Development of Online management system for Stud Farm

Student Name
ID Development of Online
management system
for Stud Farm

1. Part One:
1.1 MOV - Measurable Organisational Value
Area of Impact Rank (1 to 5)
Operational 1
Customer 2
Financial 3
Strategy 4
Social 5
1.2 Value of the project
The project values are as follows:
Better: The organization “Stud Farm” provides better breeding services to the clients who
are related with the organization.
Cheaper: The organization saves 20% of its budget as the new system manages the
operations of the organization.
Faster: The response rate between the clients and the stud farm increases due to the online
facility that is delivered to the customers..
1.3 Appropriate metric
Rank Impact Metrics Timeframe
1 Operational The efficiency of
organization
operation gets
improved due to the
development of new
system within the
organization.
2 months
2 Customer The customers can
easily get their queries
solved due to the
minimization in the
response time.
3 months
3 Financial The revenue of Stud
Farm enhances by
20% due to
development of the
online management
system.
4 months
4 Strategy The organization uses
proper strategies for
managing its
operations
3 months

successfully.
5 Social The features as well as
functionalities of the
system are promoted
due to the new
system.
2 months
2. Part Two:
2.1 Scope
The project scope includes the following:
 Developing project prototype
 Identifying features needed
 Identifying requirements
 Designing the interface
 Developing database
 Facility of breed registry
 Developing frailty of easy recording of process
 Breeding review process development
 Facility of customised communication
 Creating database for marketing
 Facility for contract management
 Developing location facility
 Developing facility of cost
2.2 Out of Scope
The out scope of the project is as follows:
 Training facility is not delivered to the team members or workers
 Proper in-depth details about the suppliers are not elaborated
2.3 Assumptions
Assumptions are as follows:
 Project manager make assumption that the project development will be finished within 97
days.
 The sponsor approves $99,360, and the project manager makes assumption that the
approved budget will be enough for executing the project successfully.
2.4 Constraints
The constraints of the project are as follows:
 As per the assumption of the project manager, development of the project must be finished
within 97 days.
 The sponsor approves $99,360, and therefore the project must be finished within the
approved budget

 The project must uses scope for progressing with the plan that is created in the initial phase.
2.5 Scope Management Plan
The scope of the project can be managed by utilizing techniques that are as follows:
Understanding needs of the project: Understanding needs as well as demands of the project
is quite significant in managing the scope of the project successfully.
Identifying signs of project creep: It is quite important to determine the signs of the project
creep properly so that the circumstances of project creep can be managed significantly.
Account for the changes within the scope financially: It is the responsibility of the project
manager to remain prepare about the enhancement in budget if the project scope creep changed
budget.
2.6 Resource Plan
 People
Resource Name Std. Rate
Project manager $ 35.00/hr.
Project planner $ 30.00/hr.
Financial manager $ 30.00/hr.
Developer $ 35.00/hr.
System engineer $ 35.00/hr.
Designer $ 35.00/hr.
Tester $ 25.00/hr.
System analyst $ 25.00/hr.
Database administrator $ 26.00/hr.
Human resource manager $ 25.00/hr.
Risk analyst $ 25.00/hr.
Programmer $ 30.00/hr.
System administrator $ 25.00/hr.
Software engineer $ 25.00/hr.
Project sponsor $ 0.00/hr.
 Technology
Hardware RAM, hardware, desktop
Software Server, Operating system, Java and
more.
Network Application firewall
 Facilities
Proper facility of coffee and water is present for the workers of the organization who are mainly
involved with the project.

 Other
Travel Requirements The workers who work over-time are
delivered with the service of travel
expense.
Training Requirements Training facility is arranged for those
team members who are facing difficulty
in handling the project work.
Part three:
3.1 Project Milestones
Milestone Completion date
Milestone 1: Completion of project initiation phase Wed 23-05-18
Milestone 2: Completion of project planning phase Mon 04-06-18
Milestone 3: Completion of design phase Mon 18-06-18
Milestone 4: Completion of development phase Mon 27-08-18
Milestone 5: Completion of testing phase Tue 11-09-18
Milestone 6: Completion of monitoring and control phase Fri 21-09-18
Milestone 7: Completion of closure phase Wed 26-09-18

3.2 Project activities
Figure 1: Project activities
(Source: Created by Author)

3.3 Project resources
Figure 2: Project resources
(Source: Created by Author)

3.4 Time estimation
Figure 3: Time estimation
(Source: Created by Author)

3.5 Project budget
Figure 4: Project budget
(Source: Created by Author)

3.6 Time phase budget
Figure 5: Time-phase budget
(Source: Created by Author)

Part four:
4.1 Assumptions
The project assumptions are as follows:
 Project manager make assumption that the project of online management system
development will be finished within 97 days.
 The sponsor approves $99,360 for the project and therefore the project must be finished
within the expected budget that is approved.
4.2 Project risks and management strategy
Risk
ID
Description Probability Impact Rate Assigned
To
Response
Strategy
Threat or
Opportunity
1 Inappropriate
estimation of
budget: Due
to lack of
analysis, the
budget is not
estimated
properly.
Up to 90% High High Financial
manager
Proper
market
analysis
must be
conducted
for
estimating
the budget
of the
project
correctly.
Threat
2 Extension of
project
schedule:
Schedule of
the project is
extended for
adding more
features
within the
new system.
Up to 70% High High Project
manager
Extension of
timeframe in
schedule is
done or
adding
features
which are
generally
considered
beneficial for
the
customers
though it
increases
project cost.
Opportunity
3 Lack of
resources:
Due to
improper
estimation of
resources the
project
progress gets
obstructed.
Up to 60% Medium Mediu
m
Resource
manager
Before
initiating the
project it is
necessary to
ensure that
proper
resource is
present for
finishing the
project for
Threat

avoiding the
issues due to
lack of
resources.
4 Inappropriate
management:
As the project
managers are
not
experienced,
they face
difficulty in
handling the
project.
Up to 75% Medium Mediu
m
Project
planner
Hiring
experienced
project
manager will
be helpful n
mitigating
this issue.
Threat
5 Technical
issue: If the
system
prototype is
not
developed as
per the
organizational
objectives
then number
of technical
challenges
can occur.
Up to 85% High High Technical
engineer
Testing must
be
conducted
after the
developmen
t of project
prototype.
Threat
6 Slippage of
schedule: If
the schedule
is not tracked
successfully
then the
chances of
schedule
slippage is
too high.
Up to 70% High High Human
resource
manager
The
schedule of
the project
must be
tracked
weekly for
avoiding
issues
related with
schedule
slippage.
Threat
Part Five:
 Statement on project quality
It is identified that in order to fulfil the quality of the project, it is very much essential to
follow the scope of the project. The client satisfaction lies in those features or steps that are
generally created by the project team as scope so that it can be easily fulfilled. In order to deliver
quality based project, the project manager follow the steps or philosophies that are illustrated
below:
 Weekly meetings must be arranged for getting status about the project work
 Testing will be conducted before deploying the system

 The resources of the project will be checked before utilizing it within the project
 It is necessary to implement highly secured protocol for securing the system
 A set of verification activities
Verification Activity When?
Review of code by the programmer The codes are reviewed after
utilizing it for developing the
functionalities of the system.
Verification of project test report
quality analyst
Test reports of the project are
verified after undertaking the tests.
Review and verification of project
documents.
The project documents are
generally reviewed by the project
manager in the last stage of the
project.
 A set of validation activities
Part Six:
a. Annotated bibliography
Refer to appendices
b. Develop a closure checklist
Activities Status
Has testing been completed? Yes
Have documents been reviewed and approved? Yes
Requirements Traceability Matrix been checked? No
All risks and issues closed Yes
Handover completed? No
Training completed? No
c. Develop a project evaluation
Objective Evaluation
Quality The system provided the quality that is
Validation Activity When?
Checking user needs At the last stage of the project, it is
reviewed to check whether the
needs and demands of the
customers get satisfied.
Validation of software are checked It is done after utilization of
software within the project.
Validation of automation script It is done after the development of
database.

confronted at the initial stage of the project for
meeting requirements and demands of the
clients
Scope The resources went out of project scope.
Budget The project scope is finished within the
expected time and budget

Bibliography
Cicmil, S., Cooke-Davies, T., Crawford, L., & Richardson, K. (2017, April).Exploring the complexity of
projects: Implications of complexity theory for project management practice. Project
Management Institute.
Hwang, B. G., & Ng, W. J. (2013). Project management knowledge and skills for green construction:
Overcoming challenges. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 272-284.
Kendrick, T. (2015).
Identifying and managing project risk: essential tools for failure-proofing your
project. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.
Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and
controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Larson, E. W., &Gray, C. (2013). Project Management: The Managerial Process with MS Project.
McGraw-Hill.
Mir, F. A., &Pinnington, A. H. (2014).Exploring the value of project management: linking project
management performance and project success. International journal of project
management, 32(2), 202-217.
Nanda, V. (2016).
Quality management system handbook for product development companies.CRC
Press.
Pemsel, S., &Wiewiora, A. (2013).Project management office a knowledge broker in project-based
organisations. International Journal of Project Management, 31(1), 31-42.
Stark, J. (2015). Product lifecycle management.In
Product Lifecycle Management (pp. 1-29).Springer
International Publishing.
Todorović, M. L., Petrović, D. Č., Mihić, M. M., Obradović, V. L., &Bushuyev, S. D. (2015). Project
success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project
management. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 772-783.
Tornabene, C., Hussain, M. M., Crowe, T., Cohen, N., & Panzer, J. (2012).
U.S. Patent No. 8,103,729.
Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Verburg, R. M., Bosch-Sijtsema, P., &Vartiainen, M. (2013).Getting it done: Critical success factors for
project managers in virtual work settings.
International Journal of Project
Management,
31(1), 68-79.

Appendices
Appendix 1: Annotated Bibliography
Article 1: Todorovic, M. L., Petrović, D. C., Mihić, M. M., Obradovic, V. L., & Bushuyev, S. D. (2015).
Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project
management.
International Journal of Project Management,
33(4), 772-783.
This paper essentially focuses on the framework of project achievement analysis. It is found
that that the most critical difficulties that happen within the environment of PM is that that
achievement of the project is inadequately investigated. The paper examines the ways that are
useful in breaking down the achievement of the project. It is distinguished that an experimental
research is mostly directed to know the systems that supports the variables of project achievement
that are vital in the task condition. Also the examination result distinguished that the project
achievement that is investigated with the assistance of execution markers, basic achievement
factors makes appropriate positive impact on the project environment in context to coordinated
framework.
Article 2: Too, E. G., & Weaver, P. (2014). The management of project management: A conceptual
framework for project governance.
International Journal of Project Management,
32(8), 1382-1394.
This paper considers the conceptual framework that is related with project governance. It is
discovered that if a project makes little value from the spending that is put helps in reflecting the
connections between the project results that is made and the project needs for the business
strategy. This paper helps in inspecting existing exploration, ideas and also thoughts of both PM and
Project governance for offering appropriate system that aides in building current hypothesis of
advancement and practice.
Article 3: Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology
and project success in different project governance contexts.
International Journal of Project
Management,
33(6), 1377-1392.
The paper reflects on the relationship that is present between the success of the project and
project methodology in relation to project administration. In this paper, an online overview is
attempted through which 254 reactions are examined and according to the examination it is
determined that the investigation which is performed is basically done by utilizing factor analysis.
The consequence of the examination reflected that the utilization of project procedure helps in
creating variation of around 23% within the accomplishment of the project and in this manner
project administration philosophy are considered as far reaching that assists in dealing with the
achievement of the task.