Psychological Approaches and Human Behavior

PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACHES AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR

Introduction
Human behavior and its patterns can be explained from different psychological perspectives.
These different perspectives are called psychological approaches that have been developed by
different theorists over the past years in order to analyze and understand human behavior and all
the areas of this phenomenon. In this study, two specific psychological approaches have been
chosen including the cognitive approach and the humanistic approach in order to explain one
particular area of human behavior that is personality. Finally, some significant strengths and
shortcomings of both the approaches have been identified in this study.
Psychological approaches
Psychological approaches mainly fall under five categories which explain human behavior and
various aspects related to it in five different ways. These categories include the biological
approach, behavioral approach, psychodynamic approach, cognitive approach and the humanistic
approach.
Among these, cognitive psychological approach analyses human mind as an information
processor that according to the cognitive psychologists, processes different functions of human
mind such as memorizing, thinking, perception, consciousness and so on (Barsalou, 2014). This
approach has come to light in the 1950s and theorists like Piaget and Tolman have been involved
in developing new theories based on this psychological approach to study human behavior
(Eysenck and Keane, 2015). Cognitive approach mainly appeared to counter the behaviorist
psychological approach which solely focuses on external behavioral changes and not on internal
processes (Glenberg, Witt and Metcalfe, 2013). Cognitivists believe that human behavior is
influenced by internal mental processes of human mind.
On the other hand, humanistic approach came to prominence attacking the main ideology of
cognitive approach. This approach has been termed as the third force of psychology that protests
about the limitations of the previously emerged psychological approaches including behaviorism
and cognitivism (Waterman, 2013). Humanistic approach, as the name suggests, perceives
human beings as the whole having complicated mental functions and needs unlike cognitive
approach that sees human minds as a computer (Waterman, 2013). The main difference between
humanistic and the cognitive approach is that humanistic approach values the individual

differences of each human being and do not put them in one singular category while analyzing
their behavioral process (Grogan, 2013). The wave of humanistic approach came with the works
of Maslow and Rogers who talked about human needs and motivation. However, this approach
became prominent in the 1970s when various psychologists started explaining human behavior
from a humanistic point of view (Felder et al. 2014). This approach has become one of the most
realistic approaches to perceive human mind and its functions because this approach believes in
some innate qualities of human beings. In this way, this approach became a very reliable
approach for psychotherapy.
Human behavior
Human behavior has different areas such as personality, memory, language, aggression,
attachment and so on. All of these areas can be explained from different psychological
perspectives. Among them, human personality can be defined as a combination of different
humane qualities that form an individual character (Kumaranayake, 2017). However, personality
can be defined in various ways using different psychological approaches.
The cognitive approach views personality as a set of dispositional features of a person that give
prominence to a pattern of consistency, predictability and consistency of a particular social
behavior according to the big five theory of personality, theories of Murray and other cognitive
theories of personality (Gawronski and De Houwer, 2014). On the other hand, with the rise of
socio cognitive approach, personality started to be perceived as a phenomenon that forms itself
with the help of social interaction. According to walter Miscel, personality depends on situations
and thus personality can be diverse depending upon the situation the individual is facing
(Armezzani and Chiari, 2014). This theory contradicts other pervious explanation of personality
by other cognitivists who explained personality as consistent traits. Thus, socio cognitive
approach supports the role of self regulation in the formation of human personality and views
situations as the stimuli that are responsible for the responses.
Despite the recent changes in perceiving personality by the latest cognitivists, there is still a lack
of perceiving human personality as a unique phenomenon. Humanistic approach tries to resolve
these limitations by coming up with new concepts such as self realization and self determination
while explaining personality (Liu and Han, 2013). According to Maslow, personality reaches its