The Impacts of Price Discounts on Consumers Buying Behavior: The Case of George Weston Foods, Australia

This study aims to assess the impacts of price discounts on consumers buying behavior at the GWF, Australia. The study proposes that price discount affects purchasing intentions of promoted products in a positive manner and strengthens consumer confidence in the promoted product/s.

Running head: THE IMPACTS 1
The Impacts of Price Discounts on Consumers Buying Behavior: The Case of George
Weston, Foods, Australia
Name of Student
Institution Affiliation

THE IMPACTS 2
Table of Contents
Introduction and Problem Statement..........................................................................................3
Research Aim, Objectives and Research Questions..................................................................4
Research Aim.........................................................................................................................4
Research Objectives...............................................................................................................4
Research Questions................................................................................................................4
Justification and Potential Output of the Research....................................................................5
Conceptual Framework and Research Hypothesis.....................................................................6
Conceptual Framework..........................................................................................................6
Research Hypothesis............................................................................................................10
Methodology............................................................................................................................11
Methodology Type...............................................................................................................11
Research Method..................................................................................................................12
Data Type and Sources.........................................................................................................12
Data Collection.....................................................................................................................13
Data Analysis Methods.........................................................................................................13
Organization of the Study........................................................................................................14
Schedule - Gantt Chart.............................................................................................................14
References................................................................................................................................15
Figure 1 The conceptual framework used in the current study..................................................9
Table 1......................................................................................................................................14
Table 2......................................................................................................................................14

THE IMPACTS 3
The Impacts of Price Discounts on Consumers Buying Behavior: The Case of George Weston
Foods, Australia
SECTION I
Introduction and Problem Statement
Shopping has turned into a social affair (van Rompay, Krooshoop, Verhoeven &
Pruyn, 2012), where today’s consumers often expect a multi-tactile, intelligent, and all-
encompassing shopping experience that engages, stimulates, influences and innovatively
challenges them (Foster & McLelland, 2015). These conditions offer retailers the avenues to
express their uniqueness and distinguish them from their competitors by planning retail
environments that will create paramount customer experiences (Petermans, Janssen & Van
Cleempoel, 2013). In the present dynamic business environment, it has turned out to be
essential for retail managers to unmistakably comprehend and anticipate how different types
of consumers act when purchasing distinctive products and services, in order to satisfy their
wants and needs. Thus, in line with Shamsher’s (2015) thought-process, to attain a
competitive advantage in the marketplace, numerous retailers have concentrated on creating
ideal images about their brands and products in the minds of their consumers to impact their
buying behaviour.
Understanding buying behaviour is not simple, since each consumer’s preference is
dependent on numerous factors. For instance, consumer buying behaviour depends upon
price, quality, and market condition, availability of substitutes, preference and income (Wee,
Zakuan & Tajudin, 2014). Sometimes, consumers tend to invest less energy in pondering
about either low-or high-value products or services, since they consider that satisfying their
needs is more critical (Hanaysha, 2018). Thus, it is essential that each industry and every
business conducts specific and periodic studies in relation to the sales promotion strategies.
With a focus on George Weston Foods (GWF), the current study aims to focus on the impact

THE IMPACTS 4
of price discounting policy on consumers in the context of Australian food products
company. GWF faces serious competition from online and offline retailers and it is important
that a study in relation to pricing strategies be conducted, especially related to grocery items
to help the consumers products company retain the market share. While this is the central
thesis of the paper, it is important to note that, it is impossible that a comprehensive review of
the consumer shopping experience is conceivable within the bounds of a scholarly paper such
as the current paper (Alhouti, Gillespie, Chang & Davis, 2015). Nevertheless, it is important
to offer distinctive perspectives on consumer buying behaviours, particularly identified with
price discounts to gain some legitimization to the context of the investigation.
Research Aim, Objectives and Research Questions
Research Aim
The aim of the study is to assess the impacts of price discounts on consumers buying
behavior at the GWF, Australia. The aim is to conduct this examination from a general
perspective and socio-demographic factors’ perspective.
Research Objectives
To achieve the aim of the examination, the following objectives can be outlined:
1. To assess the variation of consumer buying intention during low-price and high-price
discounts at the GWF.
2. To identify the relationship between price discounts and consumer buying intention at
the GWF.
3. To identify the role of socio-demographic factors in influencing the relationship
between price discounts and consumer buying intention at the GWF.
Research Questions
1. What is the extent of variation of consumer buying intention during low-price and
high-price discounts at the GWF?

THE IMPACTS 5
2. What is the relationship between price discounts and consumer buying intention at the
GWF?
3. What is role of socio-demographic factors in influencing the relationship between
price discounts and consumer buying intention at the GWF?
SECTION II
Justification and Potential Output of the Research
The current study has potential to impact three different stakeholders, consumers, the
supply chain managers, and management team of GWF. From the consumers’ viewpoint, this
examination demonstrates the customers' state of mind towards sales promotion and
henceforth make them aware of their conduct that influences the business advancement. It
likewise gives more data to the consumers about their buying behaviour which is influenced
contrastingly by various promotional apparatuses. From a supply chain managers’
perspective, understanding the buying behavior of consumers at the GWF will provide clarity
regarding the demand-supply quotient and help the management manage its supply-chain
effectively. From GWF management perspective, exploration of marketing instruments is
imperative to comprehend the most persuasive devices to contend in the market. With the
assistance of this information, retailers and marketers can use their assets to their greatest
benefit. Along these lines, marketers will know about the consumers’ conduct with a specific
end goal to offer the most appropriate promotional techniques and tools to attract consumers.
The marketing team can adopt systems that influence consumers to buy their products and
services by creating customized and powerful promotional arrangement. The managers can
know about their consumers’ qualities and inclinations as they assume a critical role in
forming purchasing decisions. This data could empower them to cultivate their
competitiveness and guarantee their long-term survival and growth.

THE IMPACTS 6
SECTION III
Conceptual Framework and Research Hypothesis
Conceptual Framework
The Prospect Theory.
The conceptual framework of the current study can be understood from the
fundamentals of the prospect theory as indicated in Kahneman and Tversky’s (1979)
work. The authors perceived that purchasing decision is extraordinarily affected by
cognitive difficulties. The term ‘framing effect’ can be utilized to depict the
phenomenon that occurs when there is an adjustment in an individual’s preference
between two or more choices caused by the manner in which the scenario is
introduced. The individual’s decision-making procedure with regards to the
uncertainty in the decision-making can be understood in two phases: the main stage,
which includes an investigation of the choices, which results in the discernment that
rationales and introduces an official choice and the second stage, which is a careful
assessment of the issue (Isabella, Pozzani, Chen & Gomes, 2012). Through this
process, two fundamental outcomes are evident, gains or losses with respect to a
reference point (actual price in this scenario). If the outcomes are gains (high-price
discount), there will be more noteworthy accentuation on the risk-taking; however, if
when observed from the reference point, the outcomes are viewed as losses (low-price
discount), there will be risk aversion. As to reference point, the gains and losses are
assessed regarding their subjective and individual value, which is called utility, and
estimated by the level of fulfilment related with the decision’s end-goals.
Understanding sales promotion and price discounts.
In the extant marketing literature, promotion is viewed as a key component of
marketing mix that focuses on educating, encouraging and reminding the target

THE IMPACTS 7
market about a product or service offer with a goal to impact the consumers’
sentiments, perceptions or buying behavior. As indicated by Kotler and Keller (2012),
sales promotion is a powerful motivating force for attracting consumers and
expanding sales volumes. In the past investigations, it can be observed that price
promotion is one of the principle strategies which is regularly utilized by various
marketing managers to exploit their deals and performance (Zoellner & Schaefers,
2015). Basically, sales promotion can be understood through a few methodologies, for
example, client coupons, displays and price discounts, which are generally utilized as
a part of differing retail store experience around the globe. Price promotions as
clarified by Mullin and Cummins (2010) can include various structures, for example,
buy one get one, two or more free, additional packs, price discounts and/or cash-off
coupons. Since the mid-1990s, a few retailers utilized extensive price promotions to
impact consumers’ buying behaviour who are sensitive to price by exhibiting them the
discounts on various products and services, which is continued even today. Generally,
retail managers apply promotional methodologies as motivating forces for acquiring a
noteworthy number of consumers and enhance their business incomes (Cui, Yang &
Chou, 2016). Köksal (2014) included that sales promotions have significant beneficial
outcomes on product and brand preference and consumers’ buying behaviour
Moreover, past examinations ahve indicated that sales promotion affect customer's
purchasing intent (Andreti, Zhafira, Akmal & Kumar, 2013; Biswas, Bhowmick,
Guha & Grewal, 2013). Since the study is specific to GWF, based on the results of the
previous studies, the current study extends the relationship of sales promotion and
buying behavior to specifically test the relationship between low-price discounts and
high-price discounts on the consumers high or low-level purchasing intent. Thus,
price discount constitutes as the independent variable of the study.

THE IMPACTS 8
Consumer Buying Intent.
The consumer decision-making procedure can be portrayed as the stages that
consumers experience in settling on a final purchasing decision. The errand of a
marketer is to centre around the entire buying process as opposed to underlining
exclusively on the purchasing decision, since consumers encounter distinctive stages
before arriving at the conclusion (Basil, Etuk & Ebitu, 2013). Consumer behaviour
accentuates on understanding the purchasing decision procedure of individual
consumers and how they use their current assets, for example, time, finances and
energy to get a product or service (Schiffman & Kanuk, 2007). Buying decision
includes a succession of decisions shaped by a buyer before making a purchase which
begins once he/she has an urge or willingness to satisfy a need. The consumer should
arrive at a choice with respect to the place of purchasing, the coveted brand or
product, model, quantity, time to purchase, value or benefit and mode of payment.
These choices can be impacted by marketers by relevant giving data about products or
services that may suitably influence the consumer’s appraisal procedure. Since buying
intent is varying in nature, given the role of numerous antecedents, a high or low
buying intent is evident. Thus, consumer buying behavior constitutes as the dependent
variable of the study.
Socio-demographic factors.
Socio-demographic factors such as gender, age, education, occupation,
income, frequency of visits have the capacity to influence consumer buying behavior.
For instance, in a study conducted by Samik and Aindrila (2012) on the topic of
discounted coupons and purchasing behavior in India. Based on the opinions of 200
individuals, the study highlighted the role of geography, race/ethnic identities, gender
and age as the influencing factors of coupon purchases. Hefer and Cant (2013)

THE IMPACTS 9
conducted a marketing study on promotion and buying behavior in South Africa. The
results of the study indicated the role of gender as an influencing factor. Malik et al.
(2013) conducted a study on sales promotion and purchasing intent based on the
questionnaires of 175 respondents. The authors highlighted the presence of age as an
influencing factor in purchasing behavior. In a recent, study Kalia (2017) aimed at
assessing the role of demographic factors on the online purchasing behavior. The
authors highlighted the role of gender and occupation in influencing the purchasing
frequency. While these studies have explored the role of sales promotion or
advertising on the consumer buying behavior retail or otherwise, they have failed to
specifically address the behavior of the consumers during the two levels of price
discounts. This is important to assess to develop unique and customized promotional
strategies that cater to specific consumers, especially at the retail level to ensure
organizational agility and growth. Thus, socio-demographic factors constitute as the
independent variable of the study.
Figure 1 The conceptual framework used in the current study (Source: Author)

THE IMPACTS 10
A review of the literature on the individual variables, highlights the presence of gaps
in recent marketing literature, especially in the retail field, regarding the role of price
discounts and socio-demographic factors on the consumer buying behavior. Accordingly, this
study proposes that price discount affects purchasing intentions of promoted products in a
positive manner and strengthens consumer confidence in the promoted product/s. However, it
is proposed in the current study that the levels of discount play a significant role in deciding
the levels of buying intent. For better understanding, it is supposed that discounts above 50%
can be referred as high-price discount and discounts below 10% are indicated as low-price
discount (Mir, 2012). The impact of the two variations in the price discounts on consumers'
buying intentions divided into high buying intent and low buying intent in addition to the
influence of socio-demographic factors constitutes as the conceptual framework of the
current study, which is represented in the figure below. Thus, it is supposed that, if a
promoted product has 50% or greater discount off of the actual price value, the consumers at
GWF have higher buying intent, as opposed to 10% or lesser discount off of the actual price
value. In addition, this supposition is influenced by the socio-demographic factors of the
customers at the GWF.
Research Hypothesis
To achieve the research aim and objectives, the following hypotheses will be tested,
based on the conceptual framework
Hypothesis 1
H01: Null hypothesis: There is no variation in the consumer buying behavior during the two
occasions of price discounts, high and low.
H1A: Alternative hypothesis: There exists strong variation in the consumer buying behavior
during the two occasions of price discounts, high and low.

THE IMPACTS 11
Hypothesis 2
H02: Null hypothesis: Higher price discounts (50% and greater discount off of the original
price) have an indirect and negative impact on the consumer buying behavior at the GWF.
H2A: Alternative hypothesis: Higher price discounts (50% and greater discount off of the
original price) have a direct and positive impact on the consumer buying behavior at the
GWF.
Hypothesis 3
H03: Null hypothesis: Lower price discounts (10% and lesser discount off of the original
price) have an indirect and positive impact on the consumer buying behavior at the GWF.
H3A: Alternative hypothesis: Lower price discounts (10% and lesser discount off of the
original price) have a direct and negative impact on the consumer buying behavior at the
GWF.
Hypothesis 4
H04: Null hypothesis: Socio-demographic factors do not play a significant role in impacting
the relationship between price discounts and consumer buying behavior at the GWF.
H4A: Alternative hypothesis: Socio-demographic factors play a significant role in impacting
the relationship between price discounts and consumer buying behavior at the GWF.
SECTION IV
Methodology
Methodology Type
The purpose of the study is to assess the relationship between price discounts and
consumers buying behavior at the GWF. The study aims to describe the characteristics of a
specific population (consumers at the GWF), in addition to highlighting the facts and
phenomena of a reality such as the buying behavior on the price discounts (low and high).
The results may provide a larger recognition with the issue, making it more obvious and

THE IMPACTS 12
supporting the change of thoughts and contemplations of the most dynamic viewpoints
connected to the reality examined (Kumar, 2014). Furthermore, the current study in line with
the characteristics of a descriptive design can be used for making judgements pertinent to the
relationship between price discounts and buying behavior for further generalization
(McGregor, 2018). Thus, with the purpose of identifying and describing the role of high-price
discounts and low-price discounts on consumer buying behavior from a general and socio-
demographic perspective, the methodology type of the current study is descriptive in nature.
Research Method
The purpose of the study is to assess the association between price discounts and
consumer buying behavior at the GWF from a general and socio-demographic perspective.
With an aim to test hypothesis and conduct an objective study to identify the association
between the dependent variable (DV) consumer buying behavior and independent variables
(low-high-price discount), the research method is based on quantitative approach. Since the
focus of the current study is to analyze the collected data in relation to the frequency of
occurrence (consumer buying) instead of in-depth analysis of the reasons for consumers to
buy during high or low-price discounts (McCusker & Gunaydin, 2014; Smith, 2015),
quantitative approach is applied. The information and estimations of the data are quantitative
or quantifiable in nature. Likewise, trademark advantages of the quantitative approach, for
instance, cost-productivity and time-proficiency are used in the present investigation.
Data Type and Sources
Both primary and secondary data will be accommodated in the current study. Primary
data, which is the first-hand data (Adams & Raeside, 2014), will be collected from consumers
of GWF who are willing to participate in the study and secondary data, which can be defined
as existing data (Adams & Raeside, 2014) will be taken from credible books, journals, reports
and other reliable sources, which will be presented in the references section of the paper.

THE IMPACTS 13
Data Collection
Primary data will be collected from consumers of GWF through random sampling
method, which allows equal opportunity for all (Thompson, 2012) consumers to express their
opinions on their buying behavior during price discounts. A survey method, which is the most
common method in quantitative approach (Saris & Gallhofer, 2014) will be used to collect
the data after gaining approval from the management team of the GWF. Once the approval is
obtained, the reliability of the questionnaire will be subjected to testing using the Cronbach’s
alpha (α) analysis. The questionnaire adapted from Mir’s study on price discounts and
consumer buying behavior in a poor economy (2012) will be used as a tool to conduct
surveys. The questionnaire is divided into two parts. Part A will collect demographic
information of the consumers such as gender, age, education, occupation, income, frequency
of visits, and part B will collect data regarding the purchasing behavior during two price
discounts – low-price discounts and high-price discounts using a Likert scale, a scale of 1-5 1
= definitely not, 2 = probably not, 3 = maybe, 4 = probably, 5 = definitely. Nominal
measurements of data will be obtained from part A of the questionnaire and ordinal
measurements of data will be obtained from part B which will subjected to hypothesis testing
and data analysis.
Data Analysis Methods
The first objective of the study can be achieved using frequency analysis, which will
clearly identify the variation in the buying intention (high or low) of the consumers at the
GWF. The second objective of the study can be achieved using Pearson’s correlation
analysis, where the relationship between high-price discount and buying intention, and low-
price discount and buying intention can be assessed. The third objective of the study can be
evaluated using Pearson’s partial correlation analysis, where the role of each socio-
demographic factor in influencing the relationship between price discounts and consumer

THE IMPACTS 14
buying intention can be assessed. The data analysis will be conducted using SPSS 24 tool and
the hypotheses will be objectively tested. Table and graphs will be used to present the data.
Organization of the Study
The research study will be structured in five chapters as listed below:
Chapter 1: Project Proposal
Chapter 2: Introduction and Literature Review
Chapter 3: Conceptual Framework and Research Methodology
Chapter 4: Data Analysis and Discussion
Chapter 5: Conclusion and Recommendations
Schedule - Gantt Chart
The schedule for project accomplished is presented in the tables below in the form of Gnatt
Charts.
Table 1
Gnatt Chart highlighting the activity, the start and end date, and the duration in number of
days for each research activity
Activity Start Date End Date Duration (Number
of Days)
Project Proposal 22/05/2018 30/05/2018 8
Literature Review 31/05/2018 14/06/2018 15
Development of
Conceptual
Framework and
Variables
15/06/2018 05/07/2018 20
Identification of
Sample and
Approvals
06/07/2018 11/07/2018 5
Data Collection 12/07/2018 22/07/2018 10
Data Analysis 23/07/2018 28/07/2018 5
First Draft with
Conclusion and
Introduction
29/07/2018 01/08/2018 3
Final Draft 02/08/2018 05/08/2018 3
Table 2
Periodic representation of the Gnatt chart highlighting each research activity

THE IMPACTS 15
Activity 22nd
May
31st
May
15th
June
6th
July
12th
July
23rd
July
29th
July
2nd
August
Project
Proposal
Literature
Review
Development
of Conceptual
Framework
and Variables
Identification
of Sample
and
Approvals
Data
Collection
Data Analysis
First Draft
with
Conclusion
and
Introduction
Final Draft
SECTION V
References
Adams, J., Khan, H. T. A., & Raeside, R. (2014). Research methods for business and social
science students (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Alhouti, S., Gillespie, E., Chang, W., & Davis, L. (2015). The Thin Line between Love and
Hate of Attention: The Customer Shopping Experience. Journal of Marketing Theory
and Practice, 23(4), 415-433. doi: 10.1080/10696679.2015.1049687
Andreti, J., Zhafira, N.H., Akmal, S.S., & Kumar, S. (2013). The analysis of product, price,
place, promotion and service quality on customers’ buying decision of convenience
store: a survey of young adult in Bekasi, West Java, Indonesia. International Journal
of Advances in Management and Economics, 2(6), 72-78.

THE IMPACTS 16
Basil, G., Etuk, E., & Ebitu, E.T. (2013). The marketing mix element as determinants of
consumer’s choice of made-in-Nigeria shoes in Cross River state. European Journal
of Business and Management, 5(6), 141-147.
Biswas, A., Bhowmick, S., Guha, A., & Grewal, D. (2013). Consumer evaluations of sale
prices: role of the subtraction principle. Journal of Marketing, 77(4), 49-66.
Cui, B., Yang, K., & Chou, T. (2016). Analyzing the Impact of Price Promotion Strategies on
Manufacturer Sales Performance. Journal of Service Science and
Management, 09(02), 182-187. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2016.92022
Foster, J., & McLelland, M. (2015). Retail atmospherics: The impact of a brand dictated
theme. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 195-205. doi:
10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.07.002
Hanaysha, J. (2018). An examination of the factors affecting consumer’s purchase decision in
the Malaysian retail market. PSU Research Review, 2(1), 7-23. doi: 10.1108/prr-08-
2017-0034
Hefer, Y., & Cant, M. (2013). Visual Merchandising Displays Effect on Consumers: A
Valuable Asset or An Unnecessary Burden For Apparel Retailers. International
Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 12(10), 1217. doi:
10.19030/iber.v12i10.8132
Isabella, G., Pozzani, A. L., Chen, V. A., & Gomes, M. B. P. (2012). Influence of discount
price announcements on consumer’s behavior. Journal of Business Administration,
5(26), 657-671.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under
Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263. doi: 10.2307/1914185

THE IMPACTS 17
Kalia, P. (2017). Does Demographics Affect Purchase Frequency in Online
Retail?. International Journal of Online Marketing, 7(2), 42-56. doi:
10.4018/ijom.2017040103
Köksal, Y. (2014). The efficiency of monetary and non-monetary sales promotions on brand
preference: a case of Albanian GSM companies. Journal of the School of Business
Administration, Istanbul University, 43(2), 319-331.
Kotler, P. and Keller, K.L. (2012). Marketing Management (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River,
NJ: Pearson Education Limited.
Kumar, R. (2014). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Los Angeles,
CA: Sage Publications.
Malik, M. E., Ghafoor, M. M., Iqbal, H. K., Ali, Q., Hunbal, H…& Ahmad, B. (2013).
Impact of brand image and advertisement on consumer buying behavior. World
Applied Sciences Journal 23(1), 117-122. doi: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.23.01.824
McCusker, K., & Gunaydin, S. (2014). Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed
methods and choice based on the research. Perfusion, 30(7), 537-542. doi:
10.1177/0267659114559116
McGregor, S. L. T. (2018). Understanding and evaluating research: A critical guide.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Mir, I. A. (2012). Impact of Different Levels of Instant Price Discounts on Consumer
Perceptions and Purchase Intentions. Actual Problems of Economics, 5(102), 409-416.
Mullin, R., & Cummins, J. (2010). Sales Promotion: How to Create, Implement and
Integrate Campaigns That Really Work. (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Kogan Page
Publishers

THE IMPACTS 18
Petermans, A., Janssen, W. and Van Cleempoel, K. (2013). A Holistic Framework for
Conceptualising Customer Experiences in Retail Environments. International Journal
of Design, 7(2), 1-18.
Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. N. (2014). Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires
for survey research. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
Schiffman, L.G. & Kanuk, L.L. (2007). Consumer Behavior (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River,
NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Shome, S., & Roy, A. (2012). A study on online discount couponing industry in India. Indian
Journal of Marketing, 42(10), 4-10.
Smith, J. A. (2015). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (3rd ed.).
Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Thompson, S. K. (2012). Sampling (3rded.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
van Rompay, T., Krooshoop, J., Verhoeven, J., & Pruyn, A. (2012). With or without you:
Interactive effects of retail density and need for affiliation on shopping pleasure and
spending. Journal of Business Research, 65(8), 1126-1131. doi:
10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.08.005
Wee, C. S., Zakuan, N., & Tajudin, M. N. M. (2014). Consumers Perception, Purchase
Intention and Actual Purchase Behavior of Organic Food Products. Review of
Integrative Business & Economics Research, 3(2), pp. 378-397.
Zoellner, F., & Schaefers, T. (2015). The Impact of Price Promotion Types on Sales and
Brand Perception of Premium Products. In K. Kubacki, Ideas in Marketing: Finding
the New and Polishing the Old. Ideas in Marketing: Finding the New and Polishing
the Old. Switzerland: Springer, Cham.