Impact of Social Policy on Aged People in Australia
Verified
Added on  2023/06/03
|7
|1859
|423
AI Summary
This essay discusses the impact of social policy on aged people in Australia, including the benefits provided by the government, the cost of social policies, and the need for policy revision.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: FOUNDATION IN SOCIAL POLICY FOUNDATION IN SOCIAL POLICY Name of the student: Name of the university: Author note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1FOUNDATION IN SOCIAL POLICY Social policy can be defined as a term that applies to various aspects of the system, commonly it is in the sphere of governmental and political setting that involves the social services, the welfare state and related (Alber & Flora, 2017). There has been an ongoing debate in Australia that concerns the key issues such as welfare, education, health care and child protection (Mendes, 2017). In this essay, the primary aim is the way social policy debates and changes to the Australian welfare state have affected aged people in Australia. The essay discusses the concepts relevant to the essay followed by the impact of the policy on the population. Lastly, the essay provides potential future issues and the strategies for assistance. ‘Elderly’ and ‘aged’ are the terms used for the people who are aged over 65 years of age. Over the years, like other developed countries, Australia’s population as well tend to grow due to developed medicine and technical improvement (Chatterji et al., 2015). It is projected that by 2057 the ageing population will result in more than double. There are several facilities that are specifically designed for the aged population who are aged beyond 65 years of age (Chastin et al., 2014). However, it is important to note that often then there are few similar supports which are provided to the aged people are also offered to the people who are younger to the mentioned age group. For example, the transport concessions and exclusive entry fees are provided to people over 60 years and in some cases 55 years. There are a number of various programs available for the aged involving the three levels of government as well as non-governmental sectors. These governmental and non-governmental sectors combine to provide provisions for the programs designed for the betterment of the elderly population of the state. It is common for the elderly be worried about their financial aspects, however, in Australia, there are several facilities are provide to the elderly. The Australian government gives the information that is needed to understand the income support of the elderly Australian
2FOUNDATION IN SOCIAL POLICY population.The Age Pensionis a source of income support that offers a range of concessions for older Australians who are eligible. The requirements for availing the benefits depends on the age and resident requirements and depending on the income, assets and other circumstances the age pension is calculated. When an elderly are eligible for Age Pension, they are capable of receiving help with household costs as well as living expenses. In case the elderly person is still working past the age pension age, they are eligible for partial Age payment as well. Transfer to age pension is also another policy that one can avail if the person is of age pension age and receive eligible centerline income support payment. There is financial assistance for older Australia as payment and supplements for the aged. The Pension Loans Scheme helps elderly when their capital is tied up in assets, and they require more income to live.The Commonwealth Senior Health Cardis for the self-funded retirees that provide assistance with payments and avail services. Also, the state offersCarer PaymentsorCarer Allowancesfor the elderly who are caring for a family member who is disabled, requires medical condition and someone who is frail aged.The Rent Assistanceis payment provided to elderly to provide extra financial help in case the elderly person rent privately and receives payment from the Australian government. Along with thatEnergy Supplementis an ongoing payment that is provided to help with living and household costs in case the elderly person receives a pension. The Australian government has payments that are specifically for health care expenses. TheContinence Aids Payment Scheme helps the eligible elderly who are with severe and permanent incontinence to meet the costs of the incontinence products. Services such as External Breast Prostheses Reimbursement Program help women who have had a mastectomy due to breast cancer. Under this program, women with such medical issues can claim for the financial benefits from the government. Apart from the
3FOUNDATION IN SOCIAL POLICY mentioned policies, there is Payment And Service Finder that helps find the right assistance required for the elderly (Australian government, 2018). The social policies are for the benefits of the aged population. It is a part of human rights that needs acute attention. However, it is found by social researchers that increased number of social policies and making the welfare state as the priority has some disadvantages as well (Gorman, 2017). It is believed that when the country is providing various benefits, it promotes the disabilities. It creates pressure due to the limited resources that are available in nature. It is found that despite the rapid increase in wealth and living standards there are more people in Australia who are dependent on the public purse (Dixon & Isaacs, 2013). Moreover today, one in every six working-age people in Australia relies on welfare for full or partial part of their income. Therefore, the debate is that the changes in the social policies are only making the state cost higher and higher for the Australians. There is a need for the government to promote individual responsibility and self-reliance (Trnka & Trundle, 2014). Although the aim of encouraging responsibility and autonomy needs to be by done considering the safety net that for the one who needs help as a priority. Ageing has become a social and economic issue of major significance for Australia, and in Australia, the majority of the debates regarding the ageing population is about the cost that bore by the government (Börsch-Supan et al., 2013). The cost bore by the government for the aged population is significant for the healthcare, household costs and many more. The changes in the policies that the government provides will impact the elderly since they are physically not as efficient as the young people (Sallis, Owen & Fisher, 2015). The costs are large, and along with the time, it is only increasing which becomes hard for older people to take care. Therefore, although the social policies cost to the government it would be unethical to withdraw the beneficial policies.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4FOUNDATION IN SOCIAL POLICY It is certain that changes are required for it is needed to understand that the government has to take up a big load for the elderly population and it will only rise. Their future policy implications should, therefore, need to be amended however making sure that the people in need should not be deprived of their fundamental human rights. Revision of policies should be done and the extra costs should be cut down. The policies should aim at providing the costs and house essentials to the population who are in acute need and not the population who have a source of income. Based on the average income needed to survive with appropriate basic requirements to be made mandatory however when the extra costs are given the attention it should be given as per the revised methods of social policy. The elderly population in Australia is provided with several benefits, and it is now a question of cost that state goes through in this decade of limited resources. It would be holistically unfair to if the help given to them is withdrawn without any realistic assumption. The contribution made by to the society by the elderly cannot be measured on basis of any criteria. Therefore, the revision of social policy should be revised however, it should not be making aged individual deprived of their human rights.
5FOUNDATION IN SOCIAL POLICY References: Alber, J., & Flora, P. (2017). Modernization, democratization, and the development of welfare states in Western Europe. InDevelopment of Welfare states in Europe and America(pp. 37-80). Routledge. Australiangovernment,(2018),PaymentsforolderAustralians,retrievedfrom https://www.humanservices.gov.au/individuals/subjects/payments-older-australiansdate accessed: 10: 18: 2018 Börsch-Supan, A., Brandt, M., Hunkler, C., Kneip, T., Korbmacher, J., Malter, F., ... & Zuber, S. (2013). Data resource profile: the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).International journal of epidemiology,42(4), 992-1001. Chastin, S. F., Fitzpatrick, N., Andrews, M., & DiCroce, N. (2014). Determinants of sedentary behavior, motivation, barriers and strategies to reduce sitting time in older women: a qualitative investigation.International journal of environmental research and public health,11(1), 773-791. Chatterji, S., Byles, J., Cutler, D., Seeman, T., & Verdes, E. (2015). Health, functioning, and disability in older adults—present status and future implications.The Lancet,385(9967), 563-575. Dixon, J., & Isaacs, B. (2013). Why sustainable and ‘nutritionally correct’food is not on the agenda: Western Sydney, the moral arts of everyday life and public policy.Food Policy, 43, 67-76.
6FOUNDATION IN SOCIAL POLICY Gorman, M. (2017). Development and the rights of older people. InThe ageing and development report(pp. 21-39). Routledge. Mendes, P. (2017). Australia’s welfare wars: The players, the politics and the ideologies. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work,29(2), 145-148. Sallis, J. F., Owen, N., & Fisher, E. (2015). Ecological models of health behavior.Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice,5, 43-64. Trnka,S.,&Trundle,C.(2014).Competingresponsibilities:Movingbeyondneoliberal responsibilisation. InAnthropological Forum(Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 136-153). Routledge.