The Impact of Lead Contamination on Health
VerifiedAdded on  2020/03/28
|25
|8451
|67
AI Summary
This assignment delves into the detrimental impacts of lead contamination on human health. It examines various sources of lead contamination, particularly focusing on drinking water. The assignment highlights the adverse health effects associated with lead exposure, emphasizing its potential consequences on neurological development, reproductive health, and overall well-being. Furthermore, it discusses strategies for mitigating lead contamination in drinking water systems, including regulatory measures, technological solutions, and public awareness campaigns.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 1
REMOVAL OF LEAD FROM POTABLE WATER
Name
Course
Professor
University
City/state
Date
REMOVAL OF LEAD FROM POTABLE WATER
Name
Course
Professor
University
City/state
Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 2
Table of Contents
1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................3
2. How Lead Gets into Potable Water..................................................................................................4
3. Health impacts of lead contaminations............................................................................................5
4. Methods of removing lead from potable water................................................................................6
4.1. Conventional lead removal methods........................................................................................6
4.1.1. Distillation...........................................................................................................................6
4.1.2. Reverse osmosis...................................................................................................................7
4.1.3. Activated carbon filtration.................................................................................................10
4.1.4. Ion exchange......................................................................................................................12
4.2. Advanced lead removal methods............................................................................................14
4.2.1. Alkali Ash Material Permeable Reactive Barrier (AAM-PRB)..........................................14
4.2.2. Electrocoagulation.............................................................................................................15
4.2.3. Ultrafiltration (UF) system.................................................................................................15
4.2.4. Electrodialysis (ED)...........................................................................................................16
4.2.5. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles.......................................................................................16
5. Factors to consider when selecting a water treatment method....................................................17
6. Conclusion........................................................................................................................................18
References................................................................................................................................................19
Table of Contents
1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................3
2. How Lead Gets into Potable Water..................................................................................................4
3. Health impacts of lead contaminations............................................................................................5
4. Methods of removing lead from potable water................................................................................6
4.1. Conventional lead removal methods........................................................................................6
4.1.1. Distillation...........................................................................................................................6
4.1.2. Reverse osmosis...................................................................................................................7
4.1.3. Activated carbon filtration.................................................................................................10
4.1.4. Ion exchange......................................................................................................................12
4.2. Advanced lead removal methods............................................................................................14
4.2.1. Alkali Ash Material Permeable Reactive Barrier (AAM-PRB)..........................................14
4.2.2. Electrocoagulation.............................................................................................................15
4.2.3. Ultrafiltration (UF) system.................................................................................................15
4.2.4. Electrodialysis (ED)...........................................................................................................16
4.2.5. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles.......................................................................................16
5. Factors to consider when selecting a water treatment method....................................................17
6. Conclusion........................................................................................................................................18
References................................................................................................................................................19
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 3
1. Introduction
Water is a very valuable natural resource to human beings. The water covers about 71% of
the earth’s surface (Perlman, 2016) but only about 0.03% of this water is usable by humans
(Mullen, 2012). The water is also vulnerable to numerous sources of contamination, both natural
and manmade. This has resulted to global water crisis (Harhay, 2011) because millions of people
across the world do not have access to safe potable water. Today, inadequate or limited supply of
fresh water has become one of the most pressing global issues (Srinivasan, et al., 2012). Each
year, about half a billion people across the world are affected by severe water scarcity
(Mekonnen & Hoekstra, 2016). Some of these people end up using contaminated water, which is
unsafe for drinking. Contaminated water is very hazardous to human life as it can transmit
diseases like cholera, diarrhea, typhoid, dysentery, etc. It is estimated that contaminated potable
water causes more than half a million diarrheal deaths every year (World Health Organization,
2017). This number is expected to rise with the rapidly growing global population that is
estimated to reach 9.8 billion by 2050 (United Nations, 2017). Lead is one of the major toxic
inorganic chemicals that contaminate water in many parts of the world. This compound is
dangerous both to the ecosystem and human health (Verstraeten, et al., 2008). The problem of
lead contamination in potable water is not new as this heavy metal started being used in making
water supply pipes and plumbing fixtures many years ago (Payne, 2008). Lead is a corrosion-
resistant soft material that is mainly used to making pipe lines, brass fixtures and lead solders.
The metal can also be added other metal alloys like bronze and brass, hence it is used for making
water fixtures, fittings and faucets. Lead is a harmful metal to health of both children and adults,
with children being the most affected. This makes lead contamination in potable water a major
health problem across the world.
Lead contamination in potable water has been reported in different countries, including the
U.S., Canada, Australia, Europe, United Kingdom and China, among others. Different countries
have formulated varied approaches of reducing lead contamination in potable water. Some of
these include prohibiting use of lead pipes in water supply systems and lead-based solders,
plumbing fixtures, fittings or faucets and setting maximum acceptable concentration of lead in
potable water. The maximum acceptable concentration of lead in potable water that has been set
by the World Health Organization (WHO) is 0.01 mg/L or 10 μg/L (Lead Free Water, 2015).
This is the water quality standard that is used in many countries including Australia, Canada,
1. Introduction
Water is a very valuable natural resource to human beings. The water covers about 71% of
the earth’s surface (Perlman, 2016) but only about 0.03% of this water is usable by humans
(Mullen, 2012). The water is also vulnerable to numerous sources of contamination, both natural
and manmade. This has resulted to global water crisis (Harhay, 2011) because millions of people
across the world do not have access to safe potable water. Today, inadequate or limited supply of
fresh water has become one of the most pressing global issues (Srinivasan, et al., 2012). Each
year, about half a billion people across the world are affected by severe water scarcity
(Mekonnen & Hoekstra, 2016). Some of these people end up using contaminated water, which is
unsafe for drinking. Contaminated water is very hazardous to human life as it can transmit
diseases like cholera, diarrhea, typhoid, dysentery, etc. It is estimated that contaminated potable
water causes more than half a million diarrheal deaths every year (World Health Organization,
2017). This number is expected to rise with the rapidly growing global population that is
estimated to reach 9.8 billion by 2050 (United Nations, 2017). Lead is one of the major toxic
inorganic chemicals that contaminate water in many parts of the world. This compound is
dangerous both to the ecosystem and human health (Verstraeten, et al., 2008). The problem of
lead contamination in potable water is not new as this heavy metal started being used in making
water supply pipes and plumbing fixtures many years ago (Payne, 2008). Lead is a corrosion-
resistant soft material that is mainly used to making pipe lines, brass fixtures and lead solders.
The metal can also be added other metal alloys like bronze and brass, hence it is used for making
water fixtures, fittings and faucets. Lead is a harmful metal to health of both children and adults,
with children being the most affected. This makes lead contamination in potable water a major
health problem across the world.
Lead contamination in potable water has been reported in different countries, including the
U.S., Canada, Australia, Europe, United Kingdom and China, among others. Different countries
have formulated varied approaches of reducing lead contamination in potable water. Some of
these include prohibiting use of lead pipes in water supply systems and lead-based solders,
plumbing fixtures, fittings or faucets and setting maximum acceptable concentration of lead in
potable water. The maximum acceptable concentration of lead in potable water that has been set
by the World Health Organization (WHO) is 0.01 mg/L or 10 μg/L (Lead Free Water, 2015).
This is the water quality standard that is used in many countries including Australia, Canada,
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 4
China, European Union and United Kingdom. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has
set the maximum acceptable concentration of lead in potable water to 15 μg/L or 0.015 mg/L
(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2017). In these countries, water supply companies or
other relevant utilities are required to test water and ensure that the lead levels do not exceed the
maximum acceptable concentration. Cumulative exposure of lead can result to permanent
damage of important body organs such as the kidney, brain, heart, lungs and nervous system, or
even death.
The main reason why lead contamination is of great concern worldwide is because lead is
one the most toxic heavy metals. Lead exposure beyond recommended limits has several health
problems. For this reason, it is always important to ensure that potable water supplied to people
is free from lead. This report aims at investing sources of lead contamination in potable water,
health impacts of lead-contaminated water and various methods of removing lead from potable
water.
2. How Lead Gets into Potable Water
There are various ways in which lead gets into potable water. One of these ways is corrosion
of water faucets and fixtures (Zietz, et al., 2010), especially older ones that were mainly made of
lead. Most of water fixtures contain lead and when they get old, they can be easily corroded
(Torrice, 2016). When this happens, lead compound mixes with water thus contaminating it.
Solder and fittings used for connecting water supply pipes are other sources of lead in potable
water. With time, the solder and fittings may start corroding and the deposits get released into
potable water thus causing contamination. Lead water pipes are another source of lead
contamination in potable water. This was a major source of potable water contamination many
years back because most of the water pipes and other plumbing fixtures were made from lead
(Rabin, 2008). This metal was preferred because it is easily malleable and stable. Today, use of
lead water pipes has been prohibited in many parts of the world thus reducing potable water
contamination resulting from lead plumbing pipes. Therefore it is apparent that potable water is
usually contaminated after leaving the treatment plant (Renner, 2010). This makes it quite
challenging to deal with lead contamination in potable water especially in areas that are still
using water supply systems built many years ago, which contain lead plumbing components.
China, European Union and United Kingdom. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has
set the maximum acceptable concentration of lead in potable water to 15 μg/L or 0.015 mg/L
(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2017). In these countries, water supply companies or
other relevant utilities are required to test water and ensure that the lead levels do not exceed the
maximum acceptable concentration. Cumulative exposure of lead can result to permanent
damage of important body organs such as the kidney, brain, heart, lungs and nervous system, or
even death.
The main reason why lead contamination is of great concern worldwide is because lead is
one the most toxic heavy metals. Lead exposure beyond recommended limits has several health
problems. For this reason, it is always important to ensure that potable water supplied to people
is free from lead. This report aims at investing sources of lead contamination in potable water,
health impacts of lead-contaminated water and various methods of removing lead from potable
water.
2. How Lead Gets into Potable Water
There are various ways in which lead gets into potable water. One of these ways is corrosion
of water faucets and fixtures (Zietz, et al., 2010), especially older ones that were mainly made of
lead. Most of water fixtures contain lead and when they get old, they can be easily corroded
(Torrice, 2016). When this happens, lead compound mixes with water thus contaminating it.
Solder and fittings used for connecting water supply pipes are other sources of lead in potable
water. With time, the solder and fittings may start corroding and the deposits get released into
potable water thus causing contamination. Lead water pipes are another source of lead
contamination in potable water. This was a major source of potable water contamination many
years back because most of the water pipes and other plumbing fixtures were made from lead
(Rabin, 2008). This metal was preferred because it is easily malleable and stable. Today, use of
lead water pipes has been prohibited in many parts of the world thus reducing potable water
contamination resulting from lead plumbing pipes. Therefore it is apparent that potable water is
usually contaminated after leaving the treatment plant (Renner, 2010). This makes it quite
challenging to deal with lead contamination in potable water especially in areas that are still
using water supply systems built many years ago, which contain lead plumbing components.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 5
Lead may also find its way into potable water through pollution of natural water sources such
as rivers, lakes, oceans, etc. This can be through direct disposal of wastes containing lead into the
water source, infiltration from a landfill or weathering of rocks containing lead into groundwater
(Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Water, 2016). In general, lead
contamination is potable water is primarily caused by wearing away or corrosion of lead-
containing materials in plumbing and water distribution systems. These materials comprise of
lead pipes, lead-based solders (Nguyen, et al., 2010) that are used for joining copper pipes, and
chrome plated and brass faucets, valves and fittings (Department of Public Health, (n.d.)). A very
small percentage of lead contamination in potable water is caused by pollution of natural sources
(World Health Organization, 2011).
There are also several factors that determine the extent to which potable water gets
contaminated with lead. These factors include: water chemistry (i.e. alkalinity and acidity) and
amount and types of minerals present in the water; water temperature; amount of lead coming in
contact with potable water; amount of water pipe corrosion or wear; the time the water stays in
supply pipes; water corrosivity (Swistock, 2017); and the presence of coatings or protective
scales in plumbing pipes, fixtures, fittings and faucets (United States Environmental Protection
Agency, 2017).
3. Health impacts of lead contaminations
Lean contamination in potable water causes a wide range of health problems in infants,
children and adults. Lead, which is a toxic metal, affects several body systems, including
cardiovascular, hematologic, neurologic, renal and gastrointestinal systems. The most common
problems in infants and children are delayed neurologic, mental or physical development
(Renner, 2009), anemia, hearing problems, slowed growth, brain damage, headaches, mood
disorders, hyperactivity, pica (easting strange stuffs such as paint chips, dirt, etc.) and lower IQ
(reduced intelligence) and learning and behavior problems. Affected children usually show
deficits in learning and attention span abilities. In adults, common health problems resulting
from lead contamination in potable water include: kidney problems, heart diseases (Navas-
Acien, et al., 2007), high blood pressure, hypertension, cancer, reproductive problems
(infertility) (Woodruff, et al., 2008) joint and muscle pain, digestive problems, loss of appetite,
(infertility) (Brown & Margolis, 2012), mood disorders, blood disorders (Iqbal, et al., 2008),
Lead may also find its way into potable water through pollution of natural water sources such
as rivers, lakes, oceans, etc. This can be through direct disposal of wastes containing lead into the
water source, infiltration from a landfill or weathering of rocks containing lead into groundwater
(Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Water, 2016). In general, lead
contamination is potable water is primarily caused by wearing away or corrosion of lead-
containing materials in plumbing and water distribution systems. These materials comprise of
lead pipes, lead-based solders (Nguyen, et al., 2010) that are used for joining copper pipes, and
chrome plated and brass faucets, valves and fittings (Department of Public Health, (n.d.)). A very
small percentage of lead contamination in potable water is caused by pollution of natural sources
(World Health Organization, 2011).
There are also several factors that determine the extent to which potable water gets
contaminated with lead. These factors include: water chemistry (i.e. alkalinity and acidity) and
amount and types of minerals present in the water; water temperature; amount of lead coming in
contact with potable water; amount of water pipe corrosion or wear; the time the water stays in
supply pipes; water corrosivity (Swistock, 2017); and the presence of coatings or protective
scales in plumbing pipes, fixtures, fittings and faucets (United States Environmental Protection
Agency, 2017).
3. Health impacts of lead contaminations
Lean contamination in potable water causes a wide range of health problems in infants,
children and adults. Lead, which is a toxic metal, affects several body systems, including
cardiovascular, hematologic, neurologic, renal and gastrointestinal systems. The most common
problems in infants and children are delayed neurologic, mental or physical development
(Renner, 2009), anemia, hearing problems, slowed growth, brain damage, headaches, mood
disorders, hyperactivity, pica (easting strange stuffs such as paint chips, dirt, etc.) and lower IQ
(reduced intelligence) and learning and behavior problems. Affected children usually show
deficits in learning and attention span abilities. In adults, common health problems resulting
from lead contamination in potable water include: kidney problems, heart diseases (Navas-
Acien, et al., 2007), high blood pressure, hypertension, cancer, reproductive problems
(infertility) (Woodruff, et al., 2008) joint and muscle pain, digestive problems, loss of appetite,
(infertility) (Brown & Margolis, 2012), mood disorders, blood disorders (Iqbal, et al., 2008),
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 6
Alzheimer disease, and autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis, lupus, fibromyalgia,
chronic fatigue syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, type 1 diabetes, etc. (Hayward, 2017). It also
affects pregnant women and their unborn babies. These effects include: premature birth, low
birth weight, gestational hypertension, miscarriage or abortion and reduced fetus growth.
Lactating mothers can also transmit lead to their babies through breast milk (United States
Environmental Protection Agency, 2017). Pregnant women, fetuses, infants and children are
more vulnerable to potable water contamination by lead because they have sensitive tissues
capable of absorbing lead more easily. When exposed to same level of lead, children and adults
will absorb 30-75% and 11% of the lead respectively (Water Quality Association, 2016).
Therefore lead is a major threat to public health and there is need for more people to have access
to information so that they can establish ways of preventing these effects. If not treated properly
or managed on time, lead exposure through potable water can lead to death.
4. Methods of removing lead from potable water
There are different methods of removing lead from potable water. Some of these methods are
discussed below.
4.1. Conventional lead removal methods
4.1.1. Distillation
Distillation is a conventional and effective method of treating water for domestic and
commercial use. This method has been in use for millennia. The method removes a wide range of
impurities from water, including bacteria, dissolved solids, nitrates, hardness, lead, sodium, etc.
The principle of water distillation has remained the same over the years, only the type and layout
of equipment used keeps on changing. The process starts with boiling water in a container. The
steam produced is then directed into cooling tubes where it is condensed then collected in a
second container as purified water. In this process, almost all impurities present in water are left
in the first container.
Distillation is suitable for removing chemicals or contaminants whose boiling point is
greater than that of water. The boiling point of water and lead is 100 °C and 1,749 °C
respectively. When lead-contaminated water is heated, the water starts evaporating when
temperature reaches 100 °C. At this point, the lead is still very away from reaching its boiling
point. Therefore the water evaporates and the escaping steam is collected and directed into the
Alzheimer disease, and autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis, lupus, fibromyalgia,
chronic fatigue syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, type 1 diabetes, etc. (Hayward, 2017). It also
affects pregnant women and their unborn babies. These effects include: premature birth, low
birth weight, gestational hypertension, miscarriage or abortion and reduced fetus growth.
Lactating mothers can also transmit lead to their babies through breast milk (United States
Environmental Protection Agency, 2017). Pregnant women, fetuses, infants and children are
more vulnerable to potable water contamination by lead because they have sensitive tissues
capable of absorbing lead more easily. When exposed to same level of lead, children and adults
will absorb 30-75% and 11% of the lead respectively (Water Quality Association, 2016).
Therefore lead is a major threat to public health and there is need for more people to have access
to information so that they can establish ways of preventing these effects. If not treated properly
or managed on time, lead exposure through potable water can lead to death.
4. Methods of removing lead from potable water
There are different methods of removing lead from potable water. Some of these methods are
discussed below.
4.1. Conventional lead removal methods
4.1.1. Distillation
Distillation is a conventional and effective method of treating water for domestic and
commercial use. This method has been in use for millennia. The method removes a wide range of
impurities from water, including bacteria, dissolved solids, nitrates, hardness, lead, sodium, etc.
The principle of water distillation has remained the same over the years, only the type and layout
of equipment used keeps on changing. The process starts with boiling water in a container. The
steam produced is then directed into cooling tubes where it is condensed then collected in a
second container as purified water. In this process, almost all impurities present in water are left
in the first container.
Distillation is suitable for removing chemicals or contaminants whose boiling point is
greater than that of water. The boiling point of water and lead is 100 °C and 1,749 °C
respectively. When lead-contaminated water is heated, the water starts evaporating when
temperature reaches 100 °C. At this point, the lead is still very away from reaching its boiling
point. Therefore the water evaporates and the escaping steam is collected and directed into the
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 7
cooling tubes, leaving lead and other impurities in the original boiling container. The cooling
tubes deposit the steam into a condenser where the steam condenses back to liquid form. This
liquid is very pure and suitable for drinking.
4.1.1.1. Advantages
Pure water: distillation is a very efficient method of removing contaminants with boiling
point greater than that of water. This makes it most suitable for removing lead from drinking
water. Besides heavy metals, distillation also removes all pathogens.
Reliability: the quality and purity of water obtained from distillation process always
remains high as long as the distillation unit is working properly and kept clean.
Reusability: distillation method can be reused over and over again without replacing any
component.
4.1.1.2. Disadvantages
Wasteful: this process wastes a lot of water as only about 20% of the water gets purified
while the remaining 80% is discarded with other contaminants.
Mineral-free water: the water obtained from distillation process is mineral-free and
tasteless because all minerals, including beneficial minerals, are removed. The mineral-free
water is also more acidic making it dangerous to the human body.
Not suitable for contaminants with low boiling point: any contaminants whose boiling
point is lower than that of water will find its way in the water collected in the final container.
Therefore distilled water will still contain all contaminants with boiling point lower than that of
water.
Energy: this method requires substantial amount of power for heating the water. Some
water distillation units have been designed to use renewable energy such as solar power so as to
reduce energy bills (Gugulothu, et al., 2015).
Slow: distillation method is relatively slow because the water output is very low.
4.1.2. Reverse osmosis
This is one of the most common and effective methods used to remove lead from potable
water for domestic, commercial and industrial uses because its efficiency is about 98%. Besides
cooling tubes, leaving lead and other impurities in the original boiling container. The cooling
tubes deposit the steam into a condenser where the steam condenses back to liquid form. This
liquid is very pure and suitable for drinking.
4.1.1.1. Advantages
Pure water: distillation is a very efficient method of removing contaminants with boiling
point greater than that of water. This makes it most suitable for removing lead from drinking
water. Besides heavy metals, distillation also removes all pathogens.
Reliability: the quality and purity of water obtained from distillation process always
remains high as long as the distillation unit is working properly and kept clean.
Reusability: distillation method can be reused over and over again without replacing any
component.
4.1.1.2. Disadvantages
Wasteful: this process wastes a lot of water as only about 20% of the water gets purified
while the remaining 80% is discarded with other contaminants.
Mineral-free water: the water obtained from distillation process is mineral-free and
tasteless because all minerals, including beneficial minerals, are removed. The mineral-free
water is also more acidic making it dangerous to the human body.
Not suitable for contaminants with low boiling point: any contaminants whose boiling
point is lower than that of water will find its way in the water collected in the final container.
Therefore distilled water will still contain all contaminants with boiling point lower than that of
water.
Energy: this method requires substantial amount of power for heating the water. Some
water distillation units have been designed to use renewable energy such as solar power so as to
reduce energy bills (Gugulothu, et al., 2015).
Slow: distillation method is relatively slow because the water output is very low.
4.1.2. Reverse osmosis
This is one of the most common and effective methods used to remove lead from potable
water for domestic, commercial and industrial uses because its efficiency is about 98%. Besides
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 8
lead, reverse osmosis method also removes other organic chemicals, microorganisms and
inorganic contaminants from water. The process entails passing contaminated water through a
reverse osmosis membrane that sieves lead out of water. This process starts with pre-filtration
where water is passed through a sediment filter to remove larger sediments. The water is then
forced through the reverse osmosis membrane, which is semi-permeable, under pressure
(Bakalar, et al., 2009), as shown in Figure 1 below. The size of reverse osmosis membrane pores
is usually 0.0001 micron. This membrane only allows water molecules to pass through it but
blocks passage of sodium, calcium, chlorine and other larger molecules including viruses,
bacteria, urea and glucose. After this, the water is again passed through another carbon filter to
remove any remaining contaminants that may have passed through the reverse osmosis
membrane. The water is then finally passed through an in-line activated carbon filter so as to
eliminate any flavors or odor.
Figure 1: Schematic diagram showing reverse osmosis process (Water Right Group, 2016)
4.1.2.1. Advantages
Reverse osmosis treatment method has numerous advantage. Some of these are discussed
below
lead, reverse osmosis method also removes other organic chemicals, microorganisms and
inorganic contaminants from water. The process entails passing contaminated water through a
reverse osmosis membrane that sieves lead out of water. This process starts with pre-filtration
where water is passed through a sediment filter to remove larger sediments. The water is then
forced through the reverse osmosis membrane, which is semi-permeable, under pressure
(Bakalar, et al., 2009), as shown in Figure 1 below. The size of reverse osmosis membrane pores
is usually 0.0001 micron. This membrane only allows water molecules to pass through it but
blocks passage of sodium, calcium, chlorine and other larger molecules including viruses,
bacteria, urea and glucose. After this, the water is again passed through another carbon filter to
remove any remaining contaminants that may have passed through the reverse osmosis
membrane. The water is then finally passed through an in-line activated carbon filter so as to
eliminate any flavors or odor.
Figure 1: Schematic diagram showing reverse osmosis process (Water Right Group, 2016)
4.1.2.1. Advantages
Reverse osmosis treatment method has numerous advantage. Some of these are discussed
below
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 9
Removes contaminants: reverse osmosis methods removes almost 100% of contaminants
from water. This includes lead, arsenic, copper, sodium, nitrates, organic chemicals, viruses,
protozoa, bacteria, etc.
Cost-effective: this method produces very clean potable water for about $0.25 per day
(Linton, 2016), making it affordable even for domestic uses.
Environmental friendly: the method does not require uses of large amount of energy that
could otherwise result to emission of greenhouse gases to the environment and it does not use or
produce any toxic chemicals. Additionally, it eliminates the need of buying water bottles that
could end up being disposed in landfills because it provides clean potable water at all times.
Reduces odor and improves taste: reverse osmosis not only removes lead but numerous
other contaminants including arsenic, nitrates, nickel, chlorine and total dissolved solids.
Removal of these impurities leaves clean water that tastes better and has no odor.
Small size: reverse osmosis systems are usually small in size thus suitable for home uses.
By removing most of the metals and dissolved minerals from water, reverse osmosis
helps in preventing corrosion of plumbing systems.
4.1.2.2. Disadvantages
This method removes all chemical materials and minerals from water, including
beneficial and/or healthy minerals such as manganese and iron.
By removing most of the minerals, this method leaves the water more acidic.
The method requires large amount of water because only about 5-15% of the water that
gets pushed through the reverse osmosis system returns (Craig, (n.d.)). The remaining water
leaves the system as wastewater.
The method is consuming meaning it requires a lot of time in order to treat a substantial
amount of water. For example, filtering one gallon of water using reverse osmosis system may
take between 3 and 4 hours.
Reverse osmosis systems usually require frequent maintenance so as to maintain high
level of effectiveness in removing lead from the water.
Removes contaminants: reverse osmosis methods removes almost 100% of contaminants
from water. This includes lead, arsenic, copper, sodium, nitrates, organic chemicals, viruses,
protozoa, bacteria, etc.
Cost-effective: this method produces very clean potable water for about $0.25 per day
(Linton, 2016), making it affordable even for domestic uses.
Environmental friendly: the method does not require uses of large amount of energy that
could otherwise result to emission of greenhouse gases to the environment and it does not use or
produce any toxic chemicals. Additionally, it eliminates the need of buying water bottles that
could end up being disposed in landfills because it provides clean potable water at all times.
Reduces odor and improves taste: reverse osmosis not only removes lead but numerous
other contaminants including arsenic, nitrates, nickel, chlorine and total dissolved solids.
Removal of these impurities leaves clean water that tastes better and has no odor.
Small size: reverse osmosis systems are usually small in size thus suitable for home uses.
By removing most of the metals and dissolved minerals from water, reverse osmosis
helps in preventing corrosion of plumbing systems.
4.1.2.2. Disadvantages
This method removes all chemical materials and minerals from water, including
beneficial and/or healthy minerals such as manganese and iron.
By removing most of the minerals, this method leaves the water more acidic.
The method requires large amount of water because only about 5-15% of the water that
gets pushed through the reverse osmosis system returns (Craig, (n.d.)). The remaining water
leaves the system as wastewater.
The method is consuming meaning it requires a lot of time in order to treat a substantial
amount of water. For example, filtering one gallon of water using reverse osmosis system may
take between 3 and 4 hours.
Reverse osmosis systems usually require frequent maintenance so as to maintain high
level of effectiveness in removing lead from the water.
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 10
4.1.3. Activated carbon filtration
This is one of the oldest and common methods of water treatment (Bhatnagar, et al.,
2013). The method is also known as adsorption. Most of the activated carbon filters used today
have been improved and therefore are more effective in water treatment than those used several
years back (Egbon, et al., 2013). Activated carbon filtration method removes lead from potable
water using a special type of carbon filter. The lead and other contaminants get removed from
water through a process known as adsorption. Activated carbon filtration system uses reactive or
adsorptive filters. These filters contain a medium that reacts with or adsorbs the lead present in
water. The medium can be made from petroleum coke, wood products, lignite, peanut shells,
bituminous coal or coconut shell. When the water is passed through the activated carbon filter, it
gets attracted and adsorbed or held on the carbon particles surface. The adsorption process
efficiency depends on carbon characteristics (pore size, particle size, hardness, density and
surface area) and contaminant characteristics (solubility, attraction to carbon surface and
concentration) (Dvorak & Skipton, 2013).
Before the start of water treatment process, the carbon medium has to be activated first.
This is done by subjecting it to high temperature of up to 1260 °C and steam in absence of
oxygen. Sometimes the carbon medium may be coated with a specific compound or processed
using acid wash so as to improve its capability of removing particular contaminants from water.
This activation process generates carbon that has numerous small pores thus its surface area is
also very high. After that, the carbon medium is crushed to create a pulverized or granular carbon
product creating smaller particles whose outside surface area is more available for adsorption of
contaminants.
Once the carbon medium or activated carbon filter has been prepared, water is passed
through it. Since the filter is made from carbon that is more effective in removing lead, the lead
particles present in water will get strongly and easily adsorbed onto the surface of the carbon
filter. The efficiency of lead adsorption is also directly proportional to the length of contact time
between carbon and water. When the same activated carbon filter is used for a long period of
time, it gets saturated. This basically means that its pores become filled with lead contaminant
and therefore further adsorption cannot take place. In such cases, the filters have to be cleaned or
replaced.
4.1.3. Activated carbon filtration
This is one of the oldest and common methods of water treatment (Bhatnagar, et al.,
2013). The method is also known as adsorption. Most of the activated carbon filters used today
have been improved and therefore are more effective in water treatment than those used several
years back (Egbon, et al., 2013). Activated carbon filtration method removes lead from potable
water using a special type of carbon filter. The lead and other contaminants get removed from
water through a process known as adsorption. Activated carbon filtration system uses reactive or
adsorptive filters. These filters contain a medium that reacts with or adsorbs the lead present in
water. The medium can be made from petroleum coke, wood products, lignite, peanut shells,
bituminous coal or coconut shell. When the water is passed through the activated carbon filter, it
gets attracted and adsorbed or held on the carbon particles surface. The adsorption process
efficiency depends on carbon characteristics (pore size, particle size, hardness, density and
surface area) and contaminant characteristics (solubility, attraction to carbon surface and
concentration) (Dvorak & Skipton, 2013).
Before the start of water treatment process, the carbon medium has to be activated first.
This is done by subjecting it to high temperature of up to 1260 °C and steam in absence of
oxygen. Sometimes the carbon medium may be coated with a specific compound or processed
using acid wash so as to improve its capability of removing particular contaminants from water.
This activation process generates carbon that has numerous small pores thus its surface area is
also very high. After that, the carbon medium is crushed to create a pulverized or granular carbon
product creating smaller particles whose outside surface area is more available for adsorption of
contaminants.
Once the carbon medium or activated carbon filter has been prepared, water is passed
through it. Since the filter is made from carbon that is more effective in removing lead, the lead
particles present in water will get strongly and easily adsorbed onto the surface of the carbon
filter. The efficiency of lead adsorption is also directly proportional to the length of contact time
between carbon and water. When the same activated carbon filter is used for a long period of
time, it gets saturated. This basically means that its pores become filled with lead contaminant
and therefore further adsorption cannot take place. In such cases, the filters have to be cleaned or
replaced.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 11
4.1.3.1. Advantages
Installation and maintenance: it is very easy to install an activated carbon filtration
system and maintain it. These processes require less tools and equipment.
Low operating costs: the operation costs of activated carbon filtration method are
relatively low because they usually require less energy and maintenance needs are also low.
Efficiency: this method is very efficient in removing lead from water as long as the
activated carbon filter is made from carbon medium that has high affinity for lead.
Flexibility: the method can also be used to remove lead from water at point-of-use (such
as community or household filters) or at point-of-entry (such as wastewater treatment facilities or
semi-centralized potable water treatment facilities) (Mazille & Spuhler, 2011).
Availability: this method can be used anywhere because activated carbon filters can be
made in any part of the world. The required raw materials for making activated carbon are
abundant.
Reliability: this method is very reliable in removing lea from water as long as the
activated carbon filter is made or selected by considering the characteristics of the contaminant
(composition, solubility, quantity and affinity).
4.1.3.2. Disadvantages
Maintenance: activated carbon filters require regular regeneration or replacement. This is
because the filters, after adsorbing lead for some time, get clogged or saturated making them
ineffective in removing lead from the water. The filters can be replaced based on the
manufacturer’s recommendations or the user can calculate replacement intervals based on the
amount of lead being removed and quantity of water being purified by the system on daily basis.
Limited lifetime: activated carbon filters’ lifetime is limited. After these filters have been
used for a long time, their surfaces get saturated with lead or other water contaminants and they
stop purifying water. Sometimes backwashing the filter may not be enough leaving replacement
as the only best solution.
4.1.3.1. Advantages
Installation and maintenance: it is very easy to install an activated carbon filtration
system and maintain it. These processes require less tools and equipment.
Low operating costs: the operation costs of activated carbon filtration method are
relatively low because they usually require less energy and maintenance needs are also low.
Efficiency: this method is very efficient in removing lead from water as long as the
activated carbon filter is made from carbon medium that has high affinity for lead.
Flexibility: the method can also be used to remove lead from water at point-of-use (such
as community or household filters) or at point-of-entry (such as wastewater treatment facilities or
semi-centralized potable water treatment facilities) (Mazille & Spuhler, 2011).
Availability: this method can be used anywhere because activated carbon filters can be
made in any part of the world. The required raw materials for making activated carbon are
abundant.
Reliability: this method is very reliable in removing lea from water as long as the
activated carbon filter is made or selected by considering the characteristics of the contaminant
(composition, solubility, quantity and affinity).
4.1.3.2. Disadvantages
Maintenance: activated carbon filters require regular regeneration or replacement. This is
because the filters, after adsorbing lead for some time, get clogged or saturated making them
ineffective in removing lead from the water. The filters can be replaced based on the
manufacturer’s recommendations or the user can calculate replacement intervals based on the
amount of lead being removed and quantity of water being purified by the system on daily basis.
Limited lifetime: activated carbon filters’ lifetime is limited. After these filters have been
used for a long time, their surfaces get saturated with lead or other water contaminants and they
stop purifying water. Sometimes backwashing the filter may not be enough leaving replacement
as the only best solution.
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 12
Skilled labour: removing lead from potable water using active carbon filtration method
requires skilled labour, at least occasionally. The skilled labour is needed for monitoring removal
efficiency and/or performance of the activated carbon filtration unit.
Water analysis: for the activated carbon filtration method to remove lead effectively from
the water, water analysis has to be carried out comprehensively. This helps in determining the
most effective type of activated carbon for removal of lead. The water analysis process may
require more resources, including time, personnel and money.
Energy: activated carbon filtration units are usually driven by power and therefore energy
must be provided.
This method also only separates lead and other contaminants from the water but it does
not destroy them. As a result of this, the adsorbed contaminants, including lead, may still find
themselves back in water creating more health problems.
4.1.4. Ion exchange
This is a water treatment method that uses ion exchange resins to remove contaminants
from the water. Ion exchange resins are simply colored synthetic spherical micro-porous beads of
size ranging between 0.5mm and 1mm and have pores on their surfaces for trapping and
absorbing contaminants present in water. Ion exchangers are water-insoluble substances that
exchange some of their ions with similar charged ions that are present in the media with which
they come in contact with (Kumar & Jain, 2013). The method treats water through exchange of
ions between the water and resin. Ion exchange resins contain loosely held positive and negative
ions. The positively charged ions are known as cations while the negatively charged ions are
called anions. There are two main types of ion exchange resins: cation exchange resin and anion
exchange resin (New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, 2009). A cation
exchange resin is a type of resin that has a positive charge and is suitable for treating water
containing a positive charge whereas an anion exchange resin is a type of resin that has a
negative charge and is suitable for treating water containing a negative charge. Cation exchange
resins comprise of polystyrene chains of divinylbenzene covalent bonds. A cation exchange resin
is denser than an anion exchange resin thus the former has a greater exchange capacity than the
latter. A cation exchange resins also needs less volume than an anion exchange resin of the same
Skilled labour: removing lead from potable water using active carbon filtration method
requires skilled labour, at least occasionally. The skilled labour is needed for monitoring removal
efficiency and/or performance of the activated carbon filtration unit.
Water analysis: for the activated carbon filtration method to remove lead effectively from
the water, water analysis has to be carried out comprehensively. This helps in determining the
most effective type of activated carbon for removal of lead. The water analysis process may
require more resources, including time, personnel and money.
Energy: activated carbon filtration units are usually driven by power and therefore energy
must be provided.
This method also only separates lead and other contaminants from the water but it does
not destroy them. As a result of this, the adsorbed contaminants, including lead, may still find
themselves back in water creating more health problems.
4.1.4. Ion exchange
This is a water treatment method that uses ion exchange resins to remove contaminants
from the water. Ion exchange resins are simply colored synthetic spherical micro-porous beads of
size ranging between 0.5mm and 1mm and have pores on their surfaces for trapping and
absorbing contaminants present in water. Ion exchangers are water-insoluble substances that
exchange some of their ions with similar charged ions that are present in the media with which
they come in contact with (Kumar & Jain, 2013). The method treats water through exchange of
ions between the water and resin. Ion exchange resins contain loosely held positive and negative
ions. The positively charged ions are known as cations while the negatively charged ions are
called anions. There are two main types of ion exchange resins: cation exchange resin and anion
exchange resin (New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, 2009). A cation
exchange resin is a type of resin that has a positive charge and is suitable for treating water
containing a positive charge whereas an anion exchange resin is a type of resin that has a
negative charge and is suitable for treating water containing a negative charge. Cation exchange
resins comprise of polystyrene chains of divinylbenzene covalent bonds. A cation exchange resin
is denser than an anion exchange resin thus the former has a greater exchange capacity than the
latter. A cation exchange resins also needs less volume than an anion exchange resin of the same
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 13
exchange capabilities. Since lead-contaminated water contains positively charged lead ions, this
water is treated using cation exchange resin.
The operation of ion exchange process is very easy. The water is made to flow through
the cation exchange resin. As the water passes through the resin, the positively charged lead ions
from water get attracted to the cation exchange resin and they get exchanged with the cation
exchangers (positive ions in the ion exchange resin). In other words, lead ions are removed from
the water and get trapped in the resin while the positive ions in the resin moves from the resin to
the water molecule. This means that cations in the ion exchange resin get exchanged with lead
ions from the water. In this process, ions obtained from an ion exchange resin are used to
exchange with lead ions that are in an aqueous solution (Arar, 2013). It is important to note that
ion exchange resins used to remove lead from water are selective ion exchange resins. These
resins have greater affinity for lead and they can effectively remove any dissolved lead present in
water (Rohm and Haas, 2008). In most cases, i0n exchange resins are made or modified
depending on the contaminants that are targeted to be removed from water (Wang, et al., 2014).
When an ion exchange resin has been used for some time, it needs to be regenerated or
reactivated. This basically means rebooting the exchange capacity of the ion exchange resin. An
anion exchange resin is usually regenerated using sodium hydroxide while a cation exchange
resin is regenerated using sulfuric or hydrochloric acid.
4.1.4.1. Advantages
Low initial capital: the cost of installing an ion exchange resin for water treatment is
relatively low. This is because the equipment used is simple thus installation does not necessarily
require technical expertise.
Low operating costs: this is the major advantage of ion exchange process. The process
has very low operating costs because it requires little amount of energy, the cost of chemicals
used for regeneration is very low and the ion exchange resins can last for several years before
replacement as long as they are maintained properly.
Low maintenance needs: if the ion exchange resin is properly designed, installed and
maintained, it can be used for numerous years before any maintenance is done.
exchange capabilities. Since lead-contaminated water contains positively charged lead ions, this
water is treated using cation exchange resin.
The operation of ion exchange process is very easy. The water is made to flow through
the cation exchange resin. As the water passes through the resin, the positively charged lead ions
from water get attracted to the cation exchange resin and they get exchanged with the cation
exchangers (positive ions in the ion exchange resin). In other words, lead ions are removed from
the water and get trapped in the resin while the positive ions in the resin moves from the resin to
the water molecule. This means that cations in the ion exchange resin get exchanged with lead
ions from the water. In this process, ions obtained from an ion exchange resin are used to
exchange with lead ions that are in an aqueous solution (Arar, 2013). It is important to note that
ion exchange resins used to remove lead from water are selective ion exchange resins. These
resins have greater affinity for lead and they can effectively remove any dissolved lead present in
water (Rohm and Haas, 2008). In most cases, i0n exchange resins are made or modified
depending on the contaminants that are targeted to be removed from water (Wang, et al., 2014).
When an ion exchange resin has been used for some time, it needs to be regenerated or
reactivated. This basically means rebooting the exchange capacity of the ion exchange resin. An
anion exchange resin is usually regenerated using sodium hydroxide while a cation exchange
resin is regenerated using sulfuric or hydrochloric acid.
4.1.4.1. Advantages
Low initial capital: the cost of installing an ion exchange resin for water treatment is
relatively low. This is because the equipment used is simple thus installation does not necessarily
require technical expertise.
Low operating costs: this is the major advantage of ion exchange process. The process
has very low operating costs because it requires little amount of energy, the cost of chemicals
used for regeneration is very low and the ion exchange resins can last for several years before
replacement as long as they are maintained properly.
Low maintenance needs: if the ion exchange resin is properly designed, installed and
maintained, it can be used for numerous years before any maintenance is done.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 14
Efficiency or exchange capacity: ion exchange resins can be reformulated or modified so
as to increase their affinity or exchange capacity for lead. Therefore this method is very effective
in removing lead, using selective cation exchange resins.
Regeneration: instead of replacing an ion exchange resin when its exchange capacity
reduces, the resin can be regenerated. This saves both time and cost.
Simplicity: this technology is very simple, which translates into easy installation and operation
processes.
4.1.4.2. Disadvantages
Clogging: ion exchange resins may get clogged by other solid particles present in water
thus reducing their efficiency in removing lead because efficiency of exchange of ions will
decrease.
Bacterial contamination: this method is not effective in removing bacteria and other
microorganisms from water. In fact, organic matter that accumulates at the resin beds helps in
bacterial growth by acting as their source of nutrients. Therefore is has to be combined with
other water treatment methods for the water to be safe for drinking.
Environmental concern: during regeneration of an ion exchange resin, minerals and salts
from the system is usually dumped into the environment, which raises a major environmental
concern.
Frequent regeneration: the exchange capacity of an ion exchange resin declines quickly
making it necessary to regenerate the resin regularly. The decline is usually as a result of the
resin trapping some organic elements present in water.
4.2. Advanced lead removal methods
4.2.1. Alkali Ash Material Permeable Reactive Barrier (AAM-PRB)
This is one of the latest and most effective methods of removing lead from potable water
(Brooks, et al., 2010). AAM-PRB is an innovative material made with a filer material (coarse
aggregates and sand) and fly ash alkali. The material is produced from alkali-activation process
where a caustic sodium hydroxide is mixed with conc. sodium silicate then reacted with fly ash
Efficiency or exchange capacity: ion exchange resins can be reformulated or modified so
as to increase their affinity or exchange capacity for lead. Therefore this method is very effective
in removing lead, using selective cation exchange resins.
Regeneration: instead of replacing an ion exchange resin when its exchange capacity
reduces, the resin can be regenerated. This saves both time and cost.
Simplicity: this technology is very simple, which translates into easy installation and operation
processes.
4.1.4.2. Disadvantages
Clogging: ion exchange resins may get clogged by other solid particles present in water
thus reducing their efficiency in removing lead because efficiency of exchange of ions will
decrease.
Bacterial contamination: this method is not effective in removing bacteria and other
microorganisms from water. In fact, organic matter that accumulates at the resin beds helps in
bacterial growth by acting as their source of nutrients. Therefore is has to be combined with
other water treatment methods for the water to be safe for drinking.
Environmental concern: during regeneration of an ion exchange resin, minerals and salts
from the system is usually dumped into the environment, which raises a major environmental
concern.
Frequent regeneration: the exchange capacity of an ion exchange resin declines quickly
making it necessary to regenerate the resin regularly. The decline is usually as a result of the
resin trapping some organic elements present in water.
4.2. Advanced lead removal methods
4.2.1. Alkali Ash Material Permeable Reactive Barrier (AAM-PRB)
This is one of the latest and most effective methods of removing lead from potable water
(Brooks, et al., 2010). AAM-PRB is an innovative material made with a filer material (coarse
aggregates and sand) and fly ash alkali. The material is produced from alkali-activation process
where a caustic sodium hydroxide is mixed with conc. sodium silicate then reacted with fly ash
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 15
to form a material that has a unique microstructure with cementitious properties (Brooks, et al.,
2010).
4.2.2. Electrocoagulation
This is a method that removes lead from water using an electrical current (Bouguerra, et
al., 2015). Lead is maintained in water by electrical charges (Arbabi, et al., 2015). The electro-
coagulation system provides negative electrical charges that neutralizes the positively charged
lead ions. Through this process, the lead ions get precipitated and destabilized leaving water free
from lead particles (Ahluwalia & Goyal, 2007). This method has been found to be very effective
in removing lead from water (Heffron, et al., 2016) and new and better electrode materials are
still being developed. Efficiency of this method is also affected by factors such as temperature,
co-existing ions, current density, inter-electrode distance, pH and electrode configuration
(Kamaraj, et al., 2015).
4.2.3. Ultrafiltration (UF) system
This is a membrane separation method where water is passed along the surface of the
membrane under pressure. As a result of this, pure water permeates through the membrane while
lead and other contaminants are not allowed to pass through the membrane. A complete UF
system comprises of a screening unit, filtration unit, microfiltration unit and UF unit in that
order, as shown in Figure 2 below. Screening unit is used to remove large particles from water
such as organic matter, hair, etc. Filtration unit usually removes sand and other particles larger
than 10 microns. Microfiltration unit removes particles greater than 0.1 microns, and
ultrafiltration unit removes particles greater than 0.02 microns. Alternatively, the screening,
filtration and microfiltration units can be separate from the UF unit so that the water is pretreated
before being discharged to the UF unit (Rojas-Serrano, et al., 2015). There are different types of
UF membranes, each with a unique filtration capacity (Reyhani, et al., 2015). Several studies are
still ongoing to develop more effective UF membranes using nanomaterials. More UF systems
for industrial water treatment have also been developed and have become a sustainable way of
treating water for industrial use (Chew, et al., 2016).
to form a material that has a unique microstructure with cementitious properties (Brooks, et al.,
2010).
4.2.2. Electrocoagulation
This is a method that removes lead from water using an electrical current (Bouguerra, et
al., 2015). Lead is maintained in water by electrical charges (Arbabi, et al., 2015). The electro-
coagulation system provides negative electrical charges that neutralizes the positively charged
lead ions. Through this process, the lead ions get precipitated and destabilized leaving water free
from lead particles (Ahluwalia & Goyal, 2007). This method has been found to be very effective
in removing lead from water (Heffron, et al., 2016) and new and better electrode materials are
still being developed. Efficiency of this method is also affected by factors such as temperature,
co-existing ions, current density, inter-electrode distance, pH and electrode configuration
(Kamaraj, et al., 2015).
4.2.3. Ultrafiltration (UF) system
This is a membrane separation method where water is passed along the surface of the
membrane under pressure. As a result of this, pure water permeates through the membrane while
lead and other contaminants are not allowed to pass through the membrane. A complete UF
system comprises of a screening unit, filtration unit, microfiltration unit and UF unit in that
order, as shown in Figure 2 below. Screening unit is used to remove large particles from water
such as organic matter, hair, etc. Filtration unit usually removes sand and other particles larger
than 10 microns. Microfiltration unit removes particles greater than 0.1 microns, and
ultrafiltration unit removes particles greater than 0.02 microns. Alternatively, the screening,
filtration and microfiltration units can be separate from the UF unit so that the water is pretreated
before being discharged to the UF unit (Rojas-Serrano, et al., 2015). There are different types of
UF membranes, each with a unique filtration capacity (Reyhani, et al., 2015). Several studies are
still ongoing to develop more effective UF membranes using nanomaterials. More UF systems
for industrial water treatment have also been developed and have become a sustainable way of
treating water for industrial use (Chew, et al., 2016).
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 16
Figure 2: Schematic diagram of UF system (Aquasource, 2011)
4.2.4. Electrodialysis (ED)
This is a membrane technology method of water treatment (Barakat, 2011). In this
method, water ions are passed through a semi-permeable membrane. The water is under effect of
an electrical potential. There are two main types of semi-permeable membranes: anion-selective
or cation-selective membranes. Anion-selective membranes contain positively charged matter
thus they reject and allow positively and negatively charged ions respectively. On the other hand,
cation-selective membranes contain negatively charged matter thus they reject and allow
negatively and positively charged ions respectively. Anion-selective membranes are used for
removing lead from water. These membranes do not allow the positively charged lead ions to
pass through them. In this method, water is passed through a series of anion-selective membranes
until all the lead has been removed. However, the membrane pores can be clogged especially if
the water contains particles larger than 10 μm. This requires the water to be pre-treated before it
can be treated using ED method (Lenntech, (n.d.)).
4.2.5. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles
There are also several ongoing research and development projects aimed at using
nanomaterials and nanotechnology to develop more efficient water treatment systems (Gehrke, et
al., 2015). These nanomaterials are specially made to block flow of lead through them. The
nanomaterials and nanoparticles have less energy and operating costs, discard less wastewater
and produce high quality water (Tambe, 2015).
Figure 2: Schematic diagram of UF system (Aquasource, 2011)
4.2.4. Electrodialysis (ED)
This is a membrane technology method of water treatment (Barakat, 2011). In this
method, water ions are passed through a semi-permeable membrane. The water is under effect of
an electrical potential. There are two main types of semi-permeable membranes: anion-selective
or cation-selective membranes. Anion-selective membranes contain positively charged matter
thus they reject and allow positively and negatively charged ions respectively. On the other hand,
cation-selective membranes contain negatively charged matter thus they reject and allow
negatively and positively charged ions respectively. Anion-selective membranes are used for
removing lead from water. These membranes do not allow the positively charged lead ions to
pass through them. In this method, water is passed through a series of anion-selective membranes
until all the lead has been removed. However, the membrane pores can be clogged especially if
the water contains particles larger than 10 μm. This requires the water to be pre-treated before it
can be treated using ED method (Lenntech, (n.d.)).
4.2.5. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles
There are also several ongoing research and development projects aimed at using
nanomaterials and nanotechnology to develop more efficient water treatment systems (Gehrke, et
al., 2015). These nanomaterials are specially made to block flow of lead through them. The
nanomaterials and nanoparticles have less energy and operating costs, discard less wastewater
and produce high quality water (Tambe, 2015).
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 17
5. Factors to consider when selecting a water treatment method
The rapidly increasing global population, climate change and depleting water resources
have increased the necessity of developing efficient, cost effective, environmental friendly and
easy water treatment methods (Amin, et al., 2014). There are various methods that can be used to
remove lead from water so as to make it potable. However, there are several factors that must be
considered when selecting the most suitable method. Some of these factors are discussed below
Effectiveness: the method selected should be able to remove lead from water up to the
required minimum acceptable level and/or concentration
Capacity: the method selected should be able to produce the required amount of water
output within the expected time.
Lead concentration: the method selected should also be based on the concentration level
of lead. Some methods are only effective for low levels while others are effective for high levels
of lead concentration.
Cost: each method has different initial, operating and maintenance costs. Therefore the
method selected should be able to be installed, operated and maintained properly using the
available resources.
Skills: the labour skills required should also be considered so as to ensure that the system
is operated as recommended by the manufacturer and in compliance with relevant industry
requirements. The skills required depend on simplicity and technicality of the water treatment
method.
Safety: the method selected should also be safe to the operator, water users, technicians
and the environment.
Renewable energy: considering the negative effects of non-renewable energy, it is always
a good decision to consider selecting a method that can be effectively run using renewable
energy.
Environmental impacts: the method selected should also have no or minimal impacts on
the environment.
5. Factors to consider when selecting a water treatment method
The rapidly increasing global population, climate change and depleting water resources
have increased the necessity of developing efficient, cost effective, environmental friendly and
easy water treatment methods (Amin, et al., 2014). There are various methods that can be used to
remove lead from water so as to make it potable. However, there are several factors that must be
considered when selecting the most suitable method. Some of these factors are discussed below
Effectiveness: the method selected should be able to remove lead from water up to the
required minimum acceptable level and/or concentration
Capacity: the method selected should be able to produce the required amount of water
output within the expected time.
Lead concentration: the method selected should also be based on the concentration level
of lead. Some methods are only effective for low levels while others are effective for high levels
of lead concentration.
Cost: each method has different initial, operating and maintenance costs. Therefore the
method selected should be able to be installed, operated and maintained properly using the
available resources.
Skills: the labour skills required should also be considered so as to ensure that the system
is operated as recommended by the manufacturer and in compliance with relevant industry
requirements. The skills required depend on simplicity and technicality of the water treatment
method.
Safety: the method selected should also be safe to the operator, water users, technicians
and the environment.
Renewable energy: considering the negative effects of non-renewable energy, it is always
a good decision to consider selecting a method that can be effectively run using renewable
energy.
Environmental impacts: the method selected should also have no or minimal impacts on
the environment.
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 18
Reliability and durability: the method selected should also be reliable and durable so as to
avoid frequent replacements or inconveniences.
6. Conclusion
The importance of water in human life cannot be overemphasized. However, millions of
people across the world do not have access to potable water. This is due to various reasons,
including lead contamination. Water that is contaminated with lead is not fit for drinking. This is
because lead is one of the toxic heavy metals that cause numerous health problems when
exposed to human bodies either through air, food, water, etc. These health problems affect
unborn babies, infants, children, pregnant women and other adults. Some of the health problems
resulting from consumption of lead contaminated water include: delayed neurologic, mental or
physical development, anemia, hearing problems, slowed growth, brain damage, headaches,
mood disorders, hyperactivity, pica, lower IQ, learning and behavior problems, kidney problems,
heart diseases, high blood pressure, hypertension, cancer, reproductive problems, joint and
muscle pain, digestive problems, loss of appetite, mood disorders, blood disorders, Alzheimer
disease, autoimmune diseases, premature birth, low birth weight, gestational hypertension,
miscarriage or abortion and reduced fetus growth. Children are the most affected.
Lead typically gets into potable water through corrosion of water supply pipes, solders and
plumbing systems, including components such as fittings, faucets and fixtures. Lead is
predominantly used to make most of these components and therefore when they get corroded,
lead deposits find their way into potable water. Potable water may also get contaminated with
lead through pollution of natural water sources by direct disposal of lead wastes, infiltration from
a landfill or weathering of rocks containing lead into groundwater. According to World Health
Organization, the maximum acceptable concentration of lead in potable water is 0.01 mg/L (10
μg/L). This is the level that is applicable in many countries across the world.
However, lead contamination in potable water is a problem that can be solved. There are
many conventional and contemporary methods that are used to remove lead from potable water.
These methods include: distillation, reverse osmosis, activated carbon filtration, ion exchange,
alkali ash material permeable reactive barrier, electrocoagulation, ultrafiltration, electrodialysis,
and use of nanomaterials and nanoparticles. Each of these methods has its advantages and
disadvantages. Before selecting a particular method, it is also important to consider factors such
Reliability and durability: the method selected should also be reliable and durable so as to
avoid frequent replacements or inconveniences.
6. Conclusion
The importance of water in human life cannot be overemphasized. However, millions of
people across the world do not have access to potable water. This is due to various reasons,
including lead contamination. Water that is contaminated with lead is not fit for drinking. This is
because lead is one of the toxic heavy metals that cause numerous health problems when
exposed to human bodies either through air, food, water, etc. These health problems affect
unborn babies, infants, children, pregnant women and other adults. Some of the health problems
resulting from consumption of lead contaminated water include: delayed neurologic, mental or
physical development, anemia, hearing problems, slowed growth, brain damage, headaches,
mood disorders, hyperactivity, pica, lower IQ, learning and behavior problems, kidney problems,
heart diseases, high blood pressure, hypertension, cancer, reproductive problems, joint and
muscle pain, digestive problems, loss of appetite, mood disorders, blood disorders, Alzheimer
disease, autoimmune diseases, premature birth, low birth weight, gestational hypertension,
miscarriage or abortion and reduced fetus growth. Children are the most affected.
Lead typically gets into potable water through corrosion of water supply pipes, solders and
plumbing systems, including components such as fittings, faucets and fixtures. Lead is
predominantly used to make most of these components and therefore when they get corroded,
lead deposits find their way into potable water. Potable water may also get contaminated with
lead through pollution of natural water sources by direct disposal of lead wastes, infiltration from
a landfill or weathering of rocks containing lead into groundwater. According to World Health
Organization, the maximum acceptable concentration of lead in potable water is 0.01 mg/L (10
μg/L). This is the level that is applicable in many countries across the world.
However, lead contamination in potable water is a problem that can be solved. There are
many conventional and contemporary methods that are used to remove lead from potable water.
These methods include: distillation, reverse osmosis, activated carbon filtration, ion exchange,
alkali ash material permeable reactive barrier, electrocoagulation, ultrafiltration, electrodialysis,
and use of nanomaterials and nanoparticles. Each of these methods has its advantages and
disadvantages. Before selecting a particular method, it is also important to consider factors such
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 19
as effectiveness, capacity, cost, lead concentration, skills, safety, renewable energy,
environmental impacts, reliability and durability. There are also several other ongoing research
and development projects aimed at developing simpler and more reliable, cost effective, energy
efficient and environmental friendly methods of removing lead from potable water. Considering
the significance of potable water to human life, it is recommended that everyone should support
efforts made towards creating more efficient, reliable and cost effective methods and/or
processes of removing lead from potable water. This will save many lives today and in the future
because lead contamination in potable water is a major public health threat.
References
Ahluwalia, S. & Goyal, D., 2007. Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy
metals from wastewater. Bioresources Technology, 98(12), pp. 2243-2257.
Amin, M., Alazba, A. & Manzoor, U., 2014. a review of removal of pollutants from
water/wastewater using different types of nanomaterials. Advances in Materials Science and
Engineering, Volume 2014, pp. 1-24.
Aquasource, 2011. Membrane unfiltration. [Online]
Available at: http://www.aquasource-membrane.com/-ultrafiltration-filtration-.html
[Accessed 20 September 2017].
Arar, O., 2013. Removal of lead(II) from water by di (2-ethylexyl) phosphate containing ion
exchange resin. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52(16-18), pp. 3197-3205.
Arbabi, M., Hemati, S. & Amiri, M., 2015. Remocal of lead ions from industrial wastewater: A
review of removal methods. International Journal of Epidemiologic Research, 2(2), pp. 105-109.
Bakalar, T., Bugel, M. & Gajdosova, L., 2009. Heavy metal removal using reverse osmosis. Acta
Montanistica Slovaca, 14(3), pp. 250-253.
as effectiveness, capacity, cost, lead concentration, skills, safety, renewable energy,
environmental impacts, reliability and durability. There are also several other ongoing research
and development projects aimed at developing simpler and more reliable, cost effective, energy
efficient and environmental friendly methods of removing lead from potable water. Considering
the significance of potable water to human life, it is recommended that everyone should support
efforts made towards creating more efficient, reliable and cost effective methods and/or
processes of removing lead from potable water. This will save many lives today and in the future
because lead contamination in potable water is a major public health threat.
References
Ahluwalia, S. & Goyal, D., 2007. Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy
metals from wastewater. Bioresources Technology, 98(12), pp. 2243-2257.
Amin, M., Alazba, A. & Manzoor, U., 2014. a review of removal of pollutants from
water/wastewater using different types of nanomaterials. Advances in Materials Science and
Engineering, Volume 2014, pp. 1-24.
Aquasource, 2011. Membrane unfiltration. [Online]
Available at: http://www.aquasource-membrane.com/-ultrafiltration-filtration-.html
[Accessed 20 September 2017].
Arar, O., 2013. Removal of lead(II) from water by di (2-ethylexyl) phosphate containing ion
exchange resin. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52(16-18), pp. 3197-3205.
Arbabi, M., Hemati, S. & Amiri, M., 2015. Remocal of lead ions from industrial wastewater: A
review of removal methods. International Journal of Epidemiologic Research, 2(2), pp. 105-109.
Bakalar, T., Bugel, M. & Gajdosova, L., 2009. Heavy metal removal using reverse osmosis. Acta
Montanistica Slovaca, 14(3), pp. 250-253.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 20
Barakat, M., 2011. New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arabian
Journal of Chemistry, 4(4), pp. 361-377.
Bhatnagar, A., Hogland, W., Marques, M. & Sillanpaa, M., 2013. An overview of the
modification methods of activated carbon for its water treatment applications. Chemical
Engineering Journal, Volume 219, pp. 499-511.
Bouguerra, W. et al., 2015. Optimization of the electrocoagulation process for the removal of
lead from water using aluminium as electrode material. Desalination and Water Treatment,
56(10), pp. 2672-2681.
Brooks, R., Bahadory, M., Tovia, F. & Rostami, H., 2010. Removal of lead from contaminated
water. International Journal of Soil, Sediment and Water, 3(2).
Brown, M. & Margolis, S., 2012. Lead in drinking water and human blood lead levels in the
United States. Supplements, 61(4), pp. 1-9.
Chew, C., Aroua, M., Hussain, M. & Ismail, W., 2016. Evaluation of ultrafiltration and
conventional water treatment systems for sustainable development: an industrial scale case study.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(4), pp. 3152-3163.
Craig, R., (n.d.). Advantages & disadvantages of reverse osmosis. [Online]
Available at: https://www.hunker.com/13416587/advantages-disadvantages-of-reverse-osmosis
[Accessed 20 September 2017].
Department of Public Health, (n.d.). Lead in drinking water. [Online]
Available at: http://www.ct.gov/dph/lib/dph/drinking_water/pdf/lead.pdf
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Dvorak, B. & Skipton, S., 2013. Drinking water treatment: activated carbon filtration, Lincoln:
University of Nebraska - Lincoln Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources .
Egbon, E., Idode, V., Egbon, E. & Chukwuma, P., 2013. Treatment of saloon waste water using
activated carbon. Chemical and Process ngineering Research, Volume 17, pp. 24-29.
Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Water, 2016. Lead in drinking water,
Ottawa, Ontario: Health Canada.
Barakat, M., 2011. New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arabian
Journal of Chemistry, 4(4), pp. 361-377.
Bhatnagar, A., Hogland, W., Marques, M. & Sillanpaa, M., 2013. An overview of the
modification methods of activated carbon for its water treatment applications. Chemical
Engineering Journal, Volume 219, pp. 499-511.
Bouguerra, W. et al., 2015. Optimization of the electrocoagulation process for the removal of
lead from water using aluminium as electrode material. Desalination and Water Treatment,
56(10), pp. 2672-2681.
Brooks, R., Bahadory, M., Tovia, F. & Rostami, H., 2010. Removal of lead from contaminated
water. International Journal of Soil, Sediment and Water, 3(2).
Brown, M. & Margolis, S., 2012. Lead in drinking water and human blood lead levels in the
United States. Supplements, 61(4), pp. 1-9.
Chew, C., Aroua, M., Hussain, M. & Ismail, W., 2016. Evaluation of ultrafiltration and
conventional water treatment systems for sustainable development: an industrial scale case study.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(4), pp. 3152-3163.
Craig, R., (n.d.). Advantages & disadvantages of reverse osmosis. [Online]
Available at: https://www.hunker.com/13416587/advantages-disadvantages-of-reverse-osmosis
[Accessed 20 September 2017].
Department of Public Health, (n.d.). Lead in drinking water. [Online]
Available at: http://www.ct.gov/dph/lib/dph/drinking_water/pdf/lead.pdf
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Dvorak, B. & Skipton, S., 2013. Drinking water treatment: activated carbon filtration, Lincoln:
University of Nebraska - Lincoln Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources .
Egbon, E., Idode, V., Egbon, E. & Chukwuma, P., 2013. Treatment of saloon waste water using
activated carbon. Chemical and Process ngineering Research, Volume 17, pp. 24-29.
Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Water, 2016. Lead in drinking water,
Ottawa, Ontario: Health Canada.
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 21
Gehrke, I., Geiser, A. & Somborn-Schulz, A., 2015. Innovations in nanotchnology for water
treatment. Nanotechnology Science and Applications, Volume 8, pp. 1-17.
Gugulothu, R., Somanchi, N., Reddy, K. & Gantha, D., 2015. A review on solar water
distillation using sensible and latent heat. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, Volume 11, pp.
354-360.
Harhay, M., 2011. Water stress and water scarcity: a global problem. American Journal of
Public Health , 101(8), pp. 1348-1349.
Hayward, J., 2017. 7 health effects of lead in drinking water. [Online]
Available at: http://www.activebeat.com/diet-nutrition/7-health-effects-of-lead-in-drinking-
water/4/
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Heffron, J., Marhefke, M. & Mayer, B., 2016. Removal of trace metal contaminants from potable
water by electrocoagulation. Scientific Reports, Volume 6, pp. 1-9.
Iqbal, S., Muntner, P., Batuman, V. & Rabito, F., 2008. Estimated burden of blood lead level
>=5 mu g/dl in 1999-2002 and declines from 1988 to 1994. Environmental Research, 107(3), pp.
305-311.
Kamaraj, R., Ganesan, P. & Vasudevan, S., 2015. Removal of lead from aqueous solutions by
electrocoagulation: isotherm, kinetics and thermodynamic studies. International Journal of
Environmental Science and Technology, Volume 12, pp. 683-692.
Kumar, S. & Jain, S., 2013. History, introduction, and kinetics of ion exchange materials.
Journal of Chemistry, Volume 2013, pp. 1-13.
Lead Free Water, 2015. World Standards for allowable levels of lead in water. [Online]
Available at: http://www.leadfreewater.com/world-standards/
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Lenntech, (n.d.). Electrodalysis. [Online]
Available at: http://www.lenntech.com/electrodialysis.htm
[Accessed 20 September 2017].
Gehrke, I., Geiser, A. & Somborn-Schulz, A., 2015. Innovations in nanotchnology for water
treatment. Nanotechnology Science and Applications, Volume 8, pp. 1-17.
Gugulothu, R., Somanchi, N., Reddy, K. & Gantha, D., 2015. A review on solar water
distillation using sensible and latent heat. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, Volume 11, pp.
354-360.
Harhay, M., 2011. Water stress and water scarcity: a global problem. American Journal of
Public Health , 101(8), pp. 1348-1349.
Hayward, J., 2017. 7 health effects of lead in drinking water. [Online]
Available at: http://www.activebeat.com/diet-nutrition/7-health-effects-of-lead-in-drinking-
water/4/
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Heffron, J., Marhefke, M. & Mayer, B., 2016. Removal of trace metal contaminants from potable
water by electrocoagulation. Scientific Reports, Volume 6, pp. 1-9.
Iqbal, S., Muntner, P., Batuman, V. & Rabito, F., 2008. Estimated burden of blood lead level
>=5 mu g/dl in 1999-2002 and declines from 1988 to 1994. Environmental Research, 107(3), pp.
305-311.
Kamaraj, R., Ganesan, P. & Vasudevan, S., 2015. Removal of lead from aqueous solutions by
electrocoagulation: isotherm, kinetics and thermodynamic studies. International Journal of
Environmental Science and Technology, Volume 12, pp. 683-692.
Kumar, S. & Jain, S., 2013. History, introduction, and kinetics of ion exchange materials.
Journal of Chemistry, Volume 2013, pp. 1-13.
Lead Free Water, 2015. World Standards for allowable levels of lead in water. [Online]
Available at: http://www.leadfreewater.com/world-standards/
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Lenntech, (n.d.). Electrodalysis. [Online]
Available at: http://www.lenntech.com/electrodialysis.htm
[Accessed 20 September 2017].
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 22
Linton, I., 2016. How to remove lead from drinking water. [Online]
Available at: http://blog.watertech.com/how-to-remove-lead-from-drinking-water/
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Mazille, F. & Spuhler, D., 2011. Adsorption (activated carbon). [Online]
Available at: http://www.sswm.info/content/adsorption-activated-carbon
[Accessed 20 September 2017].
Mekonnen, M. & Hoekstra, A., 2016. Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Science
Advances, 2(2), pp. 1-6.
Mullen, K., 2012. Information on Earth's water. [Online]
Available at: http://www.ngwa.org/Fundamentals/teachers/Pages/information-on-earth-
water.aspx
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Navas-Acien, A., Guallar, Silbergeld, K. & Rothenberg, J., 2007. Led exposure and
cardiovascular disease - A systematic review. Environmental Health Perspectives, 115(3), pp.
472-482.
New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, 2009. Ion exchange treatment of
drinking water, Concord, New Hampshire: Drinking Water and Groundwater Bureau and the
New Hampshire Water Well Board.
Nguyen, C. et al., 2010. Impact of chloride:sulfate mass ratio (CSMR) changes on lead leaching
in potable water, Denver, Colorado: Water Research Foundation and U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency .
Payne, M., 2008. Lead in drinking water. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 179(3), pp.
253-254.
Perlman, H., 2016. How much water is there on, in, and above the Earth?. [Online]
Available at: https://water.usgs.gov/edu/earthhowmuch.html
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Rabin, R., 2008. The lead industry and lead water pipes "a modest campaign". American Journal
of Public Health , 98(9), pp. 1584-1592.
Linton, I., 2016. How to remove lead from drinking water. [Online]
Available at: http://blog.watertech.com/how-to-remove-lead-from-drinking-water/
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Mazille, F. & Spuhler, D., 2011. Adsorption (activated carbon). [Online]
Available at: http://www.sswm.info/content/adsorption-activated-carbon
[Accessed 20 September 2017].
Mekonnen, M. & Hoekstra, A., 2016. Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Science
Advances, 2(2), pp. 1-6.
Mullen, K., 2012. Information on Earth's water. [Online]
Available at: http://www.ngwa.org/Fundamentals/teachers/Pages/information-on-earth-
water.aspx
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Navas-Acien, A., Guallar, Silbergeld, K. & Rothenberg, J., 2007. Led exposure and
cardiovascular disease - A systematic review. Environmental Health Perspectives, 115(3), pp.
472-482.
New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, 2009. Ion exchange treatment of
drinking water, Concord, New Hampshire: Drinking Water and Groundwater Bureau and the
New Hampshire Water Well Board.
Nguyen, C. et al., 2010. Impact of chloride:sulfate mass ratio (CSMR) changes on lead leaching
in potable water, Denver, Colorado: Water Research Foundation and U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency .
Payne, M., 2008. Lead in drinking water. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 179(3), pp.
253-254.
Perlman, H., 2016. How much water is there on, in, and above the Earth?. [Online]
Available at: https://water.usgs.gov/edu/earthhowmuch.html
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Rabin, R., 2008. The lead industry and lead water pipes "a modest campaign". American Journal
of Public Health , 98(9), pp. 1584-1592.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 23
Renner, R., 2009. Out of plumb: when water treatment causes lead contamination.
Environmental Health Perspectives, Volume 117, pp. A542-A547.
Renner, R., 2010. Exposure to tap: drinking water as an overlooked source of lead.
Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(2), pp. A68-A74.
Reyhani, A., Rajaei, F., Shahmoradi, M. & Kahkesh, A., 2015. A study of a polymeric
membrane performance in an ultrafiltration system to use in industrial application. Desalination
and Water Treatment, 53(2), pp. 340-351.
Rohm and Haas, 2008. Ion exchange for dummies. [Online]
Available at: http://www.lenntech.com/Data-sheets/Ion-Exchange-for-Dummies-RH.pdf
[Accessed 20 September 2017].
Rojas-Serrano, F., Marin, E., Perez, J. & Gomez, M., 2015. Autopsy of ultrafiltration membranes
for drinking-water production with in-line coagulation and ozonation pre-treatments.
Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(42), pp. 19619-19631.
Srinivasan, V. et al., 2012. The nature and causes of the global water crisis: syndromes from a
meta-analysis of coupled human-water studies. American Geophysical Union (AGU) Journal,
48(10).
Swistock, B., 2017. Lead in drinking water. [Online]
Available at: https://extension.psu.edu/lead-in-drinking-water
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Tambe, P., 2015. Wastewater treatment using nanoparticles. Journal of Advanced Chemical
Engineering, Volume 5, p. 131.
Torrice, M., 2016. How lead ended up in Flint's tap water. [Online]
Available at: http://cen.acs.org/articles/94/i7/Lead-Ended-Flints-Tap-Water.html
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2017. Lead and copper rule. [Online]
Available at: https://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/lead-and-copper-rule
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Renner, R., 2009. Out of plumb: when water treatment causes lead contamination.
Environmental Health Perspectives, Volume 117, pp. A542-A547.
Renner, R., 2010. Exposure to tap: drinking water as an overlooked source of lead.
Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(2), pp. A68-A74.
Reyhani, A., Rajaei, F., Shahmoradi, M. & Kahkesh, A., 2015. A study of a polymeric
membrane performance in an ultrafiltration system to use in industrial application. Desalination
and Water Treatment, 53(2), pp. 340-351.
Rohm and Haas, 2008. Ion exchange for dummies. [Online]
Available at: http://www.lenntech.com/Data-sheets/Ion-Exchange-for-Dummies-RH.pdf
[Accessed 20 September 2017].
Rojas-Serrano, F., Marin, E., Perez, J. & Gomez, M., 2015. Autopsy of ultrafiltration membranes
for drinking-water production with in-line coagulation and ozonation pre-treatments.
Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(42), pp. 19619-19631.
Srinivasan, V. et al., 2012. The nature and causes of the global water crisis: syndromes from a
meta-analysis of coupled human-water studies. American Geophysical Union (AGU) Journal,
48(10).
Swistock, B., 2017. Lead in drinking water. [Online]
Available at: https://extension.psu.edu/lead-in-drinking-water
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Tambe, P., 2015. Wastewater treatment using nanoparticles. Journal of Advanced Chemical
Engineering, Volume 5, p. 131.
Torrice, M., 2016. How lead ended up in Flint's tap water. [Online]
Available at: http://cen.acs.org/articles/94/i7/Lead-Ended-Flints-Tap-Water.html
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2017. Lead and copper rule. [Online]
Available at: https://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/lead-and-copper-rule
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 24
United Nations, 2017. World population projected to reach 9.8 billion in 2050, and 11.2 billion
in 2100. [Online]
Available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/world-population-
prospects-2017.html
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2017. Ground water and drinking water: basic
information about lead in drinking water. [Online]
Available at: https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/basic-information-about-
lead-drinking-water
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Verstraeten, S., Aimo, L. & Oteiza, P., 2008. Aluminium and lead: molecular mechanisms of
brain toxicity. Archives of Toxicology, 82(11), pp. 789-802.
Wang, Q. et al., 2014. Study on the removal of dissolved organic matters in the raw water by a
new magnetic anion-exchange resin. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(2), pp. 572-581.
Water Quality Association, 2016. Lead Fact Sheet. [Online]
Available at: https://www.wqa.org/Portals/0/Technical/Technical%20Fact%20Sheets/
2016_Lead.pdf
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Water Right Group, 2016. How do reverse osmosis sdrinking water systems work?. [Online]
Available at: http://www.water-rightgroup.com/blog/how-do-reverse-osmosis-drinking-water-
systems-work/
[Accessed 20 September 2017].
Woodruff, T., Carlson, A., Schwartz, J. & Guidice, L., 2008. Proceedings of the Summit on
Environmental Challenges to Reproductive Health and Fertilifty: executive summary. Fertility
and Sterility, 89(2), pp. 281-300.
World Health Organization, 2011. Lead in drinking-water, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health
Organization.
United Nations, 2017. World population projected to reach 9.8 billion in 2050, and 11.2 billion
in 2100. [Online]
Available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/world-population-
prospects-2017.html
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2017. Ground water and drinking water: basic
information about lead in drinking water. [Online]
Available at: https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/basic-information-about-
lead-drinking-water
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Verstraeten, S., Aimo, L. & Oteiza, P., 2008. Aluminium and lead: molecular mechanisms of
brain toxicity. Archives of Toxicology, 82(11), pp. 789-802.
Wang, Q. et al., 2014. Study on the removal of dissolved organic matters in the raw water by a
new magnetic anion-exchange resin. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(2), pp. 572-581.
Water Quality Association, 2016. Lead Fact Sheet. [Online]
Available at: https://www.wqa.org/Portals/0/Technical/Technical%20Fact%20Sheets/
2016_Lead.pdf
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Water Right Group, 2016. How do reverse osmosis sdrinking water systems work?. [Online]
Available at: http://www.water-rightgroup.com/blog/how-do-reverse-osmosis-drinking-water-
systems-work/
[Accessed 20 September 2017].
Woodruff, T., Carlson, A., Schwartz, J. & Guidice, L., 2008. Proceedings of the Summit on
Environmental Challenges to Reproductive Health and Fertilifty: executive summary. Fertility
and Sterility, 89(2), pp. 281-300.
World Health Organization, 2011. Lead in drinking-water, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health
Organization.
Removal of Lead from Potable Water 25
World Health Organization, 2017. Drinking-water. [Online]
Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs391/en/
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Zietz, B., Lab, J., Suchenwirth, R. & Dunkelberg, H., 2010. Lead in drinking water as a public
health challenge. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(4), pp. A154-A155.
World Health Organization, 2017. Drinking-water. [Online]
Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs391/en/
[Accessed 19 September 2017].
Zietz, B., Lab, J., Suchenwirth, R. & Dunkelberg, H., 2010. Lead in drinking water as a public
health challenge. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(4), pp. A154-A155.
1 out of 25
Related Documents
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
 +13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024  |  Zucol Services PVT LTD  |  All rights reserved.