Public Participation in Social Impact Assessment

The assignment delves into the crucial role of public participation in Social Impact Assessments (SIA). It highlights the significance of stakeholder engagement from various sectors like business, NGOs, and trade unions. The document discusses different tools and techniques used to encourage participation, including online platforms and traditional methods. It also analyzes the benefits and challenges of public involvement, emphasizing the need for capacity building and addressing potential negative perceptions. The assignment aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of public participation's complexities within the SIA process.

Running head: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION-ISSUES AND METHODOLOGIES
Public Participation-Issues and Methodologies
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author’s Note:

1PUBLIC PARTICIPATION-ISSUES AND METHODOLOGIES
Thesis statement- This essay analyzes the methodological, conceptual and practical
issues which are involved in the SIA process, the SIA and public participation process is also
discussed in the essay.
Introduction
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) model led to the concept of Social Impact
Assessment in the United States in the year 1970s. The development projects and schemes like
the roads, airports, mines and other infrastructural projects have social impacts which were
studied by the SIA. Major developments in several countries across the globe affect groups,
population and settlement and thus Social Impact Assessment should be conducted. A set of core
principles should be followed for the practice of public participation. The public should express
their opinion about decisions and actions that affect their lives. Sustainable decisions are
promoted by the public participation because the interests and needs of all participants and
decision making agencies are communicated in the process of public participation (Arce-Gomez,
Donovan and Bedggood 2015). Public participation has many benefits like decision making
agencies can understand the needs, role and contribution of members of the community and
support from community members is gained by the process of public participation.
Discussion
EIA has purpose of completion of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and
improvement of quality of decisions (Glasson, Therivel and Chadwick 2013). Public should be
informed about the proposed project and the purpose of the project. Public should be made aware
of the adverse impacts of a project on the environment and this will be an environmentally
sensitive decision. Integration of economic, environmental and social objectives is the critical

2PUBLIC PARTICIPATION-ISSUES AND METHODOLOGIES
role of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Public participation can contribute positively to
the process of EIA. The methodological issues of public participation are based on screening,
profiling, scoping, assessment, development of alternatives and monitoring. Public involvement
(PI) is an activity within the process of Social Impact Assessment (SIA). Quantitative
information about variables of Social Impact Assessment can be obtained by the social impact
assessor. In the process of screening, a planned intervention can be descried, public involvement
can be invited, the issues and impacts of screening can be understood and it can be determined if
Social Impact Assessment (SIA) will be required. In the process of profiling existing data is
gathered, spatial domain is determined, areas of impact is delineated and community engagement
of solicited. Scoping involves technical identification and engagement of community. Assessing
is the process of where a comparative diachronic model is adopted, an interactive community
forum (ICF) is conducted and cumulative impacts are measured. In the process of developing
impacts technical and engineering aspects and social, environmental and economic criteria are
considered. In the mitigation process, impacts are identified and prioritized, mitigation strategies
are developed and these strategies are implemented. In the monitoring process, key impacts are
listed, targets are compared, monitoring plan is developed and grievance handling process is
monitored. In the management and evaluation process, social impacts are managed, mitigation
strategies are evaluated, and corrective action plans are adopted. Thus, it can be understood that
in the process of Social Impact Assessment, the intended and unintended social consequences
which are both positive and negative can be analyzed, monitored and managed. In both Social
Impact Assessment (SIA) and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), impact area is
identified, data is collected, analysis and mitigation is done and generating solutions are
provided. However socio-economic studies of people who are affected by loss of land, loss of

3PUBLIC PARTICIPATION-ISSUES AND METHODOLOGIES
livelihood, alternate occupation is the primary concern of Social Impact Assessment unlike
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)( Vanclay and Esteves 2011).
There are many benefits of public participation. Sustainable development, conflict
management, protection of environment, understanding of projects and economic benefits are
essential components of Public participation. This also minimizes or avoids public controversy,
confrontation and delay. There is delicate balance between economic and environmental trade-
offs and public participation makes public aware of this. Public participation also safeguards
against decisions which are politically motivated. The experiences of public participation have
been documented since years but the process evaluation of public participation requires
improvement. The common set of criteria of evaluation criteria should and the features which
define the mechanism of public participation should be identified. The contextual variables play
a crucial role to shape and influence public participation. This role should be categorized and
evaluated by the evaluation framework of public participation. In order to achieve these goals,
innovative public participation ideas should be developed in forums; general knowledge should
be exchanged between policy makers and practitioners who belong to different policy sectors.
Agreement should be reached about evaluation framework which is required to be adopted and a
balance should be maintained between specific and generic evaluation framework (Vanclay and
Esteves 2011).
The goal of public participation is to inform, consult, involve, collaborate and empower
the public participation process. The effective public participation has a number of criteria for
theoretical evaluation. The acceptance criteria are the features of a method that encourages
acceptance by a wide public and the process criteria are the features of a process that ensures that
the public process occurs in an effective manner. Instruments are required to be developed so

4PUBLIC PARTICIPATION-ISSUES AND METHODOLOGIES
that these criteria can be measured effectively and thus there is a scope of future research in this
arena (Vanclay and Esteves 2011).
The issue of public participation is that participatory approaches were centralized around
issues that involved power. Powerful government and technical bureaucracies were in alignment
with the commercial and economic interests of developers. However, there lies risk in adopting
non-participatory methods which are technically acceptable and the impact study can’t access the
crucial data of the impact processes which are generated by a proposal. The locally affected
groups undergo dilemma to participate in the impact assessment process. These principles are in
alignment with the ethics involved in project assessment and development action. Social justice,
fostering diversity, sustainability and economic equity are the primary ethical concerns (Hillier
2016). Appropriate scales for participation must be considered by impact assessment studies.
After this the methodological, practical and conceptual issues which are required to foster,
manage and understand non-specialist participation should be reviewed by impact assessment
studies.
The development projects are justified and conceptualized beyond local, the task of
environmental change response can be understood by environmental and social impact studies.
Impact assessment is a specialized area which and technical expertise is required for the basis of
participation because ecological and social aspects of interaction is quite complex. The
integration, public display, information review and counseling are the concepts but these
concepts are limited to particular social factors in the process of participation or post evaluation
of the assessment (Vanclay and Esteves 2011).

5PUBLIC PARTICIPATION-ISSUES AND METHODOLOGIES
The risk of participation in SIA is that public participation is not often adequate in the
process. This is also a practical issue of SIA. The public often do not perceive SIA as a
deliberative process which determines the acceptability of projects. SIA is often perceived by
public as an attempt for legitimization of projects. Also SIA often does not address human rights
adequately. Issues like human trafficking, access of members of community to cultural heritage
and forced evictions are practical issues which are not adequately addressed by Social Impact
Assessment (SIA)( Esteves, Franks and Vanclay 2012).
The practical issues of SIA process are the specific characteristics of the environment
which is examined must accommodate the terms of reference and technical specification. The
requirement of development agencies and project proponents is of paramount importance in this
process. The impact assessment system should be opened to a long-term commitment to the
process of monitoring and post-development evaluation (Vanclay and Esteves 2011).
The various groups of stakeholders like business, non-governmental organizations and
trade unions are required to be decided in advance for the SIA process (Li, Ng and Skitmore
2013). The economic, social and environmental interests should be represented in the SIA
process. Sustainable Development Councils have a large number of representatives of civil
society. These councils can provide qualified and relevant participants for the SIA process. Tools
of Information Technology (IT) like participative web tools and electronic focus groups can be
used to encourage participation of a large number of stakeholders in the process of Social Impact
Assessment (SIA)( Franks and Vanclay 2013 ).There are different tools which can inform
debates, deliberations and dialogues among stakeholders. Other conventional tools can be used to
encourage participation of various stakeholders like Delphi Survey, In-depth interviews,

6PUBLIC PARTICIPATION-ISSUES AND METHODOLOGIES
Interactive back casting, consensus conference and focus groups (Cuppen, Broekhans and
Enserink 2012).
Conclusion
It can be concluded that public participation has multiple benefits like sustainable
development, conflict management, effective usage of available data and environmental
protection. Screening, profiling, scoping, assessment, development of alternatives and
monitoring are different methodologies of SIA process. There are however different practical,
conceptual and methodological issues which are involved in SIA process. Local groups often
undergo dilemma to participate in the impact assessment process. The process of public
participation can be expensive and can consume a lot of time. The capacity should be built and
staffs should be trained in the process of public participation. If the process delivers negative
experiences to public, then public can develop negative perception of the process and can refuse
to participate in future process.

7PUBLIC PARTICIPATION-ISSUES AND METHODOLOGIES
Reference Lists
Arce-Gomez, A., Donovan, J.D. and Bedggood, R.E., 2015. Social impact assessments:
Developing a consolidated conceptual framework. Environmental Impact Assessment
Review, 50, pp.85-94.
Cuppen, M., Broekhans, B. and Enserink, B., 2012. Public participation in EIA and attitude
formation. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(2), pp.63-74.
Esteves, A.M., Franks, D. and Vanclay, F., 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the
art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), pp.34-42.
Franks, D.M. and Vanclay, F., 2013. Social Impact Management Plans: Innovation in corporate
and public policy. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 43, pp.40-48.
Glasson, J., Therivel, R. and Chadwick, A., 2013. Introduction to environmental impact
assessment. Routledge.
Hillier, J., 2016, February. Values, images, identities: cultural influences in public participation.
In Geography Research Forum(Vol. 17, pp. 18-36).
Li, T.H., Ng, S.T. and Skitmore, M., 2013. Evaluating stakeholder satisfaction during public
participation in major infrastructure and construction projects: A fuzzy approach. Automation in
construction, 29, pp.123-135.
Vanclay, F. and Esteves, A.M. eds., 2011. New directions in social impact assessment:
conceptual and methodological advances. Edward Elgar Publishing.