related to group
tasks such as the focus on deadlines, structure, time and efficiency (Burke, Georganta &
Hernandez,2017). People who have nature to predict and clear things, getting the task done
and not wasting time can give direction or help SMT to stay focused on goals. With the help
of organizing leadership group can solve the problem and can bring more solutions for small
issues that have a greater impact.
Spanning leadership includes integrating group efforts or activities with outside
groups and individuals. Some of traits or behavior includes presentation management,
networking, intelligence gathering, maintaining good relation with outsiders, securing and
locating critical resources, being sensitive to power distribution and bargaining. This style
ensures that group outcomes will be used by others in the organization so that the problem
can be solved on time (Irving, 2015).
Social leadership includes a social leader that able to slow down group conflicts and
encourage individual efforts, team accomplishments, and individual differences. This
leadership style is most demanding from all of the above. As this demands constant vigilance
and activity. From the different leadership styles, it is identified that in a group also there
exists a need for at least one primary form of leadership and furthermore there are mainly two
leaders in a group at least that possess different leadership skills and act as a leader at the
given point of time (Irving,2015).
Perry, Pearce & Sims (1999), supported that leadership without hierarchy can be
possible or the concept of self-managed teams or bosslessness can be used. The three main