Introduction Human behavior and its patterns can be explained from different psychological perspectives. These different perspectives are called psychological approaches that have been developed by different theorists over the past years in order to analyze and understand human behavior and all the areas of this phenomenon. In this study, two specific psychological approaches have been chosen including the cognitive approach and the humanistic approach in order to explain one particular area of human behavior that is personality. Finally, some significant strengths and shortcomings of both the approaches have been identified in this study. Psychological approaches Psychological approaches mainly fall under five categories which explain human behavior and various aspects related to it in five different ways. These categories include the biological approach, behavioral approach, psychodynamic approach, cognitive approach and the humanistic approach. Amongthese,cognitivepsychologicalapproachanalyseshumanmindasaninformation processor that according to the cognitive psychologists, processes different functions of human mind such as memorizing, thinking, perception, consciousness and so on (Barsalou, 2014). This approach has come to light in the 1950s and theorists like Piaget and Tolman have been involved in developing new theories based on this psychological approach to study human behavior (Eysenck and Keane, 2015). Cognitive approach mainly appeared to counter the behaviorist psychological approach which solely focuses on external behavioral changes and not on internal processes (Glenberg, Witt and Metcalfe, 2013). Cognitivists believe that human behavior is influenced by internal mental processes of human mind. On the other hand, humanistic approach came to prominence attacking the main ideology of cognitive approach. This approach has been termed as the third force of psychology that protests about the limitations of the previously emerged psychological approaches including behaviorism and cognitivism (Waterman, 2013). Humanistic approach, as the name suggests, perceives human beings as the whole having complicated mental functions and needs unlike cognitive approach that sees human minds as a computer (Waterman, 2013). The main difference between humanistic and the cognitiveapproach is that humanisticapproach values the individual
differences of each human being and do not put them in one singular category while analyzing their behavioral process (Grogan, 2013). The wave of humanistic approach came with the works of Maslow and Rogers who talked about human needs and motivation. However, this approach became prominent in the 1970s when various psychologists started explaining human behavior from a humanistic point of view (Felder et al. 2014). This approach has become one of the most realistic approaches to perceive human mind and its functions because this approach believes in some innate qualities of human beings. In this way, this approach became a very reliable approach for psychotherapy. Human behavior Humanbehaviorhasdifferentareassuchaspersonality,memory,language,aggression, attachment and so on. All of these areas can be explained from different psychological perspectives. Among them, human personality can be defined as a combination of different humane qualities that form an individual character (Kumaranayake, 2017). However, personality can be defined in various ways using different psychological approaches. The cognitive approach views personality as a set of dispositional features of a person that give prominence to a pattern of consistency, predictability and consistency of a particular social behavior according to the big five theory of personality, theories of Murray and other cognitive theories of personality (Gawronski and De Houwer, 2014). On the other hand, with the rise of socio cognitive approach, personality started to be perceived as a phenomenon that forms itself with the help of social interaction. According to walter Miscel, personality depends on situations and thus personality can be diverse depending upon the situation the individual is facing (Armezzani and Chiari, 2014). This theory contradicts other pervious explanation of personality by other cognitivists who explained personality as consistent traits. Thus, socio cognitive approach supports the role of self regulation in the formation of human personality and views situations as the stimuli that are responsible for the responses. Despite the recent changes in perceiving personality by the latest cognitivists, there is still a lack of perceiving human personality as a unique phenomenon. Humanistic approach tries to resolve these limitations by coming up with new concepts such as self realization and self determination while explaining personality (Liu and Han, 2013). According to Maslow, personality reaches its
full potential while human beings reach the stage of self actualization (Schultz and Schultz, 2016). For that reason, he studied some famous historical personas in order to explain personality as something unique and a combination of distinct traits. The difference between the cognitive approach and the humanistic approach on personality is that humanism believes that human beings can control how they behave and how their personality is formed unlike cognitivsm that views personality as a stimulus response phenomenon. Strengths and weaknesses One of the strengths of cognitive approach is that this approach only uses laboratory experiments in order to come up with reliable data. For this reason, this approach is one of the mostly used psychological approaches as it is easily applicable. On the other hand, cognitive approach fails to perceive human beings as being distinct from machines and thus it ignores the fact that human behavior is unpredictable and is dependent upon various factors simultaneously. One of the most important factors of humanistic approach is studying realistic applications of any theory and thus it has been considered a reliable approach for psychological therapy. On the other hand, unlike cognitive approach, humanistic approach focuses more on the emotional aspects of human behavior and less on mental processes (Reisberg, 2013). Free will of human beings has been taken into consideration through this approach that started a revolution in psychology. However, many theorists criticized this approach for being unscientific because it deals with subjective area and not objective data. Conclusion This study has focused on explaining two psychological approaches including cognitive and humanistic approach. Furthermore, personality being one of the areas of human behavior has been explained from the perspectives of the above mentioned approaches. Moreover, some strengths and weaknesses of both the approaches have been identified in this study.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Reference list Armezzani, M. and Chiari, G., 2014. Ideas for a phenomenological interpretation and elaboration ofpersonalconstructtheoryPart2.HusserlandKelly:Acaseof commonality.Costruttivismi,1(2). Barsalou, L.W., 2014.Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. Psychology Press. Eysenck,M.W.andKeane,M.T.,2015.Cognitivepsychology:Astudent'shandbook. Psychology press. Felder, A.J., Aten, H.M., Neudeck, J.A., Shiomi-Chen, J. and Robbins, B.D., 2014. Mindfulness attheheartofexistential-phenomenologyandhumanisticpsychology:Acenturyof contemplation and elaboration.The Humanistic Psychologist,42(1), pp.6-23. Gawronski,B.andDeHouwer,J.,2014.Implicitmeasuresinsocialandpersonality psychology.Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology,2, pp.283-310. Glenberg, A.M., Witt, J.K. and Metcalfe, J., 2013. From the revolution to embodiment: 25 years of cognitive psychology.Perspectives on psychological science,8(5), pp.573-585. Grogan, J., 2013.Encountering America: humanistic psychology, sixties culture & the shaping of the modern self. New York: Harper Perennial. Kumaranayake,A.R.,2017.Reviewofthecurrentstatusofthestudiesonpersonality traits.IJAR,3(11), pp.38-45. Liu, H. and Han, L., 2013, December. The Beauty of the Transcending of the Humanity-- Research on Maslow’s Self-actualization Theory. In2013 International Conference on Advances in Social Science, Humanities, and Management (ASSHM-13). Atlantis Press. Reisberg, D. ed., 2013.The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology. Oxford University Press. Schultz, D.P. and Schultz, S.E., 2016.Theories of personality. Cengage Learning.
Waterman, A.S., 2013. The humanistic psychology–positive psychology divide: Contrasts in philosophical foundations.American Psychologist,68(3), p.124.