Plain Packaging of Tobacco Policy: Rational, Scope, Implications and Challenges

This essay explains the rational of the policy, its scope, the implications and impacts as well as the challenges for its implementation. The law strongly prevents people from being misled about the effects or hazards of smoking. The law has twofold effects where the former and latter experience alternate effects.

Running Head: PLAIN PACKAGING OF TOBACCO POLICY 1
Contemporary Issues in Health Services Management
Institution
Tutor
Student Name
Student ID

PLAIN PACKAGING OF TOBACCO POLICY 2
Contemporary Issues in Health Services Management
The Australian government is part of the tobacco control program that seeks to eradicate
tobacco use (Staff and Agencies, 2012). Hence, it has been relentless in ensuring that it meets its
obligation as a member. Recently in 2012, the government passed a law that facilitated
standardized branding of cigarettes and other tobacco products. The law strongly prevents people
from being misled about the effects or hazards of smoking. This came about as a result of
lobbying from world health organization to make all the brands of the products plain. This
reduces the appeal of the product to consumers. Tobacco use has been a leading cause of death
through cancer that can be preventable. The passage of the bill has various implications for the
manufacturers as well as the public. The law has twofold effects where the former and latter
experience alternate effects. It has been acknowledged that the policy does indeed have
significant impacts on the use of tobacco products (Reuters, 2017). This essay then explains on
the rational of the policy, its scope, the implications and impacts as well as the challenges for its
implementation.
Policy Regulating the Branding of Cigarettes
In 2012, a law was passed in Australia that regulated the packaging of cigarettes from
various brands. Australia set the pace with the enactment of this law that is restrictive of the
marketing privileges that cigarette companies have (The Department of Health, 2012). The law
provides that the packaging for all brands is plain and common. For example, the color of the
package should be olive oil green. 75% of the package should contain warnings of the use of
tobacco. Gruesome pictures of body parts that are diseased are a prerequisite of the law. The
gruesome pictures include for example pictures pf babies that have defects due to their parents’
smoking habits. The packaging should be presented in plain fonts as well. The law also caters

PLAIN PACKAGING OF TOBACCO POLICY 3
that there is a strong penalty for smuggling of the tobacco products (The Department of Health,
2012). Also, cigarettes or other tobacco products containing tobacco that are duty free have their
concessions reduced. This policy mostly regulates the marketing of the tobacco products.
The law also regulates the distribution of the product by retailers. For example, the law
considers it an offense to offer for sale the products of tobacco. This means that display of the
product in shelves (BBC News, 2017) is equal to offering it for sale. It is a recommendation of
the law that the product should not be visible to the consumers in retail shops. As such, the
purchase of the product with the intention to distribute (selling) is also an offense according to
this policy. This law intends to completely regulate the packaging and distribution of the product
to ensure that it is well controlled in line with the government’s objectives. The World Health
Organization (WHO) is lobbying other countries to follow suit in regulating the branding of
cigarettes.
WHO is encouraging countries around the world to reduce the power of advertising of
cigarette manufacturers. The lobbying gas been so far successful in several countries including
the United Kingdom. After the communication of these manufacturing companies was made
public, a weak point to reduce the propagation of the products was found. Lencucha and Drope
(2013) explain that the various company documents indicated that the branding or marketing of
their products influenced the flow of the product in the market. Therefore, to reduce this ability,
regulating its marketing according to above mentioned proves to be successful.
The law reduces the potential of these companies to mislead the consumers on the
dangers of the use of the tobacco product. For example, some companies chose to use light
colors for branding to indicate that the product has less potency when in fact it is no different
from others (Smith et al., 2015). Various companies that manufacture cigarettes have sought to

PLAIN PACKAGING OF TOBACCO POLICY 4
battle the law in courts in several occasions. Their defense was that freedom of speech were
violated as well as the international laws of trade. Many companies have lost the cases
considering the piled data showing the effects of tobacco smoking. The passage of this law that
controls the distribution of tobacco is due to a number of concerns that relate to public health.
Rational for the Policy
The effects of tobacco use were recognized as early as in the 1970s and probably before
as Belluz (2016) explains and efforts to reduce its use were exerted. During the 1970s the
tobacco product was marketed through radios and television which thus increased the usage of
the same. The various companies that manufactured these products also sponsored various
activities and teams in a bid to market their product. Following research on the adverse effects on
health that were linked to the use of tobacco, campaigns took place lobby against tobacco use.
The fight against the use of tobacco has been long but progressive. For example, the first form of
lobby against use of tobacco was through warnings on the packaging. The warnings were in
small gold fonts at the top of the cigarette package. Towards the end of the 1970s, the cigarette
manufacturing companies were banned from advertising through radios and television. Also,
towards the entry into the 1980s, these companies were barred from sponsoring any games or
activities (Scollo, Bayly, and Wakefield, 2018). Towards the end of the 1980s, advertising of the
tobacco product virtually disappeared from many types of media. The current law advocates for
hampering advertisement of the product through branding.
The new policy has the objective of creating awareness on the use of tobacco from
various fronts. For example, the law was enacted to ensure that the tobacco products would lose
their appeal. Many young people are attracted to use of the product due to the style or design
branding. To break this power of advertising as per the companies’ documents indicate, the plain

PLAIN PACKAGING OF TOBACCO POLICY 5
packaging has an effect on the promotion of the product. In addition, the law has the objective to
ensure that these companies do not mislead people on the effects of tobacco on health. This takes
effect through captions that are gruesome and are magnified on the package to this effect. In this
light as well. The magnified captions or images of the hazards of tobacco use help to intensify
the health warnings (Haines-Saah, Bell, & Dennis, 2015). This law has seen that the purchase of
these products reduce and more people prevented from beginning a smoking habit.
Scope of the Policy
Part of the focus of the policy is on improving the health of the citizens of Australia.
Would-be smokers or those likely to be influenced to smoke are discouraged from doing so.
Individuals that had stopped smoking are also discouraged from relapsing into the habit. Non-
smokers would be protected from the hazards of the tobacco smoke in public areas. The
gruesome or uncharacteristic pictures on the covers of the tobacco product are likely to
discourage those who smoke. More people would want to stop smoking or not start at all due to
the intensified warnings on the packages. The law has taken effect as per the surveys conducted
(Mackey, Liang, & Novotny, 2013). The number of people that use tobacco products has reduced
significantly compared to the past. Peer reviewed articles reinforce campaigns against tobacco
use and enforcement of this policy. This also enables the parliament to meets its objectives
according to section 1.
The Australian parliament is part of tobacco control movements to which it is obligated
to restrict the movement of the product. the enactment of the law restricting the sale of tobacco
ensures that the parliament meets it goals (Chester, 2014). This forms focus for the law where the
advertising of the product is nearly completely curtailed. Not only does this law provide for the
restriction for afore mentioned but also ensure that the consumers of the products are well

PLAIN PACKAGING OF TOBACCO POLICY 6
informed. The consumers are provided with truthful information on the use of the narcotic
product. This law reduces the potential for companies to mislead users of the product regarding
the dangers of tobacco use. The graphic images on the package as per the provision of the law
cater for the creation of awareness or importance against cigarette smoking. Various parties are
likely to be affected by the implementation of the law.
Stakeholders in the Implementation of the Policy
One of the stakeholders that are likely to be impacted by the enactment of the law is the
tobacco manufacturing industries (Marsoof, 2013). The transition to new designs (plain) is costly
to the companies. This adds on to the expenses that are weighed against the benefits, which are
reducing significantly. The companies would also experience intense monitoring from the
government which poses new challenges. However, despite scrutiny from the government to
ensure compliance, these companies will not be charged any extra costs for compliance. The
change in branding is more likely to reduce the value of the same as most of them are similar.
Many companies will have a diminished competitive advantage as far marketing is concerned.
Manufacturing companies for tobacco are likely to experience low rates of profits in the
future. The features of the law have influenced that less people indulge in the use of the product.
not only is the law strongly prohibitive nut also the health warnings. The health warnings
discourage the use of tobacco products significantly. Therefore, (Kennedy, 2014) the market for
the tobacco products has reduced and is more likely to decrease further in the future. As the
market for tobacco products reduce, so will the profit margins of these companies. The tobacco
manufacturers had actively thrived on the high profits generated from the use of tobacco, which
is addictive. The dwindle of the profits is most likely not to be subtle considering the shift in the

PLAIN PACKAGING OF TOBACCO POLICY 7
consumer habits due to change in the image of the products. On the other hand, the benefits
outweigh the costs other people are involved as well.
More people will be healthy in as far as use of tobacco products is stopped. Individuals
that had previously stopped using the product will less likely indulge, as the image of the product
would not be appealing. In addition, the law prevents people, especially the younger generation
from taking up the product. in addition, people exposed to smoke will be protected as the number
of people smoking in public places is likely to reduce. Previous smokers will have more
productive lives as they will have been able to cut back on the costs for the product. use of the
product takes a large portion of the users’ money especially for chain smokers. The law has
impacts on the environment as well.
The environment would more clean resulting from the lowered littering. The cigarette
butts would not pose a problem for environment sanitation, as they would have decreased
alongside the number of smokers. Environmental pollution through smoke from the smokers
would also reduce resulting in a healthier population (Lee et al., 2015). The cost of production
for companies will decrease as the new law provides for usage of simple materials for design.
This also impacts the environment positively as less raw materials for the production will be
used. The implementation of the law faces several challenges.
Challenges for the Implementation of the Policy and the Recommendations
The manufacturers who are the main stakeholders other than the public pose the main
challenge for the implementation of the law (Parmet & Jacobson, 2014). The manufacturers have
filed lawsuits in court against the government on various accounts. For example, the
manufactures claim that the government has violated its freedom of speech and has violated

PLAIN PACKAGING OF TOBACCO POLICY 8
other international laws relating to trade. In addition, manufacturers claim that the government
used their intellectual property without compensating them. These lawsuits are to no avail as
they have lost while some are still pending. However, the odds are not likely to favor the tobacco
manufacturers. These lawsuits are in attempt to stop the law requiring unified branding for all
tobacco products.
Another challenge is the dispute in the two world organizations: world health
organization and world trade organization regarding their commitment. The latter focuses on
trade and investment that house the tobacco industry. The commitments of WHO to eradicate the
use of tobacco directly interfere with those of WTO. The plain packaging of cigarette products
directive challenges aspects of trade recommended by WTO such as the protection of intellectual
property and that of the agreements on trade and tariffs. The World Health Organization requires
member states that are committed to improve the health of the public to provide more directives
regarding the manufacture and distribution of the tobacco products. the minimum requirements
or commitments of the directive is to curtail efforts of advertising that are linked with high rates
of tobacco consumption. However, member states are to provide more regulations regarding the
same as seen with Australia regulating the sale of the product (Crosbie, Gonzalez, & Glantz,
2014). The tobacco industry, which involves many sectors of agriculture, manufacturing and
others are directly affected. Thus, the tobacco manufacturers sought to battle the WHO directive
as well as that of the Australian Government on the basis of the violation of the provisions of
WTO. The tobacco manufacturers have failed so far as the directives and provisions by the WHO
are based firmly on the law.

PLAIN PACKAGING OF TOBACCO POLICY 9
Recommendations for the Challenges Posed
The challenges posed are likely to be solved if the Australian government could have
coordination within itself regarding the control of tobacco. PR (2015) explains that the
government can have various ministries coordinating in order to enforce the law. Coordination in
this sense is necessary as it gives the enforcement a stronger approach. Also, the government can
evaluate whether it is lawful to control trade when compared against the trade regulations. The
government should also make clear its commitments regarding the control of tobacco. These
steps are more likely to protect the government from future litigations regarding the issue. The
interaction between governments that enforce the control of tobacco can influence the
establishment and enforcement of the WHO directive.
Coordination between governments involved in the control of tobacco products can
enhance the enforcement of the policy. Countries such as the United Kingdom and New Zealand
that are also committed to the regulation of tobacco products can impact the trade laws jointly.
For example, the said countries can apply pressure to the systems of trade law through diplomacy
to achieve their goals as International Business, (2012) explains. Also, carrying out consultations
with other governments significantly improves the implementation of the WHO regulations. PR
(2012) notes that since the WHO requires additional regulations to enforce the policy, different
countries may have different policies. In one country, for example, the sale of the products may
be regulated more compared to a different country. This can be solved through consultations to
attain near uniformity to strengthen the policy.
In conclusion, Australia is the first country to pass a law that regulates the distribution of
tobacco. Other countries have followed suit while others have made commitments to control the
manufacture and distribution of the product. The policy provides that all brands of the cigarettes

PLAIN PACKAGING OF TOBACCO POLICY 10
or tobacco products will bear plain designs. Also, the health warnings are more pronounced as it
is the requirement of the law to have graphic pictures of diseases parts of the body. The law also
regulates the purchase, distribution of the product by retail. The enactment and enforcement of
the law is due to the government’s objectives to control the use of tobacco to protect the health of
the public. The scope of the law is such that is focuses on improving the health of the public and
controlling tobacco products’ flow into the market. The tobacco manufacturers are affected as
their profits are set to dwindle further in the future. The health of the public will be further
improved as less people will be smoking. the challenge for the implementation of the law is the
litigation from the tobacco industry on the basis of the violations of the international trade
regulations. A solution to the challenge could possibility be the coordination within the
government and with other governments as well to increasing the ground or footing for the
passing of the law.

PLAIN PACKAGING OF TOBACCO POLICY 11
Reference
Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Law Faces Crucial Test by Stickers Marketing Company.
International Business, T. (2012, December 12). International Business Times.
Belluz. J (2016). Cigarette Packs Are Being Stripped of Advertising Around the World. But Not
in The US. Vox [Online]. Available at https://www.vox.com/2016/6/2/11818692/plain-
packaging-policy-us-australia[accessed on 30 May 2018]
Chester, M. M. (2014). The Answer Is in The Evidence: Plain Packaging, Graphic Health
Warnings, And The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Syracuse
Journal of International Law & Commerce, 41(2), 413-445.
Crosbie, E., Gonzalez, M., & Glantz, S. A. (2014). Health Preemption Behind Closed Doors:
Trade Agreements and Fast-Track Authority. American Journal of Public Health, 104(9),
e7-e13.
Haines-Saah, R. J., Bell, K., & Dennis, S. (2015). A Qualitative Content Analysis of Cigarette
Health Warning Labels in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
American Journal of Public Health, 105(2), e61-e69.
Haines-Saah, R. J., Bell, K., & Dennis, S. (2015). A Qualitative Content Analysis of Cigarette
Health Warning Labels in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
American Journal of Public Health, 105(2), e61-e69.
Health policy in Australia (2015). OECD Health Policy Review [Online]. Available at
www.oecd.org/health
High Court rejects plain packaging challenge 2012 ABC News [Online]. Available at
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-15/high-court-rules-in-favour-of--plain-packaging-
laws/4199768[accedded on 30 May 2018]
Introduction of tobacco plain packaging in Australia (2012) The Department of Health [Online].
Available at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/tobacco-plain
Kennedy, M. S. (2014). Australia's Tobacco Plain Packaging Act: Convergence of Public Health
and Global Trade. North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial
Regulation, 39(2), 591-629.
Lee, K., Fooks, G., Wander, N., & Fang, J. (2015). Smoke Rings: Towards a Comprehensive
Tobacco Free Policy for the Olympic Games. Plos ONE, 10(8), 1-18. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0130091
Lencucha. R and Drope.J (2013). Plain packaging: an opportunity for improved international
policy coherence? Health Promotion International, Volume 30, Issue 2, 1 June 2015,
Pages 281–290

PLAIN PACKAGING OF TOBACCO POLICY 12
Mackey, T. K., Liang, B. A., & Novotny, T. E. (2013). Evolution of Tobacco Labeling and
Packaging: International Legal Considerations and Health Governance. American
Journal of Public Health, 103(4), e39-e43.
Marsoof, A. (2013). The TRIPs Compatibility of Australia's Tobacco Plain Packaging
Legislation. Journal of World Intellectual Property, 16(5/6), 197-217.
doi:10.1002/jwip.12013
Miller. S (2016) Regulatory Burden Measurement & Analysis of Costs and Benefits.
Consultancy services to inform the development of a Post Implementation Review of the
tobacco plain packaging measure. 1: 3-40
Myers. P, Vickers. N, and Misson. S. (2015). Australian National Tobacco Plain Packaging
Tracking Survey: Technical Report. Cancer Council Victoria and Social Research Centre
1: 4-148
Parmet, W. E., & Jacobson, P. D. (2014). The Courts and Public Health: Caught in a Pincer
Movement. American Journal of Public Health, 104(3), 392-397.
Plain packaging of tobacco products (2012) The Department of Health [Online]. Available at
http://www.health.gov.au/tobaccopp [accessed on 30 May 2018]
PR, N. (2012) August 14). Australia's Highest Court Upholds Landmark Law Requiring Plain
Cigarette Packaging. PR Newswire US
PR, N. (2015), March 18). Australia's Plain Packaging is working First Comprehensive
Evaluation of World-First Tobacco Laws Released. PR Newswire US.
Reuters (2017) Tobacco industry suffers defeat as WTO upholds Australia’s plain packaging
laws. the guardian [Online]. Available at
https://www.theguardian.com/global/2017/may/05/australias-defeats-wto-challenge-to-
plain-packaging-of-tobacco[accessed on 30 May 2018]
Scollo. M. Bayly. M, and Wakefield. M (2018) Plain Packaging: A Logical Progression for
Tobacco Control in One of the World's ‘Darkest Markets. Journal of Epidemiology and
Community Health 24(2)
Smith. C. N Kraemer. D. J Johnson. A. C and Mays.D (2015). Plain Packaging Of Cigarettes:
Do We Have Sufficient Evidence? Risk Management Health Policy. 2015; 8: 21–30
Staff and Agencies (2012) Cigarette plain packaging laws come into force in Australia. The
Guardian [Online]. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/dec/01/plain-
packaging-australian-cigarette-tobacco [accessed on 30 May 2018]]
Tobacco Company Flags Appeal Over Plain Packaging (2017) BBC News [Online]. Available at
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-39814003