CQUniversity NAIDOC Week Celebrations Project Description and Background

Campus: Insert campus or distance Tutor: Insert tutor name Tutorial number: Insert the tutorial number Project Manager Description Project Description and Background The project of CQUniversity NAIDOC Week Celebrations is developed for aligning the implication of the enhanced activities deployment supporting the utilization of the project management tools and activities for listing the involvement of the event management activities for celebrating the National Aborigines and Islanders Day Observance Committee (NAIDOC). The Supplier Team would be responsible for the integration of the project activities and it would be

TERM 1 ASS_2
PROJECT PLAN
Student name Student number Qu/s responsible for.
Campus: Insert campus or distance
Tutor: Insert tutor name
Tutorial number: Insert the tutorial number

1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The project of CQUniversity NAIDOC Week Celebrations is developed for aligning the
implication of the enhanced activities deployment supporting the utilization of the project
management tools and activities for listing the involvement of the event management
activities for celebrating the National Aborigines and Islanders Day Observance
Committee (NAIDOC). The School of Engineering and Technology wants to increase the
awareness of the CQU staff and students about the cultural heritage and indigenous
practices of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island. The hosting of the event would be eased
by the deployment of the effective project plan supporting the utilization of the enhanced
deployment of technology. The event would have the primary objectives of making the
students and staffs of CQU aware of the perspectives and cultures of the native people.
The analysis would also be helpful for forming the implication of the activities for aligning
with the implication of the successive activities. The deployment of the project is aligned
with the implication of the successive deployment of the event management activities. The
deployment of the project for the management of the event of NAIDOC week celebration
would be assisted by the implication of the effective deployment of the activities.
The NADIOC week celebration is a major event of aligning the deployment of the activities
so that enhanced communication can take place. The celebration week of NAIDOC would
be dependent on the implication of the enhanced functional deployment. The School of
Engineering and Technology would be responsible for the formation of the activities
favouring the implication of the effective activities deployment. The celebration of the event
would be assisted by the deployment of the enhanced activities deployment. The
implication of the activities would also be assisted for the utilization of the effective
activities deployment. The supply of the activities had helped in listing the modification of
the activities favouring the formation of the successive management of the activities. The
implementation of the successive deployment of the activities has helped in listing the
modification of the enhanced successive deployment of the activities. The implementation
of the activities had helped in forming the successive implication of the activities
supporting the spreading of the cultural event of the NAIDOS
1.2 JUSTIFICATION
Output Outcome Benefits
The event plan for the
cultural event is the final
deliverable for the project
and the implication of the
effective activity
deployment. The utilization
of the activities of project is
aligned for improving the
successive formation of the
awakening for the cultural
heritage of the Torres island.
The event of NAIDOS would be
successfully executed for
listing the implication of the
effective deployment of the
activities. The event would be
executed for the week duration
so that the staff and student
can become acquainted by the
implication of the activities for
listing the implication of the
final project deliverable. The
outcome of the project would
be supported by the formation
of the activities limitation and it
would help in spreading to the
formation of the effective
The benefits of implying the
event would be helpful for
forming the utilization of the
activities and it would also be
helpful for forming the
implication of the effective
activities deployment. The
event would have the primary
objectives of making the
students and staffs of CQU
aware of the perspectives and
cultures of the native people.

activities deployment.
2 STAKEHOLDERS
The stakeholders of the project are the people that are directly and indirectly related to the
implication of the effective integration deployment. The stakeholders of the project are
responsible for the formation of the effective functions for the successive integration
deployment. The stakeholders of the project can be divided into three sections of sponsor,
supplier, and user. All the stakeholders of the project can be divided into the three sections
and the following table would provide a brief of the key stakeholders of the project and their
description of interest.
2.1 Key Stakeholder List
Stakeholder Category
(i.e.
Sponsor /
Supplier /
User)
Description of Interest Description of Influence
1 Project Manager Supplier The project manager would
be responsible for the
completion of all the
activities of the project and
the manager would be
responsible for the
management of the
activities.
The divisions of the activities
would be aligned by the
project manager for forming
the usages of the information
and it would also be utilized
for the implication of the
effective activities deployment.
2 Board Members
of Central
Queensland
University
User The board members of the
CQU would act as the main
sponsor for the project as
they would be responsible
for the project deployment.
The boards members are
responsible for the completion
of the project approval
3 Contractor Supplier They are bounded by the
procurement and
agreements for forming the
utilization of the effective
and final project activities.
Contractor would be
responsible for carrying out
the project for the formation of
the successive deployment of
external support to the project
4 Students, and
Staffs of Central
Queensland
University
User They would be the end
users who would be using
the services of the events.
The awareness of the event
would be acting directly to
them
The students and staffs of the
organization would imply the
utilization of the enhanced
activities.
5 Project Team Supplier They would get the benefit
of recognition after the
completion of the event.
They would take care of all the
activities of the project for
implying the implication of the
activities.
6 Food vendors Supplier The agreement by the
various vendors would be
supported by the effective
activities deployment.
The food vendors would be
responsible for providing food
and drinks at the event in
return of payments

2.2 Stakeholders Engagement Assessment Matrix (3 marks)
Stakeholders Engagement Assessment Matrix
Stakeholder Unaware Resistant Neutral Supportive Leading
1. Project
Manager
C D
2. Board
Members of
Central
Queensland
University
C D
3. Contractor C C
4. Students,
and Staffs of
Central
Queensland
University
C D
5. Project Team C, D
6. Food Vendor C D
2.3 Stakeholder Communication
Communication
method
PULL
or
PUSH
Justification
Reports and
Documentation
Push The communication method of Reports and Documentation would
act as the push factor for the deployment of the effective
communication strategies. The reports would also be helpful for
aligning the various activities deployment plan in implementing the
effective activities limit.

3 REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT
3.1.1 Traditional Owner/s of the land on which CQ University campuses are located
The single key stakeholder is the most successive operation development for the utilisation
of the project ownership. The key stakeholder would help in forming faster decision making
and the continuation of the activities so that the project of CQU cultural event can be
effectively executed. The stakeholders of the project can be communicated easily for the
final decision making.
3.1.2 Opening statement style
The Project Executive should use ‘Acknowledgement of Country’ for the opening statement
because the opening statement style is a traditional statement for the culture of Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Island.
3.1.3 Requirements gathering for each event
Yes, the study of the previous event management report would help them for forming the
successive deployment of the activities favouring the formation of the project activities. It
would also serve the implication of the supportive deployment of the activities so that the
implication can be carried on successfully. The gathering of the information would also be
helpful for listing the implication of the activities deployment.
3.1.4 Requirements traceability
Project Progress Report should be used to track or ‘trace’ requirements throughout the
project life cycle
3.1.5 Requirements prioritization process
The prioritization of the requirements would allow the integration of the effective activities
for aligning with the implication of the successive activities. The School of Engineering and
Technology wants to increase the awareness of the CQU staff and students about the
cultural heritage and indigenous practices of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island. The hosting
of the event would be eased by the deployment of the effective project plan supporting the
utilization of the enhanced deployment of technology. The event would have the primary
objectives of making the students and staffs of CQU aware of the perspectives and cultures
of the native people.
The MOSCOW technique is given below,
Must have- Event Management plan
Should have- Knowledge about the implication of the project management activities
Could have- Advertisements for the events
Won’t have- lack of knowledge about the culture and heritage of Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Island

CQUniversity NAIDOC
Week Celebrations
Initiation Planning Executing
Resource
Acquisition
Initial
Documentation
Plan
Development
Plan
Approval
Event
Requirements
are Prepared
Execution
of the event
4 SCOPE
4.1 WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE
.

4.2 WBS DICTIONARY
Resource Acquisition
WBS ID 1
Description of work The resources are a major factor that would be
required for the completion of the project. Hence, it is
very important for the accumulation of the required
resources for the project. This step is very important
for the initiation of the activities of the project.
Cost Estimate $9,360.00
Start and Finish Dates Mon 3/5/18
Thu 4/19/18
Initial Documentation
WBS ID 2
Description of work The proper documents would be made for the
deployment of the activities that would be required in
the project for completing the project activities.
Cost Estimate $10,240.00
Start and Finish Dates Fri 3/16/18
Mon 6/11/18
Plan Deployment
WBS ID 3
Description of work The deployment of the project plan is helpful for
ensuring that the activities of the project are
completed in the scheduled time. The involvement of
the plan would help the completion of the project
activities.
Cost Estimate $5,040.00
Start and Finish Dates Wed 3/28/18
Mon 4/9/18
Plan Approval
WBS ID 4
Description of work The project manager would approve the plan by
carefully examining the feasibility of the plan. It would
be utmost responsibility for the manager that planned
activities must be executed successfully.
Cost Estimate $6,360.00
Start and Finish Dates Tue 4/10/18
Thu 4/19/18

Event Requirements are Prepared
WBS ID 5
Description of work The event would be dependent on a number of
resources and materials. The accumulation of these
resources along with the necessary setup and
alignment of the event requirements.
Cost Estimate $18,600.00
Start and Finish Dates Fri 4/20/18
Tue 6/5/18
Execution of the event
WBS ID 6
Description of work The carrying out of the event is another major factor
that would be aligned for the deployment of the
operations for favouring the utilization of the plan
developed.
Cost Estimate $3,040.00
Start and Finish Dates Tue 6/12/18
Fri 6/15/18

5 SCHEDULE (6 MARKS)
5.1 SCHEDULE
Resource Acquisition
Activity Description of work Start Date End Date Duration
(days)
1.1 Project Requirement Analysis Mon 3/5/18 Wed 3/7/18 2
1.2 Human Resource employment Thu 3/8/18 Mon
3/12/18
2
1.3 Material Resource Acquisition Tue 4/17/18 Thu 4/19/18 2
Initial Documentation
Activit
y
Description of work Start Date End Date Duration
(days)
2.1 Deployment of initiation documents Fri 3/16/18 Wed 3/21/18 3
2.2 Manual Reports are documented Thu 5/17/18 Tue 5/22/18 3
2.3 Final Reports are made Wed 6/6/18 Mon 6/11/18 3
Plan Deployment
Activit
y
Description of work Start Date End Date Duration
(days)
3.1 Outlining the plan Wed 3/28/18 Fri 3/30/18 2
3.2 Complete Plan is made Mon 4/2/18 Mon 4/9/18 5
Plan Approval
Activity Description of work Start Date End Date Duration
(days)
4.1 Submission of Plan Fri 4/20/18 Thu 4/26/18 5
4.2 Client approval is
made
Fri 4/27/18 Tue 5/1/18 3
Event Requirements are Prepared
Activity Description of work Start Date End Date Duration
(days)
5.1 Site is developed Wed 5/2/18 Mon 5/7/18 4
5.2 Event set up is made Thu 5/10/18 Wed 5/16/18 5
5.3 Program is
scheduled
Wed 5/23/18 Tue 6/5/18 10
Execution of the event
Activity Description of work Start Date End Date Duration
(days)
6.1 Event is initiated Tue 6/12/18 Tue 6/12/18 1
6.2 Event in Executed Wed 6/13/18 Thu
6/15/18
3
6.3 Event is closed Fri 6/15/18 Fri 6/15/18 1

6 COST BASELINE (4 MARKS)
WB
S
id
Activity
name
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1.1 Project
Require
ment
Analysis
$
1,560.0
0
1.2 Human
Resource
employm
ent
$
1,560.0
0
2.1 Deploym
ent of
initiation
documen
ts
$
2,280.0
0
2.2 Manual
Reports
are
documen
ted
$
1,680.0
0
2.3 Final
Reports
are made
$
2,280.0
0
3.1 Outlining
the plan
$
2,560.0
0
3.2 Complete
Plan is
made
$
2,560.0
0
4.1 Submissi
on of
Plan
$
1,680.0
0
4.2 Client
approval
is made
$
3,360.0
0
5.1 Site is
develope
d
$
3,600.0
0
5.2 Event set
up is
made
$
720.00
$
1,440.0
0
5.3 Program
is
schedule
d
$
3,040.0
0

6.1 Event is
initiated
$
3,800.0
0
6.2 Event in
Executed
$
4,200.0
0
6.3 Event is
closed
$
1,600.0
0
Total
weekly
cost $3,120.
00
$3,960.
00
$2,280.
00
$5,120.
00
$1,680.
00
$7,680.
00
$12,480
.00
$1,600.
00
Cumulati
ve cost $3,120.
00
$7,080.
00
$9,360.
00
$14,480
.00
$16,160
.00
$23,840
.00
$36,320
.00
$37,920
.00

7 RISKS
Risk Register
Name Description Likelihood Impact Response
type
Mitigation
strategy
Delay in
completion
The activities would
be delayed for the
deployment of the
activities favouring the
formation of the
successive
deployment of the
activities
Almost
Certain
Negligible Accept Surrogacy
schedule plan
should be
implied for the
project
Cost Overrun The overrun of the
cost would be
resulted due to the
delayed activities
formation.
Likely Moderate Transfer Contingency
budget allocation
should be done
Competition
among team
members
Team members would
have to face the
compete with each
other for performing
better deliverable
Possible Minor Exploit Should be used
for getting
enhanced
productivity of
the project
deliverable
8 TOLERENCES
Tolerance Specific Tolerance allowed
Tolerance specified for time Project must be completed in 4 months with 1
month of tolerance
Tolerance specified for cost Project Budget is expected to be $40,000.00,
$37,920.00 actual budget with a tolerance of
$2,180.00
9 LESSONS
Previous lessons learned Proposed activity to
address
(in current project)
Work package which activity
will be added
Lesson
Previously there have been problems with
attendance of students and staff at campus
events. Attendance was low when students
and staff perceived that the event did not
relate to them or they had little interest in
The event management
deployment is eased by
the implication of the
enhanced activities
deployment
The implication of the effective
management of the projects
with the help of aligning with
the principles of the event
management activities.

the event theme.
Project Submission Approval
The undersigned acknowledge that they have reviewed the Assessment Task 2 and
agree with the information presented within this document.
Signature: Date:
Print Name:
Title:
Organisation:
REFERENCES
Bailey, D. (2015). Business continuity management into operational risk management: Assimilation
is imminent… resistance is futile!. Journal of business continuity & emergency
planning, 8(4), 290-294.
Caruana, A. (2016). A business continuity plan maturity index: a comparative study of Maltese
licensed financial services firms (Bachelor's thesis, University of Malta).
Cook, J. (2015). A six-stage business continuity and disaster recovery planning cycle. SAM
Advanced Management Journal, 80(3), 23.
Gozman, D., Wilcocks, L., Kovacevic, M., & Craig, A. (2017). Preparing for the wolf: sustainability
through business continuity management. Intelligent Sourcing, (3), 50-63.
Henderson, C., Klimas, J., Dunne, C., Leddin, D., Meagher, D., O'Toole, T., & Cullen, W. (2014).
Key performance indicators for mental health and substance use disorders: a literature
review and discussion paper. Mental Health and Substance Use, 7(4), 407-419.
Hills, M. (2016). Being resilient: business continuity principles for vetinary practice. In
Practice, 38(10), 484-486.
Hřebíček, J., Soukopová, J., Štencl, M., & Trenz, O. (2014). Corporate key performance indicators
for environmental management and reporting. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et
Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 59(2), 99-108.
Karaman, E., & Kurt, M. (2015). Comparison of project management methodologies: prince 2
versus PMBOK for it projects. Int. Journal of Applied Sciences and Engineering
Research, 4(5), 657-664.
Krysiński, M., & Miller, P. (2016). The Role of Conflict in Project Management in the PRINCE2
Methodology. Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsiębiorstwa, (6), 3-12.
Olson, A., & Anderson, J. (2016). Resiliency scoring for business continuity plans. Journal of
business continuity & emergency planning, 10(1), 31-43.
Parker, E., & Fox, A. (2016). Changing Perceptions About Business Continuity Planning (BCP) in
Communities Around Mounts Bay in Cornwall, UK.
Parmenter, D. (2015). Key performance indicators: developing, implementing, and using winning
KPIs. John Wiley & Sons.
Peltier, T. R. (2013). Information security fundamentals. CRC Press.
Podgórski, D. (2015). Measuring operational performance of OSH management system–A
demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators. Safety
Science, 73, 146-166.
Rodger, J. A., Bhatt, G., Chaudhary, P., Kline, G., & McCloy, W. (2015). The Impact of Business
Expertise on Information System Data and Analytics Resilience (ISDAR) for Disaster
Recovery and Business Continuity: An Exploratory Study. Intelligent Information
Management, 7(04), 223.
Rui, X. U. E., Baron, C., Esteban, P., & Zheng, L. (2016). Integrating the ISO/IEC 15288 Systems

Engineering Standard with the PMBoK Project Management Guide to Optimize the
Management of Engineering Projects. In Complex Systems Design & Management (pp.
291-291). Springer International Publishing.
Sahebjamnia, N., Torabi, S. A., & Mansouri, S. A. (2015). Integrated business continuity and
disaster recovery planning: Towards organizational resilience. European Journal of
Operational Research, 242(1), 261-273.
Snedaker, S. (2013). Business continuity and disaster recovery planning for IT professionals.
Newnes.
Snyder, C. S. (2014). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge: PMBOK (®) Guide.
Project Management Institute.
Stark, C. G., & Willemse, A. (2016, April). Maintaining Business Continuity During the Ebola Crisis.
In SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Security, Environment,
and Social Responsibility. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Tomanek, M., & Juricek, J. (2015). Project risk management model based on PRINCE2 and
SCRUM frameworks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03595.
Torabi, S. A., Soufi, H. R., & Sahebjamnia, N. (2014). A new framework for business impact
analysis in business continuity management (with a case study). Safety Science, 68, 309-
323.
Wallace, M., & Webber, L. (2017). The disaster recovery handbook: A step-by-step plan to ensure
business continuity and protect vital operations, facilities, and assets. AMACOM Div
American Mgmt Assn.
Xing, J., & Zio, E. (2016, September). An integrated framework for business continuity
management of critical infrastructures. In ESREL 2016.