This study analyzes the historical monthly closing prices of Samsung, Google and Apple to model the closing price of Samsung. The factors considered are the GDP growth of South Korea, share price of Google and share price of Apple. The study found that GDP growth of South Korea has a significant impact on the share price of Samsung.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: STATISTICS ASSIGNMENT STATISTICS ASSIGNMENT Name of Student Name of University Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
2STATISTICS ASSIGNMENT Data The study analysis includes historical monthly closing prices of Samsung, Google and Apple. Furthermore it includes the quarterly historical GDP growth of South Korea. The data of closing prices were obtained from yahoo finance and the GDP of South Korea was obtained from the OECD website (OECD, 2018). It is of interest to model the closing price of Samsung. The factors considered are the GDP growth of South Korea, since Samsung is a South Korean company and stock prices are believed to be positively associated with macro-economic statistics (Gay, 2016). Aside from the software and hardware relationship that exists between Google and Samsung, they share ad revenue and have in agreements for patent co-licensing as well as collaboration in projects, setting standards of mobile security and computing as per Kristina Zuchhi (2018) on her article in Investopedia. Hence their performance are anticipated to be related. Additionally Apple being one of the primary competitors of Samsung, their performance in the market is also expected to have an explanatory impact on the price of Samsung. The data converts monthly prices to quarterly and spans from May of 2013 to February of 2018. The data was then used to fit a regression model with Samsung closing prices as dependent and closing price of Google and Apple as well as GDP of South Korea as independent variable. Calculations/Interpretations The goodness of fit statistic of the regression analysis on the data shows that model has R-squared vale 0.518, that is model explains 51.8% of the variation in the quarterlyclosing price of Samsung. The factor adjusted R-squared value was found to be 0.4277 that is for. This value
3STATISTICS ASSIGNMENT increase when a predictor which is useful for the model in included in the model and decreases otherwise (Andersonet al.,2016). Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.71976 9 R Square 0.51806 7 Adjusted R Square 0.42770 4 Standard Error 144372. 7 Observations20 Table 1: Regression Statistics The coefficient of the variable GDP which is the GDP growth of South Korea is seen to have a value 315562.4 meaning unit increase in GDP corresponds with increase in 315562.4 units of closing price of Samsung. The p-value for the test of significance was 0.00601 which is less than 0.05 and hence the variable was significant at 5% level. The variable Apple price had coefficient 2691.276 which means that unit increase of 2691.276 units in price of Apple corresponds to almost little to no increase in price of Samsung share price. It had p-value 0.20515 and hence is insignificant at 5% level. The variable Google Price which is the share price of Google had coefficient 159.542 meaning that unit increase in share price of Google corresponds with 159.542 unit increase in share price of Samsung. It had p-value 0.63411 and hence is insignificant at 5% level. Coefficien ts Standar d Errort StatP-value Intercept-575137 162442. 7 - 3.540560.00272 GDP Value315562.4 99720.2 9 3.16447 50.00601 Apple Price2691.276 2037.62 4 1.32079 1 0.20515 2
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4STATISTICS ASSIGNMENT Google Price159.5422 328.817 60.4852 0.63411 1 Table 2: Regression Summary Graphs/Charts The following charts show the relationship between the dependent variable with reach of the independent variables. -0.4-0.200.20.40.60.811.21.41.6 0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 R² = 0.183993188754421 GDP growth S.Korea quarterly GDP growth Samsung Close price Figure 1: GDP growth of S.Korea against Samsung share price
5STATISTICS ASSIGNMENT 400500600700800900100011001200 0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 800000 900000 1000000 R² = 0.188871590173727 Google Price Google Close Price Samsung Close Price Figure 2: Google share price against Samsung share price 024681012 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 R² = 0 Apple Price Apple Close Price Samsung Close Price Figure 3: Apple share price against Samsung share price Summary/Conclusion/Findings The study found that GDP growth of South Korea, share price of Google and share price of Apple explain 62% of the variation in the share prices of Samsung. However out of all these
6STATISTICS ASSIGNMENT factors only GDP of South Korea has a significant impact on the share price of Samsung. The study thus concludes that the share price of Samsung is closely associated with that of the GDP of South Korea and a causal relationship exists.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7STATISTICS ASSIGNMENT Sources Anderson,D.R.,Sweeney,D.J.,Williams,T.A.,Camm,J.D.,&Cochran,J.J. (2014).Essentials of statistics for business and economics. Cengage Learning. AppleInc.(AAPL).(2018).HistoricalPrices.Retrievedfrom https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/AAPL/history?p=AAPL&.tsrc=fin-srch-v1 Gay, R. D. (2016). Effect of macroeconomic variables on stock market returns for four emerging economies: Brazil, Russia, India, and China.The International Business & Economics Research Journal (Online),15(3), 119. Google(GOOG).(2018).HistoricalPrices.Retrievedfrom https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/GOOG/ OECD.(2018).Domesticproduct-QuarterlyGDP-OECDData.Retrievedfrom https://data.oecd.org/gdp/quarterly-gdp.htm#indicator-chart SamsungElectronicsCo.,Ltd.(005930.KS).(2018).HistoricalPrices.Retrievedfrom https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/005930.KS/history?p=005930.KS&.tsrc=fin-srch-v1 Zucchi,K.(2018).SamsungandGoogle:ABeautifulFriendship?.Retrievedfrom https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/062515/samsung-and-google- beautiful-friendship.asp
8STATISTICS ASSIGNMENT Appendix Significance test of model: Result ANOVA dfSSMSF Significanc e F Regressio n3 3.58E+1 1 1.19E+1 1 5.73320 60.007339 Residual16 3.33E+1 1 2.08E+1 0 Total19 6.92E+1 1 Cleaned Quarterly Data used for model Date Samsun g GDP Value Apple Price Google Price 30-06-2013 27733.3 3 0.86166 8 60.4471 5 426.585 5 30-09-201328000 0.96569 8 67.4523 8 432.281 8 31-12-201327640 0.82819 2 78.0852 4 531.688 6 31-03-201426900 0.94595 3 74.4561 9 582.003 8 30-06-2014 27386.6 7 1.00614 4 89.2190 5 550.914 1 30-09-2014 24413.3 3 0.60433 2 99.6166 7 570.383 7 31-12-2014 26526.6 7 0.66472 2 112.436 7 539.470 4 31-03-2015 28053.3 3 0.47763 9123.35 543.979 8 30-06-2015 25066.6 7 0.82867 7 126.953 3 529.986 7 30-09-2015 23966.6 7 0.36975 9114.84623.88 31-12-2015 24626.6 7 1.24574 2 114.353 3737.43 31-03-201624900 0.76017 5 101.006 7 728.556 7 30-06-201628373.30.6314196.4706.943