Amcor Limited Investment Analysis

This assignment delves into the investment potential of Amcor Limited. It examines the company's financial health based on metrics like Return on Equity and revenue growth, concluding that its strong fundamentals make it an attractive investment for dividend-seeking investors. The analysis also highlights Amcor's focus on portfolio leadership and quality service delivery as factors contributing to future sales improvement.

Running head: ACCOUNTING
Accounting
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Authors Note:

1ACCOUNTING
Executive Summary
In this report, an attempt is made to analyse the financial performance of the company. In
order to do that the debt, equity and valuation of the company is analysed. The result of the
analysis show that the company is performing reasonably well than its competitors.

2ACCOUNTING
Table of Contents
Part I:..........................................................................................................................................1
1..............................................................................................................................................1
Long term and Short term debts:............................................................................................1
Comparing Debt Structure:....................................................................................................2
Influence of industry in the debt of the company:.................................................................3
Cost of debt............................................................................................................................3
Part II:.........................................................................................................................................4
Cost of Equity:.......................................................................................................................4
2..............................................................................................................................................4
Analysis of the firm’s reported earnings:...............................................................................4
3..............................................................................................................................................5
Valuation of companies stock using comparable approach...................................................5
4..............................................................................................................................................6
Reasonable Approach based on the current market price......................................................6
5..............................................................................................................................................6
Additional information and data essential to value firm’s share:..........................................6
Part III........................................................................................................................................6
Part IV:.....................................................................................................................................10
Comparative Analysis of financial performance of company and industry:........................10
Literature search on company:.............................................................................................10

3ACCOUNTING
Other items that are relevant to the company:.....................................................................11
Reference..................................................................................................................................12

4ACCOUNTING
Part I:
Debt Valuation:
1.
Long term and Short term debts:
In observing and critically examining the annual report of Amcor Ltd, that is a
multinational packaging business. Amcor has a strong balance sheet and an exceptional
liability profile. The Amcor Ltd borrowed finance from various financial organizations and
debt providers in the way of overdrafts, loans, corporate bonds, commercial paper and
unsecured notes (Franks 2014). The company has a good mix of floating and fixed rate of
interests and utilizes the rate of interest swaps to supply additional elasticity in administering
the expense of interest borrowings. The liabilities that bear interests are categorized under
current liability except for some liabilities where the company has a right to postpone the
settlement on unconditional terms for minimum of 12 months subsequent to the end of the
year that are categorized under non-current liabilities. The total current interest bearing debts
is $ 916.7 and non-current interest bearing debts is $ 3428.4 in 2016. The company has
utilized Euro bonds, Swiss bonds, etc for Long-term debts and commercial papers, bank
overdrafts are utilized for Short-term debts. This is being nicely displayed in the below figure
that is taken from annual report.

5ACCOUNTING
2.
Comparing Debt Structure:
The debt equity ratio is used for analyzing and comparing, the debt structure of the
company with that to industry. The Debt-Equity Ratio means a ratio of debt utilized to gauge
a firm’s leverage in terms of finance that is computed by separating a firm’s whole liability
by the holders of equity (Scholes 2015). This is used for understanding the amount of debt a
business is utilizing to fund its assets comparing to the total of cost symbolized in holder’s
equity.
The industry average of Debt-Equity Ratio is 2.5 whereas the company Amcor
Limited has 4.2 that mean the business is utilizing far more debt as compared to the industry.
The business is utilizing the leverages far more as compared to the industry average.

6ACCOUNTING
3.
Influence of industry in the debt of the company:
The company Amcor Limited belongs to a multinational packaging business industry.
This manufactures rigid and flexible packaging for various companies across the globe. The
industry has influence of industry on the business is affected in numerous ways. The revenue
growth of Amcor limited is 2.9 and industry average is 1.1. This can observed that revenue
growth of Amcor limited is much higher than the industry average (Loughran and McDonald
2016). The Return on Assets (ROA TTM) of Amcor Limited is 6.6 whereas industry average
is 3.0. This can be clearly observed that ROA of Amcor Limited is more than industry
average. The Return on Equity (ROE TTM) of Amcor Limited is 73.1 whereas industry
average is 16.7. This is critically examined that ROE of Amcor Limited is far better than
industry average. As from the above discussion, we can clearly state that the industry has
influenced the debt structure of Amcor Limited because of their condition in comparison to
industry average. Therefore, the business has debts because of its strong fundamentals.
4.
Cost of debt
In order to calculate the cost of debt the interest expenses are divided by the average
debt. The calculation is provided below:
Statement Showing calculation of Cost of Debt
Particulars Amount (million)
Interest Expenses $ 192.20
Debt $ 3,965.20
Cost of Debt 5%
Tax rate 30%
After tax Cost of debt 3%

7ACCOUNTING
Part II:
Share Valuation:
1.
Cost of Equity:
The cost of equity means an expense that is incurred due to equity matters of a
company. The usual way of computing the cost of equity is Capital Assets Pricing Model
(Benson et al. 2014). In this way, the anticipated cost of equity or Return on Equity (ROE) is
computed by accumulation of rate of return is risk free with the anticipated interest for the
risk.
Statement Showing calculation of Cost of Equity
Particulars Amount
Risk Free rate of return 2.76%
Market Rate of return 5.50%
Beta 0.79
Cost of Equity 5%
2.
Analysis of the firm’s reported earnings:
The revenue of Amcor limited on 2016 was $ 12,687 as compared to on 2015 was $
12,515 has increase in the amount of revenue between the two year was $ 172.

8ACCOUNTING
The Earnings per share of Amcor Limited for the profit on functions that is incurring
profit per share in 2016 was 21.0 US Cents and in 2015 is 56.6 US Cents. The percentage
change in EPS of profit has decreased by 62.29% as compared between 2016 and 2015.
The dividend for 2015-16 was $ 41 US Cents per share that had a ratio of payout
about 71% on income of each share of $ 57.7 US cents. This is paid based on the price of the
share on 1st July 2015 (McLaney and Atrill 2014).
The profit after tax for the year was $ 671.1 Million as this has increased on a steady
basis as this displayed through an increase by 7.5%. The innovation is very vital for the
growth of the earnings.
3.
Valuation of companies stock using comparable approach
The company is valued using the PE ratio the calculation is given below;
Statement Showing Valuation of Company using PE ratio
Particulars Amount
PE ratio 23.39
Earnings (million) $ 273.60
Value of the company (million) $ 6,399.50
The dividend growth has been 25% and it is expected to remain the same. On the
other hand, the expected return of the shareholder is 5% as per the cost of equity. Therefore,
dividend growth model is not utilised in valuing the company.

9ACCOUNTING
4.
Reasonable Approach based on the current market price
The business can assess its company through utilizing the P/E ratio and the dividend
growth model. In the present scenario, the corporation has declared dividend as a result the
dividend growth model can be implemented in evaluating the firm. For that reason, in the
current scenario the P/E ratio and dividend growth model can be implemented for evaluating
and computation of the firm (Cahan 2016). The most appropriate model is the PE ratio.
5.
Additional information and data essential to value firm’s share:
The supplementary information that is utilized for the assessment of the shares of the
firm are market capital, net profit after tax, the change of the earning per share of the firm to
its peers and dividend per share (Contessotto and Moroney 2014).
Part III
1.
Calculation of WACC
Calculation of WACC
Particulars Amount (million) Weight Cost CXW
Equity $ 783.90 0.15 5% 0.75%
Debt $ 4,345.10 0.85 3% 2.87%
Total $ 5,129.00 3.63%
The calculation shows that the WACC of the company is 3.63%.
2.
Tax rate in calculating the WACC

10ACCOUNTING
The Tax rate of a company is considered as an important element since it is used for
the calculation of the company’s cost of debt and interest bearing securities (Choi and Young
2015). In this case, the rate of tax considered for the calculation of weighted average cost of
capital is 30.30%
3.
Difference between cost of debt and cost of equity
The major differences that lies between cost of debt and cost of equity can be highlighted
in the following manner:
 The expected return of the shareholders of a company is generally known as the cost
of equity. Whereas on the other hand the return expected by the loan providers of the
company is known as cost of debt (Su and Wells 2015).
 Cost of debt is much cheaper than the cost of equity. The cost of equity remains
usually above 25% while the cost of debt is only 4 to 8 percentage.
 The cost of debt is subject to deduction of tax while in case of cost of equity; it is not
subject to tax deduction.
4.
Current Liability in the calculation of WACC
While calculating the cost of capital of a company, the current liabilities can be
included. However, including current liabilities in the calculation of cost of capital have some
pros and cons (Giacobbe et al. 2016). The pros and cons are as discussed here.

11ACCOUNTING
Major Pros of including current liabilities in Cost of Capital:
 It provides relaxed eligibility than banks.
 It facilitates the company in acquisition of short term loans much quickly.
 It requires less paperwork that in turn helps in processing the loans must faster and
smooth.
Major Cons of including Current Liabilities in Cost of Capital are:
 The cost of the rate of interest in much higher.
 It involves high-cycle of risk
 It makes a habit for borrowers to take loans much often and hence it might end up in
spending much more than the borrower can actually afford.
5.
Major Value for WACC calculation
The debt-equity ratio of the company is 4.2 which suggests that the company is using more
debt than equity. Thus, the major component observed while calculating the weighted
average cost of capital is debt.
While assessing any investment decision or project, if it is observed that the cost of
capital is high than the return on investment then the project will be accepted else the project
will be rejected.
6.

12ACCOUNTING
Application of WACC in investment decision
The Amcor Limited has freshly utilized Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
in its investment decisions like in projects like the acquisition of Souza Cruz’s operations of
packaging in Brazil and Nampak Flexibles who was the market leader in South Africa for
flexible packaging (Beekes et al. 2015).
7.
Capital Structure of the company
The Capital Structure refers to the process by which a company finances its operation
and growth using the available funds. A company raises its funds from equity and debts.
Equity refers to the shares, retained earnings, etc. Whereas debt originates from the issue of
bonds, long term loans, etc.
8.
Optimum Capital Structure
The most effective ratio of debt and equity that a business can have to reap the most
of the earnings termed as the optimal capital structure for that company. If the company have
more debt in its capital structure then it means that the company is exposed to more risk
hence the company will be paying more interest.
If the rate of interest for borrowing loans in the market is increased then the company
will take less loans compared to the previous situation and vice versa (Cheng et al. 2013).
This will bring a change in the capital structure of the company due to the effect of economic
circumstances.

13ACCOUNTING
Part IV:
Market Analysis:
1.
Comparative Analysis of financial performance of company and industry:
The financial performance of Amcor Limited is being assessed on the terms of
numerous factors. The ROA TTM of Amcor Ltd is 6.6 whereas industry average was 3.0.
The ROE TTM of Amcor Ltd is 73.1 whereas the industry average was 16.7. The revenue on
2015 was 12515 and 2016 was 12687 this means that there is an increase of revenue (Chua et
al. 2015). The revenue growth of Amcor limited is 2.9 whereas the industry average is 1.1.
The net income growth of Amcor Limited is 11.2 whereas the industry average is negative
3.3. The financial performance of Amcor Limited as compared to industry is far better and
exceptional even in the present scenario of the economic situations.
2.
Literature search on company:
The financial analyst are in perspective that the business of the Amcor Limited is
exceptional on the basis of the present market situation in the world economy as the net
income of the business has improved and it is much better as compared to the industry
scenario. The Return on Asset and Return on Equity are higher than the industry that is
interpreted by them as good sign for the business, investors should be attracted to invest as
they provide dividend to them and has good revenue, and it is increasing day by day (Chua et
al. 2015). As per the views of financial analyst is same as mine because the fundamentals are
strong in the Amcor Limited and Return on Equity is also good as compared to industry.

14ACCOUNTING
3.
Other items that are relevant to the company:
The Amcor Limited has a focus on the portfolio of the firm where the firm can make a
position of leadership and provide quality services that ensures improvement of sales in the
near future.

15ACCOUNTING
Reference
Beekes, W., Brown, P. and Zhang, Q., 2015. Corporate governance and the informativeness
of disclosures in Australia: a re‐examination. Accounting & Finance, 55(4), pp.931-963.
Benson, K., Faff, R. and Smith, T., 2014. Fifty years of finance research in the Asia Pacific
Basin. Accounting & Finance, 54(2), pp.335-363.
Brief, R.P. and Peasnell, K.V. eds., 2013. Clean surplus: A link between accounting and
finance. Routledge.
Cahan, S., 2016. Consequences of IFRS for capital markets, managers, auditors and standard‐
setters: an introduction. Accounting & Finance, 56(1), pp.5-8.
Cheng, P., Man, P. and Yi, C.H., 2013. The impact of product market competition on
earnings quality. Accounting & Finance, 53(1), pp.137-162.
Choi, Y.S. and Young, S., 2015. Transitory earnings components and the two faces of non‐
generally accepted accounting principles earnings. Accounting & Finance, 55(1), pp.75-103.
Chua, W.F., Lowe, T. and Puxty, T. eds., 2015. Critical perspectives in management control.
Springer.
Contessotto, C. and Moroney, R., 2014. The association between audit committee
effectiveness and audit risk. Accounting & Finance, 54(2), pp.393-418.
Franks, J., 2014. LibGuides: Graduate Accounting Empirical Research: Accounting &
Finance Databases.

16ACCOUNTING
Giacobbe, F., Matolcsy, Z. and Wakefield, J., 2016. An investigation of wholly‐owned
foreign subsidiary control through transaction cost economics theory. Accounting &
Finance, 56(4), pp.1041-1070.
Loughran, T. and McDonald, B., 2016. Textual analysis in accounting and finance: A
survey. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(4), pp.1187-1230.
McLaney, E.J. and Atrill, P., 2014. Accounting and Finance: An Introduction. Pearson.
Scholes, M.S., 2015. Taxes and business strategy. Prentice Hall.
Su, W.H. and Wells, P., 2015. The association of identifiable intangible assets acquired and
recognised in business acquisitions with postacquisition firm performance. Accounting &
Finance, 55(4), pp.1171-1199.