This paper elaborates on the major incentives for a society that it gets for shifting from a stratified class system to a class system that permits mobility. It highlights the importance of social mobility and class system for growth and development.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: SOCIAL MOBILITY AND CLASS SYSTEM Social Mobility and Class System Name of the Student: Name of the University: Author note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1SOCIAL MOBILITY AND CLASS SYSTEM The controversy over the relative merits of the material and moral incentives has turned into one of the major battleground for the verbal war among and within the socialist nations. Resolution of this important debate would decisively influence the course of socialism each and everywhere for the effective systems of the incentives usually taps heavy reservoirs of creative energy that might otherwise be completely get wasted. Through governing the behaviour, incentives directly influence the rate of economic growth and with the same, through governing the consciousness, they indirectly accelerate the emergence of the socialist man. Hence, it can be said that incentives are the principal means of shaping the fragment of the history under the impact of living men and is also one of the important index to the moral, social and economic future of the socialist societies. This paper is going to elaborate on the major incentives for a society that it get for shifting from a stratified class system to a class system that permits mobility. To start with the main subject of the essay, it is to state that, class refers to the power, financial resources and education level that people have. The stratified class system refers to the class system in which a society is divided into various different strata or layers based on the factors such as occupation, wealth, income and education. There is a presence of cultural and economic rift in between these different classes of the society. For example, In United Sates, there are very opportunities that are been created equally for all the people living there. Peopletheredonothavetheaccessofsameresourceslikebestschoolsorbest neighbourhoods and the chances of life too are not same for everyone. Generally, there are three classes in U.S and they are middle class, upper class and the working class. The people who belong from the same class have similar types of jobs and similar levels of income. Stratified class system results in inequality among the citizen. People who live within the same level or strata are the members who are said to belong from the same social class. It is very tough to experience a social mobility in between the strata, especially while moving
2SOCIAL MOBILITY AND CLASS SYSTEM upwards, also known as upward mobility. Social mobility is found in several forms and extents in two primary types of stratification and they are class stratification and caste stratification. The caste system is constituted of the closed groups in which the status tends to ascribed and not achieved. The system is imposed on an individual by the criteria of his or her birth. The members belonging from one class are often not even allowed to stay in contact or to have a close relation with the members who belong from some other caste. They are also bounded by many restrictions based on marriage, food, social intercourse etc. Hence, the members of a case system could not even dream of becoming a member of higher case or any lower caste. It does not provide any scope to the individual for any kind of social mobility. It is the only type of a rigid social stratification in which social mobility is denied to individual. Furthermore, unlike caste system, the class system consists of rational group of members and it is not rigid regarding restrictions of marriages, occupations, inter class, social interactions or intra class circulations and social mobility. The social mobility in a class system has its very own rule. However, it is also to state that in this modern age, social mobility is getting introduced in many of the caste system, including that of in India and there are certain studies that have verified this fact. In a class system that encourages mobility, each and every individual enjoys and celebrates equal rights and opportunities for improving his own status. Such exercises introduce a sense of competition among the class members belonging from different classes and hence, provide an incentive to hard work and improve or progress in the society (Savage & Egerton, 2017). It also supports and encourages prosperity, advancement as well as social change and this in turn is beneficial for majority of the members living in a society, especially the ones who belong from lower class. It would allow them to grow further and not to remain in the same category generation after generation by experiencing only the bad and unequal opportunities. It also provides a sense of motivation for progressing and higher
3SOCIAL MOBILITY AND CLASS SYSTEM attainments and makes the individuals to become active, dynamic and alert. With the same, shifting from a stratified class system to a class system that permits mobility also keeps the individuals fit to life in a competitive society. Hence, to sum up, it can be said that mobility in class system is very important to prevail in the class systems in order to avail the individual with equal opportunities and chances to progress and improve further. It is great opportunity for the ones who belong from the underprivileged backgrounds for breaking the boundary of their social classes. Therefore, shifting to a class system that permits mobility from the ones that is stratified, is extremely important for the ultimate growth and development of a society.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4SOCIAL MOBILITY AND CLASS SYSTEM References: Savage, M., & Egerton, M. (2017). Social mobility, individual ability and the inheritance of class inequality.Sociology,31(4), 645-672.