EDU4096-N Combining Professional and Academic Practice

Parent Partnership 0
Title: A critical commentary of professional development carried out
Assignment Name:
Student Name:
Course Name and Number:
Professor:
Date:

Parent Partnership 1
Contents
Introduction................................................................................................................................2
Professional Development.........................................................................................................3
Critical Commentary..................................................................................................................5
SWOC Analysis.......................................................................................................................12
Strengths –............................................................................................................................12
Weaknesses –.......................................................................................................................13
Opportunities –.....................................................................................................................13
Challenges –.........................................................................................................................13
Action Plan...............................................................................................................................13
Conclusion................................................................................................................................16
References................................................................................................................................17

Parent Partnership 2
Introduction
Parents are the first teacher of a kid. They are responsible for making the kid learn about
the basic things before the kid is enrolled in a school. The responsibility of parents starts from
the day of birth of their kid by the time the kid starts going to school. But the responsibility of
parents never ends, they have to work in collaboration with their kid’s teachers, so as to
provide the kid with effective learning. These early days of learning embark a foundation for
the kid that would help in building a solid future. Parent partnership is a process of combined
efforts, in which the parents and the teacher help each other in different ways, so as to offer
the kid with a great learning experience. So, as a person who will be turning into a teacher
soon, it is crucial that I understand the different aspects associated with parent partnership
and understand the different tactics that can be applied in helping the parent and the kid, in
this learning process. There is an attitude that prevails amongst many parents that their
responsibility ends as soon as their kid goes to school. As a future teacher, I have to end this
attitude of parents towards their kid education and learning. I have the responsibility to make
the parents understand that parents have a role that has to be played in and outside the
classroom and the home. They are the main educators and that the role of a teacher is of a
strong supporter.. Thus, there are certain goals that I have to fulfill from this critical
commentary, which will be beneficial to me as a future teacher. The goals are –
 To understand parent partnership deeply, along with the various tactics that can be
used for formulating a better relationship with the parents and to increase the
involvement of the parents in the classroom.
 To critical analyze my journey and learn about different aspects.
 To increase the awareness of parents about parent partnership, along with deepening
my knowledge too about the complete approach.

Parent Partnership 3
 Lastly, to utilize the different tactics of parent partnership in the better development of
the child.
Professional Development
We live in a fast-changing world, thus it is paramount that we should also keep
changing and developing. The changes are inevitable and thus, as teachers, we should adapt
them for our benefits. In the opinion of Bellanca & Brandt, it is vital to have a professional
learning experience and with the time limitations that teachers have, online platforms can
help the teachers in professional development (Bellanca & Brandt, 2010). In my opinion,
online programs for professional development can help teachers who lead a busy life and
does not have time for traditional practices.
In my opinion, due to effective professional development, teachers are facilitated with
the opportunity to keep advancing their skills and knowledge, which is essential for providing
the students with high standards of learning. According to Levstik, Tyson & Hover, the main
components of professional development are instructional practices, a deeper focus on the
learning communities, the growth of content knowledge and the student’s achievement
(Levstik, Tyson & Hover, 2008). In my view, professional development has the main focus
on the needs of a teacher, which includes sharing ideas, forming relationships, reflection, and
teaching. But, it should be noted that all professional development does not necessarily help
in progress, some can have an adverse effect too.
Though initially many educators faced immense issues to attain quality professional
development. But with the main focus laid on the students learning and to prepare the
students for bigger goals, professional development became paramount, and thus, teachers
were provided with the pedagogy and content knowledge that will help students in a better
way (Colbert, Brown, Choi, & Thomas, 2008; Patton & Parker, 2015; Wei, Darling-

Parent Partnership 4
Hammond, Andree, Richardson, & Orphanos, 2009). Thus, it is an interrelated practice,
which depends on a various different aspect. Due to this professional development, cannot be
conducted only with the efforts of the teacher.
According to Grimm, Kaufman, & Doty, initially, teachers were not consulted at all
regarding their developmental needs when the traditional approaches of professional
development were in practice (Grimm, Kaufman & Doty, 2014). Though with time this has
changed still, there is not an accurate model for professional development.
There are studies that have also highlighted the fact that professional development
programs that have an approach of “one size fits all” cannot cater to the needs and growth of
individual teachers and it is crucial that the professional development programs should be
diverse and multifaceted, as they will address the individual needs of all the teachers that will
be in sync with the classroom needs of the teachers (Koretz, 2008; Patton & Parker, 2015).
In my opinion, some of the important aspects of professional development are the content
focus, collaborative participation, and active learning. All these features provide teachers
with effective professional development.
 Content Focus
According to Lee & Buxton, a content focus showcases the requirement for
professional development activities, which have a main focus on the subject matter
content, that is, it focuses on increasing the content knowledge of the teachers and
also their skills that support student’s growth, along with the focus on the student’s
learning (Lee & Buxton, 2013). Thus, content focus pays more attention to the
knowledge and skills of the teacher, so that the students can be provided with better
learning.
 Active learning

Parent Partnership 5
According to Darling-Hammond, Orphanos, Richardson, Andree & Wei,
effective professional development is possible only if the teachers are involved
actively in the complete experience. This experience can be through any type of
collaboration or by a professional development community (Darling-Hammond,
Orphanos, Richardson, Andree & Wei, 2009).
 Collaborative participation
According to Dufour, many of the researches have highlighted the fact that
educators’ benefits even more through combined and collaborative participation. It is
due to the collaborative wisdom of different colleagues that are part of the community
(Dufour, 2014).
Critical Commentary
In the opinion of Selwyn, Banaji, Hadjithoma-Garstka & Clark, the participation of
parents in the holistic development of the child is considered as a crucial malleable factor,
which was identified by the educational economists’ years back and this lead to the
incorporation of parent partnership in the different educational policies around the world
(Selwyn, Banaji, Hadjithoma-Garstka & Clark, 2011). In the United Kingdom, the various
policy formulators identified the advantages of parent partnership in the better development
of the child, which forced them to formulate new strategies for offering a better learning
experience to the children. The educational economists in the United Kingdom initiated the
participation of parents in the child’s learning with various different programs from the last
fifteen years. During these days, with the advancement in the technological sector, the
teachers have been facilitated with better and convenient opportunities to connect with
parents through online intranets, e-learning platforms and university websites, and many

Parent Partnership 6
other (Ballam & Stanley, 2009). In the United Kingdom, there are many schools that push the
parents to increase their involvement in their kids learning by creating a mandatory
agreement with the parents, forcing the parents to actively participate in kid’s homework,
parent-teacher meetings, and many more activities. This has been made mandatory due to the
attitude of many parents, as they do not want to participate in any school activities.
In my opinion, if the educational system of the United Kingdom is increasing their efforts
for the betterment of students then it is also the duty of parents to acknowledge these efforts
by participating in their child’s learning process. As a future teacher, I also have to
acknowledge these efforts by understanding the latest trends that can be used for a better
parent-teacher relationship (Brereton, 2010). I also feel that though many of the schools have
made it mandatory for the parents to regularly participate in their child’s development
process, the agreement that is formulated between the schools and parents should also be
flexible for parents who are both working and have a strict working schedule. The other thing
which I feel and have examined parent partnership is that the involvement of the parent
should also be conducted in different ways (Choi & Kim, 2014). Thus the Epstein model
includes–
 Parenting – This process helps in the parents in understanding the child in a better
manner, their different traits and also helps the parents in setting a learning
environment at home inspired by the strengths and weaknesses of their child.
 Communicating – The process of telling parents about the school programs and also
discussing the progress of the child. The process of communication happens between
home to school and vice-versa.
 Volunteering – It is the duty of the teacher and the school to improve the schedules
that would help in increasing the volunteers for parent partnership.

Parent Partnership 7
 Learning at home – The other duty of the teachers is to increase the participation of
parents in the child’s homework. This should be initiated by building activities and
practices that involve compulsory involvement of parents in activities that are to be
performed at home.
 Decision Making – This parental involvement requires the increase in participation of
parents in school decisions. In this approach, a committee should be formulated that
provides the parents with the power to take a decision on the school administration
and governance.
 Increase in collaboration with the society – This parental involvement requires the
collaboration of communities, schools, and agencies that will help in strengthening
the family practices and the school programs for better parent partnership.
In my opinion, these different types of parental involvement will be beneficial for the
kids, but there are various aspects that can also create many issues. It is a good initiative to
provide the parent with the power to help the school in the decision-making process, but
giving them the power to make a decision on the school governance and administration can
create hindrance in the other school activities (Gonida & Cortina, 2014). The other aspect
which all these parental involvement is missing is the attitude of the teacher and parents
towards the kids during the various different learning activities. In the early childhood
learning days, kids have a fast grasping power and thus, they are often seen copying their
parent's habits, thus parents have to be more conscious about what they say and do in front of
their kids.
The key reason that has forced educational institutions to elevate parent’s participation in
their child’s development, is the huge positive impact it has on the child’s growth (Gordon &
Cui, 2014). There are various aspects that massively impact the progress of the child in

Parent Partnership 8
school and the parental model of Hoover-Dempsey covers and elaborates the different
aspects. The various aspects have been divided into five levels, they are –
 The first level is the decision of the parents to participate in their child’s better
development. This is conducted through the decision that parents take on school
invitation and school agreements.
 The other aspect that helps in involvement is the choice of the parents. This is
determined by the skills which the parents possess, the time availability, and the
amount of knowledge that parents possess.
 The ultimate result of the involvement of the school’s outcome. For example,
modeling, reinforcement, and construction.
 The different variables that can be helpful for tempering and mediating. These
variables should have the potential to fulfill the school expectation and the actions
taken by the school for parent’s involvement.
 The last level of this model is the child’s outcome. The achievement and progress
made by the child (Ice & Hoover-Dempsey, 2010).
After analyzing and understanding the different aspects proposed by the Hoover-
Dempsey model is that through the various aspects that have been highlighted all are crucial
for effective parent involvement, but the model focuses more on the third level, which is the
school outcome. In my opinion, for an effective parent partnership, there are three main basic
aspects that are communication, the behavior of the teacher and parent towards the child, and
a strong bond (Kaur, 2017). The fact that this model has also ignored the behavior aspect
highlights the fact that many scholars have still not explored this aspect.
In my opinion, the student outcome is also affected by three mechanisms. The first
one is socializing. The process of socializing can be explained as the involvement of the

Parent Partnership 9
parents at home in their child’s education. This involves the different ways through which a
parent supervises their kid’s homework and the different way through which the parent
contributes to the homework (Kuan & Chuen, 2017). The second aspect that affects student
outcome is the development of social control with the help of school-based participation. The
school-based pariticpation provides the parents with the chance to build a strong bond with
the teacher. This also provides the teachers with valuable information about the child from
the parents. The teacher also comes to know about the approaches that are being practiced by
the parents and the vision of the parents for their child (Lalayants, 2015). So as a future
teacher, it will be my duty to have regular discussions with the parents, asking them about the
various activities that are practiced by the child at home, the child’s attitude at home, and also
the different behavior and reactions that a child displays during different circumstances at
home. As a teacher, I will require all this information for analyzing the traits of the child’s for
implementing activities that are crucial for bringing a positive change in the child. The third
mechanism that impacts the student’s outcome is communication, which takes place between
the parent and the school. According to me, this is the most important mechanism for the
effective development of the child (McAfee & Vergason, 2018). The communication
between both the parties will facilitate the parents with the various techniques that the parents
can use for changing the behavior of the child. The parents will learn a lot about the child and
will also attain professional help for controlling the behavior and mood swings of their child.
The reason I consider this aspect most crucial that it addresses the three core aspects of parent
partnership, which are communication, behavior, and a strong bond (Petro, 2013). The
parents will acquire the knowledge to implement productive methods that do not demotivate
the children. As in early childhood learning, the one thing that has to be constant is
encouraging the child for the betterment. The reason that makes me give such high preference
to the behavior of the parent and teacher is that, in the current busy world, there are many

Parent Partnership 10
parents that have the habit of releasing their stress and frustration on their kids in the form of
misbehavior, which demoralizes the child and at such an early age, the child loses the power
to express himself openly (McGowan, 2018).
According to the opinion of Hill & Taylor, social control and attaining information
from an insider, both help in elevating the social capital (Hill & Taylor, 2010). I feel that
many of the scholars have this perception about social control and gaining information from
an insider for better child development, as it helps in increasing the involvement of the
parents in the school activities. Also, it is through this engagement that the parents learn
about the school’s expectations from the parents and the child’s homework (Xu & Wu, 2013).
This helps the parents to shape the child’s work in a better way and in sync with the
expectation of the school. Thus, both these aspects help in attaining better school and student
outcomes. The other advantage of this aspect to the parents is that during the regular
involvement in the school-based activities the parents also learn from the other participating
parents. The exchange of information between different parents helps in learning about
different techniques that can be undertaken for improving the performance of the children.
The fact that parent partnership is a process in which teachers learn about a lot of things from
the parents about the kids and the school expectations. In the same manner, during the
various school-based activities, the teachers also learn about the various expectations of the
parents from the child and the school. Thus, this can be formulated that the approach of
parent partnership is a two-way process of communication (Yates & Gatsou, 2017).
The theory of parenting style also highlights the fact that the main factors that
determine the progress of the child are the behavior of the parents at home. This does not
only include the behavior while teaching the child but during the entire day. The theory of
parenting style consists of three dimensions and all these dimensions contribute in
understanding the child’s attitude and behavior. The first aspect of this theory is the

Parent Partnership 11
encouragement and support of autonomy. This dimension of the theory states every parent
should always encourage their child to become independent from an early stage (Chen &
Fish, 2012). This can be practiced by forcing the child to voluntarily and independently solve
its various problems. These problems can be a minute day to day issues but it is the
responsibility of the parent to let the child become independent from an early age. This will
provide the child with confidence and they will attain the power to formulate better decisions.
The second part of the theory is direct parental involvement. This aspect helps in determining
the extent to which a parent will get for their child’s growth. This aspect also helps in
measuring the interest level of parents in the future of their child. The third aspect of the
theory is the provision of the structure. This aspect is associated with the guidelines that have
been provided to the parents in the homework, the different school engagement activities, and
other activities that are helpful in early childhood learning (Duan, Guan & Bu, 2018). The
biggest advantage of this theory is that it helps in building a bridge between the
encouragements of autonomy and the achievements of students. In saying that, I also
identified a negative trait of this theory lies in the second dimension that is direct parental
involvement. This is due to the fact that the relationship between the achievements of the
child and direct parental involvement, does not seem to be productive in the current
competitive world. This aspect will be very harmful to the children who will under-perform,
the parents of those students will get involve regressively in their child’s learning, which will
impose humongous pressure on the child. This will also increase the stress level of the child
that will degrade the child’s performance even more. Also, for the children who did perform
well, their parents might reduce their involvement and will mostly rely on the support from
autonomy. Thus, in my opinion, the main focus of the parents and the autonomy should be on
equal involvement and also it should be influenced by the child’s outcomes. It is crucial that

Parent Partnership 12
the parents should only focus on productive measures rather than getting influenced by the
other child’s performance (Gordon, 2017).
In the opinion of Patall, Cooper, & Robinson, the engagement of the parents in the
child's homework, has a great effect on the child’s performance (Patall, Cooper & Robinson,
2009). This encourages the child to work more efficiently and also pushes the child to aim for
bigger goals (Kaplan Toren, 2013). In my opinion, the fact that parents take out time for
helping their kids with their homework also provides the child with an opportunity to have
quality time with their parents, especially if both the parents are working. Also, the child
learns about self-regulation through these independent ways of learning. The other benefits of
making the child independent are that they understand the importance of time management,
develop better planning skills and many more (Williams, Swift, Williams & Van Daal, 2017).
Amongst all these benefits, there are some negative traits too, that cannot be ignored.
In my opinion, in the current times, the children have a mind of their own and they like
conducting their work in different ways, which may not match with the parent’s methods.
Thus, this will create tension and stress between parent and child. This has also been
highlighted by Dumont et al. that due to the parent's involvement in the child’s homework,
tensions can also be built between the two parties (Dumont et al., 2012). In my view, tension
will also be created if the child underperforms. In the case of parents, who are over-
controlling and wants the child to follow their methods blindly and the parents do not provide
any freedom to the children, this can lead to a rebellious child. In the current competitive
world, the parents of today have very high expectations from their child, and due to this, the
child does not get the appropriate encouragement and appreciation that will help in pushing
the child to do better (Iline, 2017).

Parent Partnership 13
SWOC Analysis
From my complete journey of exploring the parent partnership, I would like to
conduct a SWOC analysis on myself –
Strengths –
 I have the potential to identify the core cause of the problem.
 I have knowledge about the current behavior that should be exhibited in front of
children for their better development.
 I also believe in pushing the parents to formulate changes according to the changing
times (Kocayörük, 2016).
Weaknesses –
 I have the habit of getting overly involved in any practice. This will reduce the
practices that parents want to implement for their child’s better development.
 I also still believe in old school methods. This will be the biggest barriers, as though I
am ready to change with time, but this will make the process of transformation slow. I
will take an ample amount of time to acquire the change completely.
Opportunities –
 I possess the knowledge about the latest technologies and that will be very helpful in
utilizing various different gadgets and software for an effective parent partnership.
 I am also a strong believer in utilizing the strengths of the children for improving their
weaknesses (Kung, 2016).
Challenges –
 The most challenging aspect for me will be to build a bond with diverse people,
especially when I am an introvert. I find it difficult to freely communicate with people
and it takes me quite a few meetings to exhibit my opinion easily.

Parent Partnership 14
 The other challenge that I will definitely face is mine over lenient behavior. This will
provide the children with the opportunity to not take me seriously (Lokanadha Reddy,
David & Susmitha, 2014).
Action Plan
The action plan that will help to increase the involvement of the parent in the classroom
are –
 Building a strong foundation from the beginning.
As a future teacher, I should have the attributes to build a strong foundation
with all the parents from the beginning of the academic year. It is my duty to ensure
that there should be transparency between the opinion of the parents and mine. It is
crucial that the foundation of the relationship between a teacher and parent should be
strong as this helps in the overall development of the child throughout the year. For
people like me who have difficulties in taking to diverse people and are introvert, it is
crucial that I work on this trait and bring the necessary changes because as a teacher I
will have to take the initiative in building a relationship. In this approach, I should
also send positive notes to the parents that will enlighten them about their child’s
progress. These notes should be provided with the necessary feedback from the
parents and the teacher should also provide parents with a feedback (Snell, Miguel &
East, 2009).
 Inviting the parents in the school with open arms.
Most of the parents have this perception that teachers do not want the
interference of parents in the classroom and it is one of the biggest challenge of parent
partnership which can be tackled only through changing perception. The traditional
culture of learning has instill this opinion in the parent's mind. As a future teacher, it

Parent Partnership 15
is my duty to change this opinion of the parents. The other aspect associated with this
is the parents are unaware of the comfort level of the teacher. So, with so many strong
perceptions still prevailing amongst parents, it is crucial that this mindset should be
changed by inviting the parents in different classroom activities (Loughlin-Presnal &
Bierman, 2017).
 It is crucial that the goals for the children should be decided during the beginning of
the session with parent’s involvement.
The collaboration of teacher and parent for deciding the goals of the children
will exhibit the expectations of both the parent and the teacher to each other. Also,
this will build trust amongst both the parties from the beginning. This will also
provide the parent and the teacher with the necessary direction that is crucial for better
development of the child. Apart from this, this will provide me with the opportunity to
inform the parents about the different activities that they should conduct with the
child at home. There are a number of parents who live a busy life and does not
possess the time to meet me every month. The other challenge of parent partnership is
the shortage of time especially with both the working parents. Thus, deciding the
goals, in the beginning, will provide the parents with a schedule that they can easily
incorporate into their busy lives. Also, this will help the busy parents to decide the
different terms and methods that can be used for regular parent involvement like
through the internet and the school official portal (May, Chai & Burrows, 2017).
 Formulating activities that increase the involvement of parents in school.
As a future teacher, I believe that planning activities on a monthly basis will
be convenient for both the teacher and the parent. These activities should not be
restricted only to school, but the teacher has the responsibility to direct the parents at
home too. It will be my duty to pre-inform parents about different activities. Also, it

Parent Partnership 16
will be my duty to inform the parents about the necessary resources that they have to
bring to school. I can use e-mails to inform the parents about all the necessary
information (McNeal, 2012).
 The communication standards have to be improved regularly.
The communication aspect is the main driving force to successfully practice
parent partnership. It is crucial that the communication between both the parties
increase and improves as the session progresses (Wilder, 2013). The communication
can be improved only if there is a transparency between both the parties. This can be
conducted through the regular parent-teacher meeting, inviting the parents on special
days to celebrate with the kids, and many more. The process of parent partnership is a
two-way process and the same has to be conducted between parent and teacher
(Myrberg & Rosén, 2009).
 Increasing the knowledge of the parents about the activities inside the classroom.
In my memory, when I was a kid, my parents were mostly clueless about the
activities that use to be conducted in the classroom until I use to tell them. All
children do not have the habit of informing about their daily activities in the
classroom. The parents should be provided with an insight into the class (Puccioni,
2018). Thus, it is crucial that I regularly invite parents in the class, so they can also
provide their suggestions to different functions of the class. In this approach, inviting
all the parents will be difficult and impossible, thus, I believe that inviting a parent,
every third day will be a more convenient and appropriate method (Powell, Son, File
& Froiland, 2012).
Conclusion
From the complete analysis, I would like to conclude that as a future teacher, I
completely believe in the concept of parent partnership. It is an effective approach for both

Parent Partnership 17
the student and the teacher. This concept helps in the development of both, which many of
the educational approaches fail to do so. Also, I have identified different areas that I have to
work on to effectively implement the parent partnership. In the end, I would like to conclude
that with the advancement in the field of technology, the practices and approaches for parent
partnership will become more convenient. Also, the technology will help in better
collaboration of parents with teachers.
References
Ballam, N., & Stanley, P. (2009). Book Review: Nurturing Gifted and Talented Children: A
Parent-Teacher Partnership. Teachers and Curriculum, 11(1), 12-65.
Bellanca, J., & Brandt, R. (2010). 21st century skills : rethinking how students learn (1st ed.).
Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Brereton, A. (2010). Extending thought in young children: a parent-teacher partnership, 2nd
Ed. Early Years, 30(1), 96-97.
Choi, M., & Kim, J. (2014). Associated Factors in Pediatric Nurse Parent Partnership. Child
Health Nursing Research, 20(3), 176.

Parent Partnership 18
Chen, Y., & Fish, M. (2012). Parental Involvement of Mothers with Chronic Illness and
Children’s Academic Achievement. Journal of Family Issues, 34(5), 583-606.
Darling-Hammond, L., Orphanos, S., Richardson, N., Andree, A., & Wei, R.
(2009). Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report onTeacher
Development in the United States and Abroad (1st ed., pp. 45-65). Dallas: National Staff
Development Council.
Duan, W., Guan, Y., & Bu, H. (2018). The Effect of Parental Involvement and
Socioeconomic Status on Junior School Students’ Academic Achievement and School
Behavior in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2), 15-68.
Dufour, R. (2014). Harnessing the power of PLCs. Educational Leadership, 71(8), 31-35.
Dumont, H., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Neumann, M., Niggli, A., & Schnyder, I. (2012).
Does parental homework involvement mediate the relationship between family
background and educational outcomes? Contemporary Educational
Psychology, 37(1), 55-69.
Gonida, E., & Cortina, K. (2014). Parental involvement in homework: Relations with parent
and student achievement-related motivational beliefs and achievement. British
Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 376-396.
Gordon, M., & Cui, M. (2014). School-Related Parental Involvement and Adolescent
Academic Achievement: The Role of Community Poverty. Family Relations, 63(5),
616-626.
Gordon, M. (2017). Self-perception and relationship quality as mediators of father's school-
specific involvement and adolescent's academic achievement. Children and Youth
Services Review, 77(3), 94-100.

Parent Partnership 19
Grimm, E., Kaufman, T., & Doty, D. (2014). Rethinking classroom observation. Educational
Leadership, 71(8), 24-29.
Hill, N., & Taylor, L. (2010). Parental School Involvement and Children's Academic
Achievement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 161-164.
Ice, C., & Hoover-Dempsey, K. (2010). Linking Parental Motivations for Involvement and
Student Proximal Achievement Outcomes in Homeschooling and Public Schooling
Settings. Education And Urban Society, 43(3), 339-369.
Iline, C. (2017). An Ecological Panorama on How Parental Involvement Affects Academic
Achievement of Secondary School Pupils in Masvingo. IRA International Journal of
Education and Multidisciplinary Studies (ISSN 2455-2526), 6(3), 275.
Kaplan Toren, N. (2013). Multiple Dimensions of Parental Involvement and Its Links to
Young Adolescent Self-Evaluation and Academic Achievement. Psychology in the
Schools, 50(6), 634-649.
Kaur, K. (2017). Achievement in Mathematics of Ninth Class Government School Students
in Relation to Their Parental Involvement. Issues and Ideas in Education, 5(1), 59-71.
Kocayörük, E. (2016). Parental Involvement and School Achievement. International Journal
of Human and Behavioral Science, 2(2), 10-40.
Kuan, N., & Chuen, T. (2017). A Study on Parental Involvement and Academic Achievement
in Elementary School Students. Sains Humanika, 9(3-2), 20-30.
Kung, D. (2016). The Relationships among Parents’ Socioeconomic Status, Parental
Involvement and Academic Achievement in Taiwanese Middle School
Students. Journal of Education and Human Development, 5(3), 15-70.

Parent Partnership 20
Lalayants, M. (2015). Partnership between child protective services and parent
representatives. Child & Family Social Work, 22(1), 40-50.
Lee, O., & Buxton, C. (2013). Teacher Professional Development to Improve Science and
Literacy Achievement of English Language Learners. Theory Into Practice, 52(2), 110-
117.
Lokanadha Reddy, G., David, B., & Susmitha, G. (2014). Psycho-Social Variables of
Elementary School Children with Spelling Difficulties in relation to their Academic
Achievement. Issues and Ideas in Education, 2(1), 39-52.
Loughlin-Presnal, J., & Bierman, K. (2017). Promoting parent academic expectations predicts
improved school outcomes for low-income children entering kindergarten. Journal of
School Psychology, 62(4), 67-80.
May, C., Chai, L., & Burrows, T. (2017). Parent, partner, co-parent or partnership? The need
for clarity as family systems thinking takes hold in the quest to motivate behavioural
change. Children, 4(4), 29.
McAfee, J., & Vergason, G. (2018). Parent Involvement in the Process of Special Education:
Establishing the New Partnership. Focus On Exceptional Children, 11(2), 20-60.
McGowan, M. (2018). The Parent Trap: Equality, Sex, and Partnership in the Modern Law
Firm. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1(1), 12-60.
McNeal, R. (2012). Checking In or Checking Out? Investigating the Parent Involvement
Reactive Hypothesis. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(2), 79-89.
Myrberg, E., & Rosén, M. (2009). Direct and indirect effects of parents' education on reading
achievement among third graders in Sweden. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 79(4), 695-711.

Parent Partnership 21
Patall, E., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. (2009). Parent Involvement in Homework: A Research
Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1039-1101.
Patton, K., & Parker, M. (2014). “I Learned More at Lunchtime”: Guideposts for
Reimagining Professional Development. Journal Of Physical Education, Recreation &
Dance, 86(1), 23-29.
Petro, M. (2013). A Platform for Partnership: Preparing Student Teachers for Parent-Teacher
Participation. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 1(1), 19-45.
Powell, D., Son, S., File, N., & Froiland, J. (2012). Changes in Parent Involvement across the
Transition from Public School Prekindergarten to First Grade and Children's
Academic Outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 113(2), 276-300.
Puccioni, J. (2018). Parental Beliefs about School Readiness, Home and School-Based
Involvement, and Children’s Academic Achievement. Journal of Research in
Childhood Education, 32(4), 435-454.
Selwyn, N., Banaji, S., Hadjithoma-Garstka, C., & Clark, W. (2011). Providing a platform for
parents? Exploring the nature of parental engagement with school learning
platforms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(4), 314-323.
Snell, P., Miguel, N., & East, J. (2009). Changing directions: participatory action research as
a parent involvement strategy. Educational Action Research, 17(2), 239-258.
Wilder, S. (2013). Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: a meta-
synthesis. Educational Review, 66(3), 377-397.
Williams, K., Swift, J., Williams, H., & Van Daal, V. (2017). Raising children’s self-efficacy
through parental involvement in homework. Educational Research, 59(3), 316-334.

Parent Partnership 22
Xu, J., & Wu, H. (2013). Self-Regulation of Homework Behavior: Homework Management
at the Secondary School Level. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(1), 1-13
Yates, S., & Gatsou, L. (2017). Enhancing Family Communication in Families Where a
Parent has a Mental Illness. Journal of Parent and Family Mental Health, 2(3), 15-45.

Parent Partnership 23

Parent Partnership 24
.