Social Media's Influence on Politics

This paper analyzes the influence of social media on politics, focusing on Canadian politics. It discusses the emergence of social media and its dominance in communication, as well as the political scenario before social media. The paper explores the positive and negative effects of social media on politicians and citizens. It also examines the consequences of social media's influence on politics.

Running head: SOCIAL MEDIA’S INFLUENCE ON POLITICS
SOCIAL MEDIA’S INFLUENCE ON POLITICS
Name of the student
Name of the university
Author note

1
SOCIAL MEDIA’S INFLUENCE ON POLITICS
Social Media’s Influence on Politics
Introduction
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the influence of social media on politics. The
paper will first analyze the emergence of social media and the way it replaced all other forms of
media to become the most dominant form. The social media phenomenon shall be discussed in
details at first. Then, the paper will discuss the scenario of politics before the advent and
emergence of the social media. Lastly, the paper will analyze the influence of social media on
politics with special focus on Canadian politics.
It is important first to understand the term ‘social media’ in the context of modern
communication technologies prior to explaining its influence. In the days that preceded the
internet, social media included telegraph communications that emerged in the later part of the
19th century. However, with the introduction of the internet during the 20th century, it achieved a
different meaning. Social media came to be known as a form of communication that is done
online by people, communities and groups creating networks. Social media emerged during the
early years of the 21st century when other forms of media especially the broadcast were at its
peak. Television was the ultimate platform that was utilized by every field to ensure maximum
performance and result. The broadcast media had dominated every household. The political,
cultural and economic discourse during that period used to take place in the television and radio
platforms. The main thesis of the paper is to argue that social media’s influence on politics has
been both positive and negative, for the politicians as well as the citizens.
The social media phenomenon

2
SOCIAL MEDIA’S INFLUENCE ON POLITICS
In a quick time, social media has become the all-powerful platform for not just
communicating but marketing and networking as well. Although many forms of social media
were there in the previous centuries as well, as mentioned above, the actual form that is
dominating today could be traced back to the emergence of the internet. The internet emerged
during the 1980s and 1990s and quickly led to the development of various communication
platforms. GeoCities, Classmates and Six Degrees were amongst the first known social
networking site that developed in the 1990s (Cbsnews.com, 2019). However, Six Degrees is
credited as the first social networking site because it included friends list, profiles, and school
affiliations that some registered users could use. This created the phenomenon that would later
go on to become the ultimate platform for all kinds of activities. With the turn of the 21st century,
sites like Ryze, Friendster, LinkedIn, hi5, MySpace, Orkut, Facebook and Twitter were
introduced that changed the social media landscape forever (Cbsnews.com, 2019). The
introduction of blogs also added to the phenomenon. Orkut was the first social networking site
that received immense popularity especially amongst the youth. However, Facebook went on to
become the ultimate player in the end. The site changed the meaning of social networking with
innumerable other features being included and opportunities being provided to people
(Cbsnews.com, 2019).
The social media phenomenon was at its full swing with people having the opportunity to
connect not only with others from around the globe but also with their long lost friends. Mark
Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook, became the youngest billionaire thanks to the immense
popularity of the site. His company became the most sought after company by businesses across
the world, by politicians, entrepreneurs, NGOs, and many such. The site became an instant hit
amongst the youth even with its limited features initially. The phenomenon began to rise as new

3
SOCIAL MEDIA’S INFLUENCE ON POLITICS
features began to be added and the numbers started increasing with each day. The site was no
longer confined to a particular age group as people of all ages began to take interest in it.
Speaking about the popularity of the social networking site, Lim et al. (2015) stated that the site
has become a lifeline to most of the people especially the young adults. After Facebook, the
micro-blogging site Twitter attracted much attention. This micro-blogging site was the perfect
tool for those belonging to the ‘celebrity’ category to communicate with their fans and other
people. The site was popular amongst the celebrities because it provided the opportunity to
express or share something without spending much time on it. In the views of Wagner, Vollmar
and Wagner (2014) Twitter’s popularity increased because it was used by people who mattered
and their ‘tweets’ became the credible source o information. based on an article published in The
Guardian, it could be stated that Twitter’s popularity only grew with time and never went down
even in the presence of the giant like Facebook (Addley, 2019). The report stated that in 2008,
maximum articles that appeared in the national and local newspapers in Britain had the mention
of Twitter.
Canada too was equally influenced by the social media phenomenon. According to a
recent data, Canada boasts of around 22.69 million social network users as of 2017 (Facts, 2019).
Amongst the social media sites, Facebook is the most preferred choice of communication with
84% Canadians opting for this site (Facts, 2019). The phenomenon has been described as a
revolution changing the landscape of the entire world, be it any field. In the present generation, it
has become the most influential tool by which even the common people could raise their voice
that too by being anonymous. Anonymity is one of the biggest advantages of the social media
that has contributed to it being such a huge phenomenon; note Xenos, Vromen and Loader
(2014). Those who were previously subjugated because of their inability to speak aloud, found a

4
SOCIAL MEDIA’S INFLUENCE ON POLITICS
new way to express their anger, frustration and demands on the social media. However, as
Vromen, Xenos and Loader (2015) observe, this anonymity also led to the rise and creation of
many crimes. Online stalking became a graving issue for women users in particular whereas
“trolls” under the safety of anonymity began be one of the prime reasons for depression and even
suicides. In both the cases, it could be stated that the social media has been a phenomenon that
could not be overlooked.
Politics before social media’s emergence
While the social media has largely influenced the younger generation in both positive and
negative ways, visible influence could be seen in the field of politics as well. To understand the
way social media have changed politics, it is important to analyze the politics before the
emergence of the social media. In the years prior to social media, politics was viewed as an
inaccessible and incomprehensible field especially for the common people (Wittel, 2016). The
candidates running for office and the elected officials as well held little to no accountability for
their actions prior to the advent of social media. The voters who were responsible to elect a
strong and efficient representative had no real or transparent information about them and hence,
it resulted in imbalanced control of power. This affected the politicians as well in that those who
had good intentions and wanted to bring positive change were not able to directly communicate
or interact with their voters. The political parties had to spend huge sums of money on
advertising such as hoardings, banners, pamphlets, TV and print ads to campaign during
elections. This money could have instead have been spent on improving the infrastructure of a
country or even a locality.

5
SOCIAL MEDIA’S INFLUENCE ON POLITICS
While observing the political scenario of the current generation, Borge-Holthoefer et al.
(2015) note that the new age political revolutions could not have been possible without the social
media. The authors give example of the famous Arab Spring where social media play a vital role
in mobilizing the people. The Arab Spring refers to the mass movement in many Arab nations
beginning with Tunisia and including Egypt, Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria. All these
movements took place at a time when the social media had established its stronghold within the
realms of politics. This could not have been even imagined few decades ago when there was no
social media. The Tunisian Revolution had spread like wildfire owing to Facebook, Twitter and
YouTube. People demonstrating on the streets against the tyrant regime were being recorded and
posted on these social media platforms (Wolfsfeld, Segev & Sheafer, 2013). This caused the
movement to become national although it began in the remote parts of the country. Now imagine
the scenario in the decades when there was no social media. Incidents like the young man
burning himself alive on the streets would have been restricted in that part of the city as there
was no social media.
Before the emergence and dominance of social media, there were some doubts regarding
the news content being broadcast on televisions and radio because these were majorly inclined
towards a particular ideology or political party. Therefore, what the public viewed in the media
platforms could not have been taken as entirely true. Politics prior to the social media was
restricted to the powerful and the powerless found no medium to raise their voices.
Influence of social media on politics
The political landscape has seen many changes in the last 20 years or so. The social
media have been credentialing in alternating its face of change. The candidates as well as their

6
SOCIAL MEDIA’S INFLUENCE ON POLITICS
supporters keep posting their perception regarding the upcoming elections on Facebook, Twitter
and so on (Castañeda, Fuentes‐Bautista & Baruch, 2015). Every agent of election as well as
individual parties participating in the elections is having their own pages on Facebook. By means
of these pages, they appeal to the voters, broadcast their propaganda and request for donations.
News around the Clock
The sheer speed at which news, rumors as well as poll results are shared over social
media has transformed the approach of politics. In the pre-internet days, people relied on the
hourly news bulletin or the next day newspaper for getting latest updates about the ongoing
elections. However, in social media people can access the news websites at any hour to get the
latest news and real time updates about the election. In this context, Allcott and Gentzkow
(2017), argues that real time news information is also provided by television media. However,
the reason why people prefer to check the news feed of election over social media is that along
with news, they can also do live chat with people contemplating over the current news of
election. This is how; perception of people regarding votes is also framed. In fact, Halpern
Valenzuela and Katz (2017), states that false updates can also mislead the people by masses. As
evident in the discussion of the Defense Minister of Canada with the Canadian Press, he is under
threat that in the upcoming federal elections of Canada, the Russian intelligence agencies might
attempt to manipulate the decisions of the Canadians with fake news and fake results of voting
polls.
The Impact of Polls
Public electoral polls before the election are a very common and engaging phenomenon.
However, as Johnson and Kaye (2015), states, we find that the outcomes of the different polls are

7
SOCIAL MEDIA’S INFLUENCE ON POLITICS
varying. That is why the people are not able to frame a future projection of the election, easily.
However, with the advent of polling over the social media, the number of political polls has
increased by number, manifold. It is evident that those outcomes are also flawed, most of the
times. However, Skogerbø et al. (2016) states that if the people participating in the Facebook
polls, see that one candidate is constantly ahead of the other in the social media polls, that is
bound to impact on their psychology. They might perceive that is would be of mostly benefitting
to vote for the leading candidate, rather than voting the underdog.
Direct Interaction with the Politicians
Social media nowadays provide the candidates with the opportunity of interacting with
their favorite politicians. Traditionally it is not possible to meet any electoral candidate outside
any live show or event. However, Halpern, Valenzuela and Katz (2017), states that most people
do not get the chance to meet them. On the contrary, with the use of social media, the people are
now able to participate in virtual events like Facebook live shows where they can live stream the
activities of the politicians.
Consequences of the influence
It could thus be evident that social media have been able to change politics in remarkable
ways. However, it is also crucial to analyze the consequences that these changes have brought.
As discussed above, social media have provided people with the opportunity to be up to date
with news about elections, their candidates, results and so on. The consequence of this change
could be discerned in the fact that those who do not have access to social media even today have
to rely on the mainstream media, which results in the news being interpreted differently. As
Gibson (2015) notes, while those on the social media have the advantage of communicating

8
SOCIAL MEDIA’S INFLUENCE ON POLITICS
directly to the politicians, others without the social media rely on whatever the politicians say
through the mainstream media. Another change brought in by social media is in the electoral
polls. The outcome of this change is that the psychological impact of these polls results
sometimes in conflicts as well. In contrast to this view, Rogstad (2014) states that the
psychological impact that social media polls have on the users is limited and that it is not
powerful enough to change the set mindset of a user or a voter.
In the context of Canadian politics, social media has had a remarkable affect as has been
mentioned in the previous sections. On one hand, it has presented the Canadian public with new
scope and hope in the political arena especially regarding the atrocities against the First Nations
citizens; while on the other, it has caused much concern regarding the ill-practices of the social
media platform (refer to the Cambridge Analytica controversy) (Wong, 2019). It remains to be
seen in the coming days to what extent does the social media change politics further.
Conclusion
In the end, it could be reiterated that the social media has changed politics in both
positive and negative ways. Firstly, it has made politics accessible to all those who were devoid
of the opportunity previously. Secondly, it has created made the news related to politics reach
faster and wider for the public and thirdly, it has allowed the political parties to interact directly
with voters. As discussed in the paper, these changes have had numerous consequences on the
global politics. The numerous mass movements have been successful due to the social media.
People have been able to raise their voice in a better way against the political incapability and
injustices. This has been possible especially because of the anonymity that people could have
owing to the social media. The paper has also discussed the changes social media has brought in

9
SOCIAL MEDIA’S INFLUENCE ON POLITICS
the Canadian politics. While it has allowed the minority classes to come up and raise their
voices, it has also provided some politicians to use it illicitly to influence the voters. the political
parties have used the social media as a tool to secretly examine the behavior of their voters to
mold them in their favor.

10
SOCIAL MEDIA’S INFLUENCE ON POLITICS
References:
Addley, E. (2019). The rise and rise of Twitter. Retrieved from
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/blog/2009/mar/27/twitter-popularity
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of
economic perspectives, 31(2), 211-36.
Borge-Holthoefer, J., Magdy, W., Darwish, K., & Weber, I. (2015, February). Content and
network dynamics behind Egyptian political polarization on Twitter. In Proceedings of
the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social
Computing (pp. 700-711). ACM.
Castañeda, M., Fuentes‐Bautista, M., & Baruch, F. (2015). Racial and ethnic inclusion in the
digital era: Shifting discourses in communications public policy. Journal of Social Issues,
71(1), 139-154.
Cbsnews.com. (2019). Then and now: a history of social networking sites. Retrieved from
https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/then-and-now-a-history-of-social-networking-sites/2/
Facts, S. (2019). Topic: Social networking in Canada. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/topics/2729/social-
networking-in-canada/
Gibson, R. K. (2015). Party change, social media and the rise of ‘citizen-
initiated’campaigning. Party politics, 21(2), 183-197.
Halpern, D., Valenzuela, S., & Katz, J. E. (2017). We face, I tweet: How different social media
influence political participation through collective and internal efficacy. Journal of
Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 320-336.

11
SOCIAL MEDIA’S INFLUENCE ON POLITICS
Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2015). Site effects: How reliance on social media influences
confidence in the government and news media. Social Science Computer Review, 33(2),
127-144.
Lim, J. S., Hwang, Y., Kim, S., & Biocca, F. A. (2015). How social media engagement leads to
sports channel loyalty: Mediating roles of social presence and channel
commitment. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 158-167.
Rogstad, I. D. (2014). Political News Journalists in Social Media: Transforming political
reporters into political pundits?. Journalism Practice, 8(6), 688-703.
Skogerbø, E., Bruns, A., Quodling, A., & Ingebretsen, T. (2016). Agenda-setting revisited:
Social media and sourcing in mainstream journalism. The Routledge companion to social
media and politics, 104-120.
Vromen, A., Xenos, M. A., & Loader, B. (2015). Young people, social media and connective
action: From organisational maintenance to everyday political talk. Journal of Youth
Studies, 18(1), 80-100.
Wagner, D., Vollmar, G., & Wagner, H. T. (2014). The impact of information technology on
knowledge creation: An affordance approach to social media. Journal of Enterprise
Information Management, 27(1), 31-44.
Wittel, A. (2016). Digital Marx: Toward a political economy of distributed media. Boston: Brill.
Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E., & Sheafer, T. (2013). Social media and the Arab Spring: Politics comes
first. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 115-137.

12
SOCIAL MEDIA’S INFLUENCE ON POLITICS
Wong, J. (2019). I was one of the first people on Facebook. I shouldn't have trusted Mark
Zuckerberg | Julie Carrie Wong. Retrieved from
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/17/facebook-people-first-ever-mark-
zuckerberg-harvard
Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media
use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information,
Communication & Society, 17(2), 151-167.