Revisiting the Limits to Growth after Peak Oil: An Analysis on Sustainable Systems

This article analyzes the limitations to growth after reduction in oil prices and the impact of packaging on the environment. It also discusses the steps needed for obtaining approval for a project requiring EIA and the approach of practitioners in overcoming the pitfalls of EIA.

Running head: SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
Article analysis on Revisiting the Limits to Growth after Peak Oil
Name of the student:
Name of the university:
Author note:

1
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
Table of contents
Introduction................................................................................................................................2
1. Key learning in terms of limits to growth from the article....................................................2
1.1 How Australia is dealing with these issues?........................................................................3
2. Steps needed for obtaining approval for a project requiring EIA..........................................4
3. Approach of practitioners in overcoming the pitfalls of EIA................................................6
4. Development activity in a square kilometre area...................................................................8
4.1 Developmental activity....................................................................................................8
4.2 Impact assessment..........................................................................................................10
4.3 Temporary traffic changes.............................................................................................10
4.4 Benefits of the Developmental activity..........................................................................10
4.5 Customer service............................................................................................................11
5. Strategies designed for controlling the illegal packing methods in Queensland.................11
Conclusion................................................................................................................................12
References and bibliography....................................................................................................13

2
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
Introduction
In the recent stage, planet Earth is witnessing a situation, where most of the natural
resources have depleted. The major drive behind this is the rapid population growth, which
has strained the economy. Even the media have failed to cover alarming environmental issues
like limitations to the growth after reduction in the oil price. Packaging of the oils and other
products in plastics has added to the pollution levels. These issues reflect the misuse of
sustainable systems (Dovgot'ko, Kusakina and Skiperskaja 2014). This assignment picks up
the developmental activity of traffic congestion in the areas near University of Wollongong
and develops strategies to assess its impact on the environment.
1. Key learning in terms of limits to growth from the article
From the beginning, the article projects the limitations in terms of man-made effects
on the ecological diversity. As a matter of specification, no discussion is found on the
climactic change, especially the depletion of the human resources. This depletion brings the
negligence towards sustainable development. In spite of the population growth, aspects like
depleting natural resources and population growth have been increasing rapidly. As a matter
of specification, mention can be made of the decline in the oil reservoirs, which was once at
the top of the natural resources (Hall and Day 2009). These issues find a proper placement in
the book, the Limits to Growth, published in 1972.
The article upholds the propositions of the ecologists and computer scientists in terms
of the materialistic needs of the growing population. 1970 was the era when humans
encountered limitations to growth in terms of shocking oil prices. Typical evidence of this
lies in the long lines at the gasoline stations. This reflected the limits, which were imposed by
the growing culture of the American economy. One of the other forms of limitation is the
absence of ideas related to the effects of the peak oil from reports and discussions in the

3
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
newspaper. As per the arguments of Hall and Day (2009), growth limitations are also evident
from the perceptions of the scientists regarding the issues. Most of the scientists are of the
opinions that technology has resolved the issues. They are also of the opinion that warnings
highlighted in The Limits to Growth are invalid, as they provide generalized notions on the
aspects of growth.
Shifting the focus from the resources has added to the threats of the ecological
diversity. Modern ecologists lack the awareness about the equation between the humans and
the resources. Here, comparison can be made with the early scientists, who focused on the
sustainable usage of the resources by the population. Mention can be made of the 2005
February issue, where the use of energy was personalized. The effects of the issues on the
human population were barely mentioned. This kept the people in darkness regarding the
environmental impacts on the utilization of the natural resources (Hall and Day 2009). 2008
was the era when media took the initiatives of publicizing the news of energy and rising food
prices. Along with this, the media also reported the issues of hunger, which resulted in riots.
However, the durability of these news headlines was short-lived. This was reflected from the
shifts, which were noticed in the newspaper headlines. From the news of the increasing food
prices and depletion of the natural resources, the focus shifted to collapse of the banking
systems, inflation and unemployment, which adversely affected the economy. The common
people blamed the officials for the economic chaos (Hall and Day 2009).
1.1 How Australia is dealing with these issues?
The issue of depleting natural resources has alarmed Australian ecologists. Since
1990, Australia has been following the principles of Ecological Sustainable Development
(ESD). For exposing better care towards the preservation of ecological diversity, the
Australian government has developed ESD Policy. The principles of this policy are:

4
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
 Incorporation of environmental and economic goals within the identified and
specified objectives
 Assessment of proper valuation for every natural resource
 Ensuring equality within the generations
 Exposing cautious approach in conducting risk assessment of the resources
 Gaining awareness about the standards of global dimensions (Epstein 2018)
Along with the policies, the Australian government adheres to Sustainable Development
guidelines, which are as follows:
 Prevention is better than cure
 Interconnectedness between the every natural resource and ecosystem
 Minimal waste generation through mass production of renewable sources of
energy and recycling
 Globalization of environmental costs and ensuring the acceptance of social
policies
 Equality within the communities (Schaltegger and Burritt 2017)
Planning is one of the crucial acts in the operations of Australian government. This
involves decision making, generating options, building consensus and establishing
regulations and control for achieving sustainable development. Within the plans, triple
bottom line reporting occupies an important position.
2. Steps needed for obtaining approval for a project requiring EIA
In this segment, the state selected is Queensland and the project selected is reduction
of packaging. Usage of the plastic in packaging adds to environmental pollution. Therefore,
assessments are needed in terms of gaining an insight into the extent plastics are causing
threat to the ecological diversity. For conducting the assessment, the proponents needs to take

5
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
prior approval from the government officials, which is done by complying to the following
steps: identifying the packets used for packaging by complying to the legislative guidelines;
assessing whether the proposed activity of using jute bags for packaging falls within the
purview of environmental clearance; approaching the State Pollution Control Board for
assessing the effectiveness of the control measures; public hearing; submission of
application for environmental clearance along with EIA report; environment appraisal
and issuing clearance or rejection letter (Jones and Morrison-Saunders 2017).
If the packets used for packaging does not match the legislative requirements, the
proponents are instructed to select some other means for packing the items. The legislation
also covers the assessment whether the packaging techniques falls under environmental
clearance. A notification is issued to the proponents, where the proponents are instructed to
conduct EIA study directly through a consultant. If the project of reducing illegal packing
methods in Queensland falls in some other category, then it directly goes to the government
officials for clearance. And if the project of reducing illegal packing methods in Queensland
falls in the B category, then it does not require preparation of EIA reports (Friedl and Reichl
2016). Once the environment impact assessment is prepared, the investors approach the State
Pollution Control Board, who assesses the effectiveness of the proposed use of jute bags in
Queensland for packing the products. If the Board is satisfied with the specified area, the
validity of the approval is extended up to 15 years.
Public hearing is an essential step for achieving clearance standards. This step
provides a platform to the Queensland citizens regarding raising their voice about the issues
of illegal packing techniques. Governmental intervention is appropriate in terms of exposing
a collaborative approach towards preserving the ecological diversity. After the public
hearing, the proponent submits an application for environmental clearance to the Ministry of
Environmental Forestry. If reduction in illegal packing techniques falls under B category,

6
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
filled up application form needs to be submitted along with EIA report (Laurance, et al.
2015). Along with this, the details of public hearing and No Objective Certificate are
considered crucial.
The next step is that of environmental appraisal, which consists of scrutinization of
the submitted documents. This is done through the means of inspecting the packing of the
products in Queensland factories. After the scrutiny, proposals are sent to the committees of
experts, who are hired for providing with special EIA notification. Finally, clearance issues or
rejection letters are issued, which provide the proponents of Queensland with the approval to
use jute bags for packing the products.
After the completion of all these steps, assessments and evaluations are completed
within the next 90 days. In the following month, the ministry announces the verdict, which is
conveyed to the proponents through proper notifications (Jones and Morrison-Saunders
2017). The clearance provided is valid for the next five year for commencing the operations
of manufacturing jute bags in mass quantities.
3. Approach of practitioners in overcoming the pitfalls of EIA
In terms of averting the delays, the proponents need to start the decision making
process well in advance. This would help in maintaining the balance between the processes of
assessing the environmental impacts. The proponents need to keep them updated with the
issues of road congestions and excessive energy consumption during the peak hours.
Negligence in following up the newly unleashed concerns of the project would aggravate the
complexities in terms of taking into account the latest editions of the issues. Absence of post
audits and monitoring would compel the proponents to encounter difficulties in the
implementation of mitigating measures and verification of predictions and estimations (De
Montis, Ledda and Caschili 2016). Simply raising the warnings would not suffice the need

7
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
for analysing the opportunities and benefits. Not considering the alternatives would make
EIA report weaker. This would increase the problems of solving the identified issues of
reducing the congestion on roads and mitigating the energy demands in case of the
customers, during the peak hours.
Biasness in the tones and language of EIA reports is problematic in terms of making
the clients understanding the impacts on the environment. Inviting the interested parties in the
preparation of EIA reports is essential in terms of executing the decision-making process
efficiently and effectively. If the affected parties are not involved in the decision-making
process, they would be deprived of the latest updates regarding the environmental impacts of
reducing the congestion on roads and the mitigating the excessive energy consumption by the
customer during the peak hours (Conte 2018).
The proponents need to be conscious about affordability in the mitigation measures.
Lackadaisical attitude in this direction would reflect non-compliance with the legislative
standards, which is difficult in terms of assessing the development levels. This is unrealistic
due to the maintenance of the operational costs. Conscious approach towards preparation of
the budget is effective in terms of gaining an insight into the costs of the activities and the
additional resources needed for assessing the environmental impact. Private sector firms
usually resist the preparation of EIA. This might be an issue for the proponents in terms of
realizing the impact, which is created as a result of their excessive utilization of the resources
(De Montis, Ledda and Caschili 2016).
In most of the cases, communication of the results of EIA reports is unclear.
Voluminous reports are missing at the time of decision-making process. Using social media
for communicating the results of EIA would be effective in terms of reaching to large mass of
audience. Along with this, if the reports of the environmental assessment are sent to the

8
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
clients, it would improve the public relations. This indicates assistance, aids and supports in
environmental projects in the near future. Planning is crucial in terms of averting the
difficulties in preparing the reports on environmental assessment of reducing the congestions
and excessive energy consumption in the regional areas.
Inadequate economic valuation of the impacts can be considered as the careless
approach of the proponents. Within this, if the modelling of the ecosystems is inappropriate,
it indicates lack of proper planning. Inexplicit considerations of the uncertainties are also a
problem in terms of solving the environmental issues (Conte 2018). Herein lays the role of
the proponents in terms of conducting the risks involved in reducing the congestion of the
specified areas of roads and reducing the excessive energy consumption during the peak
hours.
Consideration of system approach is beneficial for the proponents in terms of gaining
an understanding about the constructs of the natural world. Along with this, it also reflects the
interactions between the environment and the resources. This understanding helps in making
estimates and predictions about the growth and development. Complying with the standards
and protocols of the environmental directives is assistance for the proponents in terms of
progressing towards the path of sustainable development (Grote, Williams, Preston and
Kemp 2016).
4. Development activity in a square kilometre area
4.1 Developmental activity
The roads leading to University of Wollongong are engulfed in congestions,
aggravating the complexities of the users regarding the safety of the users. Road and
Maritime Services have been entrusted with the responsibility of managing the traffic. The
university personnel declared the traffic management at the beginning of the semesters. The

9
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
university personnel expresses the fears that congestion in the areas in the areas adjacent to
the university would lead to long traffic queues both ways to M1 Princes Motorway. These
queues would increase the risks of accidents in case of the motorists travelling in high speed
(Rms.nsw.gov.au 2018).
Figure: Traffic diversions during morning peak hours near University of Wollongong
(Source: Rms.nsw.gov.au 2018)
The developmental activity in this case would be monitoring the traffics of the areas
adjacent to the University of Wollongong in the peak hours. The main aim of this monitoring
would to manage the rush without affecting the traffic flow to M1 area. The outcome of
this management would be the safety of the motorcycles plying in that area. If need rises, the
traffic would be diverted to the west of the University. The time duration of the development
activity would be six weeks. As a matter of specification, the traffic guards are planning to
conduct the developmental activity from the coming Tuesday to Thursday in the morning

10
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
between 8:15 am and 8:45am. The previous year’s performance would be taken in
consideration (Rms.nsw.gov.au 2018).
4.2 Impact assessment
The traffic guards are concerned that the proposed developmental activity of traffic
management would increase the traffic in the Murphys Avenue and Robsons Road.
However, the people would not have to bear this rush for long, as the traffic management
would be over within two days. The people living in the other areas can use Irvine Street and
Northfields Avenue for reaching to the University. It is recommended that the residents need
to use their own transport at all times for averting delays in reaching to the workplace
(Rms.nsw.gov.au 2018).
4.3 Temporary traffic changes
Traffic controllers would be on their duties at specified location from Monday to
Friday between 8 am and 9 am. Upon discovery of traffic queues in M1, it would be diverted
to west side of the University. Therefore, people intending to reach the University need to
access Irvine Street via Murphys Avenue and Robsons Road. If the traffic is normal on M1,
then these diversions would not occur. People availing bus to reach the University of
Wollongong would not face any trouble due to the diversions. According to the plans of the
traffic guards, the northbound rush towards the University would not be diverted. The
vehicles plying on the M1 northbound ramp, i.e., towards Sydney, in the peak hours, would
be diverted to the other areas through Murphys Avenue and Robsons Road (Rms.nsw.gov.au
2018).
4.4 Benefits of the Developmental activity
The traffic management and the planned diversions would noticeably reduce the
congestion among the vehicles plying towards University exit ramps through M1. Along with

11
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
this, it would increase the safety of the motorists accessing these roads for reaching the
University. Apart from this, diversion would be effective for the guards in terms of creating
safer road conditions for the people residing in the areas adjacent to the University of
Wollongong. Moreover, the diversions would provide hassle free entrance and exit to the
people coming to the University from outside areas (Rms.nsw.gov.au 2018).
4.5 Customer service
The New South Wales government regrets for the inconvenience caused to the people
due to the diversions. The officials seek cooperation and patience from the citizens until the
traffic management is carried out. For the convenience of the people, the government
officials have uploaded a contact number, on which the citizens can get their queries,
regarding the traffic changes, resolved. Apart from this, the people can access the website for
acquiring additional information on the projects.
Figure 1: Customer service of New South Wales Government
(Source: Rms.nsw.gov.au 2018)
5. Strategies designed for controlling the illegal packing methods in Queensland
Strategies act as a central doctrine for the companies and organizations in terms of
completing the activities within the stipulated time. This is mostly applicable in terms of

12
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
effective handling of the projects, according to the requirements. In case of regulating the
case of illegal packing means in Queensland, the proponents plan to use jute bags for packing
the items. For this, mass production of jute bags is needed, as it needs to be supplied into
every household of Queensland (Ehp.qld.gov.au 2018). Along with this, segregation of the
plastics needs to be done. This would help in detecting the plastics, which can be recycled.
For this, coding the products packed in recycled plastics would act as a wise step. While
recycling plastics, plastic containers and bags need to be re-used. Sorting of plastics should
be done according to the instructions of the drop off centres or the kerbside collection centres
in Queensland. After sorting, the containers need to be thoroughly rinsed. At this stage, the
lid needs to be removed, as it is also a kind of plastic.
The government can instruct the supermarkets to adopt the techniques of recycling
plastic bags. This would act as a joint venture towards preserving the ecological diversity.
The code numbers of the plastics need to be remembered by the proponents while recycling
techniques in the local programs (Ehp.qld.gov.au 2018).
Conclusion
Traffic congestions are one of the major issues, which are adding to the environmental
pollution. More vehicles mean excessive fuel consumption. Sustainable development policies
and directives assist the government personnel in controlling issues like traffic rush in the
areas near University of Wollongong. Strategic approach in this direction is effective in terms
of sustaining the resources for the future generation. Using jute bags would reduce the illegal
packing and contribute in conserving the environment from polluting. Recycling plastic
would reflect a conscious approach towards sustaining the resources for the future generation.

13
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
References and bibliography
Cardwell, N., Cheng, Y., Gunn, C.S., Yeganeh, S.H. and Jacobson, V., 2016. BBR:
Congestion-based congestion control. Queue, 14(5), p.50.
Conte, E., 2018. The Era of Sustainability: Promises, Pitfalls and Prospects for Sustainable
Buildings and the Built Environment. Sustainability, 10(6), p.2092.
De Montis, A., Ledda, A. and Caschili, S., 2016. Overcoming implementation barriers: A
method for designing Strategic Environmental Assessment guidelines. Environmental Impact
Assessment Review, 61, pp.78-87.
Dovgot'ko, N.A.E., Kusakina, O.N. and Skiperskaja, E.V., 2014. Use of natural resources as
an object of economic incentive. Life Science Journal, 11(1s), pp.166-170.
Ehp.qld.gov.au 2018. Reduce, reuse and recycle. Available at:
https://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/waste/minimisation/reduce_reuse_recycle.html
Epstein, M.J., 2018. Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring
corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Routledge.
Friedl, C. and Reichl, J., 2016. Realizing energy infrastructure projects–A qualitative
empirical analysis of local practices to address social acceptance. Energy Policy, 89, pp.184-
193.
Ghaffari, A., 2015. Congestion control mechanisms in wireless sensor networks: A
survey. Journal of network and computer applications, 52, pp.101-115.
Grote, M., Williams, I., Preston, J. and Kemp, S., 2016. Including congestion effects in urban
road traffic CO2 emissions modelling: do local government authorities have the right
options?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 43, pp.95-106.

14
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
Guériau, M., Billot, R., El Faouzi, N.E., Monteil, J., Armetta, F. and Hassas, S., 2016. How
to assess the benefits of connected vehicles? A simulation framework for the design of
cooperative traffic management strategies. Transportation research part C: emerging
technologies, 67, pp.266-279.
Hall, C.A. and Day, J.W., 2009. Revisiting the Limits to Growth After Peak Oil: In the 1970s
a rising world population and the finite resources available to support it were hot topics.
Interest faded—but it's time to take another look. American scientist, 97(3), pp.230-237.
Hughes, B.P., Newstead, S., Anund, A., Shu, C.C. and Falkmer, T., 2015. A review of
models relevant to road safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 74, pp.250-270.
Jones, M. and Morrison-Saunders, A., 2017. Understanding the long-term influence of EIA
on organisational learning and transformation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 64,
pp.131-138.
Keyvan-Ekbatani, M., Papageorgiou, M. and Knoop, V.L., 2015. Controller design for gating
traffic control in presence of time-delay in urban road networks. Transportation Research
Procedia, 7, pp.651-668.
Laurance, W.F., Peletier-Jellema, A., Geenen, B., Koster, H., Verweij, P., Van Dijck, P.,
Lovejoy, T.E., Schleicher, J. and Van Kuijk, M., 2015. Reducing the global environmental
impacts of rapid infrastructure expansion. Current Biology, 25(7), pp.259-262.
Ramezani, M., Haddad, J. and Geroliminis, N., 2015. Dynamics of heterogeneity in urban
networks: aggregated traffic modeling and hierarchical control. Transportation Research Part
B: Methodological, 74, pp.1-19.
Rms.nsw.gov.au 2018. Managing traffic congestion and improving safety around the
University of Wollongong. Available at:

15
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/documents/projects/illawarra/traffic-management-uow/traffic-
management-uow-leaflet-2018-02.pdf
Schaltegger, S. and Burritt, R., 2017. Contemporary environmental accounting: issues,
concepts and practice. Routledge.