Vulnerable Persons: Care Interventions and Safeguarding Legislation
Verified
Added on  2023/04/05
|10
|2396
|126
AI Summary
This report reviews the care interventions of Making Safeguarding Personal and Advocacy for vulnerable persons, and their relation to safeguarding legislation. It discusses the importance of safeguarding adults and the changes in legislation over time. The interventions aim to protect vulnerable adults and empower them in decision-making.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Student ID:….. Assignment Title: Vulnerable Persons Student ID:…… Anglia Ruskin University
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Student ID:…..Vulnerable Persons2 Introduction A vulnerable person or adult may be defined as someonewho is unable to protect himself from the harm, and is unable to care for himself due to illness, age or other reasons (Department of Social Services, 2014). The report reviews the two care interventions: Making Safeguarding Personal and Advocacy, which may be applied to the case study of George. The work also illustrates the knowledge of relevant safeguarding legislations. Safeguarding Safeguarding the Adults refers to the process of protecting the rights of a person to live in a safe environment free from neglect and abuse. As per the recommendations of the Care Act 2014, the local Authorities should enquire in case they feel that an adult is being abused or neglected. The enquiry may confirm whether the person needs immediate action to be taken or not. It also directs who will be the care provider. It may require setting up of a safeguarding board and arrangements of independent advocates in assisting the adult at risk. It requires cooperating with all the care providers to protect the adult. Safeguarding ensures protection of adults to reduce their risk of abuse and prevent harm. The adults are provided with adequate control of their life letting them choose the extent of interference by the care providers. The Change In 2012, ‘A guide for safeguarding children and vulnerable adults in General Practice’ was published for the first time. Since then, the legislation has encountered several changes in the safeguarding practice. The intervention was first used to ‘safeguard the children’ where only few parts of the legislation involved adult protection. However, now it has transformed to safeguard the people of all the age groups. The Social Service and Well Being Act (2014), came in effect in 2016 with many changes adding the adults into the legislation (Farr, Davies and Blackstock, 2016). Local Safeguarding Boards also got transformed into Regional and National Safeguarding Boards. Now Adult Safeguarding has become an essential priority. It has become a duty for these Boards to report about the adults who are at risk of being vulnerable.
Student ID:…..Vulnerable Persons3 An adult ‘at risk’ may be a person who is more than 18 years of age; and who may not be capable of protecting himself from the abuse and exploitation. He may be the one who is in need ofthecareservicesduetoillness,disability,mentalretardation,oragerelatedissues (Department of Social Services, 2014). First Intervention- Making Safeguarding Personal The approach of making safeguarding personal refers to a personalized way of safeguarding ‘with’ the people, helping the people in achieving the improvements in their lives, utilizing their social work skills and acknowledging the difference made in their lives. The people suffering from dementia may be highly vulnerable (Social Care Institute for Excellence [SCIE], 2019). Theirearlysymptomsmayadverselyaffectthereasoningabilityandcommunication. Safeguarding for a dementia person may involve treating him with dignity, protecting him from the abuse of outside community and maintaining his human rights (Badenoch, 2016). The approach should be more people centered. Instead of focusing on psychotic activities in process, we should focus on his needs to keep him safe from harm and to manage risk in his life. Relation to the Legislation Accordingtosafeguardinglegislation,thecareproviders,theorganizationsandadult safeguarding boards are given certain priorities and responsibilities under the Care and Support Statutory Guidance 2017. Relevant laws in this regard are Mental Capacity Act (2005), Human Rights Act (1998) and Care Act (2014) (Dementia Advocacy and Support Network [DASN], 2015). This care intervention involves the initiatives necessary to develop Sustainability and Transformation Plans (STPs) and Accountable Care Systems (ACSs). The theme includes commissioners and providers collaborating to facilitate best practices, a holistic emphasis on safety, health and well being, and multiple sectors working together to deliver safe health services (Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS], 2018). The effectiveness of the intervention is evaluated by Care Quality Commission (CQC) and asserted by assessment of safety, responsiveness, being well-led, effectiveness and care (Association of Directors of Adult Social Services [ADASS], 2018). Second Intervention- Advocacy
Student ID:…..Vulnerable Persons4 The intervention of advocacy may support the people in making tough decisions and respecting their wishes and rights (Warwickshire Safeguarding Adults Boards, 2017). The independent Advocacy Organizations provide a professional advocate who may enquire with the patient, can listen to him, can represent the interests and views of the person when he is dealing with other support agencies. The Advocacy may focus on positive and strength based activities, to promote the things Adults can do instead of what they can’t. It will empower them. Association with Legislation The Care Act Advocacy provides the power to the adult at risk to provide the Advocacy workers as much control of their lives as they want. It assists the workers in understanding the person at risk and helps them speak out what they need. For availing the entitlement to this Care Act, the two underlying situations are: (1) The adult at risk does not have anyone to speak from his point of view, and to support him. (2) The adult at risk has problems in getting involved in the care, assessment and safeguarding. The adult may have problem in understanding or remembering the information, and taking effective decisions. The person may be referred to an Advocate for the subsequent process of care and support. Application of First Intervention During the early stage of dementia, George may exhibit symptoms like memory issues, increased level of confusion, deteriorated concentration, behavioral and personality changes, language problems, disorientation, depression, apathy and inability in doing everyday tasks. The staff in the care home can have conversation with George about how they can respond to the situation to improve his quality of life. The care providers need to consider George as the expert of his own life and working with him. It may take a number of conversations with George supported by the empowerment process. We need to understand the George’s perspective, negotiating, agreeing and recording the desired outcomes of the patient. According to Mental Capacity Act 2005, we should not make assumptions about his lack of capacity but support him
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Student ID:…..Vulnerable Persons5 in making decision with his beliefs and values (Local Government Association, 2015). We can consult with his family members as well regarding his decision of not going back home. George can be provided awareness about his health issue that is dementia and his problem of forgetting things. He should be provided adequate training to be on his own. However, the involvement of the care providers should be only as much as he wants. Speaking for himself may be encouraged for George, as he can communicate well and tell about his preferences. IT will improve his assertion and confidence level. He may also be provided issue based advocacy or non instructed advocacy to resolve the situation where George is feeling difficulttotakedecision.Suchadvocacymaybeprovidedbyspecialistadvocatesand professionals provided by the Organisations for Advocacy. It will help George in reviewing the available options, take decisions about the outcomes and take part in decision making. The Care home should have arrangements for providing him training about how to be safe, using the electronic gadgets about seeking directions, walking appropriately and doing his daily tasks on his own. He can be provided skill development opportunities and connecting with the community services where he can enjoy with the people of similar age and interest. During enquiry he may be asked open ended questions to facilitate more discussion and information sharing. It will remove depressive symptoms from his mind. George may also be provided daily visiting social care services to visit his home and help him in his care. The Care Act 2014 also involves assessment of the home conditions and the skin integrity of the other family members about taking care for George. The care workers may also assess his nutrition state which is found to be inconsistent. The safety of George will be assessed during the discharge and if the board finds that it is not safe to send him home, as per his preferences, he will be kept at the Care Home or may be referred to the Adult Social Care. The General Practitioners and the Nurse will also be informed to assess his medical condition on regular basis. Drawbacks with Making Safeguarding Personal
Student ID:…..Vulnerable Persons6 As George is not able to decide whether he wants to stay in the care home or he wants to go to his home, it may create a dilemma for the care providers. The patient having Dementia may be not capable enough to provide stabilized opinion about what he wants to do (Armytage, 2016). It may result into consistent change in statements and mood, as he is also suffering from depression and isolation tendency. George may need a regular Advocacy worker to visit him regularly at home to care for him. Application of Second Intervention The intervention of Advocacy must ensure that the interests of George are considered into account during the process of care providing. George does not want to go back to his home as his family members do not listen to him. This concern should be addressed by communicating with the family members. The family can be informed to provide him appropriate home environment so that he could return back, as George does not like to stay in the care home as well. Communicatingwith George for longerdurationswill develop trust in relationship.The Advocacy worker may act as a bridge in closing the gap in the family and in communicating the patient’s perspective to the family (Dementia Services Development Center [DSDC], 2013) The situation may be assessed for any need of emergency services and the safety and well being of George need to be maintained. The evidences must be maintained about the condition of the patient (George) in form of medical documentation and state of health. The care providers need to maintain calm during assessment and must try to communicate with him, listen to him, following the procedures to report the incident to the local police. A documented record of the informationcollectedduringthecommunicationwithpersonandhisfamilyshouldbe maintained (Cortes, 2016). To facilitate his empowerment the informed consent and person led decisions should also be maintained. Drawbacks with Advocacy The availability of a professional Advocate may be restricted by the financial constraints of the family (Advocacy for All, 2013).George may not be capable of giving accurate and directed responses which could lead towards faster outcome. He may take time to communicate. All this
Student ID:…..Vulnerable Persons7 will require a specialist Advocate to speak from his side and communicate with all the stakeholders involved. Also, It may be not possible to involve the professionals immediately due to their other busy workschedules.Theinterventioninvolvesalongercommitmentfromthestaffandthe professionals require a paternalistic approach to deal with the people of Dementia like George. Comparison The two interventions discussed for George will undoubtedly facilitate a person centered care based on his own preferences and priorities. By making the safeguarding personal, the care can be customized according to the changing healthcare needs and other social care requirements of thepersonatrisk(Hole,2018).Georgeneedsacomprehensivepersonalcarewiththe involvement of General Practitioner and Nurses to assess his health and other related factors. He needs the care of Advocacy workers to communicate his arguments and choices to the family members and bring out an appropriate conclusion out of the collected information. Being in depression and in a biased state of mind, Advocacy will help in making decisions in his best interest and favor. Advocacy will also help in reaching a common decision after the implementation of intervention (Lee, 2016). The Advocacy worker may continue to visit George regularly to ensure his welfare and to continue speaking out his views. Conclusion George being in his early state of dementia, requires professional community care which could provide him medical aid, training for walking, maintaining poise and remembering things. The two interventions of making the Safeguarding personal and Advocacy will protect him from the vulnerable condition where he is not in a condition to take care of himself. He will be given timely food, and treatment for depression. His family may be informed about his missing while going out to a shop. His preference of not going back to home will be voiced by the Advocacy worker or the Advocate. The information collected by discussing the scenario with the family
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Student ID:…..Vulnerable Persons8 members and after assessment of George’s preferences and state of health, he may be sent to his home. The Care worker may be visiting to see George at home to assess his improvements in his health and identify additional support in case he needs it.
Student ID:…..Vulnerable Persons9 References Advocacy for All (2013).Introduction to the Care Act 2014. Retrieved from http://www.advocacyforall.org.uk/careact.php Armytage, B.(2016).Specialist Advocacy Services in Aged Care for people with dementia. Retrieved from https://www.dementia.org.au/media-releases/specialist-advocacy-services-in- aged-care-for-people-with-dementia Association of Directors of Adult Social Services [ADASS], (2018).Making Safeguarding Personal.Retrieved from https://www.local.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/25.27%20- %20CHIP%20Making%20Safeguarding%20Personal%3B%20What%20might %20%E2%80%98good%E2%80%99%20look%20like%20f.-2.pdf Badenoch,D.(2016).Making Safeguarding personal. Retrieved from https://www.nationalelfservice.net/social-care/social-care-workforce/making-safeguarding- personal-are-we-there-yet/ Cortes, A.C. (2018). Advocating for your patients with Dementia. Retrieved from https://www.managedhealthcareconnect.com/blog/advocating-your-patients-dementia Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] (2018).Dementia-Early Signs. Retrieved from https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/conditionsandtreatments/dementia-early-signs Department of Social Services (2014).Vulnerable Persons, Police Checks and Criminal Offences. Retrieved from https://www.dss.gov.au/about-the-department/doing-business-with- dss/vulnerable-persons-police-checks-and-criminal-offences Dementia Services Development Center [DSDC],(2013).Dementia Centered. Retrieved from https://dementia.stir.ac.uk/blogs/dementia-centred/2016-09-14/advocacy-person-living-dementia Dementia Advocacy and Support Network [DASN],(2015).DASN International. Retrieved from http://www.dasninternational.org/ Farr, Davies and Blackstock (2016).A Guide for Safeguarding Children and Adults at Risk in General Practice.Retrieved from http://www.gpone.wales.nhs.uk/sitesplus/documents/1000/A %20guide%20for%20Safeguarding%20Children%20and%20Adults%20at%20Risk%20in %20General%20Practice%20September%202016%202.pdf Hole, E. (2018). Building a Staff and Resident Partnership around Dementia By Elizabeth Hole. Retrieved from https://daanow.org/4293-2/
Student ID:…..Vulnerable Persons 10 Lee,E.(2018). Independent Advocacy for People Living with Dementia and Unpaid Carers. Retrieved from https://www.lifechangestrust.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/Independant %20Advocay%20and%20Dementia%20Report.pdf Local Government Association (2015).Making Safeguarding Personal. Retrieved from https://www.safeguardingwarwickshire.co.uk/images/downloads/MSP-toolkit.pdf Social Care Institute for Excellence [SCIE] (2019).Safeguarding People with Dementia. Retrieved from https://www.scie.org.uk/dementia/after-diagnosis/support/safeguarding.asp Warwickshire Safeguarding Adults Boards (2017).Case Studies. Retrieved from https://www.safeguardingwarwickshire.co.uk/safeguarding-adults/i-am-an-adult-with-care-and- support-needs/case-studies