Project Management: Online Stud Farm Management (OSFMS)

This project is based on the case study Online Stud Farm Management System (OSFMS). The current Manual Systems of the Stud Farm will be replacing by the OSFMS as this process handle the information with open error and it is unsustainable. The project report in this study will consider several factors such as the breeding features, financial features and mobile features.

Running head: PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
Project Management: Online Stud Farm Management (OSFMS)
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Authors Note

1PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
Table of Contents
1. Project Description:............................................................................................................3
2. Part One:.............................................................................................................................3
2.1 Measurable Organizational Value (MOV).......................................................................3
2.2 Area of impact..................................................................................................................3
2.3 Types of Value.................................................................................................................4
2.4 Project Metric...................................................................................................................4
2.5 MOV timeframe...............................................................................................................5
2.6 Summary..........................................................................................................................5
3. Part Two:............................................................................................................................5
3.1 Scope Management Plan.............................................................................................5
3.1.1 Project Scope.................................................................................................................5
3.1.2 List of Resources...........................................................................................................7
4. Part Three...........................................................................................................................7
4.1 Project schedule using WBS:......................................................................................7
4.1.1 Schedule of the Project..................................................................................................7
4.1.2 WBS............................................................................................................................10
4.1.3 Milestones Phases and Deliverables...........................................................................10
5. Part Four:..........................................................................................................................11
5.1 Risk Analysis and Planning of a Project:.......................................................................11
5.1.1 Assumption for the Project..........................................................................................11
5.1.2 Risk Identification Framework...................................................................................11

2PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
6. Part Five:..........................................................................................................................15
6.1 Quality Management Plan..............................................................................................15
6.2 Objectives of quality system delivery for the client.......................................................15
6.2.1 Issues in Quality..........................................................................................................15
7. Bibliography.....................................................................................................................17
8. Appendices:......................................................................................................................20
Appendix 1: Annotated Bibliography..................................................................................20
Appendix 2: Closure Checklist............................................................................................21
Appendix 3: Project Evaluation:..........................................................................................22

3PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
1. Project Description:
The project is based on the case study Online Stud Farm Management System (OSFMS).
For the development in the OSFMS, Globex has contracted Virticon for developing and
managing the project. It is a newly development Farm and since Globex as a long-standing
client of Virtucon, it has made the contract with them and plan to develop the farm. The
OSFMS will be develop in house by the Globex and they will make sure that the solution of
this project is on time and with less expenses as much it is possible taking into consideration
that the requirement of the project is met.
The current Manual Systems of the Stud Farm will be replacing by the OSFMS as this
process handle the information with open error and it is unsustainable. In Manual Systems,
breeders book the services by call or mail and the stud manager has to record them in the
spreadsheet and accept the payment by cheque or credit cards. Now, the breeder will be able
to book and make the payment for services through online platform or from any mobile
devices. The system will be generating breeder’s details, payments, stud details and reports.
The breeder still has an additional option of calling the Stud Manager and booking the
services over phone as per the need arises. The project report in this study will consider
several factors such as the breeding features, financial features and mobile features.
2. Part One:
2.1 Measurable Organizational Value (MOV)
The goal of the project is to develop the Online Stud Farm Management System
(OSFMS) and it will define the value that the Virticon team will provide to the Globex
client.
2.2 Area of impact
The impact of the project will be rank based on the importance as follow:

4PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
Customer: The Breeder of Globex can adopt Online Stud Farm Management System
(OSFMS) to book their services and make the payment online. It can reduce the effort to call
and wait to get the things done manually.
Social: The new Online Stud Farm Management System is easy to book services
between the clients and communicate effectively and smoothly with less time consume.
Strategy: Every details of the breeding report that are booked and all the payment
made are being properly recorded in this newly built Online Stud Farm Management System
Operational: The operation become easier for the Stud Farm as it uses the OSFMS
online system to store their details in the database. The Stud Manager can easily get the
details of any breeder simply by acquiring the information from the database.
Financial: The OSFMS system is designed in such manner that it can help in making
the payment quickly by the breeder and keeping the records of the payment made by the
breeders.
2.3 Types of Value
According to the project being develop following are the types of value being
identified:
Better: The system has improved the manual record to online entry, which has been
helpful for the Stud Manager to check through the records
Faster: The process has been faster and quick, quick booking and making payment
with any much delay
Do more: The client would definitely consider the online system for the growth of
their services.

5PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
2.4 Project Metric
Stakeholder Quantitative Target (money increase / decrease)
Target Expectation
Breeder Target +20 % Very Favorably Exceeding Target
Target +10% Exceeding Target
Target ±10% Performance Target
Target -20% Unfavorable Expectation
Target -10% Risk of Project Failure
Stud Manager
Table 1: Project Matric
2.5 MOV timeframe
Rank Effect Metrics Timeframe
1 Customer The Online Stud Farm Management System has the
capability to reduce the time of booking and making
the payment
1 months
2 Social Provide better communication between Breeder and
Stud Manager
2 months
3 Strategy With the Online Stud Farm Management System the
details of the booked services are recorded
3.5 months
4 Operationa
l
With the new design of Online Stud Farm
Management System, it become easier for the Business
Operation to keep record of the breeder
2.5 months
5 Financial The Online Stud Farm Management System made the
payment easier
4 months
2.6 Summary
MOV has provides the area of impact with reference to the OSFMS project and
identified the best type of value that suits the project and finally provided with the MOV
timeframe of the project.
3. Part Two:
3.1 Scope Management Plan
3.1.1 Project Scope
The project is all about developing the Online Stud Farm Management System.

6PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
Requisite: Virtucon has design the online system for the Globex to record the
details of booking and payment and track details of the breeders.
In of scope and out of scope:
In of scope: The project In of scope include
 The design of the Online Stud Farm Management System (OSFMS)
that provide the activities of the business
 It identifies and manage the records of the breeder services that has
been book
 It helps is making the payment quick and easier
 All the functionalities and non-functionalities of the requirement has
provided in the documented format about the OSFMS system that has
been design by the Virtucon
 The OSFMS system facilitate the project completion within the time of
20 days.
Out of Scope: The project Out of Scope include
 Providing an appropriate training to the staff has not been incorporated.
 Security Maintenance could not be assuring as data is stored online,
there are higher chance of the attackers to hack the data.
Deliverables: Deliverables of the project need-
 To understand the report design based on the system requirements.
 To follow the verification procedure of the project scope
 To document the budget of the project
 To give the overview of the development phase related to the project
 To document the test plan of the report of the system

7PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
Procedure of Scope Verification: The scope of the project will meet the project
deliverables, understand the client requirement and solve the queries raised by the
client.
3.1.2 List of Resources
Resource Name Type Max.
Units Std. Rate
Project Manager Work 100% $100.00/hr
Program Developer Work 100% $82.00/hr
Database Administrator Work 100% $90.00/hr
Developer of GUI Work 100% $77.00/hr
Tester Work 100% $79.00/hr
System Analyst Work 100% $87.00/hr
Accountant Work 100% $88.00/hr
Requirement Analyst Work 100% $68.00/hr
Risk Manager Work 100% $66.00/hr
4. Part Three
4.1 Project schedule using WBS:
4.1.1 Schedule of the Project
Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors Resource
Names
OSFMS System 20 days? Sat 5/19/18 Fri 6/15/18
Initiation 3 days? Sat 5/19/18 Wed 5/23/18
Start the Business
Case development 1 day? Mon 5/21/18 Mon 5/21/18 Project
Manager
Assigning a project
manager 1 day? Tue 5/22/18 Tue 5/22/18 2 Project
Manager
Project Charter has
to develop 1 day? Wed 5/23/18 Wed 5/23/18 3 Project
Manager
Milestone 1:
Initiation 0 days Sat 5/19/18 Sat 5/19/18
Planning 12 days? Sat 5/19/18 Tue 6/5/18
Primary Planning
need to perform 7 days? Sat 5/19/18 Tue 5/29/18
Performing a Plan
with Supplementary 12 days? Sat 5/19/18 Tue 6/5/18

8PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
Quality
Management Planning 1 day? Wed 5/30/18 Wed 5/30/18 11 Project
Manager
Management of
database 1 day? Thu 5/31/18 Thu 5/31/18 14
Management of
Risk planning 1 day? Fri 6/1/18 Fri 6/1/18 15 Risk Manager
Management of
change planning 1 day? Mon 6/4/18 Mon 6/4/18 16 Project
Manager
Management of
communication Planning 1 day? Tue 6/5/18 Tue 6/5/18 17 Project
Manager
Milestone 3:
Confirmation of
Supplementary Planning
0 days Sat 5/19/18 Sat 5/19/18
Milestone 4:
Planning 0 days Sat 5/19/18 Sat 5/19/18
Execution 16 days? Sat 5/19/18 Mon 6/11/18
Checking of Records 1 day? Wed 6/6/18 Wed 6/6/18 18 Tester
Planning a meeting
with the stud manager 1 day? Thu 6/7/18 Thu 6/7/18 22 Project
Manager
providing with
updates 1 day? Fri 6/8/18 Fri 6/8/18 23 Program
Developer
Made necessary
modification 1 day? Mon 6/11/18 Mon 6/11/18 24 Program
Developer
Milestone 5:
Completion of
Execution
0 days Sat 5/19/18 Sat 5/19/18
Performance and
control 18 days? Sat 5/19/18 Wed 6/13/18
Checking progress of
the project 1 day Tue 6/12/18 Tue 6/12/18 25 Project
Manager
Checking the budget
cost and effort 1 day? Wed 6/13/18 Wed 6/13/18 28 Accountant
Milestone 6:
Completion of
performance and control
0 days Sat 5/19/18 Sat 5/19/18
Project Closure 20 days? Sat 5/19/18 Fri 6/15/18
Online Stud Farm
Management System
functioning evaluation
1 day? Thu 6/14/18 Thu 6/14/18 29 System
Analyst
Product Launch 1 day? Fri 6/15/18 Fri 6/15/18 32 Project
Manager
Milestone 6: Closing
of the project 0 days Sat 5/19/18 Sat 5/19/18

9PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
Figure 1: Gantt Chart
Source: Created by Author

10PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
4.1.2 WBS
OSFMS System
Inititaon
Start the Business Case
development
Assigning a project
manager
Project Charter has to
develop
Milestone 1: Initiation
Planning
Primary Planning need to
perform
Create a WBS
Schedule the plan
Resources need for the
plan
Budgeting the plan
Milestone 2: Confirmation
of Primary Planning
Performing a Plan with
Supplementary
Quality Management
Planning
Management of database
Management of Risk
planning
Management of change
planning
Management of
communication Planning
Milestone 3: Confirmation
of Supplementary
Planning
Milestone 4: Planning
Execution
Checking of Records
Planning a meeting with
the stud manager
providing with updates
Made necessary
modification
Milestone 5: Completion
of Execution
Performance and control
Checking progress of the
project
Checking the budget cost
and effort
Milestone 6: Completion
of performance and
control
Project Closure
Online Stud Farm
Management System
functioning evaluation
Product Launch
Milestone 6: Closing of
the project
Figure 2: Work Breakdown Structure
Source: Created by Author
4.1.3 Milestones Phases and Deliverables
Task Name Start
OSFMS System Sat 5/19/18
Milestone 1: Initiation Sat 5/19/18
Milestone 2: Confirmation of Primary Planning Sat 5/19/18
Milestone 3: Confirmation of Supplementary Planning Sat 5/19/18
Milestone 4: Planning Sat 5/19/18
Milestone 5: Completion of Execution Sat 5/19/18
Milestone 6: Completion of performance and control Sat 5/19/18
Milestone 7: Closing of the project Sat 5/19/18

11PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
5. Part Four:
5.1 Risk Analysis and Planning of a Project:
5.1.1 Assumption for the Project
Time: Total time required for completion of the OSFMS project would be 20 days.
Budget: Estimation of the cost of the project is $13,920
Resources: All necessary resources have to be carried out for business operations.
5.1.2 Risk Identification Framework
Sl
No.
Rank Risk Descriptio
n
Category Root
Caus
e
Trig
gers
Potential
Response
s
Risk
Owne
r
Probabilit
y
Impact Status

12PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
R44 1 malf
uncti
onin
g of
OSF
MS
With ill-
configurati
on of
rostering,
risk in
huge
number get
erupted
Risk that
is
technical
Lack
of
techni
cal
know
ledge
of the
devel
oper
led to
wron
g
desig
n of
the
OSF
MS
Instal
lation
error
in the
OSF
MS
Effective
installatio
n of
OSFMS
Projec
t
Mana
ger
Medium High 1 week
Schedul
e
R19 2 Esti
mati
on
error
in
budg
et
Scheduled
an
inappropria
te cost
budget for
the project
Risk that
is
Financial
Inapp
ropria
te
mark
et
analy
sis
and
Issue
s
with
the
budg
et
due
to
Setting up
of the
project
budget
with
market
analysis
Finan
cial
manag
er
Medium High 2 week
Schedul
e

13PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
budge
t
sched
uled
by the
proje
ct
mana
ger
inapp
ropri
ate
mark
et
analy
sis
R8 3 Sche
dulin
g are
inap
prop
riate
Project
manager
misinterpre
ted the
objective
of the
project
with wrong
scheduling
Risk of
the
Project
Mish
ap
occur
s due
to
misun
dersta
nding
of the
sched
uling
opera
tion
of the
proje
ct
Due
to
proje
ct
deliv
erabl
e
misu
nders
tandi
ng,
risk
has
occur
red in
the
Project
manager
should
proceed
with
better
understan
ding and
responsibi
lity as per
the
delivery
requireme
nt of the
project
Projec
t
Mana
ger
Medium High 1.5
Week
Schdule
d

14PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
proje
ct
sched
uling
R32 4 Man
age
ment
are
inap
prop
riate
Mishaps of
project
manageme
nt leads to
greater
problems
Risk of
the
Project
Inexp
erienc
e
proje
ct
mana
ger
are
gener
ally a
risk
to the
proje
ct
Risk
with
the
proje
ct
erupt
with
inexp
erien
ce
proje
ct
mana
ger
Project
manager
need to
follow
methodol
ogy for
project
activity
Projec
t
Mana
ger
Medium High 1 week
Schedul
e
R28 5 Reso
urce
s
Resources
of the
project not
used
effectively
Risk of
the
Resource
s
Proje
ct
lead
and
Proje
ct
Mana
Proje
ct
resou
rces
are
not
used
Organizati
on need to
appoint
skilled
project
managers
Projec
t
Mana
ger
Medium Mediu
m
1 week
schedule

15PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
ger
are
ineffe
ctive
to use
proje
ct
resou
rces
effect
ively
and
wisel
y by
the
proje
ct
lead
or
mana
ger
6. Part Five:
6.1 Quality Management Plan
Occurance
Probability
Occurance Impact
Very
Low
Low Medium High Very High
Very Low
Low
Medium Risk of
Resource
Risk
technically
High Risk in Schedule Risk
technically
Very High
Figure 3: Qualitative Analysis of Risk
Source: Created by Author

16PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
6.2 Objectives of quality system delivery for the client
The establishment of Online Stud Farm Management System could deliver a best
software for recoding the breeders’ details into the database and keep track of the details.
6.2.1 Issues in Quality
Project Name: Online Stud Farm Management System Project Manager Name:
Sl
No.
Possible issue related to quality Time for
Mitigation
Mitigation
Method
Owner Status
1 Completion of each step with
prepared documentation for the
one that are not up to the mark.
Due to this, it become difficult for
the clients and the stakeholders to
move to the project next phase.
1 months Inspection Project
Manager
Open
2 Since the resources of hardware
and software used are not a
premium quality which make
difficult to serve the quality
2 months Inspection Project
Manager
Open
3 Inappropriate skills of the project
manager lead the project to suffer
as it make difficult to handle the
project aspects
1 months Inspection Project
Manager
Open

17PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
7. Bibliography
Berta, M., Bottero, M., & Ferretti, V. (2018). A mixed methods approach for the integration
of urban design and economic evaluation: Industrial heritage and urban regeneration
in China. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(2),
208-232.
Chu, M., Matthews, J., & Love, P. E. (2018). Integrating mobile Building Information
Modelling and Augmented Reality systems: An experimental study. Automation in
Construction, 85, 305-316.
Ding, J., Wang, N., & Hu, L. (2018). Framework for Designing Project Delivery and
Contract Strategy in Chinese Construction Industry Based on Value-Added
Analysis. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018.
Farina, L., Danesi, E., Travaglini, A., Mancini, M., & Trucco, P. (2018). Integration of
Constructability and Project Risk Management. In Closing the Gap Between Practice
and Research in Industrial Engineering (pp. 313-321). Springer, Cham.
Floricel, S., Michela, J. L., & Piperca, S. (2016). Complexity, uncertainty-reduction
strategies, and project performance. International Journal of Project
Management, 34(7), 1360-1383.
Gemünden, H. G., Lehner, P., & Kock, A. (2018). The project-oriented organization and its
contribution to innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 147-
160.
Iwu, C. G., Chapano, M., & Twum-Darko, M. (2018). The impact of high performance work
practices on project performance. A case study of construction companies in South
Africa. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica, 14(1).

18PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
Keegan, A., Ringhofer, C., & Huemann, M. (2018). Human resource management and
project based organizing: Fertile ground, missed opportunities and prospects for
closer connections. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 121-133.
Lemoussu, S., Chaudemar, J. C., & Vingerhoeds, R. A. (2018). Systems Engineering and
Project Management Process Modeling in the Aeronautics Context: The SMEs Study
Case. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal
of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 5(2).
Liu, H. J., Love, P. E., Smith, J., Sing, M. C., & Matthews, J. (2018). Evaluation of public–
private partnerships: A life-cycle Performance Prism for ensuring value for
money. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 2399654417750879.
Makui, A., Zadeh, P., Bagherpour, M., & Jabbarzadeh, A. (2018). A structural equation
modeling approach to examine the relationship between complexity factors of a
project and the merits of project manager. Journal of Project Management, 3(1), 1-12.
Pasian, B., & Silvius, A. G. (2016). A Review of Project Management Research in IRNOP
and PMI Conferences from 2009 to 2014 to Identify Emerging Perspectives. In the
Proceedings of European Academy of Management Conference,“Manageable
Cooperation”, June (Vol. 1, p. 19).
Qazi, A., Quigley, J., Dickson, A., & Kirytopoulos, K. (2016). Project Complexity and Risk
Management (ProCRiM): Towards modelling project complexity driven risk paths in
construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1183-
1198.
Shi, L., Newnes, L., Culley, S., & Allen, B. (2018). Modelling, monitoring and evaluation to
support automatic engineering process management. Proceedings of the Institution of
Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 232(1), 17-31.

19PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
Wery, J., Gaudreault, J., Thomas, A., & Marier, P. (2018). Simulation-optimisation based
framework for Sales and Operations Planning taking into account new products
opportunities in a co-production context. Computers in Industry, 94, 41-51.
Zhang, M., Tse, Y. K., Doherty, B., Li, S., & Akhtar, P. (2018). Sustainable supply chain
management: Confirmation of a higher-order model. Resources, Conservation and
Recycling, 128, 206-221.

20PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
8. Appendices:
Appendix 1: Annotated Bibliography
Müller, R., & Turner, R. (2007). The influence of project managers on project success
criteria and project success by type of project. European management journal, 25(4),
298-309.
Müller & Turner (2017) had illustrated the importance of Project Manager in success
of a project. The author had also received responses on web-based survey where it could be
clearly seen that criteria and rates of the success of the project differs depending on the
complexity of the project, industry and project manager age and nationality. In the study it
has been recognized that different project requires different procedure of managing the
project. Further, in the research paper, it was also known that while choosing the right
methodology of project management, sponsor of the project or project manager will help in
identifying the appropriate success factors to achieve the success on the project. The author
has used ANOVA analyses with the test of post-hoc Scheffe that has responded on 959
sample. This has help them identify the rating differences of the success criteria. The
differences were observed in the complexity, importance of the project, type of contract and
industry sector. Thus, with the study of the research paper, it has concluded that the strength
is completely based on the mixed-method approach that provide a credible result. Weakness
were categorised with nationality. The major factor of the research study was the complexity
of the project as it could not provide an appropriate research.
Asgari, M., Kheyroddin, A., & Naderpour, H. (2018). Evaluation of Project Critical
Success Factors for Key Construction Players and Objectives. International Journal of
Engineering-Transactions B: Applications, 31(2), 228-240.

21PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
In this paper, Asgari, Kheyroddin & Naderpour (2018) has tried to make understand
that Critical Success Factor (CSFs) will help in supporting and evaluating the project success
with the approach of best project implementation which could definitely increase the
probability of the success. The paper has identified the CSFs impact on the construction
industry project. With these five major categories were classified namely, Human Resources,
Project Characteristics, Interactive processes, Financial, and Contractual Arrangement. The
PMBOK guide provide an exclusive effort in offering the product output. The limit is being
predetermined with Quality, Cost and Time. In further research study, it was found that
insufficient knowledge of CSFs makes it difficult to monitor, control and the improve the
performance of the project. From different aspects of the agent and project factor the CSFs
could be identified. Thus, throughout the research study around 42 factors of success could be
identified and the selection were based on the study that were done previously with the
construction industry experts. This study could offer some uses that are practical and used as
guidelines for CSFs for their project.
Appendix 2: Closure Checklist
Task Name Resource Names Signature
OSFMS System
Inititaon
Start the Business Case development Project Manager
Assigning a project manager Project Manager
Project Charter has to develop Project Manager
Milestone 1: Initiation
Planning
Primary Planning need to perform
Create a WBS Project Manager
Schedule the plan Project Manager
Resources need for the plan Requirement
Analyst
Budgeting the plan Accountant
Milestone 2: Confirmation of Primary Planning
Performing a Plan with Supplementary
Quality Management Planning Project Manager

22PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
Management of database
Management of Risk planning Risk Manager
Management of change planning Project Manager
Management of communication Planning Project Manager
Milestone 3: Confirmation of Supplementary Planning
Milestone 4: Planning
Execution
Checking of Records Tester
Planning a meeting with the stud manager Project Manager
providing with updates Program Developer
Made necessary modification Program Developer
Milestone 5: Completion of Execution
Performance and control
Checking progress of the project Project Manager
Checking the budget cost and effort Accountant
Milestone 6: Completion of performance and control
Project Closure
Online Stud Farm Management System functioning
evaluation System Analyst
Product Launch Project Manager
Milestone 7: Closing of the project
Appendix 3: Project Evaluation:
The impact of MOC were on multiple are of the project that are illustrated below:
Customer: The Breeder of Globex can adopt Online Stud Farm Management System
(OSFMS) to book their services and make the payment online. It can reduce the effort to call
and wait to get the things done manually.
Social: The new Online Stud Farm Management System is easy to book services
between the clients and communicate effectively and smoothly with less time consume.
Strategy: Every details of the breeding report that are booked and all the payment
made are being properly recorded in this newly built Online Stud Farm Management System

23PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ONLINE STUD FARM MANAGEMENT (OSFMS)
Operational: The operation become easier for the Stud Farm as it uses the OSFMS
online system to store their details in the database. The Stud Manager can easily get the
details of any breeder simply by acquiring the information from the database.
Financial: The OSFMS system is designed in such manner that it can help in making
the payment quickly by the breeder and keeping the records of the payment made by the
breeders.