Comparing Economic Policies of Mental Health Promotion in US and Australia

This report compares the economic policies of mental health promotion, wellness and prevention programs in United States and Australia. It also analyzes the implications and disparities of the economic policies of mental health in terms of volume-based and values-based health care.

0Running head: HEALTH CARE POLICIES
Health Care Policies
Name of the Student
Name of University
Author’s note

1
HEALTH CARE POLICIES
Introduction
Mental illness contributes a significant amount of disease burden worldwide (World
Health Organization, 2001). Around the world, approximately 450 million people develop from
mental health complications and at least one fourth of the total world’s population are susceptible
of developing mental or behavioral disorder at some point of time during their lives (Whiteford
et al., 2013). Mental health disorders account for nearly 25% of mental health disability in the
different parts of United States, Canada, Western parts of Europe and Australia. It is also
regarded as the leading cause of premature death (Centre of Disease Control (CDC), 2017). In
United States 22% of the adult population has more than one diagnosable mental disorder per
year(Perou et al., 2013). Some of the common mental health disorders prevalent among the US
population included anxiety, impulse control disorders, bipolar mood disorders and substance-
abuse disorders(American Psychiatric Association, 2013). The effects of mental illness are
evident throughout the cultural, racial and ethnic groups(Betancourt et al., 2016). Moreover,
mental illness across United States cost $150 billion per year (excluding the cost of the research)
(Croft & Parish, 2013).
The following report aims to compare the economic policies of mental health promotion,
wellness and prevention programs in United States and Australia. The report also seeks to
analyze the implications and disparities of the economic policies of mental health in terms of
volume-based and values-based health care. At the end, the report aims to implement the policy
of Australia in US and then estimate the consequences.

2
HEALTH CARE POLICIES
Comparing economic policies and economic motivation
Economic policies of mental health promotion in America are mainly based over
providing security and freedom to the people suffering from mental illness. This security and
freedom is mainly based on providing adequate housing via supportive housing policy and social
support for people with mental illness and their care givers. The economic policies for mental
health promotion in America also encompass special health and social programs targeted towards
the vulnerable group. These vulnerable groups are mainly the people residing in rural areas and
chronic physical illness along with mental health disease. The economic policies also support
and promote community development programs via evidence based approach in order to reduce
the mental health burden on large scale (WHO, 2017a).
The economic policies of the mental health promotion in Australia aims to maximize the
ability of youth, children, adults and older people to understand their potential, cope with daily
stresses of life and to participate in community activities in meaningful ways. It also aims to
increase the understanding and awareness of mental health illness and problems while decreasing
the discrimination and stigma, which centers on mental health. It also promote help-seeking
behaviors where needed (Australian Government Department of Health, 2017). Thus overall the
economic policies in the mental health promotion in Australia is aimed towards designing
community based educational program which will help to promote awareness in mental health
along with reduction of mental health stigma. According to WHO (2017b), the economic policy
of mental health promotion in Australia also aims towards the generation of supportive
environment. Supportive environment helps in protecting direct and indirect effects of
surrounding environment on mental health. Besides Australia has separate economic policies in

3
HEALTH CARE POLICIES
order to control tobacco and alcohol use in order to reduce the mental health complications
arising from substance-abuse.
Analysis of the implications of the economic policies
According to VanLare and Conway (2012), volume-based health care signifies the
payment that the healthcare providers receive as payment for providing a particular service
regardless of the outcomes or the requirement. Value based health is a special health-care
delivery model under which the service providers including the physicians and the hospitals are
paid based on the patient’s health care outcomes.
In America, the main implications of the economic policies that are directed towards the
mental health, prevention, promotion and wellness is optimal implementation of the Affordable
Care Act (ACA) of 2010. It is an well-established health insurance act where the service
consumers can contrast and compare and then enroll on different health insurance plans which
includes separate plans for mental or behavioral health services. Mental and behavioral health
services in America are regarded as Essential Health Benefits which signifies that all the health
insurance plans which are private and are covered in the Marketplace must cover these services.
During 2013, Mental Health America (MHA) was selected as one of the 105 organizations that
obtained a special grant, “Navigator grant”. This grant is issued by the centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS). Via this grant, MHA participated as Navigator delivering direct in-
person help to the individuals who are interested in applying for the health insurance coverage
viathe health insurance exchange that is facilitated federally (Mental Health America, 2017).
Thus it can be seen that the economic policies for the mental health promotion and wellness is
based on the volume-based service. These volume-based services aimed towards covering as

4
HEALTH CARE POLICIES
much as people under the ACA for comprehensive mental health promotion and prevention.
However,in certain aspects, economic policies of mental health in America cover value-based
service. This is because it provides in-person assistance to the individuals and this personalized
approach is measured on the basis of its effectiveness.
In Australia, Medicare rebates which come under the provision of “Better Access to
Psychiatrists”, “Psychologists and General Practitioners” via MBS initiative are especially
available for the patients with mental health complications. These services are mainly delivered
during the courses of treatment. Each course of treatment contains six different services procured
by an allied mental health professional. Towards the end of each treatment, the allied mental
health professionals are required to report back to the referencing medical practitioner about the
progress of the patients. The main mental health services that are delivered under this initiative
include Psychological therapy services which are given by eligible clinical psychologists and
person focused psychological strategies services (FPS) procured by the general practitioners,
occupational therapists, registered psychologists or social workers. Rebates for this mental health
services financially benefit the patients with mental health disorder. Moreover, structured
approach to management of mental health further provides economic benefits to the service users
(Australian Government Department of Health, 2017a). People with higher mental health
benefits, the waiting period of the psychiatric care are exempted in Australia. However, these
benefits can only be accessed by a person once in their lifetime and is only available to the
person after their preliminary waiting period for psychiatric benefits (2 months) is over. The
exemption also covers drug and alcohol abuse. Anyone can upgrade the coverage and enjoy the
waiting time exemption Australian Government Department of Health, 2017b). Thus it can be
seen that the implications of the economic policies for the mental health promotion, prevention

5
HEALTH CARE POLICIES
and wellness in Australia is more directed towards the value-based health care. This is because,
the health insurance for the mental health in Australia is more directed towards the value service
which covers comprehensive mental health needs of the patients via providing them proper
access to the psychiatrics, mental health nurse, occupational therapists and social workers. Not
only, at the end of each treatment, the concerned mental health professionals are required to
report back to the referencing medical practitioner about the progress of the patients and thus the
payment is based on the overall therapy outcome. Moreover, it also attempts to reduce the
waiting time for patients to visit the doctors which further increases the quality outcome.
Policy Implementation
Evaluation of the influence of US market condition for the provision for healthcare
After the passage of the ACA in 2010, the traditional roles and responsibilities and special
authority of the healthcare stakeholders can now be altered or tested. Moreover, the health care
providers can now share in savings, take risks and subsequently form relationships which were
previously forbidden. Tracking the innovation patterns and emerging trends during the post-ACA
marketplace has resulted in the proper identification of numerous high-level strategic trends
which are promising potentials (Santilli & Vogenberg, 2015). The trends that will increasingly
impact numerous healthcare stakeholders during the upcoming years in the US health care
market include
1. Transformation of the patients as an informed consumers
2. Growth of the structured quality measures
3. Revenue generation consolidation
4. Alternative or new payment structure

6
HEALTH CARE POLICIES
5. Use of specialty drug in order to drive the cost of care
6. Innovations in the information technology promoting inter stakeholder communications
(Santilli & Vogenberg, 2015)
Implementation of mental health care polices of United States in Australia
Affordable Care Act of the Obama Care is a package of genuine reforms which plan to
make major advances in developing innovative ways to deliver can fund health care services
while requiring improvement in quality and safety. It also aims to expand the health workforce
while implementing a while-of government approach to prevent and tackling health disparities.
Application of ACA will help to reduce the health care cost by US$109 billion in the next decade
(The Conversation, 2013). So in order reduce the health care cost of the mental health in
Australia via implementing ACA act, the Australia health structure must attempt to reduce the
health inequalities which are prevalent among the aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders. In
doing so, he inequalities in the social determinants of the health will reduce and thereby
promoting optimal implementation of ACA towards mental health promotion, prevention and
wellness. Moreover, reduction in the health inequalities will also led to the decrease in the
mental health complications among aboriginals which will in turn reduce the overall healthcare
economic burden (Jorm et al., 2012).
Implementation of the mental health care policies in Washington State
Washington State is located in the far northwestern part of the United States and it is
regarded as the 18th largest state in US in the terms of the acquired surface area. It has a
population size of 7.53 million during the ignition of the year 2018. According to the US Census
Bureau, the population of the Washington State has increased from 2010 (6.72 million). At

7
HEALTH CARE POLICIES
present, Washington is enjoying healthy growth rate of about 1.27% and its ranks 8th position
within the whole country (World Population Review, 2018). According to the reports published
by the Puget Sound Business Journal (2015), Washington State ranks 47 in the domain of mental
health care. The main concern is the shortage of the mental health providers in the rural parts of
the state. More than half of the counties in the Washington State have no practicing physiologist,
psychiatrist and social workers. So in order to adequately implement the affordable care act of
US in terms of mental health promotion, prevention and wellness, the government must first
come forward with adequate policies of economic funding in order to generate proper mental
health hospitals and healthcare centers in the rural parts of the state. These mental health
hospitals will be brimmed with trained mental professionals and this will help to increase the
overall access of healthcare via the adequate implementation of the ACA. Moreover, proper
mental health care based community activities must be developed so that the mental health
promotion in community level.
Conclusion
Thus from the above discussion, it can be concluded that the economic policies in the
mental health care and promotions in US is volume based and that in Australia is value-based in
its implementation approach. Moreover, it also highlighted that in order to implement mental
health promotion policy in Australia; the health equalities prevalent among the aboriginal
Australian population must be reduced. The study also revealed that in order to implementation
mental health promotion and wellness in Washington state proper access to the mental health
care facilities in the rural parts of the state needs to developed under proper funding.

8
HEALTH CARE POLICIES
References
American Psychiatric Association.(2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
(DSM-5®).American Psychiatric Pub.
Australian Government Department of Health. (2017a). Better access to mental health care: fact
sheet for professionals. Access date: 7th June 2018. Retrieved from:
http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/mental-ba-fact-prof
Australian Government Department of Health.(2017). 2.2 Mental Health Promotion. Access
date: 7th June. Retrieved from:
http://www.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/mental-pubs-n-
pol08-toc~mental-pubs-n-pol08-2~mental-pubs-n-pol08-2-2
Australian Government Department of Health.(2017b). Supporting Mental Health - waiting
period exemption for higher benefits. Access date: 7th June 2018. Retrieved from:
http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/health-privatehealth-
supporting-mental-health
Betancourt, J. R., Green, A. R., Carrillo, J. E., &OwusuAnaneh-Firempong, I. I. (2016). Defining
cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in
health and health care. Public health reports.
Centre of Disease Control (CDC)., (2017). The Role of Public Health in Mental Health
Promotion. Access date: 7th June. Retrieved from:
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5434a1.htm

9
HEALTH CARE POLICIES
Croft, B., & Parish, S. L. (2013). Care integration in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act: Implications for behavioral health. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and
Mental Health Services Research, 40(4), 258-263.
Jorm, A. F., Bourchier, S. J., Cvetkovski, S., & Stewart, G. (2012). Mental health of Indigenous
Australians: a review of findings from community surveys. Medical Journal of
Australia, 196(2), 118.
Mental Health America.(2017). Health Insurance. Access date: 7th June 2018. Retrieved from:
http://www.mentalhealthamerica.net/health-insurance-0
Perou, R., Bitsko, R. H., Blumberg, S. J., Pastor, P., Ghandour, R. M., Gfroerer, J. C., ... &
Parks, S. E. (2013). Mental health surveillance among children—United States, 2005–
2011. MMWR SurveillSumm, 62(Suppl 2), 1-35.
Puget Sound Business Journal. (2013). Washington state ranks No. 47 for mental health care, but
UW has a plan to improve things. Access date: 8th June 2018. Retrieved from:
https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/blog/health-care-inc/2015/10/washington-state-
ranks-no-47-for-mental-health.html
Santilli, J., &Vogenberg, F. R. (2015). Key Strategic trends that impact healthcare decision-
making and stakeholder roles in the new marketplace. American health & drug
benefits, 8(1), 15.
The Conversation. (2013). Explainer: what is Obamacare?. Access date: 7th June 2018.
Retrieved from: http://theconversation.com/explainer-what-is-obamacare-18642

10
HEALTH CARE POLICIES
VanLare, J. M., & Conway, P. H. (2012). Value-based purchasing—national programs to move
from volume to value. New England Journal of Medicine, 367(4), 292-295.
Whiteford, H. A., Degenhardt, L., Rehm, J., Baxter, A. J., Ferrari, A. J., Erskine, H. E., ... &
Burstein, R. (2013). Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use
disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The
Lancet, 382(9904), 1575-1586.
World Health Organization. (2001). The World Health Report 2001: Mental health: new
understanding, new hope. World Health Organization.
World Health Organization., (2017a). Mental Health in Older Adults. Access date: 7th June.
Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-of-
older-adults
World Health Organization., (2017b). Adelaide Recommendations on Healthy Public Policy.
Access date: 7th June. Retrieved from:
http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/previous/adelaide/en/index3.html
World Population Review. (2018). Population of Washington State United States. Access date:
8th June. Retrieved from: http://worldpopulationreview.com/states/washington-
population/