TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 Evaluation of Hofstede's cultural dimensions.............................................................................1 Agree and disagree with the theory of cultural dimensions.......................................................2 Make suggestion.........................................................................................................................2 CONCLUSION...............................................................................................................................3 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................4
INTRODUCTION Study skills is an array that applied to individuals learning in a certain period of time. The report will evaluate the suggestion on Hofstede's cultural dimensions and interpreting that which pointisagreedanddisagreed.Alongwithit,itwillapplycriticalthinkingskillson comprehensive. Evaluation of Hofstede's cultural dimensions Culture provides a guideline or directions for how we behave and think and define the five element of culture such as; rituals, symbols, values, beliefs and thought process. The cultural dimension model is developed by Geert Hofstede. It describes the effect of culture of a society on the values of its members across the countries (Bakir and et. al., 2015). There are six categories that define the culture; Power Distance Index, Short-term vs. long term orientation, CollectivismVs.Individualism,RestraintVs.Indulgence,UncertaintyAvoidanceIndex, Femininity Vs. Masculinity Femininity Vs. Masculinity-this refers to the distribution of the roles between women and men. The masculinity side of thisdimension representsa preference in society for achievement, assertiveness and heroism (Beugelsdijk and et. al., 2017). On the other hand, femininity, stands for a preference for cooperation, modesty caring for the weak and quality of life. The suggestion stated that in the feminine society, women share caring and modest views equal to the men and in the masculine society, women are competitive and assertive but they are less than man. The dimension state a gap between male and female values in the society. For example; goal setting being more masculine trait and growing insight is much more a feminine trait. This dimension is not does gender difference. The culture dimension called masculinity state something about what society expects from people in the society whether its is men or women (Minkov and et. al., 2017). Following are some masculinity countries; Japan, USA, etc. and femininity countries are; Thailand, Iceland, Netherlands, etc. Collectivism Vs. Individualism-It was suggested in the article that individualism and collectivism are two parallel lines that never meet. Individualism can be defines as the degree to which people have an independent. It is an ideology that upholds the virtue of self. It suggested that an individual can value his own ambitions, over the groups where he is belongs to (Bakir and et. al., 2015). It stated that an individual is free to exercise his own rights, wishes are 1
considered most essentially. On the other hand, collectivism is the degree to which people define their self as interdependent and as a member of a specific group rather than independent of others. It is based on the philosophy that an individual has control on himself in the setted framework by the group or in society. In this dimension the behaviour of the person in the group is governed by a set of rules, social obligations and code of conduct by the society. For example; A joint family displays collectivism while A nuclear family is an example of culture that displays individualism (Beugelsdijk and et. al., 2017). Agree and disagree with the theory of cultural dimensions Collectivism culture dimensions is better than individualism, because of collectivism is describing the society in which toughly incorporated relations tie extended families and other in- groups. These in-groups are patterned with undoubted loyalty and support each other when arising the conflicts with another in-groups. As compared to that, the individualism presents level to which people ins society are incorporated into groups. Individualistic societies have shifted ties which frequently only relate a single person to direct families. On other side, femininity is the better instead of masculinity. Femininity cultural dimensions shows orientation for organizations, modesty and caring for weak and quality of life. Women tend to display various values in the respective societies (Bankole and Bankole, 2017). They are shared modest and caring aspects in the femininity societies. As compared to that, masculinity cultural dimensions shows preference for achievement, assertiveness and material rewards in society for success. Men are only focused on the reward as compared to women, because female are directedonvalueandcultureoforganizationsandsocietyimprovement.Therefore, organizational values are particular to mission statement which guides conduct and relations with stakeholder like consumers, employees and so on. Value of company can not be same as values to single person in which they are determined and supported through higher level of management to evolve shared understanding for anticipated behaviour. Values are chosen by leadership to make sure that everyone understands involving ethical behaviour and social responsibility. Make suggestion An individual should utilised the long and short term orientation cultural dimensions within the organizations. This dimension equal the connection of the previous with current and future actions and challenges. The lesser level of this index shows that traditions are worthy and kept while resoluteness is valued. The high degree in this index view adjustment and specific. 2
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Magnet problem solving as necessity. A poor nation which is short term oriented normally has few to no economic development while long term adjusted nations to develop to point. In addition to that, uncertainty avoidance cultural dimensions should utilise by companies and societies (Ko, Seo and Jung, 2015). This dimension is determined as tolerance for ambiguity in which people grasp event of unexpected and away from the status quo. The high degree in this dimension, strong code of behaviour, guidelines, regulations and normally believe on absolute truth and value which one solitary actuality orders everything and know people. The lower degree in this dimension which is presented more acceptance of differing ideas. Society tends to visit lesser laws, unclearness is more used to and environment is more free flowing. These cultural dimensions help to improving the culture and value of organization and society. CONCLUSION Thisreporthassummarisedthatfemininityvs.masculinityandcollectivismvs. individualism involving in the theory of Hofstede's cultural dimensions. It can be concluded that Collectivism and Femininity cultural dimensions are beneficial for culture of organization and societies. It can be discussed that long and short term orientation cultural dimensions is more beneficial within society and organization. 3
REFERENCES Books and Journals Bakir, A. and et. al., 2015. A preliminary investigation of the reliability and validity of Hofstede’s cross cultural dimensions. InProceedings of the 2000 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference.(pp. 226-232). Springer, Cham. Beugelsdijk, S. and et. al., 2017. An overview of Hofstede-inspired country-level culture researchininternationalbusinesssince2006.JournalofInternationalBusiness Studies.48(1). pp.30-47. Minkov, M. and et. al., 2017. A revision of Hofstede’s individualism-collectivism dimension: A newnationalindexfroma56-countrystudy.CrossCultural&Strategic Management.24(3). pp.386-404. Bankole, F. O. and Bankole, O. O., 2017. The effects of cultural dimension on ICT innovation: Empirical analysis of mobile phone services.Telematics and Informatics.34(2). pp.490- 505. Ko, D., Seo, Y. and Jung, S. U., 2015. Examining the effect of cultural congruence, processing fluency,anduncertaintyavoidanceinonlinepurchasedecisionsintheUSand Korea.Marketing Letters.26(3). pp.377-390. 4