Philosophy: Critical Analysis of Audio and Video on School Life and Real-Life Scenarios
Verified
Added on 2023/06/05
|5
|1053
|371
AI Summary
This article provides a critical analysis of an audio and video on school life and real-life scenarios. It discusses the significant points in each of the audio and video, gives examples of how they relate to the community and personal life, and suggests pragmatic ways of implementing the ideas discussed.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running headS: PHILO OPHY Philosophy Name Course Unit Lecturer Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
SPHILO OPHY2 1.Clearly specify which audios and videos you have chosen to write about. The audio is the comparison between school life and real-life scenario while the video is on the consequences of failing to respond to a situation. 2.In your own words, discuss and critically analyze the significant points in each of the audio and video. Firstly, the audio illustrates how school life does not match the real-life scenarios. For example, when children join school teachers give the syllabus objective but the objective requires cramming in most cases. The practical issues and skills that real-life scenarios need is no longer there. However, students are pressurized about success. The curriculum gives examples of people who have succeeded through education according toBleicher, (2017). It does not consider the unique skills that the child has thus forcing the child to study what he or she does not like. Secondly, the video is illustrating a scenario whereby there is a war, but the victims are not responding. People have locked themselves in their houses just watching television and drinking coffee. The narrator of the video gets annoyed and tells people to come out and speak. They should become mad to the situation as that is the only way that would bring a solution to the society in reference toHampshire, (2016). 3.In your own words, give at least two detailed examples accompanied with detailed explanations as to how they relate to the community. The first example as illustrated in the video is where students end up in the field they do not like. The student will not deliver as expected because he or she was forced by the curriculum to store what he is doing at the moment. However, many learners come out half backed or going
SPHILO OPHY3 beyond their limitations because they are fighting for success the way their parents directed them. The second example is where society is faced by a peremptory challenge like the looting of public funds. There are agencies and groups that citizens expect to come out and condemn the situation, but sometimes they tend to be quiet and relaxed. The relaxation only causes more harm to the ordinary citizen. 4.In your own words, give at least two detailed examples accompanied with detailed explanations as to how they relate to your personal life. The first application is that the school life leads to wrong decision making in school. When one joins the learning system, he or she has several expectations or dream, but the way the teachers impact the knowledge may make one lose hope. The people who cannot cram the theoretical concept in the curriculum are termed as lazy. However, at a personal level, there is a unique capability and passion that the teacher has not identified. The second relation to personal life is the continuous struggle to pay high taxes, because of the failure of people to speak. Like the video illustrates, it is essential for people to act concerning matters in the society. However, some people feel ignorant and sit to watch. The failure later affects individual life as the burden is transferred to the personal level. 5.How, in your opinion, can the ideas discussed in the audios and videos be pragmatically and realistically implemented in society?
SPHILO OPHY4 From the audio, the idea of biased should syllabus in schools can be corrected by involving various stakeholders in identifying the crucial issues that student needs. Teachers should not assume that children know what they are expected to do. Concerning the video, everyone in the society should stand for what is right. In case, there is something wrong it is good for everyone to speak about mostly the agencies that are entitled to the task. 6.What steps are necessary and how do you create or make those steps available so that those ideas can in an efficient way be implemented in society. Make sure you map out the steps in order. The first step is to create awareness for people on their responsibilities in every matter. Secondly, it essential to mobilize the people during the event. For example, the audio, it is vital for teachers to illustrate to the students what they are required to do in reference toHegel, (2015). It is not good for them to fight for perfection. On the part of the video, it is good to have an agency in charge of fighting for the rights of people because sometimes it is challenging to mobilize people during the event. 7.How, in your opinion, can the ideas discussed in the audios and videos be pragmatically and realistically implemented in your own life? Make sure you map out the steps in order. In personal life, some ideas are applicable, but others are not. For instance, to come out and speak on a matter may depend on a situation. It is not right to out, and you end up losing a life in reference toNoddings, (2018). On the other hand, it is to apply the school life issue that the audio illustrates. It only requires tenacity. The first is to be aware that no one is perfect in learning but through trial and error, perfection is possible.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
SPHILO OPHY5 References Bleicher, J. (2017).Contemporary hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as method, philosophy and critique. Routledge. Hampshire, S. (2016). 3. Thought and Action. Hegel, G. W. F. (2015).The philosophy of right. Hackett Publishing. Noddings, N. (2018).Philosophy of education. Routledge.