Monitoring and Reporting for Successful Solar Installation Project
Verified
Added on 2023/06/04
|6
|1441
|405
AI Summary
This report explores monitoring and reporting methodologies for successful solar installation project. It includes project plan, performance matrices, communication and risk reports.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Student Name STUDENT NUMBER THE ATA CASE
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Introduction A small Australian not-for-profit and non-government entity has offered a project proposal that involves installation of over hundred lighting system. This project is to be done in Quelicai East Timor which is a remote village in Australia. The overall scope of this project involves raising funds, training the crew, preparation of project plan and selection of beneficiaries. This report would focus on monitoring of time as well as how exactly yhe CEO needs to be updated regarding progress of the project. Apart from this, the execution and project control would go along with the project control and monitor. Apart from this, monitoring also allows the project to make sure that the most important deliverables such as the vendor selection, solar lighting equipment and the vendor selection goes according as per the plan and if at all there’s any variation, it needs to be reported accordingly. This monitoring would be used for all major components such as the time, cost, the risk, quality, change management and communication. Project Plan It also needs to be ensured that there are no major deviations within the deadline and the budget of the project and that the Earned value method is primarily used. EVM is quite famous in project management and it mainly uses work performance, schedule and cost of the project. Afterwards, it provides the actual status of the projects. It gives the project manager the ability to figure out the trends and predict the overall status the project is in. Although, this method is based SPM or the simplified project model, it is however quite useful in terms of knowing the status of time and cost of any given project (Milosevic, 1987). Major performance matrices would be defined by using Earned Value Method (EVM) or the (RV) Resource Flow Variance, then the (CV) Cost Variance, (SV) Schedule Variance, (TV) Time Variance, (RI) Resource Flow Index, (CI) Cost Index and finally (SI) Schedule Index (Adler & Smith, 2009). Major matrices being followed here in this solar project are as follows Schedule deviation – This particular metric the status could be marked in the range of 0% to 100% wherein 100% denotes the project as complete and 0% indicates it as under progress. This particular metric helps in capturing of any kind of deviation within the project in particular the number of asks being completed at any point of time, the actual start date, the actual completion date among others. If the overall
value of the SV or Schedule Variance is positive then the project is considered to be ahead of it’s schedule and vice versa. Cost deviation –The overall budget associated with the project is around 28,000$. This particular metric would measure the deviation of the overa plan. Furthermore, it will give an idea about the estimated budget vs the decrease or increase in the budget. Again, if the Cost Variance is positive then the project is well within the budget and if the value is negative, then it means it is over the allocated(APM Group Ltd, 2017). The time and budget can be impacted by changes made within the project. Key performance metrics could provide overall number of requests of changes made, the requests that were approved, the requests that were denied among others. This would also denote the total amount of issues in the project, the issues that are closed as well as pending. The project manager would require to update the CEO about the progress made in the project. In such case, there are majorly 2 types of reports that needs to be communicated to the team as well as ATA management. These are sent before the projects are started and it is sent to them management that details about the general information regarding the project. The next report is then sent to the CEO or the top-level management detailing the following: Overall tasks completed Overall tasks delayed Overall pending tasks Whether a project is considered to be ahead of it’s time or behind the schedule time If the project is under or over the estimated budget. After this, there are risks reports that are to be sent that would contain the overall risk profile of the project and the lists of risks involve such as non-availability of funds, non-availability of skilled resources, break down of machines, lack of funds and so on. Change report is a report which details all of the changes that have been made in the project. This involves the overall changes accepted, rejected and the total number of changes recommended. Work load report for resources Time report for resources. Tracking of expenses.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Apart from the management, the PM would also need to communicate with all of the team members of the project. The team would need to provide update regardin their role within the project combined together with the status. The very first of the report would be a general report that details basic information regarding the project such as the title, the start date, the end date, duration and the congingency plan for the project. This is sent to the team members (La Trobe University, 2017).The second report given to the team members details includes the deatails of every single team member involved with the project and it includes their email ID, contact number, name and address of the member as well as their reporting manager. There would likely be a weekly meeting regarding the project status that would provide an action plan as well as minutes of meeting. The overall action plan needs to include the things which has already been done, the follow-up tasks, date for the next tasks and the person responsible for it. Simultaneously, communication report would also need to be created which would end up providing how exactly the team members communication with one another specifically the mode of communication, frequency of communication and who are involved in it among others. The risk report also needs to be shared with all of the team member and this invludes: Risk owner details, description of the task, impact on the given project and the contingency plan for it.(La Trobe University, 2017). Conclusion This paper explored 2 different methodologies to get the installation of solar successful. These includes monitoring and reporting. Project reporting ensures the team is information regardingtheproject,it’sprogressandthedevelopment.Ontheotherhand,project monitoring monitors that the budget and the schedule are adhered and do not go overboard. The same is communicated to the management and CEO of the organization. Both reporting and monitoring ensures that the resources are utilized optimally and that there are no wastage. References Adler, T., & Smith, W. (2009). How organisational cost reporting practices affect project management: the issues of project review and evaluation.International Journal Of Project Organisation And Management,1(3), 309. doi: 10.1504/ijpom.2009.027541 APM Group Ltd. (2017).DEFINING RISK: THE RISK MANAGEMENT CYCLE. Retrieved September 14, 2017, from https://ppp-certification.com/ppp-certification-guide/52- defining-risk-risk-management-cycle36
La Trobe University. (2017).Video 4: Project Risks. Retrieved September 14, 2017, retrieved https://lms.latrobe.edu.au/mod/book/view.php?id=2493632&chapterid=201714 La Trobe University. (2017).Video 3: Stakeholder Engagement and Management. Retrieved September 14, 2017, retrieved https://lms.latrobe.edu.au/mod/book/view.php? id=2493632&chapterid=201713 Milosevic, D. (1987). Organizing project control systems. International Journal Of Project Management, 5(2), 76-79. doi: 10.1016/0263-7863(87)90031-7