This is a nursing ethics assignment which is an ethical dilemma (case study ). I prefer to write topic 1, dementia and PEG insertion. Please follow the rubric of this assignment based on the scores is determined.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: Nursing ethics Nursing ethics Name of the Student Name of the University Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1Nursing ethics Reasons and the ethical principles and values to support the position taken (300) Tube feeding isoften referred to adults, who suffers from dysphagia and the alternative approach provides the same nutritional advantage the as hand or spoon feeding. My personal preference would be to refrain from using any nasogastric tube for feeding. It has been recommended byOrlandoni, Peladic and Cherubini, (2019), that feeding tubes cannot be recommendedfor the adultswho are older suffering from advanced dementia. Nasogastric tube can only be applied if the patients is not physically functional to consume food normally. Nasogastric tube fitted improperly can cause distress and bring about mortality in the patient. Some of the complication of NG tube is oesophageal perforation, pneumothorax, inadvertent intracranial placement and trachea bronchopleural placement. It has been suggested by the studies that enteral nutrition does not necessarily approve the survival or recue the risk of aspiration. `’there is no data that could suggest that the tube feeding reduced the risk of pressure sores or infections, improves the functional status, improves the functional status, improves the comfort or prevents aspiration. Schwartz, (2018) have found that the incidence of aspiration pneumonia is higher in patients who undergo enteral feeding than the non-tube fed elderly. In a study by Brookeand Ojo (2015), no improvement has been found in the functional status of the patients with feeding tube. Furthermore, application of the nasogastric tube involves the use of restraints in dementia patients. Application of restraints in the dementia patients directly breaches the autonomy and freedom of the patient. In such cases the autonomy of the patient interferes with the duty of the practitioner. In most of the cases, no consent is taken from the patients before applying the nasogastric tube. This position is supported by the ethical principle of sanctity of life and
2Nursing ethics beneficence.Hence, I personally support the use of “comfort feeding” technique in feeding patients with advance dementia like patient B.
3Nursing ethics Personal emotional responses to ethical dilemma that affects the nursing care (100) Ethical dilemma affects nursing care, by fact that one might find it difficult to take the correct ethical dilemma by resolving the conflict. In case of patient B, I could have initiated the enteral feeding seeing the fact that it would at least add to the body mass of the patient, even if it breaches the ethical principle of autonomy. Another question that made me to question my previous decision is that what would happen, if the patients is unable to consume food even after trying out comfort feeding, as then tube feeding will be the only option left. Personal ways to address when feels others to make unwise decisions (200) In spite of the ethical dilemma, I preferred to choose comfort feeding over tube feeding. However, it is also necessary to educate the family of the patient B, about the complications and the ethical issues related to the use of the feeding tube. It is also necessary to uphold the autonomy and self-determination of the patients, which can be done by accepting the client to be a unique person, having his/her own opinions, values, beliefs and perspectives (Brooke & Ojo, 2015). It is natural, that any patients would try to remove the feeding tube just out of the reflex. No-tube feeding practice has to be sustained in the long term care in special units (Peck et al, 2015). Some of the basis ethical principles that can be used for resolving the ethical dilemma are beneficence, which involves doing good and right thing of the patient and maleficence of not doing harm to the patient (Orlandoni, Peladic & Cherubini, 2019). Changes in the personal practice, reasons for change and comfort level in dealing with the dilemma It is necessary for the nurses to remain adhered to the ethical principles of justice, beneficence,autonomy,fidelityandveracitybeforetakinganydecisionsforpatients (Schwartz et al., 2018). Adhering to the ethical principles measuring which makes the greater
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4Nursing ethics good, could be used for resolving such future conflicts. A systematic process should be engaged in ethical discernment and the analysis. In certain cases, such complicated ethical dilemmas can be made clear by obtaining feedback from the mentors. Consultation with the nurses having experiences helps to resolve several ethical dilemma like this, by reflecting on their past similar experiences.
5Nursing ethics References Brooke, J., & Ojo, O. (2015). Enteral nutrition in dementia: a systematic review.Nutrients, 7(4), 2456-2468. Orlandoni, P., Peladic, N. J., & Cherubini, BA. (2019).Enteral nutrition in advanced dementia: an unresolved dilemma in clinical practice. Peck, G. E., Dani, M., Torrance, A., & Mir, M. A. (2014). Artificial feeding in patients with advanced dementia.British Journal of Hospital Medicine,75(Sup1), C2-C4. Schwartz, D. B. (2018). Enteral nutrition and dementia integrating ethics.Nutrition in Clinical Practice,33(3), 377-387. Schwartz, D. B., Barrocas, A., Wesley, J. R., Kliger, G., Pontes‐Arruda, A., Márquez, H. A., ... & DiTucci, A. (2014). Gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced dementia or near end of life.Nutrition in Clinical Practice,29(6), 829-840.