Sustainable Housing Development

This document discusses the principles and implications of sustainable housing development at Creative Eco. It covers economic, social, and environmental aspects of sustainable housing.

Running head:SUSTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
Sustainable Housing Development
(Creative Eco)
Name of the student:
Name of the university:
Author Note

1SUSTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
Executive summary
The sustainable housing has been comprised of creating various comfort, security, privacy and
health supplies. The factors for sustainable housing of physical structure has involved the type, size,
shape, position, orientation, location, materials and constructions. Creative Eco is a business that is
involved in including economic, environmental and social sustainability. They comprise of different
aims of sustainability and standards implemented in the projects. Here, the steps included in
implementing the economic sustainable developing for specific green-field site is analyzed. Next,
different implications are examined about sustainable developments for the site.

2SUSTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
Table of Contents
1. Introduction:......................................................................................................................................3
2. Implementation of principles of economic sustainable developments:.............................................3
3. Demonstrating the implications of sustainable projects at Creative Eco:.........................................8
4. Conclusion:......................................................................................................................................11
5. References:......................................................................................................................................12

3SUSTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
1. Introduction:
The sustainable housing is involved in generating the smartest health, privacy, security and
comfort with minimal probable ecological footprint. Here, the conditions making the housing of
physical structure sustainable includes construction, materials, location, orientation, position, shape,
size and type.
The Creative Eco is a developing organization having the vision to include the elements of
social, environmental and economic sustainability in the developments. They consist of various
sustainability aims and least standards that should be deployed in the projects.
The following report demonstrates the measures involved in deploying principles for the
particular green-field site of financially sustainable development. Further, various implications are
understood regarding sustainable developments.
2. Implementation of principles of economic sustainable developments:
The problems with urban development and growth across the problems of pollutions, fuel
use, congestion, creating forms are debated for Creative Eco. The legislative frameworks and
planning systems have been reworked across the sustainability and environment issues. It must be
reminded that housing by nature is multi-faceted in nature. This has been consuming various natural
resources and generating effects on the natural scenario. The situation of the houses, demands of
occupancy, water and energy consumption and building materials comprises of important
implications of the environment.
The demonstration of the site:

4SUSTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
The area is a green-field area situated in the suburb of the land of Ashburton. This is covered
by the Ashburn Grove, The Monash Fwy, Argyll St, Warrigal Rd and High St. It is bounded by the
train lines and gets accessible at Holmesglen and Alamein stations. The Gardiners Creek has bene
runnin g though the area and breeding grounds for Macquaire Perch. The Trail runs across the site
and is regarded as the Melbourne busiest recreational paths and commuter. It is assumed that there
are just the native vegetation on the site as there are absence of internal roads, different houses and
various additional infrastructures. Further, the overall city has been the City of Boroondara.
The housing is one of the prevailing elements affecting the economy (Carley and Christie
2017). This is a vital element of social development cultivating cultural attribute along with the way
of life and manifestation of aesthetic value. Holistic view-point is required for charting the future of
housing development along with the paradigm of sustainable development. This includes the
housing at y Creative Eco offering the possibility. Their housing can be distinguished as the primary
necessity of human beings. Here, the quality expense and availability are vital to the quality of life of
the individual (Wong et al. 2016).
Besides, it can be argued that various environmentally friendly houses have been permitting
more affordable that are living as they can minimize the costs. Moreover, it can be perceived that
neither the public housing nor the private market has been showing lesser interest under the housing
that is environmentally sustainable (Reckien et al. 2017). This is because the housing is driven by
different types of marginal expenses of construction with the doubt of affordability. Here, the idea of
sustainability in housing development has been limited to the requirements of fulfilling the primary
needs of human beings. Then there is absorptive ability regarding waste limits of waste absorption
for the green-field site. This minimizes the usage of non-renewable resources (Ortblad et al. 2015).
Further, it is helpful to promote the usage of various renewable resources. Having the inclusion, the

5SUSTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
common approach of sustainability is tailored for addressing the issues of human settlement. The
primary principles of sustainable housing have been to give rise to affordable housing at the green-
field site that is demonstrated below:
 Long lasting and durable
 Cost affectivity to develop and is practical to maintain
 Utilizing materials and natural resources that is efficiently based on the overall life-cycle of
environmental effects.
 Conserving water and reducing the run-offs and treatments on the waste on sites.
 Maximizing efficiency and energy conservation.
 Decreasing the creation of footprints and simplifying creating shapes and maximizing the
efficiency of spaces.
 Optimizing creation of orientation for integrating of ventilation and natural daylights.
 Healthy through eradicating the harmful and toxic materials under surrounding scenarios and
facilities.
 Supporting the alternatives of transportation
 Recycling, reusing and reducing materials in every construction and deconstruction phase of
Creative Eco
 Implementing the maintenance and various operational practices reducing and eradicating
hazardous impacts on the environment and people.
 Designing for further flexibility, widening and the ability of effective and secured demolition
of a building.

6SUSTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
The above principles aid the Creative Eco’s housing developers in setting performance
specifications for better designing and analyzing projects. Thus, it must act as a platform to create a
sustainability framework.
Evolving environmental debate applicable to Creative Eco’s housing debate:
For this various Australian Standard or Regulations are to be understood first. These are
related to Environment Protection Act 1970 (No. 8056). This act deals with the establishing of the
“Environment Protection Authority”. This is make provisions as per the functions, duties and powers
of the Authority. It is make further provisions for securing of the surroundings and additional
purposes. The Act, comprises of 10 parts that are finished by five schedules. Here, the concerns are
regarding the protecting the scenario of the Victorian territory. It first part states that various
principles are to get followed for protecting the surrounding. This includes the principle of
precautionary. Then, the second part covers the roles and description of environmental protection.
This also deploys the environment protection board in the third part.
For the case of Creative Eco the following standards are applicable:
SAI Global's Guide to Standards: Building and Construction:
It states that construction and building also involves the data on standards, the certification
schemes and various organizational specific data that are relevant to building industries and involves
the materials of manufacturers.
NCC interactive House:
The must explore the NCC standards of the interactive house including the Building Code of
Australia, Housing provisions and plumbing Code of Australia of NCC.

7SUSTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
Policies from Local councils:
The Australian Local Government or AGLA can be applicable here. It is the national voice
representing over 500 councils around the nation. It provides solutions to various challenged that are
faced by the nation’s communities.
Local environment factors:
As per Australian environmental legislation, most of the territories and states has mandated
the “common environmental duty”. This is done on a reasonable care that must never cause any
damage to the environment. It must be supported by detailed offences for various tiered levels of
harms that is been caused by particular levels of neglect and intent. Here, most of the offenses are
defensible as one can prove in looking at every reasonable cares for not making any harm. This
includes conditions, regulations and standards of the approvals. As one cause, the environmental
harm in preventing the damage of life, the environment or property in any emergency condition.
The environment of construction for the green-field site has been the aggregation of various
surrounding aspects, influences and conditions. This environment is demonstrated as the external
effect on the process of construction. In this way, the environment involves various aspects virtually
external to the project. This has included the nature and technology of the competitors, customers
and products for the present green-field site (Tabassi et al. 2016). This also includes the geographic
setting, metrological, political and financial climate where it has to be operated. It is understood that
less predictable the environment is, higher is the potential impacts. Thus more is considered to
manage the developing of a project of construction for the present site. In addition to the
conventional functions, the project managers of Creative Eco must has set up the process for
scanning the scenario. This has determined the efficiency issues and deploy the power relationships
helpful to manage the primary actors and actors on which effective deployment is dependent. It is

8SUSTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
also revealed that few factors under the environment of the green-field site have been posing higher
problems to organizational structure, management and projects than the others (Ernst et al. 2016).
Here the factors are the concentration for Creative Eco’s management for the environment of the
project. As an analysis of the primary elements of the scenario has not been effectively solving every
issue. Some of them has been actually structural.
As the examination of the primary elements of the environment has not been to resolve every
issue, some of them has been structural and providing the platform to establish different reasonable
objectives of the project (Weaver et al. 2017). Thus they are able to deliver the platform to
implement the objectives of reasonable projects and provide the prior warning of effective issues.
Further, clients initiating the projects should place the proper management, a structure of the
organization, procedures and systems to overcome the impacts of the scenario.
3. Demonstrating the implications of sustainable projects at Creative Eco:
Economic aspects:
The economic sustainably of the green-field site has indicated to the system of products
satisfying the current levels of consumption instead of compromising further necessities provided the
environmental costs and constraints (Hassan and Lee 2015). Further, the present idea underpinning
financial sustainability has been fetching to maximize the income flow generated as there is less
maintenance of stocking of resources yielding the advantageous outputs. Apart from this, the
development of technology, seeking of materials and designs of housing has been to mitigate the
environmental effects of housing acts and implication for the economic viability of Creative Eco’s
housing project is vital. Apart from this, the environmental expenses have been required to account
as the cost of production as long term sustainability with equity to be sought as mandated by the

9SUSTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
sustainable development’s advocacy (Watson 2016). Furthermore, the cost of the environment of the
green-field site has also indicated to the economic visibility of various types of projects of the
housing. This also involves the gains of socio-political achievements against economic expenses for
subsidized Creative Eco’s housing project. This also includes the capability of housing consumers in
affording acceptable housing quality. Thus it can be inferred that for housing the financial
sustainable, the advantages of Creative Eco’s housing producers and providers is same as the
expense of production in the specific levels of housing demands (Sharifi 2016).
Social Aspects:
The social capital is the resource that drawn upon be people in pursuit of the aspirations and
is created through connectivity and networks along with memberships of more formalized groups
along with exchanges, reciprocity, and trust. Moreover, there is also a vital sustainable element
including poverty and equity alleviation. In this way, the dimension of development involves the
strategies of protection reducing vulnerability, develop equity and assure the primary necessities are
been met. Next, further social development have needed socio-political institutions for adopting the
challenges of the globalization (Mulliner,Malys and Maliene 2016). Apart from this, social
sustainability in many ways has been equated with ecological sustainability. Thus it has been
analogous to ecological limits. Further, there are social constraints that have been restricting the
developments and set by various social norms. Hence, to gain ecological sustainability at the core of
sustainable development, the social values, norms and structures are to be altered such that they are
conducive to the environment’s sustainability. The willingness and consciousness for living the
environmentally sustainable methods have been affecting the housing processes and related to
Creative Eco in various ways (Wei et al. 2015). This, for instance, includeded the choice of housing
sites, principles of land use planning, intensity and use of environmentally friendly design, creating

10SUSTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
materials and intensity. This has also included the design that is environment-friendly, creating
materials, methods of construction attention of livability of property and effect of the design on the
quality life of residents in a physical way.
Political factors:
Here, the regulations for new buildings are tightened especially with respect to energy
efficiency. However, activities of Creative Eco in current days has focussed over the housing that is
owner-occupied. This is specifically at units of the single family. The homes at the green-field site
has been large relatively (Galvão et al. 2016). Moreover, at absolute terms, it has been never
representing effective environmental settings. Here, in the case of the site the rebound impacts has
indicates that the occupants have been simply modifying the behavior. In this way, it has been
negating the advantageous impacts on the measures that the architects and developers have included.
Here, for instance, the well-insulated house has been running on the risk of the overheating during
summer. Furthermore, the residents have been making higher usage of systems of air-conditions
(Murdoch and Abram 2017). On the other hand, in the situations where the property manager or
developer has been focusing centrally on environmental achievements, including the advanced
format of balanced ventilation hazards of health. This has been arising as the ventilation systems has
been maintained properly and the grills get logged.
Macro factors:
The macro factors have been operating at the level of the national economy for Australia. It
has been dealing with the relations taking place between the budgets, production, income,
employment, average prices and so on. This has a direct impact on the sustainable urban
development for green-field site. It is also possible to fetch the positive impacts and elements
required to be altered to gain better outcomes (Klein and Coffey 2016). Here, the success of urban

11SUSTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
development of sustainability of the site has been directly connected to the level of identification of
enterprises and urban residents.
Micro factors:
The micro-factors has been dealing with the green-field site and individuals that are
beneficial in the scarcity of the market. Moreover, it has been demonstrating the way in which the
activities of the sellers and buyers have been finding the prices and the way in which the prices can
affect various elements. This includes sellers, buyers and actions and decisions (França et al. 2017).
Here, the microenvironment such as tools, kinds of contracts, sources of finances, the skill level of
labors, projects and households has a direct effect on sustainable urban enhancements of Creative
Eco.
4. Conclusion:
The above study shows that elements of ease of security, accessibility, impacts and tenure of
housing quality of the project leaders of Creative Eco are vital. Besides, as there are deployments,
like designing aims for long-term and present uses, the better quality of living and housing scenario
and encouraging of social solidarity and networks at the neighborhood, are vital. The above
discussion can be inferred as the unsure phase of social sustainability deployment for the green-field
site. Moreover, the study deduced that the tenant participant has been unlikely under practice. It
indicates the primary players possessing the light consideration of tenant participation of the
management and housing design.

12SUSTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
5. References:
Carley, M. and Christie, I., 2017. Managing sustainable development. Routledge.
Ernst, L., de Graaf-Van Dinther, R.E., Peek, G.J. and Loorbach, D.A., 2016. Sustainable urban
transformation and sustainability transitions; conceptual framework and case study. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 112, pp.2988-2999.
França, C.L., Broman, G., Robèrt, K.H., Basile, G. and Trygg, L., 2017. An approach to business
model innovation and design for strategic sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production,
140, pp.155-166.
Galvão, L.A., Haby, M.M., Chapman, E., Clark, R., Câmara, V.M., Luiz, R.R. and Becerra-Posada,
F., 2016. The new United Nations approach to sustainable development post-2015: findings from
four overviews of systematic reviews on interventions for sustainable development and health.
RevistaPanamericana de SaludPublica, 39, pp.157-165.
Hassan, A.M. and Lee, H., 2015. Toward the sustainable development of urban areas: An overview
of global trends in trials and policies. Land Use Policy, 48, pp.199-212.
Klein, S.J. and Coffey, S., 2016. Building a sustainable energy future, one community at a time.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, pp.867-880.
Mulliner, E., Malys, N. and Maliene, V., 2016. Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the
assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega, 59, pp.146-156.
Murdoch, J. and Abram, S., 2017. Rationalities of planning: development versus environment in
planning for housing. Routledge.

13SUSTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
Ortblad, K.F., Salomon, J.A., Bärnighausen, T. and Atun, R., 2015. Stopping tuberculosis: a
biosocial model for sustainable development. The Lancet, 386(10010), pp.2354-2362.
Reckien, D., Creutzig, F., Fernandez, B., Lwasa, S., Tovar-Restrepo, M., McEvoy, D. and
Satterthwaite, D., 2017. Climate change, equity and the Sustainable Development Goals: an urban
perspective. Environment and urbanization, 29(1), pp.159-182.
Sharifi, A., 2016. From Garden City to Eco-urbanism: The quest for sustainable neighborhood
development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 20, pp.1-16.
Tabassi, A.A., Roufechaei, K.M., Ramli, M., Bakar, A.H.A., Ismail, R. and Pakir, A.H.K., 2016.
Leadership competences of sustainable construction project managers. Journal of cleaner
production, 124, pp.339-349.
Watson, G.B., 2016. Designing sustainable cities in the developing world. Routledge.
Weaver, P., Jansen, L., Van Grootveld, G., Van Spiegel, E. and Vergragt, P., 2017. Sustainable
technology development. Routledge.
Wei, Y., Huang, C., Lam, P.T. and Yuan, Z., 2015. Sustainable urban development: A review on
urban carrying capacity assessment. Habitat International, 46, pp.64-71.
Wong, S.Y., Susilawati, C., Miller, W. and Mardiasmo, A., 2016. Enhancing information about
sustainability features for sustainable housing delivery. In Proceedings of the 10th World Congress
on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM 2015) (pp. 407-414). Springer, Cham.