This report discusses the promotional strategies for Apple's MacBook Pro for a global market entry. It analyzes the competitive position, importance-performance analysis, BCG matrix, and product lifecycle curve.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND BRANDING New Product Development and Branding: MacBook Pro Name of the Student: Name of the University: Author note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND BRANDING 1. Introduction The MacBook Pro is a high end personal and portable computer line of the Macintosh computer family. It was introduced in January 2006, and at present, it is available in 13 and 15 inch screen size. The latest MacBook Pro has been introduced with fourth generation technology with Touch Bar and USB-C in 2016 (apple.com, 2019). The third generation contained Retina Display and to make a difference with third generation, Apple introduced Touch Bar and USB-C in the fourth generation. The product has Apple’s own operating system, that is, Mac OS. The fourth generation has battery life of up to 10 hours with built-in 54.5-watt-hour lithium-polymer battery for 13inch and 58.0-watt-hour for 15 inch, 61W USB-C Power Adapter and up to 30 days of standby time (apple.com, 2019). The market competitors of MacBook Pro are Dell XPS, ThinkPad X1 Carbon, Razer Blade Stealth, Surface Laptop 2, and HP Spectre X360 (Smith, 2018). This report will highlight the promotional strategies that can be adopted by Apple to make a global market entry with its high end portable computer MacBook Pro. The report will discuss the competitive position of the product in the market through Porter's competitive theory, and its importance-performance (IPA) framework, and its intended position through BCG portfolio matrix and product lifecycle curve (PLC) and on the basis of the analysis, promotional strategies for MacBook Pro will be recommended. 2. Analysis for determination of promotional plan 2.1 Porter's competitive strategy Porter's competitive theory demonstrates the relative position of a brand in the industry. This competitive theory is used to get an overview of the competitive position of a particular product or service and recommend the correct strategy for market entry based on the relative
2NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND BRANDING market position. It also helps to determine the whether the profitability of the firm is above or below the industry average (Wicker et al., 2015). Figure1: Porter's generic strategies (Source: Wicker et al., 2015) From the above diagram, it can be said that a product can take three types of strategies to enter a market and gain competitive advantage, and those are, cost leadership, differentiation, and focus, and focus has two dimensions, cost focus and differentiation focus. For a broad market, to gain competitive advantage, a brand should choose between cost leadership or differentiation strategy. Thus, when Apple is making a global market entry with MacBook Pro, then the competitive market scope is very broad. In this case, it should choose between cost leadership and differentiation. Cost leadership strategy allows a brand to lower the price in the market and gain a market share as a low cost producer, while in the differentiation strategy, a brand launches unique
3NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND BRANDING product or service with features that are widely valued by the customers (Salavou, 2015). In this strategy, the firms choose one or more product or service attributes, which is perceived as unique and highly important for the buyers and for its uniqueness, a premium pricing strategy is usually adopted by the firms. The given product, that is, MacBook Pro by Apple, should adopt the differentiation strategy for global market entry. It is a high end laptop by Apple and the other products by Apple are highly valued by the customers for high quality performance, long battery life, bug free OS, camera performance etc. Hence, the brand value for Apple products is very high in the market and thus, the firm has been using premium pricing strategy for all other products. Thus, for MacBook Pro also, Apple has introduced unique features than its competitors and therefore, differentiation and premium pricing on the basis of brand value and uniqueness should be adopted by it for global market entry and achieving competitive advantage. 2.2 Importance-performance analysis (IPA) framework Importance-performance analysis (IPA) framework is a technique which is widely used for measuring the service quality of a product or service. This is based on the customer satisfaction regarding the performance of the product or service and expectation from that. In other words, IPA focuses on the gap between the customer expectation on the significance or importance of the product or service and judgment about the performance of the same (Sethna, 2015). The IPA for MacBook Pro for its promotional strategy for a global market entry is described below.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND BRANDING Figure2: Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) Framework for MacBook Pro (Source: Author) From the above diagram, it can be seen that perceived importance and expectation from the particular product and judgment regarding the performance of the product are plotted in the Y and X axis respectively. The five attributes of the product that are used to evaluate the performanceofMacBookProareperformance,design,battery,priceandstorage.The performance evaluation is mostly done by analyzing the product reviews by the customers. As seen from the sample reviews chosen randomly among the list of reviews posted by the customers, it is found that there is 3 positive reviews on the performance of the product, 1 for storage, which is 256 GB, and 2 for price of the product, that is, even though the company is using premium pricing strategy, yet the customers are satisfied by the performance and other attributes. On the other hand, it has earned 2 negative reviews for its design, 1 for battery and 1 for its high price in comparison to the rival products. As per some customers, the battery life should be more, such as, Surface Pro 6 by Microsoft offers 14 hours of battery life at a less price.
5NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND BRANDING According to another customer, at the price for MacBook Pro, there should be 1TB storage capacity. As per few other customers, the design of the product is not at par with their expectation. The cooling system is not good, the system has only Wi-Fi connectivity and no scope for ports, and has highly sensitive keyboard, which is not preferred by many customers. Figure3: Product reviews for MacBook Pro for calculating IPA (Source: Author) Thus, the IPA is prepared on the basis of the reviews and by calculating the mean values for the attributes and ranking them in the order high to low. These values for importance and performance of the product are then paired and plotted on the graph. The IPA framework for MacBook Pro shows that the design for the product is placed around 4.5 as per importance and at 2.5 for performance. The price has fared slightly higher as per performance and is placed at 3.
6NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND BRANDING The importance and performance for the battery, storage and performance is very high in the graph. Thus, it can be said that while entering the global market, Apple should focus on improving the performance of design and it should also work on the price as both of these factors should be improved. But as the overall performance for the other attributes is quite high, it should be able to capture a substantial share in the global market through product differentiation and improved features and performances. 2.3 BCG matrix BCGmatrixisanothermarketinganalysisframeworkthathelpstoanalyzethe profitability of a business in the competitive market. It evaluates the relative market share and market growth rate of product or service and suggests the possibility of the brand of earning profit in the market (Madsen, 2017). The BCG matrix contains four quadrants containing question mark, star, cash cow and dog. The question mark represents a business that is just starting in the market and hence its growth rate uncertain. In other words, it has low market share in a high growth industry. The star represents that the business unit is operating for some time and showing signs of growth, that is, it has high market share in a high growth market. Cash cow is the quadrant that implies that the business is operating with high growth, that is, it has high market share in a low growth market and profit and dog represents a business unit that has weakest market share in a market with low growth. Thus, dog is not profitable for businesses, while star is the most profitable category (Schawel & Billing, 2018).
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND BRANDING Figure4: BCG matrix (Source: Schawel & Billing, 2018) Table1: Gartner's Preliminary Worldwide PC Vendor Unit Shipment Estimates for 2018 (Thousands of Units) (Source: Clover, 2018) According to Clover (2019), the worldwide shipment of Apple’s MacBook fell in the last quarter of 2018. It is seen from the report that in the 4thquarter of 2018, the global shipment of Mac computers was 4920 while it was 5112 in the 4thquarter of 2017. In terms of market share,
8NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND BRANDING it was 7.2% in the 4thquarter of 2018 while it was 7.1% in 2017. The market growth rate from the 4thquarter of 2017 to 2018 was -3.8%. The reason of this negative growth rate for Apple was the positive growth for other companies, that is, Dell, HP, and Lenovo. Thus, MacBook Pro also faced a drop in its sales and market share, partly due to the launch of MacBook Air (Lovejoy, 2018). In other words, product differentiation strategy also creates obstacles for other products under the same brand. However, it has still left behind many other brands, such as, Asus, Acer, Microsoft and Samsung in terms of market growth and market share. It has brand loyal customers who help them to retain the market share locally and globally. Thus, to evaluate the BCG matrix for Apple MacBook Pro, it can be said that MacBook Pro is a cash cow, that is, it has a high cash generation capacity but the market growth rate is low as the demand for laptops are decreasing in the global market due to introduction of smart devices. 2.4 Product lifecycle curve (PLC) Figure5: Product lifecycle curve (Source: Xu, 2018)
9NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND BRANDING There are 4 stages that describe the product life cycle, namely, introduction, growth, maturity and decline (Xu, 2018). According to the sales data for MacBook Pro, Apple refreshed the MacBook Pro generation in 2016, which led to an increase in sales in quarter 2 of 2017. It sold around 4.29 million of the Mac units, which is a slight increase than the sales in the same quarter of 2016 (Hardy, 2018). The sales increase when there is an update in the products. The sales in Q4 in 2018 was less than that in Q4 of 2017, which indicates that since there has been no product upgradation new version, the shipping of Mac units fell. However, the revenue was higher due to higher selling price of the MacBook Pro. Thus, following the PLC, it can be said that MacBook Pro by Apple lies in the third stage, that is, in the maturity or stabilization state. In this stage, the market for the product is mature and it is the most competitive time for the product and investment by the business. Hence, as the MacBook Pro falls in this stage, Apple brings new versions to gain competitive advantage and increase its market share. Although the shipment has declined in Q4 of 2018, yet Apple can bring back the market growth by launching a new version of the MacBook Pro and thus, it has not yet moved to the decline stage of the PLC. 3. Conclusion From the above brand and market analysis for MacBook Pro, it can be concluded that for a global market entry, Apple should not only focus on the differentiation strategy, but should also focus on improving the performance attribute in design, price, and battery life for the MacBook Pro to capture a larger market share. The product can be categorized as a cash cow for Apple and it still lies at the third stage, that is, the maturity stage of the product life cycle curve, hence, it has opportunities of growth in the global market. It has been seen that the sales volume for the Apple Mac units increase when there is an upgradation in the versions. Thus, there is demand for Apple products despite its higher selling price due to its importance to the loyal
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
10NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND BRANDING customers and high level of performance in comparison to the rival products. The company thus should adopt the strategy of product upgradation strategy, such as, increase in battery life, improvement in keyboard, introduction of ports for enabling the usage of internet dongles, which would also increase customer convenience. Hence, for the global market entry with MacBook Pro, Apple should utilize the brand value as well as should opt for improvisation of the product while maintaining the premium pricing strategy.
11NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND BRANDING References apple.com.(2019).MacBookPro-TechnicalSpecifications.Retrievedfrom https://www.apple.com/macbook-pro/specs/ Clover, J. (2018). Apple's Mac Sales Drop in Q4 2018 Amid Worldwide PC Shipment Decline. Retrieved from https://www.macrumors.com/2019/01/10/apple-mac-sales-drop-q4-2018/ Hardy, E. (2018). Mac sales declined in Q3, despite new MacBook Pros. Retrieved from https://www.cultofmac.com/582236/mac-sales-q3-2018-gartner/ Haslam, K. (2018). Apple fourth quarter results: increased iPhone revenue reported. Retrieved from https://www.macworld.co.uk/news/apple/apple-financial-results-3581769/ Lovejoy, B. (2018). Mac market share crashed in Q3, likely in part due to new MacBook Air. Retrieved from https://9to5mac.com/2018/11/21/mac-market-share/ Madsen, D. O. (2017). Not dead yet: the rise, fall and persistence of the BCG Matrix.Problems and Perspectives in Management,15(1), 19-34. Salavou, H. E. (2015). Competitive strategies and their shift to the future.European Business Review,27(1), 80-99. Schawel, C., & Billing, F. (2018). BCG-Matrix. InTop 100 Management Tools(pp. 41-43). Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. Sethna,B.N.(2015).Extensionsandtestingofimportance-performanceanalysis. InProceedingsofthe1982AcademyofMarketingScience(AMS)Annual Conference(pp. 327-331). Springer, Cham.
12NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND BRANDING Smith,J.(2018).BestMacBookProAlternativesin2019.Retrievedfrom https://www.gottabemobile.com/best-macbook-pro-alternatives/ Wicker, P., Soebbing, B.P., Feiler, S. and Breuer, C., 2015. The effect of Porter’s generic strategies on organisational problems of non-profit sports clubs.European Journal for Sport and Society,12(3), pp.281-307. Xu, J. (2018, May). Research on Enterprise Marketing Strategy Based on Product Life Cycle Theory.In8thInternationalConferenceonSocialNetwork,Communicationand Education (SNCE 2018). Atlantis Press.