This article discusses specific measures and strategies to prevent harm caused by opioids. It explores legislative and educational approaches to address the opioid crisis, including controlling prescription, supply, and demand of opioids.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: OPIOIDS1 Opioids Harm Prevention Student’s Name Institution
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Opioids Harm Prevention2 Introduction Opioids are drugs which are prescribed to patients by doctors to relieve and treat pain. Opioids can also include illegal heroin and synthetic opioids. Opioids are medically used to treat patients suffering from chronic headaches and backaches, relieve pain after surgery, cancer pain, and pain from accidents. Opioids relieve pain by blocking body parts experiencing pain from sending message to the brain. Opioids abuse and misuse are widespread, as they are very addictive. There are various side effects of opioids like sleepless, nausea constipation, shallow breathing, loss of unconsciousness, and slowed heart rate. This paper seeks to discuss specific measures which can be undertaken to prevent opioid harm (Dowell et al. 2016). Meetings Purpose, Key Agendas and Meeting Logistics There are a lot of deaths caused by drug abuse and misuse in the United States. Therefore a public policy meeting was held to discuss various issues regarding opioids. The primary purpose of the meeting was to discuss and come up with multiple ways to prevent harm caused by opioids. The main participants were WHO, FDA, pharmaceutical companies, manufacturers, government, and marketers. The critical agendas of the meeting were first outline harms caused by opioids, why opioid use is on the rise and finally come up with legislative and educational strategies to prevent opioid side effects (da Mota Pedrosa et al. 2016). The meeting took place in a conference room located in a central, affordable, and comfortable area where all participants could access. The facility was spacious to accommodate all the sessions of the meeting. There was a big table and chairs were arranged around it such that all participants face one another. The meeting required logistics such as audiovisual and technology items such as microphone speakers, computer and data projector screen. Tech
Opioids Harm Prevention3 support experts were available to deal with technical problems. During the meeting, beverage and meals are essential. Description of the Committee The public policy meeting consists of a committee made up of World Health Organization Secretariat, Food and Drug Association representatives, government representative, and directors from drug manufacturers, marketers, and Centers for Disease Control and prevention. CDC reports have shown that overdose and use of drugs have caused many diseases. Manufacturers are responsible for the production and distribution of drug substances thus were present in the meeting (Saloner et al. 2018). The Topic Discussed During the Meeting and the Committee Process The committee discussed one specific issue that is legislative and educational strategies suitable for opioids harm prevention. The legal policy will deal with laws concerning the examination of physical and mental status, doctor shopping laws, laws governing pain management in clinics, drug prescription laws, access to opioids, and overdose prescription laws (Foxwell et al. 2019). Rules should be set to control access, dosage, usage, and prescription of drugs. Education strategies would focus on creating public awareness on drugs. Community’s education on some issues such as safe storage, use, and disposal of prescribed drugs is appropriate. Efforts to educate medical prescribers like physicians on various areas like identification and treatment of pain, alternative methods to treat depression, screening drug abuse, assessment of mental sickness and ways to treat vulnerable population are necessary. The committee discussed the above topic broadly.
Opioids Harm Prevention4 Key Stakeholders Positions The key stakeholders related to the topic are law enforcement, the public, medical officers, families, suppliers, investors, creditors, and consumers of the opioids. Opioids directly or indirectly harm these stakeholders. Industries producing opioids produce gases and waste materials which cause environmental degradation (Pergolizzi et al. 2018). The public suffers from global warming caused by greenhouse gases from drug industries and disposal. Most of the stakeholders are indirectly harmed by opioids. Interactions of the Meeting The WHO secretariat chaired the meeting with the help of the FDA director. The discussion was open to everyone to participate. They first discussed the APHA policy, which is concerned with distribution programs. The system deals with only distribution issues but no other strategies which can prevent opioids harm such as prescription, supply, and demand programs. The committee came up with a suggestion on the inclusion of additional actions in the policy. Many opioids prescribed for pain treatments end up misused. Patients sometimes overdose or use the painkillers for other purposes rather than relieving pain (Chisholm-Burns et al. 2019). The CDC representatives argued that their reports have shown that abuse of prescribed drugs is the growing challenge in the United States. The problem is growing fast due to the use of prescribed opioids. Pharmaceutical companies sometimes make unprescribed sale medicines to people. Clinics provide opioids increasing access and availability of drugs which end up misused.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Opioids Harm Prevention5 Mortality rates associated with drug abuse is a public health issue; thus, the government should take appropriate measures to reduce usage and effects of opioids. Manufacturers and distributors should control the production and delivery of drugs; therefore, they should control the supply of drug substances. Manufacturers should control drug substances abuse by producing drugs enough for treatment and deliver them to health care facilities in limited quantities. The committee comes up with different policy initiatives to reduce the supply of drugs to control diversion to abuse and misuse. Improved technician education can be used to make sure that clinicians only prescribe doses that are suitable for curing chronic pain. Also, individuals should be educated on the effects of opioids abuse to reduce drug demand (Brooks et al. 2017). Outcomes of the Meeting Based on the focus on legislative and educational strategies, the stakeholders involved concluded that laws should be set to control prescription, supply, and demand of opioids. The stakeholders classified the policy into two approaches for the prevention of drug abuse and misuse and interventions strategies meant to promote access services supporting drug abuse. Some of the plans are Good Samaritan laws which help access to rescue drugs and programs concerning overdose reduction. The meeting concluded with various recommendations from members. Doctors or physicians should first examine mental stability of patients before prescribing medications to them, laws to control the number of clinics to monitor availability and access of medicines for example government should require registration before a clinic set up. Prescribers should be educated on alternative substances to be used to reduce pain. Training of manufactures and providers on alternative elements which they can produce to serve the same purpose as
Opioids Harm Prevention6 opioids. Opioids harm countries economy; thus, the government should set up regulations to control abuse and misuse of drug substances (Hawk et al. 2015).
Opioids Harm Prevention7 References Brooks, M. J., Holm, S. E., Thomas, S., & Rich, A. J. (2017). Addressing Opioid Misuse and Abuse through Interprofessional Engagement and Education.Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice,16(1), 9. Chisholm-Burns, M. A., Spivey, C. A., Sherwin, E., Wheeler, J., & Hohmeier, K. (2019). The opioid crisis: Origins, trends, policies, and the roles of pharmacists.American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy,76(7), 424-435. da Mota Pedrosa, A., Blazevic, V., & Jasmand, C. (2015). Logistics innovation development: a micro-level perspective.International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,45(4), 313-332. Dowell, D., Haegerich, T. M., & Chou, R. (2016). CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016.Jama,315(15), 1624-1645. Foxwell, A. M., Uritsky, T., & Meghani, S. H. (2019, April). Opioids and Cancer Pain Management in the United States: Public policy and legal challenges. InSeminars in oncology nursing. WB Saunders. Hawk, K. F., Vaca, F. E., & D’Onofrio, G. (2015). Focus: Addiction: Reducing fatal opioid overdose: Prevention, treatment and harm reduction strategies.The Yale journal of biology and medicine,88(3), 235. Pergolizzi Jr, J. V., Taylor Jr, R., LeQuang, J. A., & Raffa, R. B. (2018). What’s holding back abuse-deterrent opioid formulations? Considering 12 US stakeholders.Expert opinion on drug delivery,15(6), 567-576.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Opioids Harm Prevention8 Saloner, B., McGinty, E. E., Beletsky, L., Bluthenthal, R., Beyrer, C., Botticelli, M., & Sherman, S. G. (2018). A public health strategy for the opioid crisis.Public Health Reports, 133(1_suppl), 24S-34S.