This article explores the legislative issues and policies surrounding mental health social work in Pennsylvania. It covers workforce, children and youth, criminal justice, and more. The research was conducted using state legislative sessions in 2015 and compared with information on state websites and media coverage.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: Mental Health Social Work1 Mental Health Social Work University Affiliate Name Course
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Running Head: Mental Health Social Work2 Mental Health Social Work Pennsylvania is a state located on the northeastern part of the United States. It is the 33rd largest state and has a population of over12million as of 2017. During this research, it was found outthatnocurrentlegislativebillsarebeingmentioned.However,therewereprevious legislative reports and bills that the National Alliance of Mental Illness(NAMI) had reported on and was previously involved. The report was titled state mental health legislation of 2015. This report was to address the enacted measures and mental health reforms (Evans, 2017). This report came after an economic crisis that led to cutting off state funds allocation to healthcare of about $4.35 billion. The legislative issues of the policy were responsible for covering on state mental health budgets, different insurance policies, mental health workforce, the state of mental youth and children awareness, housing and employment, criminal justice, the prevention of suicide and inpatient and crisis care. The models covered the measures to take in these areas o=in order to achieve better results and for emulation for other states. The research was covered using state legislative sessions in 2015. This information was compared with that on state websites and coverage of media. Thelegislationhasaddressedtheworkforceinprovidingmentalhealthworkers. However, NAMI noted that the health professionals do not offer the services required due to the sparse populations. It was because some communities had segregated housing plans. They, therefore, recommended the use of measures such as peer support specialist. Mental health individuals are assisted by these individuals who come together and sort out the needs (Satcher, 2012). They have also decided on using integrated healthcare where the patients have the same professionals. They recommended that to expand the health workforce then the peer support specialists had to be trained. They will be responsible for offering support, guidance, and
Running Head: Mental Health Social Work3 leadership in the navigation of the mental health care system. The use of family support who are efficient specialists has assisted in achieving care and coordination. Integrated primary health care helps cover the differences between physical and mental health. Research shows that 70% of primary care offered to individuals who also consist of mental health care patients. Healthcare professionals, however, do not have training in mental health care while the physical care they offer consists of double patients with mental illnesses. It calls for the integration of healthcare to better equip these practitioners with mental illness skills. It will enable the treatment of both diseases by the same healthcare professional effectively. The costs that are involved in mental health care are high (Sabatier, 2017). Medical coverage if the mentally ill is expensive either in therapy, purchase if drugs or inpatient and outpatient healthcare. The costs in training of these healthcareprofessionalsshouldberevisedtoaccommodatetheeconomicsituationof professionals. The policy also addressed the children and youth and how they are affected by mental health illness. The study showed that the disease always emerges in early life. Research shows that between the ages of 14 -24 the disease is usually aggressive. Therefore, early identification for prevention can decrease the rate at which the disease strikes. In the United States, there is an average of 1 out of every five children live with a mental health condition (Smyer, Sheit, & Streit, 2014). The committee in Pennsylvania had a pilot project that was aimed to improve the conditions of mental health care for children and youth. They proposed that there was a need to affect mental screening in facilities. It was possible to identify and intervene in a mental case when it is known earlier. It has also been highlighted in the Federal Medicaid Law that it is s requirement for every parent to take their children to the Early and Periodic Screening.
Running Head: Mental Health Social Work4 The issue of intensive services and state custody was also mentioned and explored in the policy. It was due to the fundamental reason that it is difficult for families to offer essential support to children with mental health. Arrangements to ensure that there is support for them to receive comprehensive care and proper treatment is vital. The custody of the child to the state arises when the parents cannot provide for these essentials. It leads to a disagreement between the parents and the state. If the state can provide for these amenities, then it insists on taking the patient to state mental institutions. It relinquishes the custody status of the parent and renders the state the new custodian. The rule proposed that there should be multiagency examinations and stages during the determination of custody. In different cases where the mental illness strikes a college student, the case is treated different (Chamberlin & Rogers, 2010). Colleges all over Pennsylvania are reporting that there has been an increase in mental illnesses. As much as colleges and tertiary education institutions are struggling to offer support serviced the state has enacted bills that assist in ensuring that the health services are provided efficiently and effectively to students. The state of Pennsylvania has invested in mental health care system that is well- coordinated, offers comprehensive health care with a system that had crisis response to provide services with needed. However, the state has faced some challenges (McGarry & Kaplan, 2013). The psychiatric beds have decreased over the years in hospitals. There is a need to include a budgetary allocation for more psychiatric beds in psychiatric hospitals. In some hospitals, these beds are available but are combined with inpatient beds available for public hospital settings which do not work progressively for mental institutions.The state decided to introduce a psychiatric bed tracking system that would ensure that these beds are purchases, delivered and used in psychiatric hospitals (Bao & Sturm, 2014). The lack of availability of beds leads to
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Running Head: Mental Health Social Work5 difficulty in handling emergency cases. It is because it is essential to count the beds and identify whether they are adequate or inadequate. The disadvantages of having a disjointed mental health system are that the patients end up on the wrong arm of the criminal justice system. Research shows that approximately 2million Americans with mental illnesses have been locked in correctional facilities (Knitzer, 2013). The youth that has been involved in the crime has also been identified as victims if mental illness is accounting to more than 65%. The jointed team in addressing this issue has insisted ion the availability of lawmakers and criminal justice to look for extra-legal conditions that would provide justice for such cases. The county and state jails have experienced mental illness being treated as normal individuals in the society which does not entirely solve the problem. The law enforcement has been included due to their role in the nation. Crisis Intervention Teams(CIT) programs have been started in law agencies that ensure that the responses by enforcement officers are contextual (Corrigan, Druss, & Perlick, 2014). The coordination in offering these services ensures that these are different individuals and should be handled differently. The judiciary which has made great strides in the introduction of mental health courts have been at the forefront in the cause. The non-traditional programs that are customized to address the needs of those with mental health conditions have assisted in ensuring that the criminal justice system is purely unbiased in its decisions (Jacob et al. 2017). The system has led to alternative sentencing where the introduction of fines and restitution seek to ensure that there is a reduction of incarceration. Correctional facilities have also adopted equipment and conditions that accommodate mental health services. They have assured that their services are tailor-made to offer recovery for
Running Head: Mental Health Social Work6 patients. It is required to work productively during and after recovery of the incarcerated mentally ill individuals. References Bao, Y., & Sturm, R. (2014). The effects of state mental health parity legislation on perceived quality of insurance coverage, perceived access to care, and use of mental health specialty care.Health Services Research,39(5), 1361-1378. Chamberlin, J., & Rogers, J. A. (2010). Planning a community-based mental health system: Perspective of service recipients.American Psychologist,45(11), 1241. Corrigan, P. W., Druss, B. G., & Perlick, D. A. (2014). The impact of mental illness stigma on seeking and participating in mental health care.Psychological Science in the Public Interest,15(2), 37-70. Evans,S.(2017).Mentalhealthservicesinschools:Utilization,effectiveness,and consent.Clinical Psychology Review,19(2), 165-178. Jacob, K. S., Sharan, P., Mirza, I., Garrido-Cumbrera, M., Seedat, S., Mari, J. J., ... & Saxena, S. (2017). Mental health systems in countries: where are we now?The Lancet,370(9592), 1061-1077.
Running Head: Mental Health Social Work7 Knitzer, J. (2013). Children's mental health policy: Challenging the future.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders,1(1), 8-16. McGarry,A.L.,&Kaplan,H.A.(2013).Overview:currenttrendsinmentalhealth law.American Journal of Psychiatry,130(6), 621-630. Sabatier, P. A. (2017). Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change: An advocacy coalition framework.Knowledge,8(4), 649-692. Satcher,D.(2012).Mentalhealth:AreportoftheSurgeonGeneral--Executive summary.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,31(1), 5. Smyer, M. A., Shea, D. G., & Streit, A. (2014). The provision and use of mental health services in nursing homes: results from the National Medical Expenditure Survey.American Journal of Public Health,84(2), 284-287.