Project Management: Network Diagram, Stakeholder Analysis, Work Breakdown Structure, Risk Analysis, Quality Expectations

This document provides insights into project management techniques such as network diagram, stakeholder analysis, work breakdown structure, risk analysis, and quality expectations. It focuses on the Music event organized by Camden Sickle Cell together with Thalassaemia Service group. The document also discusses the importance of project methodology and suggests the critical path method as a suitable methodology for the project.

Project Management

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
TASK 1............................................................................................................................................3
Developing network diagram manually.................................................................................3
TASK 2............................................................................................................................................5
Stakeholder analysis...............................................................................................................5
TASK 3............................................................................................................................................6
Developing numbered Work break down structure and organisational structure..................6
TASK 4............................................................................................................................................8
Risk analysis...........................................................................................................................8
TASK 5..........................................................................................................................................10
Quality expectation, quality specification, acceptance criteria and measure to be put for
controlling the event.............................................................................................................10
TASK 6..........................................................................................................................................10
Critical analysis of what methodology would be appropriate for the project and why........10
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................11
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................12

INTRODUCTION
Project management depicts the effective execution of skills, techniques, efforts and
knowledge of prominent activities of the project undertaking the objective of meeting the
suitable needs. It also tends to undertake the prominent stages considering the guide for project
manager in terms of completing all the prominent activities on the grounds of scheduling criteria
to accomplish suitable success (Galli, 2018). For this, the current report is based on the Music
event which is Camden Sickle Cell together with Thalassaemia Service group who is the
organiser of event. Besides this, report tends to cover the network diagram which is developed
on the manual basis and effective stakeholder's analysis for the project. Moreover, it also
undertakes work break down structure with organisational structure for the Music event. Away
with this, risk analysis is developed with project methodology which is effectively evaluated.
TASK 1
Developing network diagram manually
Network diagram depicts the effective image of various events and concerning activities
of the project as it depicts the effective relationship among several activities of the project. It is
also useful in order to complete the task in an effective manner within the stipulated period of
time. It is also helpful for the suitable presentation which is useful in making effective
connection by which people can understand it quite easily (Jovanovic and Beric, 2018). This
network diagram tends to develop for the Camden Sickle Cell with Thalassaemia service group
which is mentioned as:
Activities Duratio
n
ES EF LS LF
1 Budget approval 1 28-09-20 28-09-20 28-09-20 28-09-20
2 Hire publicity director 14 29-09-20 13-10-20 29-09-20 13-10-20
3 Hire Set Designer 14 29-09-20 13-10-20 04-11-20 18-11-20
4 Hire Place for Audition 7 14-10-20 21-10-20 14-10-20 21-10-20
5 Advertising to hire Crew
and Cast
7 14-10-20 21-10-20 14-10-20 21-10-20
6 Hire Production and
Publicity Crew
28 22-10-20 19-11-20 22-10-20 19-11-20
7 Set Designed and Build 35 20-11-20 25-12-20 20-11-20 25-12-20

8 Train Production Crew 12 20-11-20 02-12-20 18-12-20 30-12-20
9 Audition to hire cast 2 22-10-20 24-10-20 22-10-20 24-10-20
10 Cast Rehearsal 66 25-10-20 30-12-20 25-10-20 30-12-20
11 Hire Orchestra 7 29-09-20 06-10-20 10-11-20 17-11-20
12 Music 7 29-09-20 06-10-20 16-12-20 23-12-20
13 Photograph Cast and Crew
and Collect Biographies
35 20-11-20 25-12-20 20-11-20 25-12-20
14 Enter information into
computer
1 26-12-20 27-12-20 26-12-20 27-12-20
15 Printing 5 28-12-20 02-01-21 28-12-20 02-01-21
16 Develop an advertising
plan
7 20-11-20 27-11-20 03-12-20 10-12-20
17 Advertising Media 21 28-11-20 19-12-20 11-12-20 01-01-21
18 Orchestra Rehearsal 4 07-10-20 11-10-20 14-12-20 18-12-20
19 Order Costumes 7 25-10-20 01-11-20 18-12-20 25-12-20
20 Costume Parade and
Alteration
5 26-12-20 31-12-20 26-12-20 31-12-20
21 Dress Rehearsal 1 01-01-21 02-01-21 01-01-21 02-01-21
22 Performance 10 03-01-21 13-01-21 03-01-21 18-01-42
Illustration 1: Self generated, 2020

TASK 2
Stakeholder analysis
Stakeholders Analysis: It is considered as an effective Framework which is helpful in
identifying the power and interest of stakeholders of an organisation. Stakeholders prominently
put impact on the project of Camden Sickle cell and thalassemia service Group investors Town
Hall committee participants audiences sponsors which are mentioned as underneath
 High power and high interest: Investors are the prominent group who tends to offer
suitable finance and capital for the project that put huge impact on the growth of project.
Therefore, they have suitable interest and power by which they can effectively manage.
 Low power and low interest: Audience are prominent component in this category which
is effectively monitored but consider excessive communication and waste of energy that
can be neglected (Bjorvatn and Wald, 2018).
 High power and low interest: Undertaking the town committee and prominent interest
which is low and also focus in terms of satisfying them. Therefore, the prominent
information of progress and other details which are important in terms of offering on the
continuous basis.
Illustration 1: Self created, 2020

 Low power and high interest: It depict the organizers and participants who have high
interest on the project and by which they make sure prominent growth (Jin, Shen and
Wang, 2018). Moreover, this group does not neglect and also tends to balance
information that can be provided and also satisfy their interest at the same time by
spending from energy.
TASK 3
Developing numbered Work break down structure and organisational structure
Work breakdown structure represent the suitable key project and deliverables that conduct
working of team into the manageable sections (Mavi and Standing, 2018). For this the prominent
objective in terms of music event which is Camden sickle cell with thalassemia service group in
terms of organising and developing effective understanding for the scope of project. For this the
prominent work breakdown structure is mentioned as under:

Organisational structure is the prominent system that depict the suitable activities which are
directed with the goal of accomplishment of business activities (Hasan and et. al., 2019). For the
respective music event the prominent organisational structure is functional structure in terms of
selecting their individuals while performing same activities and classified into functions on the
grounds of specialisation and their interest.
Illustration 1: Self Created, 2020

TASK 4
Risk analysis
Risk Effect Mitigation
Improve management
of event
High Making effective arrangement for the needs of event.
Social Issues High Meet suitable expectations for the targeted audiences.
Loss of reputation High Implementing all the activities of event in effective
manner.
Safety of staff High Considering proper safety measures.
Hygiene of food High Maintaining effective hygiene level in food.
Weather High Conducting effective analysis of climate conditions so

that negative impact could be neglected.
Uncertainty Moderate Identifying for the upcoming uncertainties and
developing plans to deal with them.
Withdrawal of
sponsor
Moderate Developing plan to retain interest of sponsors.
Threat of fire Moderate Making arrangements for the support of medical and staff
audiences.
Loss of equipment Moderate Ensure effective management of equipments.
Small space Moderate Select effective place for event on the grounds of
estimated number of audiences.
Improper parking
arrangements
Moderate Making arrangement for the parking vehicles.
Electricity issues Low Effective arrangement of inverter and generator to
overcome the threat.
Negative impact on
environment
Low Focusing on the overall safety and security of
environment.
Poor time
management
Low Formulating schedules for the task as per the completion
of time.
Safety and security Low Cross checking proper arrangements for the safety and
security.
Shortage of medical
help
Low Effective arrangement of medical support for the staff
members.
Financial loss Low Proper arrangement of funds as per the need of event.
Permission of local
authorities
Low Take permission from the local authorities to organise the
event.
Shortage of staff
members
Low Recruit skilled number of employees to manage event.

TASK 5
Quality expectation, quality specification, acceptance criteria and measure to be put for
controlling the event
The prominent Expectations of quality defect the statement considering the quality was
expected by customers from the project of company. It is agreed at the starting point of the
project. In terms of perspective service group and music event the quality expectations are high
for the customers considering the best event company who conduct the music event (Kucher,
Heldak and Orlenko, 2018). The prominent expect the suitable quality for the casting and
collection of offering food hygiene factors due to the pandemic and focusing on the security and
sanitization. It also depicts the major resources which company need while considering the
quality. Along with this the event organiser consider the quality specification in which they offer
various food varieties on the grounds of the preferences of their guest. In terms of music the
focus on the classical music considering the musical instruments like violin and many more. In
order to measure the quality of the event the musical event prominently put emphasis on taking
follow up from their customers in order to overcome the problems effectively (Blomquist,
Farashah and Thomas, 2018). Company also undertake the suitable process of the operations
which is done in order to offer permanent result for the event that is organised by the company.
TASK 6
Critical analysis of what methodology would be appropriate for the project and why
The project methodology considered as a set of guiding process including the principles that
plays an important role to manage the project (Garwood and Poole, 2018). Undertaking the
selection of project methodology is the prime decision made by the project manager. In terms of
their respective music event service group is planning to organise and of critical path method for
the prominent methodology. With the help of this methodology all the prominent activities are
completed in the stupid period of time. It also guides the mapping project for the duration
concerned with the suitable activities and dependencies. This methodology is beneficial for the
music event which is useful for the identification and scheduling of actions (Akkermans and et.
al., 2020). The limitations of methodology and they need expert of Scheduled activities as at

predict the completion time of the activities for the devising Path which is the complicated
process.
CONCLUSION
By undertaking the above discussion, it is identified that project methodology is an
important factor which is useful in order to identify the prominent applications which are based
on the effective completion of project. In regard of this, it is also essential take effective
decisions which depends on the project approaches and success of result. It also tends to
undertake the effective network diagram which is useful in completing project with the help of
team. Moreover, stakeholder’s analysis is useful in analysing the interest and power for the event
and also identify the risk factor that plays an important role to analyse risk for company for
effective working and overcoming them by prominent training and development sessions by
focusing on the quality expectations.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Akkermans, J and et. al., 2020. Crafting project managers’ careers: Integrating the fields of
careers and project management. Project management journal, 51(2), pp.135-153.
Bjorvatn, T. and Wald, A., 2018. Project complexity and team-level absorptive capacity as
drivers of project management performance. International Journal of Project
Management, 36(6), pp.876-888.
Blomquist, T., Farashah, A.D. and Thomas, J., 2018. Feeling good, being good and looking
good: Motivations for, and benefits from, project management
certification. International Journal of Project Management, 36(3), pp.498-511.
Galli, B.J., 2018. Application of system engineering to project management: How to view their
relationship. International Journal of System Dynamics Applications (IJSDA), 7(4),
pp.76-97.
Garwood, D.A. and Poole, A.H., 2018. Project management as information management in
interdisciplinary research:“Lots of different pieces working together”. International
Journal of Information Management, 41, pp.14-22.
Hasan, A and et. al., 2019. Empirical study on implications of mobile ICT use for construction
project management. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(6), p.04019029.
Jin, H., Shen, L. and Wang, Z., 2018. Mapping the influence of project management on project
cost. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(9), pp.3183-3195.
Jovanovic, P. and Beric, I., 2018. Analysis of the available project management
methodologies. Management: Journal of Sustainable Business and Management
Solutions in Emerging Economies, 23(3), pp.1-13.
Kucher, L., Heldak, M. and Orlenko, A., 2018. Project management in organic agricultural
production. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-
Journal, 4(3), pp.104-128.
Mavi, R.K. and Standing, C., 2018. Critical success factors of sustainable project management in
construction: A fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP approach. Journal of cleaner production, 194,
pp.751-765.