Amata population within the Indigenous community resididi

Running head: SOCIOLOGY
SOCIOLOGY
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

SOCIOLOGY 1
The indigenous community people in Australia suffer from poor health outcomes which
enables them to experience a reduction in their quality of life, disability and ultimate death at a
young age as compared to the non-indigenous community people (Goodman et al., 2017). This
assignment will focus mainly over “Amata” population within the Indigenous community
residing in extremely remote lands of southern Australia, commonly known as Aṉangu
Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara. According to the data collected by the United Nations, it has been
estimated that there are only 455 people in the Amata community, throughout the country of
Australia, residing across all the northern territory border of Australia. According to the research
data, throughout the majority of Amata community there lies persistent inequality regarding the
status of health in comparison to the non-indigenous community population (Cameron et al.,
2014). It is to note that the gap does not only lie in the status of health but also several
determinants of health. Research data indicated that circumstances related to extreme poverty are
significantly prevalent among this specific Amata community within the entire indigenous
people which are rooted in other factors like lack of social services, access to education, force-
displacement, socio-political structure and the degradation of the customary resources. These
forces are determined as well as compounded by discrimination and structural racism which
make the Amata community people, the most vulnerable towards poorer health status. Due to
this phenomenon, the Amata community people experience a higher level of infant mortality,
cardiovascular illness, AIDS and other infectious challenges like tuberculosis and malaria.
Discussion
According to Randall et al., (2013), there lies some of the essential factors that influence the
health status and the behavior of Amata community people. According to the research data,
inequalities experienced within the society and influenced by the social and economic

SOCIOLOGY 2
circumstances which are characterized by factors like gender, sex and ethnicity or religion
(Artuso et al., 2013). Fundamentally, it can be stated that social-economic structural challenges
of the class, as well as economic disadvantages in the society, places the Amata community
people close to the bottom of the social-economic ladder that results in negative lifestyle choices
and increased health disparities among the aboriginal people (Paradies, 2016). The social
determinants of the health include status of health and socioeconomic status for poverty.
Structured inequalities within the Amata community people are dependable over unequal
distribution of power, status, wealth and income which contributes to the socio-economic factors
for a poor lifestyle choice among this community people. Also, poor educational and literacy
status and language barriers are linked to poor health status which affects the capacity of people
towards using health information and getting access to healthcare resources. The Amata
community people can only speak Pitjantjatjara and Yankunytjatjara languages, making all of
them difficult to communicate with other population and state the social challenges they face in
their daily life. Towards discussing the political determinants affecting the life expectancy and
health of Amata community people, it is to know that from the era of colonization until the
present day in Australia, the laws and the political decisions for all the indigenous communities
made by the national and state government have very minimal effect over the well-being and
health of Amata community people. Inequitable legislative policies contributed to inequality in
health status that resulted from the unequal allocation of resources and power among Amata
community people. The Government of the country had consistently failed towards taking any
holistic approach for addressing the social determinants of health (Goodman et al., 2017). The
failure has resulted in inequality and a health status gap among the Amata community people and
the other communities falling under the indigenous group in Australia. The effect of these